ElevenAgents Guardrails vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionElevenAgents GuardrailsPush Security
PricingFree tier + paid plans (undisclosed pricing)Free tier + paid plans (undisclosed pricing)
Primary Use CaseVoice agent safety: prompt injection, policy enforcementBrowser security against AiTM, session hijacking, AI data leakage
Key DifferentiatorThree-layer guardrails (Focus, Manipulation, Content) for voice agentsAutonomous threat hunting via browser telemetry, no enterprise browser needed
IntegrationsTwilio, Exotel, SIP trunk, Slack, WhatsApp, OAuth, mTLSOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest News Impact2026-06-30: Procedures feature announced for multi-step workflows2026-06-24: SANS AI security maturity model; agentic threat hunting pipeline
Target BuyerEnterprise voice agent deployers, compliance officersSecurity teams, identity teams, SecOps

Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, AI data leaks) across any browser. Choose ElevenAgents Guardrails if you deploy voice agents and need real-time prompt injection protection and policy enforcement. They solve completely different problems.

Try ElevenAgents GuardrailsTry Push Security
ElevenAgents Guardrails
ElevenAgents Guardrails

ElevenAgents Guardrails enforces real-time guardrails for prompt injection, unsafe replies, and custom policy on voice agents

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$6/mo
$22/mo
$99/mo
$299/mo
$990/mo
Custom
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
6 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebAPI
Web
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails☎️ Voice AI Agents & Phone Automation
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Focus Guardrail reinforces the system prompt to stop agent drift in long calls
Manipulation Guardrails detect prompt injection and instruction-override attempts in caller input
Manipulation Guardrails can terminate conversations judged a security risk
Content Guardrails screen every agent reply across multiple sensitive-content categories
Tunable content sensitivity levels per category
Custom Guardrails define domain-specific policy in natural language
Lightweight policy model evaluates each response and returns block or allow
Policy evaluation runs independently and in parallel with response generation
Execution modes: run alongside the response, or hold until fully cleared
Exit strategies on trigger: end call, transfer agent, escalate to human, or retry with corrections
Per-agent configuration with each guardrail individually enabled or disabled
Conversation analytics log every trigger, which guardrail fired, and the action taken
Conversation history redaction of transcripts, recordings, and webhook payloads (enterprise)
Entity-level redaction granularity, e.g. last names only or payment card numbers only (enterprise)
Zero Retention Mode for stricter compliance postures (enterprise)
Real-time AiTM reverse-proxy phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser and Browser-in-the-Middle detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection that catches token theft bypassing MFA and passkeys
OAuth consent monitoring, consent blocking and app removal
Session hijacking and credential attack detection
Malicious browser extension detection, risk scoring and default-deny allowlisting
Extension supply chain change monitoring for ownership transfers and permission escalations
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection for Comet, Atlas and Dia
AI prompt and data-input monitoring with AI clipboard monitoring and blocking
AI file upload monitoring plus AI OAuth and agent permission monitoring
AI usage policy enforcement that blocks unsanctioned tools
Autonomous threat hunting agents that write detection rules and deploy blocks
Configurable response modes per control: monitor, warn or block
Browser DLP with file download, upload and clipboard telemetry and blocking
Integrations
Twilio
Slack
WhatsApp
Proofpoint
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne

Who should pick which

  • Security team at a mid-size company
    Pick: Push Security

    They need visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and AI data leakage, all from one platform.

  • Voice agent developer at a contact center
    Pick: ElevenAgents Guardrails

    They need to prevent prompt injection and ensure compliance in real-time voice conversations using ElevenLabs.

  • Compliance officer overseeing AI tool usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides in-browser DLP and AI tool inventory to enforce data loss policies across browsers.

  • Sales team using voice agents for outbound calls
    Pick: ElevenAgents Guardrails

    Guardrails keep brand messaging consistent and block manipulation attempts during live calls.

Frequently Asked Questions

ElevenAgents Guardrails vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, AI data leaks) across any browser. Choose ElevenAgents Guardrails if you deploy voice agents and need real-time prompt injection protection and policy enforcement. They solve completely different problems.

Can Push Security detect prompt injection in AI tools?

Indirectly—Push monitors clipboard, file uploads, and OAuth grants to prevent data leakage to AI tools, but it does not analyze AI interactions for injection attacks like ElevenAgents does.

Does ElevenAgents Guardrails require ElevenLabs voice agent platform?

Yes, it is specifically designed for voice agents built on ElevenLabs. It does not work with other AI agent platforms.

Which tool is better for a zero-trust browser environment?

Push Security, because it works across all browsers and provides visibility into unmanaged identities and shadow SaaS without requiring an enterprise browser.

Can both tools be used together?

They solve different attack surfaces. An organization could use Push for browser security and ElevenAgents for voice agent safety, if they use ElevenLabs.

What integrations does Push Security offer that ElevenAgents doesn't?

Push integrates with identity providers (Okta, Azure AD) and SIEM (Splunk, Snowflake). ElevenAgents focuses on telephony and messaging integrations.

Does ElevenAgents Guardrails have a free tier?

Yes, both tools have freemium models. ElevenAgents' free tier is likely limited in call minutes or guardrail configurations.

Which tool is more mature according to latest news?

Push Security recently published a SANS AI security maturity model and an attack matrix, indicating thought leadership. ElevenAgents added Procedures (multi-step workflows) in June 2026, showing active development.

More ElevenAgents Guardrails or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

ElevenAgents Guardrails
View ElevenAgents Guardrails reviewElevenAgents Guardrails alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI AI Governance & Guardrails toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Voice AI Agents & Phone Automation toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026