HomeToolsPlan StackBest ForCompare
RightAIChoice
CompareBlog
Submit a ToolSign inSign upPlan Your Stack
HomeComparePermit vs Push Security

Permit vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-06
Reviewed by our team on 2026-07-03
Saved

At a glance

DimensionPermitPush Security
Pricingfreemium · from OSS (Free) $0/mofreemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Best forEngineering teams shipping AI agents into production, Platform engineering leads needing cross-framework authorizationSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresPre-execution action authorization with deterministic policy enforcement · Canonical taxonomy across 21 action domains with risk defaults · Compliance mappings for SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, EU AI Act, and moreAdversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score77/10095/100
APIYesYes

Permit is the stronger pick for engineering teams shipping ai agents into production; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-06.

Permit
Permit

Pre-execution action authorization layer for AI agents.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$0/mo
$49/mo
$499/mo
Contact us
$5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Custom
Popularity
0 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
APICLI
WebPlugin
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy⚙️ Developer Infrastructure
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Pre-execution action authorization with deterministic policy enforcement
Canonical taxonomy across 21 action domains with risk defaults
Compliance mappings for SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, EU AI Act, and more
Single decorator (@permit0.guard) to guard any tool call
Open-source SDK with no rate limits (free tier)
Tool Action Compiler normalizes tool calls across agent frameworks
Session-aware chain detection for dangerous action sequences
Three deployment modes: cloud, self-hosted, and local
Risk scoring with 9 flags and 10 amplifiers
Capability tokens bind approved actions to payload hashes
Global kill switch for override authority
Integrates with LangChain, MCP, CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude Code
Audit-of-record per decision, cryptographically signed
Replayable evidence exportable in audit-grade format
VPC-native deployment for air-gapped environments
Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other Chromium browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
LangChain
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
CrewAI
OpenClaw
AutoGen
LangGraph
OpenAI Agents SDK
Claude Code
Stripe
Salesforce
Okta
Azure AD
Google Workspace
Slack
Splunk
Snowflake

Who should pick which

  • Security Operations (SOC) analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides real-time detection of AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious browser extensions, which are top SOC concerns.

  • AI Agent developer/engineer
    Pick: Permit

    Permit’s @permit0.guard decorator and deterministic policy enforcement are purpose-built for production AI agents that execute tool calls.

  • Compliance officer (SOC 2 / HIPAA)
    Pick: Permit

    Permit includes compliance mappings for SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, and EU AI Act, enabling audit-ready pre-execution controls.

  • Identity security manager
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS.

  • Platform engineering lead
    Pick: Permit

    Permit integrates with multiple agent frameworks (LangChain, MCP, CrewAI, etc.) and provides a single authorization layer across them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Permit or Push Security?

The best choice between Permit and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Permit and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Permit or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Permit or Push Security comparisons

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Permit
View Permit reviewPermit alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy toolsBest AI Developer Infrastructure tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

RightAIChoice

The decision-making engine for discovering AI tools.

One AI tool every Friday

A 60-second editorial pick. No filler, no funnel — unsubscribe anytime.

Product

  • Browse tools
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Plan my stack
  • Find my AI tool
  • AI chat
  • Compare
  • Submit your tool

Resources

  • Best AI guides
  • Stacks
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Viability scoring

Company

  • About
  • Team
  • Press & brand kit
  • Contact

Your account

  • Dashboard
  • Saved tools
  • Settings
  • Sign in
  • Create account

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Affiliate disclosure
  • Unsubscribe

© 2026 RightAIChoice. All rights reserved.

Built for the AI community.