Neon vs Push Security

The two products have no capability overlap, which is why they don't compete. Push Security lives in the browser as an extension and focuses entirely on attack detection and response: behavioral phishing detection, AiTM reverse-proxy page blocking, cloned login and Browser-in-the-Browser detection, ClickFix clipboard-injection blocking at the point of interaction, device-code phishing blocking for kits that bypass passkeys, consent phishing and malicious OAuth integration detection, malicious browser extension risk scoring and allowlisting, infostealer delivery detection, ghost login detection for SSO bypass and password fallback paths, MFA status monitoring with in-browser enforcement guardrails, session hijacking detection via browser session markers, and credential-stuffing detection across SaaS logins. It also gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage — prompts, clipboard activity, and file uploads to LLMs. Integrations route this telemetry into Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Teams, Sentinel, Datadog, Splunk, SentinelOne, and Slack, with a REST API. Neon sits on the other side of the stack: a serverless Postgres with storage-compute separation, autoscaling CPU/memory/storage even on Free, instant copy-on-write branching, ephemeral branches that self-delete, point-in-time restore, managed Better Auth, PgBouncer pooling to 10,000 connections, Lakebase Search (vector/keyword/hybrid), a Data API, S3-compatible branchable object storage (beta), Functions (beta), and an AI Gateway (beta). Its developer integrations are Prisma, Drizzle, Kysely, Next.js, Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Cloudflare Workers, Datadog, SigNoz, Docker, and GitHub Actions.

Both are freemium, but the cost structures answer different questions. Push Security is priced per seat at roughly $5/user/month, explicitly positioned for teams up to 500 employees — a predictable security line item you can multiply against headcount. With no recent news captured, the static positioning stands: one per-user rate covering phishing, identity, and shadow-AI controls, which is cheap relative to enterprise browsers or endpoint suites it's meant to avoid replacing. Neon prices by consumption: autoscaling compute/storage with scale-to-zero to cut idle costs, and paid features gated behind the Scale plan. Two caveats from the data matter to a budget owner: regulated industries needing HIPAA or SOC2 are expected to commit to Scale, and the newer AI Gateway is sold via prepaid credits at provider prices with no markup. Free-plan users still get autoscaling and high availability via multi-AZ storage, so the free tier is functional rather than a trial. In short, Push Security is a per-head security subscription; Neon is a usage-based infrastructure bill that fluctuates with traffic and can be driven toward zero when idle.