Pasteguard vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Pasteguard | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open-source, local-first) | Freemium (free tier limited; paid plans available) |
| Primary Focus | Data privacy proxy for AI chat & coding agents | Browser security & AI visibility for enterprises |
| Deployment | Local-first; Docker, browser extension, API proxy | Cloud-based; browser extension |
| Key Integrations | OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
| Best For | Teams & developers masking PII before cloud AI | Security teams needing browser attack detection & AI usage control |
| Latest News | No recent news | Recent insights on poisoned tenant attacks & AI security maturity |
Choose Push Security if you're an enterprise security team facing browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, shadow AI) and need real-time visibility across all browsers. Choose PasteGuard if you're a developer or small team that simply wants to mask PII before it reaches AI services like ChatGPT or coding agents, with a free, local-first, open-source tool. They target different problems: Push is for defense-in-depth against sophisticated threats; PasteGuard is for privacy compliance in AI usage.

Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Pasteguard vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Pasteguard
38 mentions across 3 sources · 55% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, GitHub
What users praise
- • Free and open-source (Apache 2.0) with a local-first architecture.
- • Automatically detects over 30 types of PII and secrets.
- • Preserves AI context by replacing data with placeholders like [[EMAIL_1]].
- • Supports multiple AI providers: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and coding agents.
What frustrates them
- • Reliability issues: 400 errors with Claude Code and long-context DOMException.
- • Docker startup crashes reported by some users.
- • Limited community support and sparse documentation for integrations.
- • Configuring with LibreChat and other tools requires manual setup.
Researched Aug 1, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
- • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
- • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
- • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.
What frustrates them
- • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
- • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
- • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
- • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.
Researched Aug 26, 2026
Who should pick which
- Enterprise security teamPick: Push Security
Needs detection of sophisticated browser attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and AI governance across all browsers; Push Security provides agentic threat hunting and integrations with SIEM/IdP.
- Developer using coding agents with production secretsPick: Pasteguard
PasteGuard masks API keys, passwords, and PII before they reach Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor; local-first and free.
- Compliance officer enforcing data privacy in AI chatPick: Pasteguard
PasteGuard auto-detects 30+ PII types and replaces them with placeholders, ensuring no sensitive data reaches cloud AI; open-source and auditable.
- Security operations center analystPick: Push Security
Push Security's agentic threat hunting and real-time telemetry provide rapid detection of novel browser-based attacks, integrating with Splunk/Snowflake.
- Solo founder with minimal budgetPick: Pasteguard
Free, easy to deploy via Docker, and covers essential AI privacy needs without enterprise overhead.
Frequently Asked Questions
Pasteguard vs Push Security: which should you choose?
Choose Push Security if you're an enterprise security team facing browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, shadow AI) and need real-time visibility across all browsers. Choose PasteGuard if you're a developer or small team that simply wants to mask PII before it reaches AI services like ChatGPT or coding agents, with a free, local-first, open-source tool. They target different problems: Push is for defense-in-depth against sophisticated threats; PasteGuard is for privacy compliance in AI usage.
Can PasteGuard block sophisticated phishing attacks like AiTM?
No, PasteGuard is not a security tool for attack detection; it only masks PII before it reaches AI providers.
Does Push Security provide PII masking for AI chat?
Push Security offers in-browser DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) but does not auto-mask PII with placeholders like PasteGuard.
Which tool is better for compliance with GDPR?
PasteGuard directly masks PII before sending to AI; Push Security helps with AI usage visibility and controls, both can support compliance depending on needs.
Is PasteGuard truly free?
Yes, PasteGuard is open-source (Apache 2.0) and free to use, with no paid tiers.
Does Push Security require a browser extension on every device?
Yes, Push Security deploys a browser extension across major browsers for telemetry and enforcement.
Can I run PasteGuard fully offline?
No, PasteGuard routes masked data to cloud AI; but in Route mode, sensitive requests can go to a local LLM.
Which tool integrates with coding agents like Cursor?
PasteGuard has explicit support for env file masking and an API proxy compatible with Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf.
Does Push Security detect shadow SaaS?
Yes, Push Security detects ghost logins and shadow SaaS via browser telemetry.
More Pasteguard or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026
