EdgeTrace vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | EdgeTrace | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact for pricing | Freemium |
| Primary Use Case | AI video intelligence for public safety | Browser security for AI era |
| Key Feature | Natural language video search across cameras | Detects AiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking |
| Deployment | On-premise or air-gapped | Cloud-based (browser extension) |
| Integrations | Genetec, Milestone, Avigilon, S3 | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk |
| Target Audience | Law enforcement, public safety agencies | Security teams, identity teams, SOC |
If your priority is securing browsers against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and data leakage to AI tools, Push Security is the clear choice — it addresses modern identity and browser threats. If you need natural language search across public safety camera networks with on-premise deployment, EdgeTrace is purpose-built for that vertical. They serve entirely different domains, so your selection depends on whether you're protecting digital identities or investigating physical incidents.
Who should pick which
- SOC AnalystPick: Push Security
Needs to detect and block AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth apps in real-time; Push provides agentic threat hunting and browser telemetry.
- Detective/InvestigatorPick: EdgeTrace
Needs to search hours of camera footage with natural language queries and get ranked results quickly; EdgeTrace's cross-camera search and chain-of-custody exports are ideal.
- Identity Security ManagerPick: Push Security
Wants to enforce MFA/SSO adoption and detect ghost logins; Push's in-browser guardrails and shadow SaaS discovery fit this need.
- Public Safety RTCC AnalystPick: EdgeTrace
Monitors live camera feeds; EdgeTrace's live behavior alerts in plain English and mobile push notifications enable quick response.
- Security Team LeadPick: Push Security
Needs to secure AI tool usage and prevent data leakage; Push offers AI visibility, DLP controls, and real-time policy enforcement.
Frequently Asked Questions
EdgeTrace vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If your priority is securing browsers against AI-powered phishing, session hijacking, and data leakage to AI tools, Push Security is the clear choice — it addresses modern identity and browser threats. If you need natural language search across public safety camera networks with on-premise deployment, EdgeTrace is purpose-built for that vertical. They serve entirely different domains, so your selection depends on whether you're protecting digital identities or investigating physical incidents.
Do Push Security and EdgeTrace compete directly?
No. Push focuses on browser security (cyber), EdgeTrace on video surveillance (physical security). Their features, integrations, and target users are completely different.
Can Push Security work without a browser extension?
No, it requires a browser extension to collect telemetry and enforce controls. If your environment blocks extensions, Push is not suitable.
Does EdgeTrace require cloud connectivity?
No. EdgeTrace supports on-premise deployment, including air-gapped networks, ensuring footage never leaves the agency's network.
Which tool has better integration with identity providers?
Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, and Slack. EdgeTrace integrates with VMS systems like Genetec, Milestone, and Avigilon.
Is there a free trial for either tool?
Push Security offers a freemium plan. EdgeTrace requires contacting sales for pricing and likely a demo.
Can EdgeTrace search footage from multiple cameras simultaneously?
Yes, it supports cross-camera queries and can search 30 days of footage in under 2 seconds.
Does Push Security detect attacks other than browser-based?
It specializes in browser-based attacks like AiTM phishing, session hijacking, OAuth abuse, and credential theft. It does not cover endpoint DLP beyond browser data.
What recent news is relevant for Push Security?
In June 2026, Push detailed a poisoned tenant attack they experienced and argued for browser controls over training for data loss prevention.
More EdgeTrace or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026