Agent Vault vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Agent Vault | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free/Open-source (self-hosted) | Freemium (custom quote for enterprise) |
| Primary Focus | AI agent credential security | Browser attack & AI tool control |
| Key Feature | MITM proxy swapping dummy for real credentials | AiTM phishing detection, ClickFix blocking |
| Deployment | Self-hosted binary/Docker | Cloud-based browser extension |
| Target User | Developers/DevOps running AI agents | Security/identity teams |
| Latest News | No recent news | Agentic threat hunting benefits all customers (Jul 2026) |
Choose Push Security if you need a comprehensive browser security platform to defend against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose Agent Vault if you are a developer who needs an open-source way to prevent credential exfiltration from AI coding agents. They solve different problems—Push secures the human browsing experience, Agent Vault secures machine-to-machine agent calls.
Open-source credential broker that stops AI agents from leaking real API keys via prompt injection
Visit Website
Browser-native security that blocks AI-driven phishing and secures AI app usage in the browser.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Agent Vault vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Agent Vault
44 mentions across 4 sources · 69% positive (averaged across 4 sources)
Hacker News, Product Hunt, GitHub, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Prevents credential exfiltration via prompt injection effectively.
- • Open-source and self-hosted with no vendor lock-in.
- • Supports integration with HashiCorp Vault and Bitwarden.
- • Active development with responsive maintainers on GitHub.
What frustrates them
- • MITM setup requires trust in the proxy itself.
- • Only supports HTTP/HTTPS, not other protocols.
- • Setup can be complex for non-developer users.
- • Some features like websocket auth are not yet supported.
Researched Jul 30, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Addresses emerging threats: AI-driven phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing.
- • Works across all major browsers without migrating users.
- • Includes shadow AI app discovery and control for unsanctioned tools.
- • Blocks malicious OAuth consents and session hijacking in real time.
What frustrates them
- • Virtually no independent user feedback or case studies available.
- • Potential browser performance overhead due to constant monitoring.
- • May cause friction with false positives blocking legitimate apps.
- • Advanced features require security expertise to configure properly.
Researched Sep 8, 2026
Who should pick which
- Security team at a mid-size enterprise concerned about AiTM phishing and shadow AIPick: Push Security
Push Security detects and blocks AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking, and provides visibility into employee AI tool use, all without migrating to a proprietary browser.
- Developer running Claude Code or OpenClaw agents and worried about secret leakagePick: Agent Vault
Agent Vault's MITM proxy replaces real credentials with dummy ones so agents never hold secrets, directly preventing exfiltration via prompt injection.
- Identity team hardening MFA adoption and detecting ghost loginsPick: Push Security
Push Security offers in-browser MFA registration guardrails and shadow SaaS discovery, helping enforce SSO and uncover unmanaged identities.
- DevOps team creating ephemeral sandboxed agents for untrusted usersPick: Agent Vault
Agent Vault's agent construct with short-lived tokens is designed for ephemeral sandboxes, and it supports API/CLI/SDK/MCP interfaces for custom harnesses.
- Compliance officer needing to demonstrate AI tool data leakage preventionPick: Push Security
Push Security provides in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) and real-time AI usage controls, helping meet AI regulations as per its June 2026 news.
Frequently Asked Questions
Agent Vault vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Choose Push Security if you need a comprehensive browser security platform to defend against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and shadow AI usage across all browsers. Choose Agent Vault if you are a developer who needs an open-source way to prevent credential exfiltration from AI coding agents. They solve different problems—Push secures the human browsing experience, Agent Vault secures machine-to-machine agent calls.
Can Push Security replace my endpoint DLP solution?
No, Push Security focuses on browser-based data loss (clipboard, file uploads to AI tools). It does not cover file system, email, or other endpoints.
Do I need to switch to an enterprise browser to use Push Security?
No, Push Security works as a browser extension on Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, Brave, Opera, Arc, and enterprise browsers like Island.
Can Agent Vault work with any AI agent?
Agent Vault supports agents using API, CLI, SDK, or MCP interfaces. It intercepts outbound HTTP requests, so any agent making HTTP calls can be proxied.
Is Agent Vault a SaaS service?
No, it is self-hosted via binary or Docker on your own infrastructure. It provides a management UI on port 14321 and a MITM proxy on port 14322.
What integrations does Push Security support?
It integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft Sentinel, Datadog, Splunk Cloud, SentinelOne, plus webhooks and REST API.
Does Agent Vault require Infisical?
It is built by Infisical and uses Infisical for credential stores, but you can point it at other vaults. It is designed to work with Infisical's infrastructure.
Which tool is easier to set up?
Push Security is easier for non-technical teams—install a browser extension and configure policies via cloud console. Agent Vault requires DevOps skills: deploy a binary or Docker container, configure proxy settings.
Can I use both together?
Yes, they address different layers: Push Security secures the browser session, Agent Vault secures backend agent calls. They are complementary and can be deployed simultaneously.
More Agent Vault or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 30, 2026