Skills vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-09
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionSkillsPush Security
PricingContact salesFreemium
DeploymentOn-premise, private cloud, air-gappedCloud-based (SaaS)
Primary FocusAutonomous SOC agents for incident responseBrowser security & AI tool control
Key AI FeatureAuto-nomous agents with chain-of-thought auditAgentic threat hunting, AI tool visibility
Best ForEnterprise SOC teams needing 24/7 autonomous responseSecurity teams needing browser attack visibility
IntegrationsSlack, TeamsOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake

For visibility into browser-based AI attacks and AI tool governance with immediate free start, choose Push Security. For a fully air-gapped, custom-runbook autonomous SOC agent platform with on-premise deployment, choose Skills. Both are complementary — Push secures the browser perimeter, Skills automates internal response.

Skills
Skills

Enterprise security agents that run where your data lives, with full observability and variable autonomy.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser-native security that blocks AI-driven phishing and secures AI app usage in the browser.

Visit Website
Pricing
Contact Sales
Freemium
Plans
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
3 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
Web
Categories
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
On-premise, private cloud, or air-gapped deployment
Secure proxy architecture with no credentials on the agent
Full chain-of-thought logging and audit trail
Autonomy levels: Inform, In-the-Loop, Above-the-Loop, Autonomous
Incident response agent: triage, correlate, isolate hosts, write timeline
Vulnerability management agent: prioritize CVEs by asset, reachability, exploit availability
Supply chain security agent: inspects dependencies, signing chains, build provenance
Phishing response agent: detonates URLs/attachments, sweeps mail tenant
BEC agent: monitors tenant-rule changes, MFA bypass, finance-routing manipulation
Identity threat response agent: ingests IdP, UEBA, EDR signals to revoke sessions
MFA fatigue response agent: detects push-bombing, blocks auth, walks user through reset
Privileged account misuse review with role baseline comparison
Over-permissioned user audit with least-privilege recommendations
Cloud access key compromise: rotate leaked keys, identify blast radius, re-issue scoped keys
Slack and Teams notifications via Inform/In-the-Loop workflows
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking in the browser
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing page detection and blocking
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent blocking and OAuth app management
Session hijacking detection and response
Credential stuffing detection
Ghost login detection and SSO login guidance
MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
Integrations
Slack
Teams
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
REST API

What real users say: Skills vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Skills

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Jul 6, 2026 and found posts matching the name “Skills”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 30% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • Addresses emerging threats: AI-driven phishing, ClickFix, device code phishing.
  • Works across all major browsers without migrating users.
  • Includes shadow AI app discovery and control for unsanctioned tools.
  • Blocks malicious OAuth consents and session hijacking in real time.

What frustrates them

  • Virtually no independent user feedback or case studies available.
  • Potential browser performance overhead due to constant monitoring.
  • May cause friction with false positives blocking legitimate apps.
  • Advanced features require security expertise to configure properly.

Researched Sep 8, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team facing AI-powered phishing attacks
    Pick: Push Security

    Push detects and blocks AiTM, ClickFix, ConsentFix, and session hijacking directly in the browser, with agentic threat hunting to automate response.

  • Enterprise SOC overwhelmed by alerts
    Pick: Skills

    Skills provides autonomous agents for incident response, vulnerability management, etc., with customizable runbooks and 24/7 coverage, reducing alert fatigue.

  • Org needing to control employee AI tool usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push offers real-time AI tool visibility, usage controls, and in-browser DLP for clipboard and file uploads, preventing data leakage to LLMs.

  • Organization with strict data residency requirements
    Pick: Skills

    Skills deploys on-premise, in private cloud, or air-gapped, ensuring sensitive telemetry never leaves the environment—ideal for compliance.

  • Team evaluating browser security with no upfront cost
    Pick: Push Security

    Push has a freemium tier, enabling immediate deployment and testing without financial commitment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Skills vs Push Security: which should you choose?

For visibility into browser-based AI attacks and AI tool governance with immediate free start, choose Push Security. For a fully air-gapped, custom-runbook autonomous SOC agent platform with on-premise deployment, choose Skills. Both are complementary — Push secures the browser perimeter, Skills automates internal response.

Can Skills run in the cloud?

Yes, Skills supports private cloud deployment, but also on-premise and air-gapped options for maximum control.

Does Push Security require a proprietary browser?

No, Push works with Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and others via a browser extension, without forcing migration to an enterprise browser.

Can I bring my own LLM to Skills?

Yes, Skills is model-agnostic and supports bring your own LLM (BYOLLM).

What integrations does Push Security support?

Push integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, and Snowflake.

Is Skills suitable for smaller teams?

Not really — Skills is designed for enterprise SOC teams with dedicated security operations; it requires engagement with forward-deployed engineers.

Does Push Security offer on-premise deployment?

No, Push is cloud-based (SaaS) only.

Can Skills handle phishing response?

Yes, Skills includes specialized agents for phishing and BEC response, with full audit trails.

Does Push Security provide DLP for AI tools?

Yes, it offers in-browser DLP for AI tools, controlling clipboard and file uploads to prevent data leakage.

More Skills or Push Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 6, 2026