SILENTCHAIN vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-09
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionSILENTCHAINPush Security
Primary Use CaseAI-assisted vulnerability scanning: OWASP Top 10 detection via Burp Suite extensionBrowser security: detect/prevent AiTM phishing, session hijacking, AI data leakage, shadow SaaS
PricingFreemium: Community (open-source free), Professional/Enterprise/SOURCE/Sn1per paid tiersFreemium (cloud SaaS); enterprise tiers unknown
DeploymentLocal/on-prem via Ollama or cloud APIs; Burp extensionCloud-based; requires browser extension per user
AI CapabilitiesMulti-provider AI (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Ollama); RAG with 80k+ security docs; Phase 2 active verificationAgentic threat hunting using browser telemetry; real-time AI tool visibility and DLP
Target AudiencePenetration testers, bug bounty hunters, AppSec engineersSecurity teams, identity teams, SecOps
Latest News FocusAI agent attack surface (MCP), RAG-based scanning, cross-product correlation (Apr 2026)Poisoned tenant attack lessons, AI security compliance, agentic threat hunting (May-Jun 2026)

If you need to protect your organization from browser-based attacks, AI data leakage, and shadow SaaS, Push Security is the clear choice. If you're a penetration tester or bug bounty hunter looking for an AI-powered Burp extension for OWASP Top 10 scanning with local processing, SILENTCHAIN is the better fit. They address entirely different security domains.

Try SILENTCHAINTry Push Security
SILENTCHAIN
SILENTCHAIN

AI pentesting extension for Burp Suite Professional that finds OWASP Top 10 issues and verifies them with proof.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
$0
$199/year
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
6 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
PluginDesktop
Web
Categories
🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Runs as an extension inside Burp Suite Professional
Passive OWASP Top 10 detection with CWE mapping and severity scoring
Phase 2 active verification with AI-guided payload generation
200+ curated OWASP payloads for verification testing
WAF detection and fingerprinting across 24 WAF signatures
Out-of-band testing for XSS, SSRF, blind injection, RFI and XXE
API checks: GraphQL introspection, insecure deserialization, JWT alg:none
API checks: SAML signature stripping, mass assignment, OAuth redirect_uri tampering
Request-header fuzzing for SSRF and proxy headers
Local LLM support via Ollama for air-gapped, offline analysis
Sensitive-data redaction before any cloud AI request
HTML and CSV advisory reports with request/response evidence
Findings emitted as native Burp issues
In-app updates and transferable annual licensing (Professional)
Configurable concurrent payload sends for faster Phase 2 verification
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
Burp Suite Professional
Ollama
Burp AI
OpenAI
Azure OpenAI
Claude
Claude Code
Gemini
OpenRouter
Z.ai
Docker
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: SILENTCHAIN vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

SILENTCHAIN

27 mentions across 2 sources · 45% positive — mixed (averaged across 2 sources)

YouTube, GitHub

What users praise

  • • Unified web, code, and network testing in one platform.
  • • RAG engine with 80,000+ docs reduces false positives.
  • • Local processing via Ollama supports air-gapped environments.
  • • Cross-product correlation escalates severity with 10 rules.

What frustrates them

  • • Extension not found in BApp Store; manual install hangs.
  • • AI requests fail with Claude Opus and DeepSeek models.
  • • Found 0 results despite adding scope; scan coverage questioned.
  • • Pricing for paid tiers is opaque; requires contacting sales.

Researched Aug 27, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides visibility and control over browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking), AI tool usage, and shadow SaaS — critical for modern enterprise security.

  • Penetration tester / bug bounty hunter
    Pick: SILENTCHAIN

    SILENTCHAIN's Burp extension with multi-provider AI, RAG knowledge base, and local Ollama processing is ideal for OWASP Top 10 detection in web application penetration testing.

  • Identity team hardening MFA/SSO
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's in-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails help enforce identity security across unmanaged devices and browsers.

  • AppSec engineer needing CI/CD integration
    Pick: SILENTCHAIN

    SILENTCHAIN Enterprise offers a standalone scanner with REST API and CI/CD pipeline integration, suitable for automating DAST in DevSecOps.

  • Red team correlating multi-vector findings
    Pick: SILENTCHAIN

    SILENTCHAIN's cross-product correlation engine joins network, web, and code scan results into attack chains with severity escalation — valuable for red teams.

Frequently Asked Questions

SILENTCHAIN vs Push Security: which should you choose?

If you need to protect your organization from browser-based attacks, AI data leakage, and shadow SaaS, Push Security is the clear choice. If you're a penetration tester or bug bounty hunter looking for an AI-powered Burp extension for OWASP Top 10 scanning with local processing, SILENTCHAIN is the better fit. They address entirely different security domains.

Can Push Security detect AI-powered phishing attacks?

Yes, Push detects AiTM phishing, ClickFix, ConsentFix, and session hijacking attacks using browser telemetry.

Is SILENTCHAIN only for Burp Suite users?

Primarily, but the Enterprise edition is a standalone web scanner; SOURCE for static code scanning can be used independently.

Does SILENTCHAIN support local AI processing?

Yes, via Ollama integration for fully air-gapped, privacy-first scanning.

Does Push Security require an enterprise browser?

No, it works across all major browsers via a lightweight extension, with no forced migration.

Can SILENTCHAIN scan mobile apps?

Not explicitly; it focuses on web, API, static code, and network scanning.

What integrations does Push Security offer?

Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake for telemetry and workflows.

What is Phase 2 in SILENTCHAIN?

Phase 2 active verification uses LLM classification and sandboxed exploitation to confirm vulnerabilities and cut false positives.

Does Push Security offer DLP for AI tools?

Yes, it provides in-browser DLP (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time usage control for AI tools.

More SILENTCHAIN or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

SILENTCHAIN
View SILENTCHAIN reviewSILENTCHAIN alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026