Hackagent vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-09
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionHackagentPush Security
Primary Use CaseAI agent red-teaming and vulnerability detectionBrowser security for AI-era threats (phishing, session hijacking, AI data leakage)
DeploymentPython SDK/CLI (local or cloud)Cloud-based browser extension
Target UsersSecurity researchers, AI safety practitioners, developersSecurity teams, identity teams
Key IntegrationGoogle ADK, OpenAI SDK, LiteLLM, LangChain, Ollama, vLLMOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest News2026-07-01: Launched CLI for scanning AI agent dependencies2026-06-26: Experienced & detailed poisoned tenant attack; 2026-06-24: Blog on real-time browser security vs. training

For organizations defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI tool usage in real-time, Push Security is the comprehensive choice with freemium pricing and deep integrations. Hackagent is the go-to open-source toolkit for red-teaming AI agents pre-deployment, but it lacks production monitoring. Evaluate based on whether your need is real-time defense (Push) or pre-deployment testing (Hackagent).

Try HackagentTry Push Security
Hackagent
Hackagent

Free, open-source Python toolkit that red-teams AI agents against prompt injection, jailbreaking, goal hijacking, and tool misuse before attackers find the

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Paid
Plans
$0
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
6 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIAPI
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Automated prompt injection testing against AI agents
Jailbreak attack techniques including AdvPrefix, AutoDAN-Turbo, PAIR, and TAP
Goal hijacking and tool misuse evaluation for agentic systems
11 attack techniques including FlipAttack, BoN, h4rm3l, CipherChat, PAP, and Static Template
Pre-built benchmark datasets: AgentHarm, JailbreakBench, HarmBench, AdvBench, StrongREJECT
Additional benchmark presets: BeaverTails, SALAD-Bench, WMDP, AIR-Bench, ToxicChat
Custom dataset import from HuggingFace, URL, or JSON/CSV/JSONL/TXT file
Modular attack engine with separate generator, judge, and target LLM roles
AutoDAN-Turbo summarizer component
Category classifier for organizing attack outcomes
Interactive terminal UI (TUI) with real-time attack progress and visualizations
Report and dashboard output for attack results
Python SDK with autogenerated API reference (hackagent v0.11.0)
CLI dependency scanner for AI agent dependencies (added July 2026)
Runs locally out of the box with optional cloud sync via HACKAGENT_API_KEY
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
Google ADK
OpenAI SDK
LiteLLM
LangChain
Ollama
vLLM
HuggingFace
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: Hackagent vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Hackagent

22 mentions across 3 sources · 67% positive (averaged across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, GitHub

What users praise

  • • Free and open-source with no cost barriers
  • • Eleven attack techniques including AdvPrefix, PAIR, and TAP
  • • Supports multiple agent frameworks: ADK, OpenAI, LangChain, etc.
  • • Integrates pre-built benchmarks like AgentHarm and JailbreakBench

What frustrates them

  • • Early-stage with few stars and limited community
  • • Steep learning curve for configuring multi-LLM roles
  • • Minimal direct user reviews or case studies
  • • Documentation may be sparse for complex setups

Researched Aug 20, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security operations team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time detection of AiTM, session hijacking, and AI data leakage across browsers, with automated response — ideal for proactive defense.

  • AI safety researcher auditing an agent
    Pick: Hackagent

    Hackagent automates prompt injection, jailbreaking, and goal hijacking testing against multiple agent frameworks, perfect for pre-deployment auditing.

  • Identity team enforcing MFA/SSO
    Pick: Push Security

    Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins, directly supporting identity hygiene.

  • Developer building a secure AI agent
    Pick: Hackagent

    Hackagent integrates with developer workflows (CLI, APIs) to test agent security before release; the new dependency scanner adds supply chain safety.

  • CISO concerned about AI tool usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides AI tool inventory, usage control (clipboard, file upload), and DLP, plus visibility into shadow SaaS — key for AI governance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Hackagent vs Push Security: which should you choose?

For organizations defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI tool usage in real-time, Push Security is the comprehensive choice with freemium pricing and deep integrations. Hackagent is the go-to open-source toolkit for red-teaming AI agents pre-deployment, but it lacks production monitoring. Evaluate based on whether your need is real-time defense (Push) or pre-deployment testing (Hackagent).

Can Push Security detect prompt injection attacks?

Push focuses on browser-based threats (AiTM, session hijacking, malicious OAuth) and AI data leakage, but does not test prompt injection on AI models. Hackagent specializes in that.

Does Hackagent provide real-time protection?

No, Hackagent is a pre-deployment testing tool. For real-time defense, consider Push Security or other runtime solutions.

Is Push Security's free tier enough for a small team?

Yes, the freemium model likely offers core features for a limited number of users, sufficient for small teams to evaluate and get basic protection.

Can Hackagent test agents built with LangChain?

Yes, Hackagent supports LangChain among other frameworks (Google ADK, OpenAI SDK, Ollama, vLLM, LiteLLM).

Does Push Security work with Safari or Firefox?

Yes, Push works across all major browsers via extensions, not just Chromium-based ones.

Is Hackagent suitable for non-technical users?

No, it requires Python and CLI experience. It's designed for security researchers and developers.

Can I use Push Security to block file uploads to ChatGPT?

Yes, Push includes in-browser DLP for AI tools, capable of blocking clipboard and file uploads to LLMs.

Does Hackagent have a cloud version?

No, it's entirely local. There's an optional API key for cloud sync, but the engine runs on your machine.

More Hackagent or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

Hackagent
View Hackagent reviewHackagent alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026