Permit vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-14
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionPermitPush Security
Primary Use CasePre-execution action authorization for AI agentsBrowser security for AiTM phishing, session hijacking, AI data loss prevention
DeploymentCloud, self-hosted, or localCloud-based (browser extension + SaaS backend)
Target UsersEngineers, platform engineering, security/trust teamsSecurity teams, identity teams, SOC analysts
Latest News FocusNo recent newsReal-world attack experience, AI security maturity, EDR gaps
Best ForTeams building AI agents that execute tool calls and need guardrailsOrganizations using Chrome/Edge/Firefox needing browser threat protection

Push Security and Permit address different threat surfaces. Push Security is the right choice for security teams that need to defend browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, AI data loss) across existing browsers without migrating to an enterprise browser. Permit is purpose-built for engineering teams shipping AI agents that need deterministic pre-execution authorization to prevent risky tool calls. Choose based on your primary risk: browser-side attacks vs. agent-side actions.

Try PermitTry Push Security
Permit
Permit

Pre-execution action authorization for AI agents — deterministic policy enforcement before tool calls run.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser-native security that blocks AI-driven phishing and secures AI app usage in the browser.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$0/mo
$49/mo
$499/mo
Custom
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
3 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
APICLI
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Pre-execution action authorization for AI agents
Deterministic policy enforcement before tool calls execute
Canonical taxonomy across 21 action domains
Risk scoring with 9 flags and 10 amplifiers
Single decorator @permit0.guard to guard tool calls
Tool Action Compiler normalizes tool calls across frameworks
Session-aware chain detection catches risky action sequences
Two-stage review with LLM that can only deny or escalate
Cryptographic capability tokens bind actions to payload hashes
PASETO v4.public token format with replay protection and TTL
Global kill switch for override authority
Audit-of-record per decision with cryptographic signing
Replayable evidence export in audit-grade format
Compliance packs for EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, SOC 2, FINRA, HIPAA, SR 11-7
Deploy modes: cloud, self-hosted, managed VPC
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing page detection and blocking
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent blocking and OAuth app management
Session hijacking detection and response
Credential stuffing detection
Ghost login detection and SSO login guidance
MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
Integrations
LangChain
Model Context Protocol (MCP)
CrewAI
OpenClaw
AutoGen
LangGraph
OpenAI Agents SDK
Claude Code
Stripe
GitHub
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: Permit vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Permit

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Jul 3, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Permit”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Addresses emerging threats: AI-driven phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing.
  • • Works across all major browsers without migrating users.
  • • Includes shadow AI app discovery and control for unsanctioned tools.
  • • Blocks malicious OAuth consents and session hijacking in real time.

What frustrates them

  • • Virtually no independent user feedback or case studies available.
  • • Potential browser performance overhead due to constant monitoring.
  • • May cause friction with false positives blocking legitimate apps.
  • • Advanced features require security expertise to configure properly.

Researched Sep 8, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security Operations (SOC) analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides real-time detection of AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious browser extensions, which are top SOC concerns.

  • AI Agent developer/engineer
    Pick: Permit

    Permit’s @permit0.guard decorator and deterministic policy enforcement are purpose-built for production AI agents that execute tool calls.

  • Compliance officer (SOC 2 / HIPAA)
    Pick: Permit

    Permit includes compliance mappings for SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, and EU AI Act, enabling audit-ready pre-execution controls.

  • Identity security manager
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS.

  • Platform engineering lead
    Pick: Permit

    Permit integrates with multiple agent frameworks (LangChain, MCP, CrewAI, etc.) and provides a single authorization layer across them.

Frequently Asked Questions

Permit vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Push Security and Permit address different threat surfaces. Push Security is the right choice for security teams that need to defend browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, AI data loss) across existing browsers without migrating to an enterprise browser. Permit is purpose-built for engineering teams shipping AI agents that need deterministic pre-execution authorization to prevent risky tool calls. Choose based on your primary risk: browser-side attacks vs. agent-side actions.

Can Push Security and Permit be used together?

Yes, they address different attack surfaces. Push protects human browser sessions, while Permit authorizes AI agent tool calls. They can complement each other in a defense-in-depth strategy.

Does Push Security require deploying an enterprise browser?

No. Push Security works as a browser extension on Chrome, Edge, and Firefox, and does not require switching to a single enterprise browser.

Is Permit only for AI agents?

Permit is designed for AI agents that execute tool calls, but its action authorization layer could technically apply to any automated system needing pre-execution policy enforcement.

What integrations does Push Security support?

Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, and Snowflake.

What agent frameworks does Permit integrate with?

Permit integrates with LangChain, Model Context Protocol (MCP), CrewAI, OpenClaw, AutoGen, LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, and Claude Code.

Does Push Security offer on-premises deployment?

No, Push Security is cloud-based only.

Does Permit have a free tier?

Yes, Permit’s open-source SDK is free with no rate limits. Cloud and self-hosted tiers may have additional pricing.

Which tool is better for preventing data loss to AI tools?

Push Security is stronger because it provides in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time AI tool visibility and usage control.

More Permit or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Explore each tool further

Permit
View Permit reviewPermit alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026