Permit vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Permit or Push Security: which should you choose?
| Dimension | Permit | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free · from $49/mo | From $5/user/mo |
| Best for | Fintech and payments teams gating refunds, transfers, and ledger writes before they execute, Insurtech and claims teams needing pre-execution evidence for EU AI Act Annex III | Security teams seeing AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking or device code phishing slip past email and SWG controls, Identity teams hunting ghost logins, non-SSO password fallback paths and credential stuffing |
| Standout features | Pre-execution action authorization before AI agent tool calls execute · Deterministic policy engine — rules and cryptography, no model in the hot path · Single decorator @permit0.guard("payments.refund") to guard any tool call | Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser · Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle detection · ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction |
| Viability score | 71/100 | 81/100 |
| API | Yes | Yes |
Permit is the stronger pick for fintech and payments teams gating refunds, transfers, and ledger writes before they execute; Push Security fits better for security teams seeing aitm, clickfix, session hijacking or device code phishing slip past email and swg controls.
Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-11-13.
Pre-execution action authorization for AI agents — a deterministic, signed gate on every tool call before it runs.
Visit Website
Browser security extension that blocks AiTM phishing and ClickFix while giving teams shadow AI visibility
Visit WebsiteWhat do real users say about Permit vs Push Security?
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Permit
101 mentions across 5 sources · 33% positive — critical (weighted across 5 sources)
Hacker News, App Store, Bluesky, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Deterministic policy engine keeps a model out of the hot path, reducing prompt-injection surface.
- • Single decorator @permit0.guard embeds authorization directly into Python tool calls.
- • Capability tokens in PASETO v4.public bind approvals to payload hashes and decision provenance.
- • Compliance packs span EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, SOC 2, FINRA, HIPAA, and SR 11-7.
What frustrates them
- • There is no genuine community feedback about Permit0 in the available data.
- • All 101 scraped posts are keyword matches for 'permit', not for the product itself.
- • Compliance mapping breadth is vendor-asserted and unverified by any third party.
- • No independent reviews or case studies to corroborate refund-blocking, escalation, or audit claims.
Researched Nov 9, 2026
Push Security
46 mentions across 4 sources · 49% positive — mixed (weighted across 4 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Bluesky, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Detection targets browser-native attacks email gateways miss: AiTM, ClickFix, Browser-in-the-Browser
- • Publishes credible, frequently-cited research on ClickFix, ConsentFix and device-code phishing
- • No endpoint agent and no forced enterprise browser — works across Chrome, AI and enterprise browsers
- • Secure AI coverage includes shadow-AI discovery and agentic-browser detection for Comet, Atlas, Dia
What frustrates them
- • Independent customer reviews of accuracy and false positives are largely absent from this data
- • Browser extension with deep page, clipboard and prompt access raises privacy/DPO scrutiny
- • Advanced skill requirement and many controls imply real tuning effort before value
- • Overlaps with secure web gateways and email security you may already pay for
Researched Nov 7, 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Permit or Push Security?
The best choice between Permit and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.
What are the main differences between Permit and Push Security?
The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.
Is there a free version of Permit or Push Security?
Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.
What else are Permit and Push Security compared with?
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Where can you read more about Permit and Push Security?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: