ContextFort vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-14
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionContextFortPush Security
PricingContact for pricing (likely per-seat or enterprise quote)Freemium (free tier + paid upgrade); exact pricing not disclosed
Best ForSecurity engineers auditing AI coding agent behavior (Cursor/Claude Code) via kernel-level monitoringSecurity teams securing browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix) and AI tool usage across all browsers
Key FeaturesKernel-level file/network/process audit for coding agents, tamper-proof logs, sandboxing, secret leakage detectionBrowser telemetry, AiTM/ClickFix/ConsentFix detection, AI tool DLP, shadow SaaS discovery, agentic threat hunting
Deployment ModelOS-level agent (eBPF/ESF/ETW+Minifilter); supports macOS, Linux, WindowsBrowser extension across all major browsers (multi-browser); cloud-based
Integration BreadthCursor, Claude Code; no SIEM/IdP integrations listedOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest NewsNo recent news captured2026-06-26: Poisoned tenant attack via fake OpenAI org invitation; lessons learned. 2026-06-24: Argues browser controls outperform training for data loss prevention. 2026-06-02: Highlights EDR gaps vs browser-side attacks.

If your primary concern is AI-powered browser attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and shadow AI tool usage, Push Security is the better fit with broader browser support, real-time AI DLP, and integration with existing identity/SIEM platforms. If you need deep kernel-level auditing of AI coding agents like Cursor or Claude Code to prevent secret leakage and ensure compliance, ContextFort is uniquely positioned. Both tools address AI-related security blind spots but at different layers: browser vs OS.

Try ContextFortTry Push Security
ContextFort
ContextFort

OS-level visibility and controls for AI coding agents like Cursor and Claude Code.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser-native security that blocks AI-driven phishing and secures AI app usage in the browser.

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
0 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Desktop
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Kernel-level telemetry via eBPF on Linux
macOS Endpoint Security Framework monitoring
ETW+Minifilter monitoring on Windows
File access logging (reads/writes of .env, credentials, SSH keys, source code)
Network outbound connection monitoring
Process tree tracking
Independent OS-level audit trail
Real-time secret access detection
Alerting on sensitive file access
Cross-platform support (Linux, macOS, Windows)
Sandboxing via OS-level controls
Integration with Cursor and Claude Code workflows
Compliance-ready logs for incident response
Agent self-reported logs replaced with OS-level monitoring
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing page detection and blocking
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent blocking and OAuth app management
Session hijacking detection and response
Credential stuffing detection
Ghost login detection and SSO login guidance
MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
Integrations
Cursor
Claude Code
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: ContextFort vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

ContextFort

7 mentions across 2 sources · 45% positive — mixed (averaged across 2 sources)

Hacker News, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Kernel-level telemetry (eBPF, ESF, ETW) provides OS audit trails.
  • • Independent audit log that AI agents cannot tamper with.
  • • Monitors file access, network calls, and spawned subprocesses.
  • • Catches sensitive data exfiltration in real time.

What frustrates them

  • • No public product or pricing—only a demo booking.
  • • Community feedback is sparse; no real user reviews.
  • • Browser extension permission set is as broad as Claude's.
  • • Blog posts and documentation are all 'Coming Soon.'

Researched Jul 3, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Addresses emerging threats: AI-driven phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing.
  • • Works across all major browsers without migrating users.
  • • Includes shadow AI app discovery and control for unsanctioned tools.
  • • Blocks malicious OAuth consents and session hijacking in real time.

What frustrates them

  • • Virtually no independent user feedback or case studies available.
  • • Potential browser performance overhead due to constant monitoring.
  • • May cause friction with false positives blocking legitimate apps.
  • • Advanced features require security expertise to configure properly.

Researched Sep 8, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team combating AiTM phishing and OAuth attacks
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security directly detects and blocks AiTM, ConsentFix, and malicious OAuth grants, with integrations for SOC workflows.

  • Engineering lead using Cursor/Claude Code and worrying about secret leakage
    Pick: ContextFort

    ContextFort provides kernel-level audit of every file read (including .env, SSH keys) and tamper-proof logs, perfect for auditing agent behavior.

  • Compliance officer needing audit trails for AI coding agent usage
    Pick: ContextFort

    ContextFort's independent, tamper-proof logs meet compliance requirements for incident response and post-mortems.

  • IT leader wanting to control unsanctioned AI tool use across the organization
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security discovers shadow SaaS and enforces AI usage policies (clipboard, file upload) across all browsers.

  • Security operations center wanting automated threat hunting from browser telemetry
    Pick: Push Security

    Push's agentic threat hunting automatically writes detection rules without human intervention, reducing analyst workload.

Frequently Asked Questions

ContextFort vs Push Security: which should you choose?

If your primary concern is AI-powered browser attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and shadow AI tool usage, Push Security is the better fit with broader browser support, real-time AI DLP, and integration with existing identity/SIEM platforms. If you need deep kernel-level auditing of AI coding agents like Cursor or Claude Code to prevent secret leakage and ensure compliance, ContextFort is uniquely positioned. Both tools address AI-related security blind spots but at different layers: browser vs OS.

Do Push Security and ContextFort overlap?

They address different layers: Push secures browser-based attacks and AI tool usage; ContextFort monitors AI coding agent actions at the OS kernel. An enterprise might use both for comprehensive coverage.

Does Push Security require deploying an enterprise browser?

No, Push works as a browser extension on Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc., without forcing a browser swap.

Can ContextFort monitor non-coding AI tools?

No, ContextFort is designed specifically for coding agents like Cursor and Claude Code. For general AI tool usage, Push Security is more appropriate.

Which tools have free tiers?

Push Security offers a freemium model; ContextFort requires contacting sales, implying no free tier.

Do both tools work on Windows?

Push Security works across all browsers on Windows; ContextFort uses ETW+Minifilter on Windows.

How do they handle alerting?

Push Security integrates with Slack, Splunk, Snowflake; ContextFort provides its own alerting but no mentioned SIEM integrations.

Which tool is better for compliance with AI regulations?

Push Security (2026-06-02 news) explicitly ties browser visibility to AI regulation compliance; ContextFort's tamper-proof logs also support compliance but are agent-specific.

Has either tool been compromised?

Push Security published a blog (2026-06-26) about experiencing a poisoned tenant attack and sharing lessons learned. No such news for ContextFort.

More ContextFort or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Explore each tool further

ContextFort
View ContextFort reviewContextFort alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026