Mcp Scanner vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Mcp Scanner | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open-source) | Freemium |
| Primary Focus | MCP server vulnerability scanning for AI agent supply chain | Browser-based security (AiTM, session hijacking, AI tool control) |
| Deployment | Command-line tool (self-hosted) | Cloud-based (browser extension) |
| Target Users | AI security engineers, DevSecOps, LLM developers | Security teams, identity teams, SOC |
| Key Threat Coverage | Tool poisoning, rug pulls, over-privileged permissions, malicious code in MCP servers | AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, malicious OAuth, data leakage to AI tools |
| Integrations | CI/CD pipelines (general), none listed | Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake |
If your primary concern is securing browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and controlling employee AI tool usage, Push Security is the comprehensive platform. If you are developing or deploying AI agents that rely on MCP servers and need to vet them for supply chain vulnerabilities, Mcp Scanner is the specialized free tool. They address different attack surfaces, so the choice depends on your immediate risk: browser or agentic supply chain.
Open-source MCP Scanner audits Model Context Protocol servers for tool poisoning, rug pulls, and over-privileged permissions before they
Visit Website
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Mcp Scanner vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Mcp Scanner
47 mentions across 5 sources · 70% positive (averaged across 5 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Specifically designed to detect MCP server supply chain vulnerabilities.
- • Open-source and free with no hidden costs.
- • Three scanning engines: Yara, LLM-as-judge, and Cisco AI Defense.
- • Detects tool poisoning, rug pull, and over-privileged permissions.
What frustrates them
- • Virtually no community reviews or real-world usage reports.
- • Dependence on external APIs for full LLM scanning capabilities.
- • Tool effectiveness tied to still-evolving MCP standard.
- • Potential for high false positives from LLM analysis.
Researched Jul 6, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
What frustrates them
- • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Who should pick which
- SOC analyst combating AiTM phishingPick: Push Security
Push detects and blocks AiTM attacks in real time, integrates with SIEMs like Splunk, and provides agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry.
- AI security engineer vetting MCP serversPick: Mcp Scanner
MCP Scanner is purpose-built to detect malicious code, tool poisoning, and rug pulls in MCP servers, with engines like Yara and LLM-as-judge.
- DevSecOps integrating agent security into CI/CDPick: Mcp Scanner
MCP Scanner offers CI/CD pipeline integration and is open-source, allowing automated scanning during build phases.
- IT admin securing employee AI tool usagePick: Push Security
Push provides real-time visibility and DLP controls for AI tools, preventing data leakage via clipboard and file uploads, and supports major identity providers.
- Security architect in a cloud-only organizationPick: Push Security
Push is cloud-based and works across all major browsers without requiring enterprise browser migration, ideal for cloud-native environments.
Frequently Asked Questions
Mcp Scanner vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If your primary concern is securing browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and controlling employee AI tool usage, Push Security is the comprehensive platform. If you are developing or deploying AI agents that rely on MCP servers and need to vet them for supply chain vulnerabilities, Mcp Scanner is the specialized free tool. They address different attack surfaces, so the choice depends on your immediate risk: browser or agentic supply chain.
Can Push Security detect MCP server vulnerabilities?
No. Push Security focuses on browser-based threats and AI tool usage control, not MCP server scanning. For MCP vulnerabilities, use Mcp Scanner.
Is Mcp Scanner a cloud-based service?
No. Mcp Scanner is a command-line tool that you run locally or in CI/CD. It is not a managed cloud service.
Does Push Security require installing an enterprise browser?
No. It works as a browser extension on Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and others, without replacing the browser.
Can Mcp Scanner scan all types of MCP servers?
It supports multiple MCP server types, but specific compatibility list is not provided. It is open-source and extensible.
Which tool is cheaper?
Mcp Scanner is entirely free and open-source. Push Security has a freemium model but likely charges for advanced features.
Do these tools compete or complement each other?
They are complementary. Push secures browser endpoints against attacks like AiTM and data leakage to AI tools; Mcp Scanner secures the MCP server supply chain for AI agents. A comprehensive security stack could use both.
More Mcp Scanner or Push Security comparisons
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 6, 2026