Agent Vault vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis generated Live tool data as of 2026-10-30
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

Agent Vault or Push Security: which should you choose?

DimensionAgent VaultPush Security
PricingFree/Open-source (self-hosted)Freemium (custom quote for enterprise)
Primary FocusAI agent credential securityBrowser attack & AI tool control
Key FeatureMITM proxy swapping dummy for real credentialsAiTM phishing detection, ClickFix blocking
DeploymentSelf-hosted binary/DockerCloud-based browser extension
Target UserDevelopers/DevOps running AI agentsSecurity/identity teams
Latest NewsNo recent newsAgentic threat hunting benefits all customers (Jul 2026)

Choose Push Security if you need a comprehensive browser security platform to defend against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose Agent Vault if you are a developer who needs an open-source way to prevent credential exfiltration from AI coding agents. They solve different problems—Push secures the human browsing experience, Agent Vault secures machine-to-machine agent calls.

Agent Vault
Agent Vault

Open-source credential broker and MITM proxy that keeps real API keys out of AI agents by substituting dummy tokens in transit.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security extension that stops AiTM phishing and ClickFix and gives you shadow AI visibility

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
Open SourceFree
Enterprise (managed via Infisical)Custom
Standard$5/user/mo
EnterpriseCustom
Popularity
6 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIAPI
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails🔒 Security & Privacy
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Credential broker that substitutes dummy credentials like __anthropic_api_key__ with real secrets
MITM proxy intercepts outbound HTTP and HTTPS traffic from agents on port 14322
Self-hosted deployment via binary or Docker on a separate host
Management UI and API served on port 14321
Bootstrap agent environment with AGENT_VAULT_ADDR, AGENT_VAULT_TOKEN, and AGENT_VAULT_VAULT
HTTPS_PROXY=agent-vault:14322 routing for all agent HTTP traffic
Service rules match the target host and inject the correct credential
Replaces auth headers entirely when reconstructing upstream requests
Mint short-lived tokens from an orchestrator agent construct for ephemeral sandboxes
Works with any HTTP-capable agent via API, CLI, SDK, or MCP
Connection guides for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, and OpenCode
Brokers credentials for LLM providers, GitHub, Stripe, and other HTTP services
Multiple credential stores including Infisical and plaintext
Open source, with the full documentation index published at /llms.txt
Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
ConsentFix and malicious OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Session hijacking, credential attack and URL blocking with custom detection rules
Mail forwarding rule monitoring for Microsoft 365 and Google
Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring, removal and default-deny allowlisting
Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
AI prompt and data-input monitoring, AI clipboard monitoring and blocking, AI file upload monitoring
AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring plus AI usage policy enforcement
Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block, with screenshot capture
Ghost login detection, non-SSO login visibility, MFA guardrails and shared account detection
Integrations
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex
OpenClaw
Hermes Agent
OpenCode
GitHub
Stripe
Infisical
Proofpoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack

Who should pick Agent Vault, and who should pick Push Security?

  • Security team at a mid-size enterprise concerned about AiTM phishing and shadow AI
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security detects and blocks AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking, and provides visibility into employee AI tool use, all without migrating to a proprietary browser.

  • Developer running Claude Code or OpenClaw agents and worried about secret leakage
    Pick: Agent Vault

    Agent Vault's MITM proxy replaces real credentials with dummy ones so agents never hold secrets, directly preventing exfiltration via prompt injection.

  • Identity team hardening MFA adoption and detecting ghost logins
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security offers in-browser MFA registration guardrails and shadow SaaS discovery, helping enforce SSO and uncover unmanaged identities.

  • DevOps team creating ephemeral sandboxed agents for untrusted users
    Pick: Agent Vault

    Agent Vault's agent construct with short-lived tokens is designed for ephemeral sandboxes, and it supports API/CLI/SDK/MCP interfaces for custom harnesses.

  • Compliance officer needing to demonstrate AI tool data leakage prevention
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time AI usage controls, helping meet AI regulations as per its June 2026 news.

Frequently Asked Questions

Agent Vault vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if you need a comprehensive browser security platform to defend against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose Agent Vault if you are a developer who needs an open-source way to prevent credential exfiltration from AI coding agents. They solve different problems—Push secures the human browsing experience, Agent Vault secures machine-to-machine agent calls.

Can Push Security replace my endpoint DLP solution?

No, Push Security focuses on browser-based data loss (clipboard, file uploads to AI tools). It does not cover file system, email, or other endpoints.

Do I need to switch to an enterprise browser to use Push Security?

No, Push Security works as a browser extension on Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, Brave, Opera, Arc, and enterprise browsers like Island.

Can Agent Vault work with any AI agent?

Agent Vault supports agents using API, CLI, SDK, or MCP interfaces. It intercepts outbound HTTP requests, so any agent making HTTP calls can be proxied.

Is Agent Vault a SaaS service?

No, it is self-hosted via binary or Docker on your own infrastructure. It provides a management UI on port 14321 and a MITM proxy on port 14322.

What integrations does Push Security support?

It integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Sentinel, Datadog, Splunk Cloud, SentinelOne, plus webhooks and REST API.

Does Agent Vault require Infisical?

It is built by Infisical and uses Infisical for credential stores, but you can point it at other vaults. It is designed to work with Infisical's infrastructure.

Which tool is easier to set up?

Push Security is easier for non-technical teams—install a browser extension and configure policies via cloud console. Agent Vault requires DevOps skills: deploy a binary or Docker container, configure proxy settings.

Can I use both together?

Yes, they address different layers: Push Security secures the browser session, Agent Vault secures backend agent calls. They are complementary and can be deployed simultaneously.

What else are Agent Vault and Push Security compared with?

Where can you read more about Agent Vault and Push Security?

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: