HomeToolsPlan StackBest ForCompare
RightAIChoice
CompareBlog
Submit a ToolSign inSign upPlan Your Stack
HomeComparePasteguard vs Push Security

Pasteguard vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-06
Reviewed by our team on 2026-07-03
Saved

At a glance

DimensionPasteguardPush Security
Pricingfreefreemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Best forTeams handling sensitive client or customer data in AI chat, Developers using coding agents with production credentialsSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresAuto-detect over 30 PII types (names, emails, credit cards, API keys, passwords, JWTs, etc.) · Replace sensitive data with placeholders ([[PERSON_1]], [[EMAIL_1]], etc.) · Restore placeholders in AI responses where supportedAdversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score77/10095/100
APIYesYes

Pasteguard is the stronger pick for teams handling sensitive client or customer data in ai chat; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-06.

Pasteguard
Pasteguard

Mask private data before it reaches AI providers

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
—
$5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Custom
Popularity
0 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
PluginAPICLI
WebPlugin
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Auto-detect over 30 PII types (names, emails, credit cards, API keys, passwords, JWTs, etc.)
Replace sensitive data with placeholders ([[PERSON_1]], [[EMAIL_1]], etc.)
Restore placeholders in AI responses where supported
Browser extension for ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini (experimental)
HTTP API proxy for apps and SDKs (OpenAI/Anthropic compatible)
ENV file masking for coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf)
Local-first architecture (no telemetry, cloud-independent)
Self-hostable via Docker (single command)
Live dashboard with request stats (scan time, masked count, model, language)
Mask mode and Route mode (local LLM for sensitive requests)
Open-source and auditable (Apache 2.0 license, GitHub repo)
Cross-platform (macOS, Linux, Windows via Docker)
Keyboard shortcut (⌘⇧K) to mask selected text manually
Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other Chromium browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google Gemini
Codex
Claude Code
Cursor
Windsurf
ChatGPT
Claude
Okta
Azure AD
Google Workspace
Slack
Splunk
Snowflake

Who should pick which

  • Enterprise security team
    Pick: Push Security

    Needs detection of sophisticated browser attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and AI governance across all browsers; Push Security provides agentic threat hunting and integrations with SIEM/IdP.

  • Developer using coding agents with production secrets
    Pick: Pasteguard

    PasteGuard masks API keys, passwords, and PII before they reach Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor; local-first and free.

  • Compliance officer enforcing data privacy in AI chat
    Pick: Pasteguard

    PasteGuard auto-detects 30+ PII types and replaces them with placeholders, ensuring no sensitive data reaches cloud AI; open-source and auditable.

  • Security operations center analyst
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's agentic threat hunting and real-time telemetry provide rapid detection of novel browser-based attacks, integrating with Splunk/Snowflake.

  • Solo founder with minimal budget
    Pick: Pasteguard

    Free, easy to deploy via Docker, and covers essential AI privacy needs without enterprise overhead.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pasteguard or Push Security?

The best choice between Pasteguard and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Pasteguard and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Pasteguard or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Pasteguard or Push Security comparisons

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Pasteguard
View Pasteguard reviewPasteguard alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

RightAIChoice

The decision-making engine for discovering AI tools.

One AI tool every Friday

A 60-second editorial pick. No filler, no funnel — unsubscribe anytime.

Product

  • Browse tools
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Plan my stack
  • Find my AI tool
  • AI chat
  • Compare
  • Submit your tool

Resources

  • Best AI guides
  • Stacks
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Viability scoring

Company

  • About
  • Team
  • Press & brand kit
  • Contact

Your account

  • Dashboard
  • Saved tools
  • Settings
  • Sign in
  • Create account

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Affiliate disclosure
  • Unsubscribe

© 2026 RightAIChoice. All rights reserved.

Built for the AI community.