Antigen vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-09
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionAntigenPush Security
PricingContact sales (custom pricing)Freemium (free tier available, paid for advanced features)
Best ForAutomated pen testing, attack surface mapping, shift-left SASTBrowser security, AI tool control, identity hardening
Core ProtectionSQLi, SSRF, JWT confusion, priority-scored vulnerabilitiesAiTM, ClickFix, session hijacking, OAuth phishing, AI data loss
DeploymentCloud-based agents targeting your production endpointsCloud-based browser extension or agent
IntegrationsGitHub, Linear, AWS, GCP, Kubernetes, VercelOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Latest NewsNo recent news capturedMultiple 2026 articles on AI security maturity and poisoned tenant attacks

Choose Push Security if your primary anxiety is browser-driven attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, AI tool data leakage) and you need real-time control across unmanaged identities and SaaS. Choose Antigen if your focus is continuous, automated penetration testing of your production attack surface with actionable, developer-friendly findings. They solve different problems—one protects the browser endpoint, the other probes your cloud infrastructure.

Try AntigenTry Push Security
Antigen
Antigen

Antigen runs AI continuous pentesting that maps, exploits, and helps fix your live attack surface.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Paid
Plans
—
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebAPICLI
Web
Categories
🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
tCell offensive agent runs continuous pentests against live production infrastructure
Chains isolated weaknesses into working attack paths that reach sensitive data
Attaches a reproducible exploit to every vulnerability finding
Auto-opens pull requests with patches for engineer review before anything merges
Verification loop reattempts the original exploit after each fix deploys
Infrastructure Graph maps exposed cloud, identity, source control, and automation
Real-time vulnerability board tracks Discover, Remediate, and Verified states
Dedicated security researcher reviews every vulnerability before it reaches you
Office hours with researchers for live finding walkthroughs
Managed deployment with zero data retention and policy-governed controls
Self-hosted workers run inside your private network and keep artifacts on your systems
Deploys on AWS, Azure, GCP, or Kubernetes
SDK for building custom internal tools and working with the Asset Map
Hooks trigger the next lifecycle step when status or assignment changes
SAML/IdP single sign-on through your existing identity provider
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
AWS
Azure
GCP
Kubernetes
Vercel
Railway
Astro
GitHub
GitLab
Linear
Jira
Okta
Clerk
Supabase
Tailscale
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
Slack
REST API

What real users say: Antigen vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Antigen

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Jul 3, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Antigen”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team worried about browser-based phishing and AI data leakage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security directly detects and blocks AiTM, ClickFix, and OAuth attacks, plus controls AI tool data flows—features Antigen doesn't address.

  • DevOps team needing continuous, automated pentesting of production infrastructure
    Pick: Antigen

    Antigen's nightly scans of endpoints, SAST integration, and developer-friendly findings match DevOps workflows better than Push's browser focus.

  • Compliance officer requiring auditable vulnerability evidence and monthly human validation
    Pick: Antigen

    Antigen provides reproduction steps, exploitability scoring, and monthly red team reports—ideal for compliance audits.

  • Identity team hardening MFA/SSO adoption and detecting shadow SaaS
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's in-browser MFA guardrails and ghost login detection directly support identity security goals.

  • Security leader seeking zero-cost starting point for browser security
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security's freemium model allows trialing core browser protection without initial investment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antigen vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Choose Push Security if your primary anxiety is browser-driven attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, AI tool data leakage) and you need real-time control across unmanaged identities and SaaS. Choose Antigen if your focus is continuous, automated penetration testing of your production attack surface with actionable, developer-friendly findings. They solve different problems—one protects the browser endpoint, the other probes your cloud infrastructure.

Do Push Security and Antigen overlap in functionality?

Minimally. Push focuses on browser-based attacks and AI data control; Antigen focuses on infrastructure and application pen testing. They are complementary.

Which tool is better for protecting against AI-powered phishing?

Push Security, as it specifically detects AiTM, ClickFix, and ConsentFix attacks—common in AI-driven phishing campaigns.

Does Antigen scan the same attack surface as Push?

No. Antigen scans your production infrastructure (cloud services, endpoints, APIs) for vulnerabilities. Push monitors browser telemetry on endpoints to detect threats in real time.

Can I use Push Security without deploying an enterprise browser?

Yes. Push works as a browser extension or agent on existing browsers (Chrome, Edge, etc.).

Does Antigen require any changes to my development workflow?

It integrates via GitHub Action for SAST checks in pull requests, fitting into existing CI/CD pipelines.

Which tool offers a free tier?

Push Security has a freemium model with a free tier. Antigen does not—pricing is custom via sales.

Can Antigen detect OAuth attacks?

No, that's outside its scope. Push Security detects malicious OAuth integrations and identity-based attacks.

Which tool is better for compliance?

Antigen provides evidence, reproduction steps, and monthly human validation—strong for compliance audits. Push helps with AI compliance (as noted in its June 2026 article on AI regulation).

More Antigen or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

Antigen
View Antigen reviewAntigen alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026