Adrian vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Adrian | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium (open-source, self-hosted) | Freemium (cloud-based) |
| Primary Focus | Runtime security monitoring for autonomous AI agents | Browser security for human employees against AI-powered attacks and unauthorized AI tool usage |
| Deployment | Self-hosted open-source, integrated via API | Cloud-based, via browser extension/agent |
| Key Integrations | Agent frameworks, Splunk, Sentinel, Discord, GitHub, YouTube, MCP | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Latest News | 2026-06-29: Avo 4 release after 2000 commits | 2026-06-26: Experienced poisoned tenant attack, shared lessons; 2026-05-12: Built agentic threat hunting pipeline with AI agents |
| Best For | Teams deploying autonomous AI agents in production requiring real-time chain-of-thought monitoring | Security teams needing browser-based attack visibility and AI tool governance for employees |
Choose Push Security if your priority is securing employee browser usage against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and data leakage to AI tools. Choose Adrian if you're building autonomous AI agents and need runtime monitoring of their chain-of-thought to catch prompt injection or policy drift. They solve different problems: human security vs. agent security.
Adrian is open-source runtime security that reads an AI agent's chain of thought and blocks malicious plans before they execute.
Visit Website
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Adrian vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Adrian
75 mentions across 6 sources · 16% positive — critical (averaged across 6 sources)
Hacker News, Product Hunt, Bluesky, Stack Overflow, GitHub, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Monitors actual chain-of-thought, not just inputs/outputs of agents.
- • Open-source codebase allows full audit and customization.
- • Blocks prompt injection and policy drift before execution.
- • Supports human-in-the-loop approval for risky actions.
What frustrates them
- • Fail-open on errors makes it unreliable for security.
- • Sync tool execution bypasses BLOCK/HITL entirely.
- • Dashboard filter mismatch hinders investigation.
- • Very small community limits third-party validation.
Researched Jul 6, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
What frustrates them
- • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security operations manager at a large enterprisePick: Push Security
Push Security provides browser-based phishing and session hijacking detection, plus AI tool governance, which directly addresses top security concerns for employee endpoints.
- ML engineer deploying autonomous AI agentsPick: Adrian
Adrian offers real-time chain-of-thought monitoring and prompt injection blocking, essential for safe agent deployment in production.
- Compliance officer overseeing AI regulationsPick: Push Security
Push Security includes AI tool visibility and usage control, helping meet US/EU/UK AI compliance requirements as noted in their news.
- Startup building multi-agent swarmsPick: Adrian
Adrian's low-overhead, open-source design fits cost-sensitive environments needing runtime security for experimental agent systems.
- IT admin hardening identity and MFA adoptionPick: Push Security
Push Security includes in-browser MFA registration guardrails and ghost login discovery, aiding identity security without full MFA rollout.
Frequently Asked Questions
Adrian vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Choose Push Security if your priority is securing employee browser usage against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and data leakage to AI tools. Choose Adrian if you're building autonomous AI agents and need runtime monitoring of their chain-of-thought to catch prompt injection or policy drift. They solve different problems: human security vs. agent security.
Can Push Security detect attacks on mobile devices?
Yes, it includes mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes.
Does Adrian require a cloud subscription?
No, Adrian is self-hosted open-source. You deploy and manage it yourself.
Which tool prevents data leakage to ChatGPT?
Push Security has in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and can block unauthorized AI tool usage.
Is Adrian suitable for simple chatbots?
No, Adrian is designed for autonomous AI agents, not deterministic chatbots.
Can Push Security replace endpoint DLP?
No, it only covers browser data loss; full endpoint DLP is outside its scope.
Does Adrian integrate with LangChain?
Yes, it integrates with agent frameworks like LangChain via API.
What's the latest version of Adrian?
As of 2026-06-29, Avo 4 has been released with 2000 commits of updates.
Does Push Security require a custom browser?
No, it works with Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other browsers without migration.
More Adrian or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 6, 2026