PlanetScale vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | PlanetScale | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud Database (Vitess & Postgres) | Browser Security (AiTM, AI Usage) |
| Pricing | Paid (free tier available for small workloads) | Free tier + paid plans (not disclosed) |
| Key Feature | Horizontal sharding, branch-per-environment, online schema changes | AiTM phishing, AI tool control, OAuth detection |
| Best For | High-traffic apps needing sharding or fast Postgres | Security teams fighting browser-based attacks & AI risks |
| Not For | Small projects under 10GB; advanced Postgres extensions | Full endpoint DLP; strict extension-blocked envs |
| Latest News | 2026-06-22: Web console now supports Postgres; 2026-06-12: pscale branch connections top | 2026-06-24: AI security maturity model; 2026-05-08: Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix |
These tools solve fundamentally different problems: Push Security secures browsers against AI-powered phishing and OAuth attacks, while PlanetScale provides fast, scalable cloud databases. Choose Push if your main need is protecting identities and AI usage in the browser – its fresh browser attacks matrix (2026-05-08) shows deep expertise. Choose PlanetScale if you need horizontal sharding for MySQL or the fastest cloud Postgres – its new web console for Postgres (2026-06-22) makes management easier.

Managed cloud Postgres & Vitess with NVMe-backed unlimited IOPS and branch-per-environment schema workflows.
Visit Website
Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: PlanetScale vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
PlanetScale
86 mentions across 5 sources · 63% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Blazing NVMe drives with unlimited IOPS for high-performance workloads.
- • Vitess horizontal sharding scales writes seamlessly for massive databases.
- • Branch-per-environment enables safe, revertable schema changes.
- • Automated failover across three availability zones for high availability.
What frustrates them
- • Vendor lock-in makes migration away from Vitess difficult.
- • DeWitt clause historically discouraged independent benchmarking.
- • Postgres feature set still lags behind MySQL/Vitess sharding.
- • Complexity of sharding and VSchema management can be overwhelming.
Researched Jul 26, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
- • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
- • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
- • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.
What frustrates them
- • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
- • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
- • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
- • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.
Researched Aug 26, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security Engineer at mid-size enterprisePick: Push Security
They need to stop AiTM phishing, OAuth attacks, and control AI tool usage – Push's browser extension and recent Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix align perfectly.
- DevOps / DB Admin scaling a high-traffic appPick: PlanetScale
PlanetScale’s Vitess sharding and branch-per-environment enable horizontal scaling and safe schema changes; new Postgres web console simplifies management.
- CISO evaluating AI security risksPick: Push Security
AI tool visibility, policy enforcement, and DLP for AI tools are key; Push’s AI news (2026-06-24) on the SANS AI security maturity model shows thought leadership.
- Startup founder needing a fast, scalable PostgresPick: PlanetScale
Unlimited IOPS, NVMe speed, and automated failover provide performance and HA; Terraform support (2026-06-16) eases IaC.
- SOC analyst investigating browser-based attacksPick: Push Security
Browser telemetry and autonomous agents for threat hunting – plus integrations with Splunk – speed investigations.
Frequently Asked Questions
PlanetScale vs Push Security: which should you choose?
These tools solve fundamentally different problems: Push Security secures browsers against AI-powered phishing and OAuth attacks, while PlanetScale provides fast, scalable cloud databases. Choose Push if your main need is protecting identities and AI usage in the browser – its fresh browser attacks matrix (2026-05-08) shows deep expertise. Choose PlanetScale if you need horizontal sharding for MySQL or the fastest cloud Postgres – its new web console for Postgres (2026-06-22) makes management easier.
Does Push Security protect against all browser-based attacks?
It focuses on AiTM phishing, ClickFix, ConsentFix, malicious OAuth, ghost logins, and credential stuffing – as per its features. It does not cover full endpoint DLP beyond browser.
Can PlanetScale handle both MySQL and Postgres?
Yes, PlanetScale offers Vitess (MySQL-compatible) and native Postgres. Its web console now supports Postgres (2026-06-22).
Is PlanetScale good for small projects?
Not ideal under 10GB – simpler, cheaper options like Neon or Supabase are recommended. It shines for high-traffic or sharded workloads.
Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?
No, it works via a browser extension on standard browsers (Chrome, Edge, etc.). It’s not for environments that block extensions.
What pricing model does Push Security use?
Freemium – free tier exists; paid plans are not publicly detailed but are likely per-seat or enterprise custom.
What are PlanetScale’s free tier limits?
Not specified in the data, but typical cloud DB free tiers offer small storage (e.g., 1GB) and limited connections. Check PlanetScale website.
Can Push Security integrate with our existing SIEM?
Yes, it integrates with Splunk (among others like Snowflake) for browser telemetry and incident investigation.
Does PlanetScale support manual failover?
Automated failover across 3 AZs is built-in. Manual control is likely available via API or support, but not highlighted in features.
More PlanetScale or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: June 1, 2026