Sanctum AI vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Sanctum AI | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Freemium, contact for paid tiers |
| Primary Function | Local LLM runner – chat, PDF analysis, transcription offline | Browser security for AI era – stops AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking, malicious OAuth |
| Deployment | Desktop app (macOS 12+, Windows 10+; Linux soon) – fully offline | Cloud-based with browser extension (multi-browser) |
| Target User | Privacy-conscious individuals, developers, professionals with sensitive data | Security teams, identity teams, organizations securing AI tool usage |
| Key Feature | 7000+ GGUF models from HuggingFace, AES-256 encrypted Vault, local API server | Agentic threat hunting via browser telemetry, AI tool DLP, in-browser MFA guardrails |
| Latest Update | 2026-06-04: Launched Patina (AI learning user judgment); 2024-12-05: Added Whisper transcription | 2026-06-26: Experienced poisoned tenant attack; 2026-06-02: AI regulation compliance requires browser visibility |
These tools serve entirely different needs. If you are a security professional battling browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, malicious OAuth) and need to control AI tool usage across your organization, Push Security is essential. If you are an individual who needs complete privacy and offline AI for chat, PDF analysis, or transcription, Sanctum AI is a free and powerful choice. They are not direct competitors; choose based on whether you need enterprise threat detection or personal offline AI.
Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Sanctum AI vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Sanctum AI
15 mentions across 1 sources · 50% positive — mixed
Lemmy
What users praise
- • Full privacy: no data leaves your device; AES-256 encrypted Vault.
- • Offline capability after initial setup—ideal for secure environments.
- • Single-click install from 7000+ HuggingFace GGUF models.
- • Chat with PDFs, audio transcription, and file summarization included.
What frustrates them
- • No community feedback available to verify quality or reliability.
- • Desktop-only; no mobile or web version.
- • Linux support still pending as of v1.9.1.
- • Hardware demands for larger models may limit usability on older Macs.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
- • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
- • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
- • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.
What frustrates them
- • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
- • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
- • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
- • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.
Researched Aug 26, 2026
Who should pick which
- Enterprise Security Team LeadPick: Push Security
To combat AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, and malicious OAuth grants, and to enforce AI usage policies across browsers—features Push excels at.
- Privacy-Focused DeveloperPick: Sanctum AI
Needs offline, private AI for coding assistance, PDF analysis, and audio transcription without cloud exposure.
- IT Admin Managing Shadow SaaSPick: Push Security
Push detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS via browser telemetry, helping control unmanaged app usage.
- Researcher Handling Sensitive DataPick: Sanctum AI
Allows local LLM processing of confidential files with AES-256 encryption and no internet requirement.
- Security Operations AnalystPick: Push Security
Benefits from agentic threat hunting and real-time blocks on browser-based attacks, integrating with existing SIEM/SOAR.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sanctum AI vs Push Security: which should you choose?
These tools serve entirely different needs. If you are a security professional battling browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, malicious OAuth) and need to control AI tool usage across your organization, Push Security is essential. If you are an individual who needs complete privacy and offline AI for chat, PDF analysis, or transcription, Sanctum AI is a free and powerful choice. They are not direct competitors; choose based on whether you need enterprise threat detection or personal offline AI.
Are Push Security and Sanctum AI direct competitors?
No. Push is enterprise browser security; Sanctum is personal offline AI. They target different markets.
Does Push Security require installing a custom browser?
No, it works as a browser extension on major browsers (Chrome, Edge, etc.). No forced migration.
Can Sanctum AI run without internet after initial model download?
Yes, fully offline. Only the initial model download needs internet.
Does Push Security support mobile devices?
It detects mobile phishing via SMS/QR codes but primarily focuses on desktop browsers. Check documentation for mobile extension support.
Is Sanctum AI completely free?
Yes, it's free and open-source-based. No hidden paid tiers as of latest updates.
What integrations does Push Security have?
Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake. More through APIs.
Can Sanctum AI handle video files?
Temporarily removed .mp4 and other video support in v1.9.1. Only audio/text currently.
Which tool is better for compliance with AI regulations?
Push Security, as it provides visibility and control over AI tool usage, aligning with US, EU, UK AI regulations.
More Sanctum AI or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026