SILENTCHAIN vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-24
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionSILENTCHAINPush Security
Primary Use CaseAI-assisted vulnerability scanning: OWASP Top 10 detection via Burp Suite extensionBrowser security: detect/prevent AiTM phishing, session hijacking, AI data leakage, shadow SaaS
PricingFreemium: Community (open-source free), Professional/Enterprise/SOURCE/Sn1per paid tiersFreemium (cloud SaaS); enterprise tiers unknown
DeploymentLocal/on-prem via Ollama or cloud APIs; Burp extensionCloud-based; requires browser extension per user
AI CapabilitiesMulti-provider AI (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Ollama); RAG with 80k+ security docs; Phase 2 active verificationAgentic threat hunting using browser telemetry; real-time AI tool visibility and DLP
Target AudiencePenetration testers, bug bounty hunters, AppSec engineersSecurity teams, identity teams, SecOps
Latest News FocusAI agent attack surface (MCP), RAG-based scanning, cross-product correlation (Apr 2026)Poisoned tenant attack lessons, AI security compliance, agentic threat hunting (May-Jun 2026)

If you need to protect your organization from browser-based attacks, AI data leakage, and shadow SaaS, Push Security is the clear choice. If you're a penetration tester or bug bounty hunter looking for an AI-powered Burp extension for OWASP Top 10 scanning with local processing, SILENTCHAIN is the better fit. They address entirely different security domains.

Try SILENTCHAINTry Push Security
SILENTCHAIN
SILENTCHAIN

AI-powered offensive security platform unifying web, code, and network testing with local processing.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security for the AI era: detect and block AI-powered attacks.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
$5/user/month (annual) or monthly per user
Custom
Popularity
5 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
PluginAPIDesktopWeb
Web
Categories
🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Burp Suite extension (Community & Professional)
OWASP Top 10 vulnerability detection
Static code analysis (SOURCE)
Network and infrastructure scanning (Sn1per AI Core)
RAG Knowledge Engine with 80,000+ documents
Cross-product correlation with 10 severity escalation rules
Phase 2 active verification with AI-driven payload generation
WAF detection and evasion for 25+ WAF types
Out-of-band testing (XSS, SSRF, blind injection, RFI, XXE)
250+ curated OWASP payloads
Multi-AI provider support (Ollama, OpenAI, Claude API, Claude Code CLI, Gemini)
Local processing with Ollama (100% offline)
Docker deployment for on-premises use
REST API & CI/CD integration (Enterprise)
SARIF output and advisory reports (Enterprise/SOURCE)
AitM / reverse-proxy phishing detection
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Session hijacking detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent flow blocking
Ghost login discovery (password fallback paths)
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Illicit browser extension detection and blocking
Extension allowlisting with default-deny management
Device code phishing detection
Shadow SaaS discovery and control
Integrations
Burp Suite
Ollama
OpenAI
Claude API
Claude Code CLI
Gemini
Docker
GitHub
SARIF
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Slack
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: SILENTCHAIN vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

SILENTCHAIN

30 mentions across 2 sources · 25% positive — critical

YouTube, GitHub

What users praise

  • • Privacy-first: fully local processing with Ollama for air-gapped environments.
  • • RAG knowledge engine grounds analyses in 80,000+ security docs.
  • • Unified web, code, and network testing in one suite.
  • • Cross-product correlation escalates severity based on corroborating findings.

What frustrates them

  • • Installation issues: not in BApp Store, manual install hangs.
  • • AI request failures with Claude and DeepSeek models.
  • • Zero-findings after configuration causes user frustration.
  • • Steep learning curve requiring advanced security expertise.

Researched Aug 12, 2026

Push Security

36 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Deploys as extension across all major browsers, avoiding enterprise lock-in
  • • Autonomous hunting agents detect and block zero-day threats in real time
  • • Addresses emerging AiTM phishing, ClickFix, and session hijacking attacks
  • • Provides shadow AI discovery and governance, a growing need

What frustrates them

  • • Limited independent reviews and community deployment case studies
  • • Extension-based agent may impact browser performance on low-end devices
  • • Pricing for advanced features likely steep for SMBs
  • • Configuration complexity requires skilled security engineers

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides visibility and control over browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking), AI tool usage, and shadow SaaS — critical for modern enterprise security.

  • Penetration tester / bug bounty hunter
    Pick: SILENTCHAIN

    SILENTCHAIN's Burp extension with multi-provider AI, RAG knowledge base, and local Ollama processing is ideal for OWASP Top 10 detection in web application penetration testing.

  • Identity team hardening MFA/SSO
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's in-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails help enforce identity security across unmanaged devices and browsers.

  • AppSec engineer needing CI/CD integration
    Pick: SILENTCHAIN

    SILENTCHAIN Enterprise offers a standalone scanner with REST API and CI/CD pipeline integration, suitable for automating DAST in DevSecOps.

  • Red team correlating multi-vector findings
    Pick: SILENTCHAIN

    SILENTCHAIN's cross-product correlation engine joins network, web, and code scan results into attack chains with severity escalation — valuable for red teams.

Frequently Asked Questions

SILENTCHAIN vs Push Security: which should you choose?

If you need to protect your organization from browser-based attacks, AI data leakage, and shadow SaaS, Push Security is the clear choice. If you're a penetration tester or bug bounty hunter looking for an AI-powered Burp extension for OWASP Top 10 scanning with local processing, SILENTCHAIN is the better fit. They address entirely different security domains.

Can Push Security detect AI-powered phishing attacks?

Yes, Push detects AiTM phishing, ClickFix, ConsentFix, and session hijacking attacks using browser telemetry.

Is SILENTCHAIN only for Burp Suite users?

Primarily, but the Enterprise edition is a standalone web scanner; SOURCE for static code scanning can be used independently.

Does SILENTCHAIN support local AI processing?

Yes, via Ollama integration for fully air-gapped, privacy-first scanning.

Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?

No, it works across all major browsers via a lightweight extension, with no forced migration.

Can SILENTCHAIN scan mobile apps?

Not explicitly; it focuses on web, API, static code, and network scanning.

What integrations does Push Security offer?

Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake for telemetry and workflows.

What is Phase 2 in SILENTCHAIN?

Phase 2 active verification uses LLM classification and sandboxed exploitation to confirm vulnerabilities and cut false positives.

Does Push Security offer DLP for AI tools?

Yes, it provides in-browser DLP (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time usage control for AI tools.

More SILENTCHAIN or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Explore each tool further

SILENTCHAIN
View SILENTCHAIN reviewSILENTCHAIN alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026