Agentsh vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-17
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionAgentshPush Security
Pricingfree · from Open Source (self-hosted) $0freemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Best forDevelopers building autonomous AI agents in production and needing deterministic security, Security engineers enforcing runtime policy beyond prompt guardrailsSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresExecution-layer security: intercepts file, network, and process syscalls at runtime · Prompt-proof enforcement: overrides any agent prompt, tool output, or jailbreak · Full audit log with subprocess tree visibilityAdversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score69/10095/100
APINoYes

Agentsh is the stronger pick for developers building autonomous ai agents in production and needing deterministic security; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-17.

Agentsh
Agentsh

Execution-layer security gateway that enforces syscall policy on AI agents at runtime.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Plans
$0
$5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Custom
Popularity
1 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLI
WebPlugin
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy🤖 Automation & Agents
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Execution-layer security: intercepts file, network, and process syscalls at runtime
Prompt-proof enforcement: overrides any agent prompt, tool output, or jailbreak
Full audit log with subprocess tree visibility
Approval gates: risky operations require human or CI confirmation
Policy engine: allow, deny, approve, redirect, audit, soft_delete actions
Drop-in deployment: shim between agent harness and OS, no code changes
Subprocess blind spot detection: captures pip installs, npm scripts, makefiles
Secret exposure prevention: controls access to environment variables and credentials
Cross-platform installation: macOS (Homebrew), Linux (deb, rpm, arch, alpine, source)
Multi-architecture support: amd64 and arm64 for Linux
Container deployment via shell shim (replaces /bin/bash and /bin/sh)
Harness wrapping: runs entire agent harness under policy control
SDK integrations for E2B, Sprites, Daytona, Blaxel, Vercel, Modal, Cloudflare, Deno, exe.dev, Runloop, Freestyle,
Structured event output for external logging systems
Quarantine with restore via soft_delete
Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other Chromium browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
E2B
Sprites
Daytona
Blaxel
Vercel
Modal
Cloudflare
Deno
exe.dev
Runloop
Freestyle
Tensorlake
Okta
Azure AD
Google Workspace
Slack
Splunk
Snowflake

Who should pick which

  • Security team facing AiTM phishing attacks
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security specializes in detecting and blocking adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth integrations using browser telemetry.

  • Developer deploying autonomous AI agents in production
    Pick: Agentsh

    Agentsh provides execution-layer syscall policy enforcement that stays effective even when agents are jailbroken, and integrates with sandbox platforms like E2B and Vercel.

  • IT admin wanting to control employee AI tool usage
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security offers real-time AI tool visibility, usage control, and in-browser DLP to prevent data leakage to LLMs without requiring an enterprise browser.

  • Compliance officer needing audit logs for agent operations
    Pick: Agentsh

    Agentsh provides full audit logs with subprocess tree visibility, capturing every syscall for compliance and forensic analysis.

  • Solo founder with limited budget
    Pick: Agentsh

    Agentsh is free and open-source, requiring no financial commitment, while offering robust security for AI agents. Push Security's freemium may also suffice for basic needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Agentsh or Push Security?

The best choice between Agentsh and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Agentsh and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Agentsh or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Agentsh or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Agentsh
View Agentsh reviewAgentsh alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy toolsBest AI Automation & Agents tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.