ScreenSafe vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
ScreenSafe or Push Security: which should you choose?
| Dimension | ScreenSafe | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer | Individuals on Android phones | Security/identity teams, mid-market under 500 seats |
| Problem solved | Shoulder-surfing on your phone screen in public | AiTM/ClickFix/device-code phishing, shadow AI, malicious extensions |
| Pricing model | Freemium with two Premium in-app purchases | Freemium, published $5/user/month |
| Deployment | Google Play app, Android only | Browser extension, no endpoint agent, no enterprise-browser migration |
| Integrations | None listed | Proofpoint, Okta, M365, Google Workspace, Sentinel, Splunk, Datadog, Slack |
| Data handling | On-device, offline; Play data-safety lists Location and device IDs shared with third parties | Browser telemetry feeds SIEM/IdP workflows |
ScreenSafe is an Android app that vibrates when its front camera detects someone looking at your phone screen.
Visit Website
Browser security extension that stops AiTM phishing and ClickFix and gives you shadow AI visibility
Visit WebsiteWhat do real users say about ScreenSafe vs Push Security?
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
ScreenSafe
No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Sep 22, 2026 and found posts matching the name “ScreenSafe”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.
Push Security
31 mentions across 3 sources · 50% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Covers AiTM, ClickFix, BitB/BitM and device-code phishing in one browser layer
- • No endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Published $5/user/month pricing under 500 seats with self-serve trial
- • Shadow AI and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia) is ahead of most rivals
What frustrates them
- • No genuine user reviews in the scraped data to validate detection accuracy
- • Advanced tuning and custom rules may overwhelm teams without a security engineer
- • Browser-only coverage leaves native-app and CLI attack paths unmonitored
- • Vendor-sourced threat statistics are not independently corroborated in the data
Researched Oct 30, 2026
How do ScreenSafe and Push Security compare feature by feature?
Push Security sells defense-in-depth at the browser click layer. Its detection list is specific: AiTM reverse-proxy phishing, cloned login pages, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle, ClickFix clipboard injection, device code phishing that steals tokens past MFA and passkeys, and ConsentFix/OAuth consent abuse — plus mail-forwarding-rule monitoring for M365 and Google, and malicious-extension detection with default-deny allowlisting and supply-chain change monitoring. On the AI side it discovers shadow AI apps, flags agentic browsers (Comet, Atlas, Dia), and monitors prompts, clipboard, file uploads and AI OAuth grants. Telemetry flows into Proofpoint, Okta, Sentinel, Splunk, Datadog and Slack, and the new Proofpoint partnership extends in-browser detection to Proofpoint customers.
ScreenSafe solves a physical-world problem with one sensor: the front camera. It runs face detection on-device, fires a silent vibration when a face turns toward the display, and works fully offline with no account. Premium adds Intruder Snapshot (auto-photo of the detected onlooker) and a Trusted Faces whitelist so family and coworkers don't buzz you; a Privacy Dashboard counts interventions. The July 2026 update tuned camera reliability, background protection and edge-to-edge display. There is no shared capability, integration or threat model here — one product defends enterprise identity, the other defends your seat on the train.
Which is cheaper, ScreenSafe or Push Security?
Push Security is freemium with a published $5/user/month price aimed explicitly at mid-market teams under 500 seats, including a self-serve trial — so a 200-seat org can estimate roughly $1,000/month before any negotiation, and cost scales linearly with seats regardless of whether a user is an engineer or a receptionist. That price is only meaningful against what it replaces or augments: email gateways, SWGs, and now Proofpoint deployments via the partnership, which likely means existing Proofpoint customers can fold it into an existing vendor relationship rather than a new procurement.
ScreenSafe is freemium in the app-store sense: free core alerting, then two discrete Premium in-app purchases (Intruder Snapshot, Trusted Faces) bought by one person on one handset. There is no seat math, no contract, no procurement — and no published figures in this data, so don't budget from a guess. The comparison is therefore meaningless on price: $5/user/month enterprise line item versus a consumer micro-transaction. The only real pricing question for a buyer is whether Push's per-seat cost is justified by incident reduction, and whether ScreenSafe's Premium unlocks are worth it versus a cheap privacy screen filter.
Who should pick ScreenSafe, and who should pick Push Security?
- Security team seeing AiTM or ClickFix bypass email and SWGPick: Push Security
Push detects reverse-proxy phishing, clipboard injection and cloned logins at the browser interaction point, which is exactly where those controls go blind.
- Identity team hunting ghost logins and device code phishingPick: Push Security
Device code phishing detection and non-SSO password path visibility target token theft that survives MFA, with Okta and M365 integration to act on it.
- Compliance lead needing shadow AI visibility and prompt/upload controlPick: Push Security
Shadow AI discovery plus monitoring of AI prompts, clipboard, file uploads and OAuth agent permissions, with usage-policy enforcement.
- Commuter checking banking apps on a trainPick: ScreenSafe
Front-camera onlooker detection with a silent vibration and full offline processing — no account, no cloud, nothing to breach.
- Remote worker in a cafe handling client filesPick: ScreenSafe
Premium Intruder Snapshot and Trusted Faces make alerts actionable without buzzing on every coworker who walks past.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use Push Security to monitor my employees' personal phones?
No — Push is a browser extension for managed browsers and Chromebooks, not a mobile app, and it monitors browser data flows like prompts, uploads and logins, not native mobile apps. ScreenSafe is the Android-side tool here, and it's an individual purchase, not something an IT team deploys across a fleet.
Does ScreenSafe protect against phishing links?
Not per its listed features. It detects people looking at your screen; URL and credential-attack blocking is Push's territory. Don't cross-shop them for this.
What does the Proofpoint partnership change for Push buyers?
As of September 29, 2026, Push's in-browser threat protection is being brought to Proofpoint customers. If you're already a Proofpoint shop, ask about folding Push in through that relationship rather than a standalone purchase — it may simplify procurement.
Is ScreenSafe's offline claim contradicted by its data-safety listing?
Worth a look before installing: the app claims camera frames never leave the device, but its Play data-safety section reportedly lists Location and device IDs shared with third parties. Privacy-sensitive buyers should read that section directly.
Does Push require an enterprise browser like Chrome Enterprise or Island?
No — it's positioned as an additional extension across popular, AI and enterprise browsers and Chromebooks, with no forced migration and no endpoint agent. The stated exception is environments where extension policy is blocked outright.
Could a small company buy both?
Mechanically yes, but they'd serve different people: Push covers the security team's browser threat surface, ScreenSafe covers an individual's physical screen privacy. Buying one tells you nothing about whether you need the other.
What else are ScreenSafe and Push Security compared with?
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Where can you read more about ScreenSafe and Push Security?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: