Oki vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Oki | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Contact (hardware purchase) | Freemium |
| Deployment | Local appliance (on-prem hardware) | Cloud-based browser extension |
| Primary Use Case | Private personal AI assistant & data indexing | Browser security & AI governance for enterprises |
| Target User | Privacy-conscious individuals & families | Security & identity teams |
| Key Feature | 122B on-device model, personal memory, removable Memchip | AiTM phishing detection, AI tool DLP, agentic threat hunting |
| Data Privacy | Fully local, data never leaves device | Cloud-based telemetry collection |
If you're a security team fighting browser-based attacks and shadow AI, Push Security is a no-brainer — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and AI data leaks. Oki, conversely, is a radical privacy appliance for individuals who want a local, always-available AI that indexes their entire digital life. They solve completely different problems: choose Push for enterprise browser security, Oki for personal data sovereignty.
Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Oki vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Oki
29 mentions across 3 sources · 10% positive — critical
Hacker News, GitHub, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Zero token cost for queries — no per-use fees.
- • 122B parameter model runs entirely on local hardware.
- • 96GB VRAM enables large context windows and complex models.
- • Removable Memchip gives physical data ownership.
What frustrates them
- • No real user reviews or community validation exist.
- • False positive mentions make it hard to find genuine feedback.
- • Hardware cost is undisclosed — could be very expensive.
- • Proprietary Memchip may lock users into Oki ecosystem.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
- • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
- • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
- • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.
What frustrates them
- • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
- • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
- • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
- • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.
Researched Aug 26, 2026
Who should pick which
- Enterprise security teamPick: Push Security
Push Security directly addresses browser-based attacks (AiTM, session hijacking, OAuth phishing) and provides visibility into AI tool usage and shadow SaaS, which are top priorities for security teams. Its integrations with Okta, Azure AD, and SIEMs fit enterprise workflows.
- Privacy-conscious individualPick: Oki
Oki keeps all data on-device with no cloud upload, removable Memchip for physical ownership, and zero token costs – ideal for those who prioritize privacy and want a personal AI that indexes their entire digital life.
- Identity/SSO managerPick: Push Security
Push provides in-browser guardrails for MFA registration and password changes, detects ghost logins, and helps enforce SSO adoption – directly useful for hardening unmanaged identities.
- Digital hoarder / family archive keeperPick: Oki
Oki’s personal memory indexing and natural language search over photos, files, and chats makes it perfect for organizing large personal collections with easy retrieval, all locally.
- Remote worker needing contextual AIPick: Oki
Oki’s on-device AI assists with scheduling, drafting, and searching personal data without requiring internet access, useful for remote workers who want privacy and reliability.
Frequently Asked Questions
Oki vs Push Security: which should you choose?
If you're a security team fighting browser-based attacks and shadow AI, Push Security is a no-brainer — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, session hijacking, and AI data leaks. Oki, conversely, is a radical privacy appliance for individuals who want a local, always-available AI that indexes their entire digital life. They solve completely different problems: choose Push for enterprise browser security, Oki for personal data sovereignty.
Can Push Security detect OAuth-based attacks?
Yes, Push detects malicious OAuth integrations and blocks them, preventing abuse of delegated access.
Is Oki’s data ever uploaded to the cloud?
No, Oki performs all inference on-device and data never leaves the device. The removable Memchip physically holds your data.
Does Push Security work on mobile browsers?
Yes, Push provides mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes, extending coverage beyond desktop.
What hardware does Oki require?
Oki is a standalone appliance with an all-aluminum chassis, 200W draw, and platinum-rated power supply. It includes a removable Memchip (2TB-16TB).
Can Push Security prevent AI data leakage?
Yes, Push offers in-browser DLP for AI tools, controlling clipboard access and file uploads to LLMs.
Does Oki support voice commands?
Yes, Oki Voice lets you hold two keys and talk on any computer for hands-free interaction.
Which SIEMs does Push integrate with?
Push integrates with Splunk, Snowflake, and others like Splunk for security event correlation.
What is the token cost for Oki queries?
Zero. Oki has no token costs for any queries; all inference is local and free after hardware purchase.
More Oki or Push Security comparisons
Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack
Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n
Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi
Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (
Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026