OpenHack vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-09
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionOpenHackPush Security
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Primary FocusAI-powered SAST for logic vulnerabilitiesBrowser security (AiTM, session hijacking, AI tool DLP)
DeploymentCLI (pipx/uv) or hosted platformCloud-based browser extension
IntegrationsGitHub, GitLab, Slack, JiraOkta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake
Key DifferentiatorVerified findings with working PoC exploits, 40x lower costReal-time browser telemetry + agentic threat hunting
Latest News2026-06-09: Launched as open-source AI security agent on open models2026-06-26: Experienced poisoned tenant attack, shared lessons

Push Security and OpenHack serve fundamentally different security needs. Push is ideal for organizations seeking real-time browser-level defense against phishing, session hijacking, and AI tool data leakage, with deep identity integrations. OpenHack excels for developers and security teams needing cost-effective, verified vulnerability detection in code, with auto-generated exploits and fix PRs. Choose Push if browser-based threats and AI governance are urgent; choose OpenHack if you prioritize code security with minimal false positives.

Try OpenHackTry Push Security
OpenHack
OpenHack

Open-source AI security agent that finds, verifies, and fixes vulnerabilities in your code and live apps.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Push Security delivers browser security for the AI era — stopping AiTM, ClickFix and consent phishing while governing shadow AI

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
$0/mo
Custom
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
5 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebCLI
Web
Categories
🔐 Application & Code Security
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Autonomous AI pentests against live web applications
AI codebase scanning with proof-of-concept verified findings
Vulnerability validation in a sandbox or browser before reporting
Chains findings to demonstrate full attack paths
Business-impact prioritization (internet-facing, payment, production)
AI Autofix pull requests ready for review
Continuous scanning across repositories
PR security reviews on pull requests
Secret scanning across code and Git history
Malicious dependency detection and supply chain analysis
SBOM export and compliance reports
SAST and supply chain reports
CLI install via pipx, runs locally
Bring any AI model from any provider, including self-hosted open models
Slack and Linear workflows for assigning fixes
Behavioral phishing detection and blocking inside the browser extension
Real-time Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) reverse-proxy phishing detection
Cloned login page, Browser-in-the-Browser (BitB) and Browser-in-the-Middle (BitM) detection
ClickFix clipboard injection blocking at the point of interaction
Device code phishing detection and blocking of kits that bypass passkeys
Consent phishing detection with OAuth consent monitoring, blocking and app removal
Malicious browser extension inventory, risk scoring, allowlisting and blocking
Supply chain change monitoring for extensions (ownership transfers, permission escalations, delisting)
Infostealer delivery detection and compromise response
Ghost login detection for password fallback paths that bypass SSO
QR code and SMS mobile phishing detection
Credential stuffing detection across SaaS logins
Session hijacking detection via browser session markers
Shadow AI app discovery and agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
AI prompt, AI clipboard and AI file upload monitoring with blocking
Integrations
GitHub
GitLab
Slack
Linear
Vanta
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk
SentinelOne
REST API

What real users say: OpenHack vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

OpenHack

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Sep 23, 2026 and found posts matching the name “OpenHack”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 34% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Interaction-level detection catches ClickFix, OAuth consent phishing and pastes that URL-reputation tools miss
  • • Explicit AiTM, BitB and BitM reverse-proxy coverage addresses the phishing class that beats MFA
  • • Shadow-AI discovery and policy enforcement is a genuinely differentiated control for 2025-era risk
  • • No endpoint agent, no network appliance — deployment is extension-based and fast

What frustrates them

  • • Nearly no independent community reviews — Reddit, Product Hunt and GitHub data is essentially absent
  • • Browser-extension-only coverage leaves non-browser auth paths and mobile-first flows unmonitored
  • • Blocking at the paste/upload/consent level risks interrupting legitimate workflows and generating tickets
  • • Autonomous threat-hunting agents risk adding noise to already-overloaded SOC alert queues

Researched Oct 7, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Solo developer
    Pick: OpenHack

    OpenHack provides free, verified vulnerability scanning with auto-generated fixes, ideal for solo developers needing reliable security without noise.

  • Security team at enterprise
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security covers browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking) and AI tool DLP, integrating with identity providers and SIEM for enterprise-scale visibility.

  • Open-source maintainer
    Pick: OpenHack

    OpenHack offers continuous scanning and PR reviews for open-source projects, with low cost and open-source models aligning with community values.

  • Identity/IAM team
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security hardens unmanaged identities, detects ghost logins, and enforces MFA/SSO adoption, fitting identity teams' needs.

  • Security operations (SOC)
    Pick: Push Security

    Push Security provides automated threat hunting via browser telemetry and integrates with Splunk/Snowflake, augmenting SOC capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

OpenHack vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Push Security and OpenHack serve fundamentally different security needs. Push is ideal for organizations seeking real-time browser-level defense against phishing, session hijacking, and AI tool data leakage, with deep identity integrations. OpenHack excels for developers and security teams needing cost-effective, verified vulnerability detection in code, with auto-generated exploits and fix PRs. Choose Push if browser-based threats and AI governance are urgent; choose OpenHack if you prioritize code security with minimal false positives.

Are Push Security and OpenHack competitors?

No, they address different security domains: Push focuses on browser-based attacks and AI tool governance, while OpenHack targets code vulnerabilities via AI-powered SAST.

Do both tools offer free tiers?

Yes, both have freemium models with free tiers suitable for initial evaluation or small teams.

Can OpenHack be deployed on-prem?

OpenHack supports on-premise deployment options in its Pro+ plan, using only OSS models.

Can Push Security detect phishing in mobile?

Yes, Push Security detects mobile phishing via SMS/QR codes, as listed in its features.

Does OpenHack generate fix PRs?

Yes, OpenHack auto-generates fix PRs with a one-click autofix feature for verified vulnerabilities.

Which tool is better for AI governance?

Push Security is designed for AI governance, offering AI tool visibility, usage controls, and in-browser DLP for AI tools.

Is OpenHack truly open-source?

Yes, OpenHack uses OSS models only and is built by Titan Security Labs, as per its description.

What integrations do they support?

Push Security integrates with Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Slack, Splunk, Snowflake. OpenHack integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Jira.

More OpenHack or Push Security comparisons

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen

Looker vs Push Security comparison

These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

There is no buying decision here. Push Security protects browsers from AiTM, ClickFix, device code and consent phishing and gives security teams visibility into shadow AI usage at roughly $5/user/mont

Explore each tool further

OpenHack
View OpenHack reviewOpenHack alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 5, 2026