Fact0 vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Fact0 | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier (30K events/mo) + paid plans | Free tier + paid plans |
| Core Focus | Tamper-evident audit for AI agents | Browser security for AI era |
| Key Feature | Hash-chained ledger with Ed25519 signatures | AiTM phishing & session hijacking detection |
| Integration Style | SDKs (Python, TS, Go) + agent frameworks | Browser extension + SIEM/IdP integrations |
| Best For | Regulated industries (fintech, healthcare) | Security teams combating browser attacks |
| Latest News | v1.2.2 dashboard fixes; Go SDK fix | SANS AI security model; agentic threat hunting |
Fact0 and Push Security serve entirely different needs: Fact0 is a cryptographic audit trail for AI agents, essential for compliance in regulated industries, while Push Security is a browser-based threat detection platform for identity and security teams. Choose Fact0 if you need provable agent logs to pass enterprise security reviews; choose Push Security if you must defend against AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and AI tool data leaks.
Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Fact0 vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Fact0
28 mentions across 3 sources · 37% positive — critical
YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky
What users praise
- • Hash-chained ledger with SHA-256 and Ed25519 cryptography provides tamper-evident logs.
- • Supports multiple SDKs (Python, TypeScript, Go) for flexibility.
- • Natively integrates with OpenTelemetry, LangChain, LangGraph, and FastAPI.
- • Generates signed evidence packs (PDF/JSON) and read-only auditor share links.
What frustrates them
- • Zero real user feedback — cannot verify reliability or ease of use.
- • Only 18 Product Hunt upvotes, no organic community buzz anywhere.
- • Off-topic YouTube and Bluesky posts waste scraping effort.
- • No reviews from Reddit, HN, GitHub, or App Store to trust.
Researched Jul 4, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
- • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
- • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
- • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.
What frustrates them
- • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
- • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
- • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
- • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.
Researched Aug 26, 2026
Who should pick which
- AI startup founder closing enterprise dealsPick: Fact0
Fact0 provides tamper-evident audit logs that satisfy CISO security reviews, with integrations for LangChain and other agent frameworks.
- CISO in regulated industry (fintech/healthcare)Pick: Fact0
Fact0's hash-chained ledger and cryptographic signatures ensure compliance with audit requirements for agent actions.
- Security team defending against phishing and session hijackingPick: Push Security
Push Security detects AiTM, ClickFix, and session hijacking in real time, with automated threat hunting via browser telemetry.
- Identity team hardening MFA and SSO adoptionPick: Push Security
Push Security offers in-browser MFA guardrails and detects ghost logins, helping enforce identity policies without an enterprise browser.
- Security team monitoring AI tool usage and data leaksPick: Push Security
Push Security provides AI tool inventory and in-browser DLP for clipboard and file uploads, preventing data leakage to LLMs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fact0 vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Fact0 and Push Security serve entirely different needs: Fact0 is a cryptographic audit trail for AI agents, essential for compliance in regulated industries, while Push Security is a browser-based threat detection platform for identity and security teams. Choose Fact0 if you need provable agent logs to pass enterprise security reviews; choose Push Security if you must defend against AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and AI tool data leaks.
Can Fact0 detect phishing attacks?
No, Fact0 is designed for audit logging of AI agents, not for detecting browser-based phishing. Push Security is better for that.
Does Push Security provide tamper-evident logs for AI agents?
No, Push Security focuses on browser security and identity protection, not on cryptographic audit trails for agent actions.
Which tool integrates with LangChain?
Fact0 integrates with LangChain, LangGraph, and other agent frameworks. Push Security does not.
Can either tool be self-hosted?
Neither tool offers a self-hosted free tier. Both are cloud-based, with enterprise options possibly including dedicated instances.
Which tool is better for a startup needing to prove compliance to enterprise buyers?
Fact0, because it provides a verifiable, tamper-evident audit ledger specifically for AI agent actions.
Does Push Security offer an SDK?
No, Push Security is deployed as a browser extension and integrates via APIs with SIEM and identity providers.
What recent updates have these tools had?
Fact0 released v1.2.2 with dashboard UX fixes and Go SDK improvements. Push Security published articles on the SANS AI security model and agentic threat hunting.
Which tool is more affordable for a small team?
Fact0's free tier (30K events/mo) may be sufficient for small-scale agent logs. Push Security's free tier likely covers basic browser threat detection, but advanced features require paid plans.
More Fact0 or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 2, 2026