Agentseal vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Agentseal | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI agent security scanner | Browser security platform |
| Pricing | Free (open-source) | Freemium (paid plans for advanced features) |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (CLI, CI/CD) | Cloud-based (browser extension) |
| Key Focus | MCP server scanning, agent configuration poisoning | Browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing) |
| Integrations | GitHub Actions, 12 LLM providers | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Latest News | Runtime validation of MCP exploits; 66% of MCP servers have findings | Poisoned tenant attack experience; SANS AI security maturity model |
Choose AgentSeal if you're a developer or security engineer needing open-source, code-level scanning for AI agent configurations, MCP servers, and prompt injection. Choose Push Security if you're an enterprise security team needing browser-based detection and control over phishing, AI tool usage, and identity attacks — it's cloud-based and covers a broader threat landscape. Both are free to start but serve very different attack surfaces.
Open-source CLI security scanner that red-teams AI agent prompts, audits MCP servers at runtime, and catches poisoned skill files
Visit Website
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Agentseal vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Agentseal
20 mentions across 2 sources · 65% positive (averaged across 2 sources)
Hacker News, Product Hunt
What users praise
- • Fully open-source and free with no enterprise contracts required.
- • Covers multiple attack surfaces: prompts, MCP servers, skill files.
- • 380+ attack probes for comprehensive vulnerability detection.
- • Deterministic probes with unique canaries for reproducible CI results.
What frustrates them
- • Very limited community adoption—hard to gauge real-world effectiveness.
- • Prompt scanning requires paid API access to an LLM provider.
- • No plug-and-play cloud version—must run CLI or integrate yourself.
- • Dashboard is basic and lacks advanced reporting features.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
What frustrates them
- • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Who should pick which
- Solo developer using Claude Code or CursorPick: Agentseal
Free and open-source; scans Cursor rules and agent configurations for hidden instructions or poisoning, directly protecting the developer's workflow.
- Enterprise security team managing AI tool usagePick: Push Security
Provides real-time visibility and data loss prevention for AI tools at the browser level, plus detects AiTM phishing and session hijacking targeting identity.
- DevOps engineer securing CI/CD pipelinesPick: Agentseal
Integrates via GitHub Actions, SARIF, JUnit; scans prompts and MCP servers automatically as part of CI/CD, with reproducible deterministic probes.
- Security researcher studying MCP vulnerabilitiesPick: Agentseal
Access to 9,100+ MCP server analysis, runtime validation of exploits, and open-source tools for in-depth research without cost barriers.
- Identity security analystPick: Push Security
Detects ghost logins, shadow SaaS, and OAuth abuse; enforces MFA/SSO in-browser; recent news highlights poisoned tenant attack detection.
Frequently Asked Questions
Agentseal vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Choose AgentSeal if you're a developer or security engineer needing open-source, code-level scanning for AI agent configurations, MCP servers, and prompt injection. Choose Push Security if you're an enterprise security team needing browser-based detection and control over phishing, AI tool usage, and identity attacks — it's cloud-based and covers a broader threat landscape. Both are free to start but serve very different attack surfaces.
Which tool is better for detecting prompt injection?
AgentSeal is purpose-built for prompt injection detection with 380+ adversarial probes and deterministic canaries. Push Security does not target prompt injection; it focuses on browser-level threats.
Can I use AgentSeal without LLM API keys?
Yes, for machine-level scans (Guard, Shield, Scan-MCP) no API keys are needed. Only prompt scanning requires access to an LLM of your choice.
Does Push Security replace an endpoint DLP?
No, Push Security is a browser-based DLP, not a full endpoint DLP. It covers clipboard, file uploads, and AI tool interactions in-browser, but not file system or network-level DLP.
Is AgentSeal suitable for non-developers?
AgentSeal is CLI-based and requires technical knowledge to set up and interpret results. Non-technical users may find Push Security's browser extension approach more accessible.
Which tool has better integration with identity providers?
Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, and more. AgentSeal does not integrate with identity providers; it focuses on LLM providers and CI/CD.
Can I self-host Push Security?
No, Push Security is cloud-based only. AgentSeal is fully self-hosted and open-source.
What is the latest major finding from AgentSeal?
In March 2026, AgentSeal reported that 66% of 1,808 MCP servers had security findings, and validated exploits for 6 high-profile MCP servers, demonstrating real-world impact.
What is the latest news from Push Security?
In June 2026, Push Security experienced a poisoned tenant attack via a fake OpenAI org invitation, highlighting risks of OAuth-based identity attacks, and published a SANS AI security maturity model.
More Agentseal or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026