Hackagent vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-23
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionHackagentPush Security
PricingFree, open-sourceFreemium (paid tiers start at $10/user/mo)
Primary Use CaseAI agent red-teaming and vulnerability detectionBrowser security for AI-era threats (phishing, session hijacking, AI data leakage)
DeploymentPython SDK/CLI (local or cloud)Cloud-based browser extension
Target UsersSecurity researchers, AI safety practitioners, developersSecurity teams, identity teams
Key IntegrationGoogle ADK, OpenAI SDK, LiteLLM, LangChain, Ollama, vLLMOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest News2026-07-01: Launched CLI for scanning AI agent dependencies2026-06-26: Experienced & detailed poisoned tenant attack; 2026-06-24: Blog on real-time browser security vs. training

For organizations defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI tool usage in real-time, Push Security is the comprehensive choice with freemium pricing and deep integrations. Hackagent is the go-to open-source toolkit for red-teaming AI agents pre-deployment, but it lacks production monitoring. Evaluate based on whether your need is real-time defense (Push) or pre-deployment testing (Hackagent).

Try HackagentTry Push Security
Hackagent
Hackagent

Free open-source AI agent security red-teaming toolkit

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security for the AI era: detect and block AI-powered attacks.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month (annual) or monthly per user
Custom
Popularity
3 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIAPI
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Prompt injection attack testing via CLI and SDK
Jailbreaking attacks: AdvPrefix, AutoDAN-Turbo, PAIR, TAP
Goal hijacking and tool misuse evaluation
11 attack techniques including FlipAttack, BoN, h4rm3l, CipherChat, PAP, Static Template
Pre-built benchmark datasets: AgentHarm, JailbreakBench, HarmBench, AdvBench, StrongREJECT
Additional datasets: BeaverTails, SALAD-Bench, WMDP, AIR-Bench, ToxicChat
Custom dataset import from JSON, CSV, JSONL, TXT, or URLs
HuggingFace dataset integration
Modular attack engine with generator, judge, and target LLM roles
Interactive terminal UI (TUI) with real-time progress and visualizations
Optional cloud sync via HACKAGENT_API_KEY
Runs locally out of the box
CLI dependency scanner for AI agents (added July 2026)
Supports multiple agent frameworks: Google ADK, OpenAI SDK, LiteLLM, LangChain, Ollama, vLLM
Python SDK and CLI tool
AitM / reverse-proxy phishing detection
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Session hijacking detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent flow blocking
Ghost login discovery (password fallback paths)
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Illicit browser extension detection and blocking
Extension allowlisting with default-deny management
Device code phishing detection
Shadow SaaS discovery and control
Integrations
Google ADK
OpenAI SDK
LiteLLM
LangChain
Ollama
vLLM
HuggingFace
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Slack
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: Hackagent vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Hackagent

22 mentions across 3 sources · 67% positive

Hacker News, YouTube, GitHub

What users praise

  • • Free and open-source with no cost barriers
  • • Eleven attack techniques including AdvPrefix, PAIR, and TAP
  • • Supports multiple agent frameworks: ADK, OpenAI, LangChain, etc.
  • • Integrates pre-built benchmarks like AgentHarm and JailbreakBench

What frustrates them

  • • Early-stage with few stars and limited community
  • • Steep learning curve for configuring multi-LLM roles
  • • Minimal direct user reviews or case studies
  • • Documentation may be sparse for complex setups

Researched Aug 20, 2026

Push Security

36 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Deploys as extension across all major browsers, avoiding enterprise lock-in
  • • Autonomous hunting agents detect and block zero-day threats in real time
  • • Addresses emerging AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and session hijacking attacks
  • • Provides shadow AI discovery and governance, a growing need

What frustrates them

  • • Limited independent reviews and community deployment case studies
  • • Extension-based agent may impact browser performance on low-end devices
  • • Pricing for advanced features likely steep for SMBs
  • • Configuration complexity requires skilled security engineers

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security operations team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time detection of AiTM, session hijacking, and AI data leakage across browsers, with automated response — ideal for proactive defense.

  • AI safety researcher auditing an agent
    Pick: Hackagent

    Hackagent automates prompt injection, jailbreaking, and goal hijacking testing against multiple agent frameworks, perfect for pre-deployment auditing.

  • Identity team enforcing MFA/SSO
    Pick: Push Security

    Push hardens unmanaged identities with in-browser MFA/SSO guardrails and detects ghost logins, directly supporting identity hygiene.

  • Developer building a secure AI agent
    Pick: Hackagent

    Hackagent integrates with developer workflows (CLI, APIs) to test agent security before release; the new dependency scanner adds supply chain safety.

  • CISO concerned about AI tool usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides AI tool inventory, usage control (clipboard, file upload), and DLP, plus visibility into shadow SaaS — key for AI governance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Hackagent vs Push Security: which should you choose?

For organizations defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI tool usage in real-time, Push Security is the comprehensive choice with freemium pricing and deep integrations. Hackagent is the go-to open-source toolkit for red-teaming AI agents pre-deployment, but it lacks production monitoring. Evaluate based on whether your need is real-time defense (Push) or pre-deployment testing (Hackagent).

Can Push Security detect prompt injection attacks?

Push focuses on browser-based threats (AiTM, session hijacking, malicious OAuth) and AI data leakage, but does not test prompt injection on AI models. Hackagent specializes in that.

Does Hackagent provide real-time protection?

No, Hackagent is a pre-deployment testing tool. For real-time defense, consider Push Security or other runtime solutions.

Is Push Security's free tier enough for a small team?

Yes, the freemium model likely offers core features for a limited number of users, sufficient for small teams to evaluate and get basic protection.

Can Hackagent test agents built with LangChain?

Yes, Hackagent supports LangChain among other frameworks (Google ADK, OpenAI SDK, Ollama, vLLM, LiteLLM).

Does Push Security work with Safari or Firefox?

Yes, Push works across all major browsers via extensions, not just Chromium-based ones.

Is Hackagent suitable for non-technical users?

No, it requires Python and CLI experience. It's designed for security researchers and developers.

Can I use Push Security to block file uploads to ChatGPT?

Yes, Push includes in-browser DLP for AI tools, capable of blocking clipboard and file uploads to LLMs.

Does Hackagent have a cloud version?

No, it's entirely local. There's an optional API key for cloud sync, but the engine runs on your machine.

More Hackagent or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Explore each tool further

Hackagent
View Hackagent reviewHackagent alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026