Cloudflare vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Cloudflare | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free - $200/mo (Business), custom Enterprise | Contact sales (enterprise) |
| Core Focus | All-in-one security, performance, & edge compute | Browser-based identity & SaaS security |
| Deployment | Global network, agent optional for Zero Trust | Browser extension, no endpoint agent |
| AI Security | AI inference, MCP portals, Workers AI | AI app visibility, policy enforcement, agent detection |
| Zero Trust | ZTNA, SWG, DEX, browser isolation | Identity enforcement in browser (MFA, SSO, credentials) |
| Best For | Developers & IT teams needing platform + edge compute | Security teams needing browser telemetry & identity protection |
Choose Push Security if your priority is hardening identities and securing AI usage directly in the browser, especially with BYOD/unmanaged devices. Choose Cloudflare if you want an all-in-one platform for web performance, DDoS protection, serverless compute, and Zero Trust networking. Push is purpose-built for browser-layer security; Cloudflare is broader but less deep in identity-specific browser telemetry.
Browser security for the AI era: stop attacks, secure AI, harden identities.
Visit WebsiteFeature-by-feature
Push Security focuses exclusively on browser-based security: real-time phishing detection, stolen credential/token detection, account takeover prevention, shadow SaaS discovery, AI app visibility, and identity enforcement (MFA/SSO/credential rules). It deploys as a browser extension on any major browser, including AI-native browsers, and provides opinionated telemetry for incident response. Cloudflare, by contrast, is a broad platform: CDN with DDoS protection, Workers serverless compute, Durable Objects, KV, R2 storage, and Zero Trust (ZTNA, SWG, DEX). It also offers Bot management, WAF, and AI inference at the edge. Key differentiator: Push delivers deep browser-level context (identities, shadow SaaS, AI app usage) that complements EDR/SIEM, while Cloudflare provides network-level security and performance for apps and remote access. Push's autonomous agent-driven attack detection is unique; Cloudflare lacks browser-centric identity telemetry but offers broader infrastructure protection.
Pricing compared
Push Security requires contacting sales (likely enterprise pricing), making it inaccessible for small teams or individual developers without budget. Cloudflare offers a freemium model: Free for hobby projects, Pro ($20/month), Business ($200/month), and custom Enterprise contracts. This makes Cloudflare far more accessible for startups and small businesses. Push's value proposition (browser identity security) may justify its enterprise-only pricing for large organizations with complex identity threats. However, teams needing basic CDN/DDoS should choose Cloudflare's free tier. For browser-focused security, Push offers no self-serve pricing; potential buyers must negotiate. Cloudflare's transparent pricing and generous free tier give it an edge for budget-constrained buyers.
Who should pick which
- Solo developer building a web appPick: Cloudflare
Cloudflare's free tier provides CDN, SSL, DDoS protection, and serverless Workers at no cost. Push Security is enterprise-focused and overkill.
- Security team with BYOD policy and shadow SaaSPick: Push Security
Push's browser extension deploys without endpoint agents, providing visibility into shadow SaaS, AI app usage, and identity enforcement on any browser.
- Enterprise needing Zero Trust remote accessPick: Cloudflare
Cloudflare Zero Trust (ZTNA, SWG, DEX) is mature and integrated with their global network. Push lacks network-level access controls.
- IT team securing Chromebooks and unmanaged devicesPick: Push Security
Push works on Chromebooks without endpoint agents, offering identity attack detection and shadow SaaS control. Cloudflare requires agents for Zero Trust.
- Developer building AI agents with inferencePick: Cloudflare
Cloudflare Workers AI and MCP support make it easy to deploy AI inference at the edge. Push is focused on securing AI usage, not deploying it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Push Security replace my existing endpoint security?
No — it complements EDR/SIEM by adding browser telemetry and identity context but does not replace endpoint detection or network security.
Does Cloudflare offer browser-based identity attack detection?
Not natively. Cloudflare's Zero Trust can enforce device posture and browser isolation, but lacks detections for phishing, token theft, or shadow SaaS in browser sessions.
Which product is better for securing AI usage?
Push Security provides AI app visibility, policy enforcement, and agent-driven detection. Cloudflare supports AI inference deployment but not governance of AI tool usage.
Can I try Push Security before purchasing?
Pricing is contact-only, but Push likely offers demos or trials upon request. Cloudflare has a free tier you can start using immediately.
Do both products work with any browser?
Push works on all major browsers via extension, including AI-native browsers. Cloudflare's Zero Trust works with any browser but requires agent or DNS for some features.
Which is better for a startup with no budget?
Cloudflare's free plan offers generous features. Push is enterprise-priced and not suitable for zero-budget teams.
Does Cloudflare provide browser telemetry for incident response?
Cloudflare can log HTTP requests, but not browser-level events like extension data or identity activity. Push provides opinionated browser telemetry for investigations.
Can Push Security enforce MFA?
Yes, Push can enforce MFA, SSO, and strong credentials directly in the browser session, even on unmanaged devices.
More Cloudflare or Push Security comparisons
Choose Datadog if you need unified observability and security monitoring for your infrastructure, apps, and logs—especially in cloud-native environments. Choose Push Security if your priority is brows
If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and identity threats in an AI era, Push Security is a specialized choice—but its enterprise-only pricing and narrow focus may not suit all. Amplitude
Push Security and Tableau serve entirely different purposes: Push focuses on browser-based security to protect identities and prevent attacks, while Tableau is a BI tool for data visualization and ana
If you need browser security for AI era threats, Push Security is essential. For data visualization and BI, Power BI is the go-to. They solve completely different problems; choose based on whether you
These are incomparable tools serving completely different domains. If you need browser-based threat detection and identity hardening for enterprise environments, Push Security is the clear choice. If
Push Security and PlanetScale serve completely different needs: one is a browser security tool, the other a cloud database. Choose Push if your priority is securing identity and AI usage across divers