Council vs Push Security

Push Security focuses on browser-based threat detection and control: it detects AiTM proxies, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking, and suspicious OAuth grants, while also providing AI visibility by tracking which AI tools employees use and what data they share. It can extend protection to unmanaged devices and Chromebooks without endpoint agents, and includes data loss prevention for clipboard, file uploads, and sensitive data submission. Council, by contrast, is a research tool: it lets you ask multiple LLMs the same question, streams answers side by side, then subjects each answer to blind peer critique from other models. It provides a divergence score (0–100) to quantify disagreement, allows a bounded debate round, highlights outlier responses, and logs decisions in a journal. Council supports vision (image attachment) and document reading (.md/.txt), and offers cost estimation with spend alerts. Push Security's feature set is defensive and operational, while Council's is analytical and deliberative.

Push Security uses contact-based pricing typical of enterprise security tools; costs are undisclosed and likely scale with deployment size, making it unsuitable for small teams or personal use without a budget. Council is free to download, but users must supply their own API keys for LLMs like Claude, GPT, and Gemini, meaning you pay per usage directly to providers. This makes Council very accessible for individuals who already have API keys or are willing to set them up, but users without keys cannot use the app. Push Security's pricing model targets organizations with dedicated security budgets, while Council's 'free + bring your own key' model appeals to power users who want control over costs and privacy.