Mcp Scanner vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-17
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionMcp ScannerPush Security
Pricingfree · from Open Source $0freemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Best forAI security engineers vetting MCP servers, DevSecOps teams integrating security into CI/CDSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresScan MCP servers for vulnerabilities · Detect tool poisoning attacks · Identify rug pull risksAdversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score87/10095/100
APINoYes

Mcp Scanner is the stronger pick for ai security engineers vetting mcp servers; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-17.

Mcp Scanner
Mcp Scanner

Open-source tool to scan MCP servers for vulnerabilities in the AI agent supply chain.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
$0
$5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Custom
Popularity
1 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLI
WebPlugin
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Scan MCP servers for vulnerabilities
Detect tool poisoning attacks
Identify rug pull risks
Audit over-privileged tool permissions
Assess supply chain vulnerabilities
Provide security reports
Integrate with CI/CD pipelines
Open-source codebase
Supports multiple MCP server types
Command-line interface
Leverages Yara, LLM-as-judge, Cisco AI Defense engines
Contextual and semantic analysis of tool definitions
Flexible authentication options
Customizable SDK
Standalone or complementary to Cisco AI Defense
Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other Chromium browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
Okta
Azure AD
Google Workspace
Slack
Splunk
Snowflake

Who should pick which

  • SOC analyst combating AiTM phishing
    Pick: Push Security

    Push detects and blocks AiTM attacks in real time, integrates with SIEMs like Splunk, and provides agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry.

  • AI security engineer vetting MCP servers
    Pick: Mcp Scanner

    MCP Scanner is purpose-built to detect malicious code, tool poisoning, and rug pulls in MCP servers, with engines like Yara and LLM-as-judge.

  • DevSecOps integrating agent security into CI/CD
    Pick: Mcp Scanner

    MCP Scanner offers CI/CD pipeline integration and is open-source, allowing automated scanning during build phases.

  • IT admin securing employee AI tool usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time visibility and DLP controls for AI tools, preventing data leakage via clipboard and file uploads, and supports major identity providers.

  • Security architect in a cloud-only organization
    Pick: Push Security

    Push is cloud-based and works across all major browsers without requiring enterprise browser migration, ideal for cloud-native environments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Mcp Scanner or Push Security?

The best choice between Mcp Scanner and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Mcp Scanner and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Mcp Scanner or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Mcp Scanner or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Mcp Scanner
View Mcp Scanner reviewMcp Scanner alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.