Skills vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Skills or Push Security: which should you choose?
| Dimension | Skills | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact sales | Freemium |
| Deployment | On-premise, private cloud, air-gapped | Cloud-based (SaaS) |
| Primary Focus | Autonomous SOC agents for incident response | Browser security & AI tool control |
| Key AI Feature | Auto-nomous agents with chain-of-thought audit | Agentic threat hunting, AI tool visibility |
| Best For | Enterprise SOC teams needing 24/7 autonomous response | Security teams needing browser attack visibility |
| Integrations | Slack, Teams | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
For visibility into browser-based AI attacks and AI tool governance with immediate free start, choose Push Security. For a fully air-gapped, custom-runbook autonomous SOC agent platform with on-premise deployment, choose Skills. Both are complementary — Push secures the browser perimeter, Skills automates internal response.

Ghost Security deploys a virtual team of security agents inside your perimeter with three-level autonomy controls.
Visit Website
Browser security extension that stops AiTM phishing and ClickFix and gives you shadow AI visibility
Visit WebsiteWho should pick Skills, and who should pick Push Security?
- Security team facing AI-powered phishing attacksPick: Push Security
Push detects and blocks AiTM, ClickFix, ConsentFix, and session hijacking directly in the browser, with agentic threat hunting to automate response.
- Enterprise SOC overwhelmed by alertsPick: Skills
Skills provides autonomous agents for incident response, vulnerability management, etc., with customizable runbooks and 24/7 coverage, reducing alert fatigue.
- Org needing to control employee AI tool usagePick: Push Security
Push offers real-time AI tool visibility, usage controls, and in-browser DLP for clipboard and file uploads, preventing data leakage to LLMs.
- Organization with strict data residency requirementsPick: Skills
Skills deploys on-premise, in private cloud, or air-gapped, ensuring sensitive telemetry never leaves the environment—ideal for compliance.
- Team evaluating browser security with no upfront costPick: Push Security
Push has a freemium tier, enabling immediate deployment and testing without financial commitment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Skills vs Push Security: which should you choose?
For visibility into browser-based AI attacks and AI tool governance with immediate free start, choose Push Security. For a fully air-gapped, custom-runbook autonomous SOC agent platform with on-premise deployment, choose Skills. Both are complementary — Push secures the browser perimeter, Skills automates internal response.
Can Skills run in the cloud?
Yes, Skills supports private cloud deployment, but also on-premise and air-gapped options for maximum control.
Does Push Security require a proprietary browser?
No, Push works with Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and others via a browser extension, without forcing migration to an enterprise browser.
Can I bring my own LLM to Skills?
Yes, Skills is model-agnostic and supports bring your own LLM (BYOLLM).
What integrations does Push Security support?
Push integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, and Snowflake.
Is Skills suitable for smaller teams?
Not really — Skills is designed for enterprise SOC teams with dedicated security operations; it requires engagement with forward-deployed engineers.
Does Push Security offer on-premise deployment?
No, Push is cloud-based (SaaS) only.
Can Skills handle phishing response?
Yes, Skills includes specialized agents for phishing and BEC response, with full audit trails.
Does Push Security provide DLP for AI tools?
Yes, it offers in-browser DLP for AI tools, controlling clipboard and file uploads to prevent data leakage.
What else are Skills and Push Security compared with?
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Where can you read more about Skills and Push Security?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: