Permit vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Permit | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | freemium · from OSS (Free) $0/mo | freemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly) |
| Best for | Engineering teams shipping AI agents into production, Platform engineering leads needing cross-framework authorization | Security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption |
| Standout features | Pre-execution action authorization with deterministic policy enforcement · Canonical taxonomy across 21 action domains with risk defaults · Compliance mappings for SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, EU AI Act, and more | Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block |
| Viability score | 77/100 | 95/100 |
| API | Yes | Yes |
Permit is the stronger pick for engineering teams shipping ai agents into production; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).
Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-06.

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.
Visit WebsiteWho should pick which
- Security Operations (SOC) analystPick: Push Security
Push Security provides real-time detection of AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious browser extensions, which are top SOC concerns.
- AI Agent developer/engineerPick: Permit
Permit’s @permit0.guard decorator and deterministic policy enforcement are purpose-built for production AI agents that execute tool calls.
- Compliance officer (SOC 2 / HIPAA)Pick: Permit
Permit includes compliance mappings for SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, and EU AI Act, enabling audit-ready pre-execution controls.
- Identity security managerPick: Push Security
Push Security hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS.
- Platform engineering leadPick: Permit
Permit integrates with multiple agent frameworks (LangChain, MCP, CrewAI, etc.) and provides a single authorization layer across them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Permit or Push Security?
The best choice between Permit and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.
What are the main differences between Permit and Push Security?
The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.
Is there a free version of Permit or Push Security?
Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.
More Permit or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
