Cloudflare vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCloudflarePush Security
PricingFreemium (free tier + usage-based; Zero Trust free for first 50 employees)Freemium (paid tiers undisclosed)
Primary Use CaseUnified edge platform (CDN, serverless, Zero Trust, AI inference)Browser security (AiTM phishing, AI usage control, session hijacking)
DeploymentCloud-based global edge network (335+ locations)Browser extension across all major browsers
AI FeaturesWorkers AI inference, AI Gateway spend limits, Agents SDKAI tool visibility, usage policies, DLP for AI tools
Zero TrustFull ZTNA, SWG, DEX for first 50 employees freeIn-browser MFA/SSO guardrails
Latest News Impact2026-06: Agents SDK v0.17.0, DMARC Management GA, VoidZero joining2026-05: Released Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix

Push Security and Cloudflare serve different primary needs. Push is laser-focused on browser-based threats (AiTM, ClickFix, AI DLP) and identity hardening, ideal for security teams that need visibility into user browsing and AI tool usage without switching browsers. Cloudflare is a broader platform for developers and security teams needing CDN, serverless compute, Zero Trust networking, and edge AI — but lacks deep browser threat detection. Choose Push if browser security is your priority; choose Cloudflare if you need a unified edge platform with some security overlays.

Try CloudflareTry Push Security
Cloudflare
Cloudflare

One platform to build, secure, and scale apps and AI agents globally.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser-native security that stops AI-driven attacks and secures employee AI usage

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$0 forever
$7/user/month
$20/mo billed annually ($25/mo monthly)
From $5/mo
$200/mo billed annually ($250/mo monthly)
Custom (annual price per user)
Custom (billed annually)
$5/user/month
Custom
Popularity
21 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Beginner-friendly
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebAPICLI
Web
Categories
⚙️ Developer Infrastructure🔐 Application & Code Security🖥️ GPU Cloud & Model Inference🚦 LLM Gateways & Model Routers
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Workers serverless with 1ms CPU billing
AI Gateway with real-time spend limits
Workers AI inference at the edge
DDoS mitigation (310B daily threats blocked)
Zero Trust SASE (ZTNA, SWG, DEX)
WAF with threat intelligence
R2 object storage with no egress fees
Durable Objects for stateful serverless
Workers KV global key-value store
Containers for any language
Cloudflare Internal DNS for private networks
Cache Response Rules to override origin cache headers
WebMCP: any site becomes usable by browser AI agents
Kitesurf: agent-first browser on Workers
AI Search for building search over your own data
Behavioral phishing detection
Adversary-in-the-Middle (AiTM) phishing detection and blocking
ClickFix / clipboard injection blocking
Device code phishing detection and blocking
Malicious OAuth consent blocking
Session hijacking detection
Credential stuffing detection
Ghost login detection and SSO guardrails
MFA enforcement via in-browser guardrails
Shadow AI app discovery and inventory
AI prompt and data input monitoring
AI file upload monitoring and blocking
Agentic browser detection (Comet, Atlas, Dia)
Autonomous threat hunting agents
Browser extension inventory, risk scoring, and blocking
Integrations
OpenAI
Anthropic
GitHub Actions
VS Code
Slack
Shopify
Discord
Intercom
DoorDash
Zendesk
npm
Okta
Google Workspace
Microsoft 365
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Sentinel
Datadog
Splunk Cloud
SentinelOne
Webhooks
REST API

What real users say: Cloudflare vs Push Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Cloudflare

49 mentions across 2 sources · 0% positive — critical

Hacker News, YouTube

What users praise

  • • Generous free plan with DDoS, SSL, and CDN for hobby projects.
  • • Serverless Workers with pay-per-CPU-time billing eliminate idle costs.
  • • Global network reaches 95% of Internet users within 50ms.
  • • Simple setup and unified dashboard for all services.

What frustrates them

  • • Turnstile's WebGL fingerprinting is privacy-invasive and forced.
  • • Cloudflare acts as a gatekeeper, blocking users with privacy tools.
  • • Turnstile can lock out users who disable fingerprinting.
  • • Fingerprinting may expose users to mass surveillance.

Researched Jun 1, 2026

Push Security

30 mentions across 3 sources · 43% positive — mixed

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Works as a lightweight extension across all major browsers without forcing a single proprietary browser.
  • • Detects advanced threats like AiTM phishing, ClickFix, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth flows.
  • • Autonomous hunting agents analyze browser telemetry to write and deploy detection rules at machine speed.
  • • Provides comprehensive AI usage governance: inventory, prompt monitoring, file upload blocking, and unsanctioned app control.

What frustrates them

  • • No independent community feedback or real-user reviews available to verify claims.
  • • Requires advanced security expertise to configure and interpret telemetry effectively.
  • • High-fidelity telemetry collection may trigger privacy and compliance red flags.
  • • Potential for false positives in blocking legitimate OAuth and extension actions.

Researched Aug 26, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security team combating AiTM phishing
    Pick: Push Security

    Push directly detects and blocks AiTM attacks, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth integrations — the exact threats hitting browsers today.

  • Startup building an AI agent
    Pick: Cloudflare

    Cloudflare Workers + AI inference + Agents SDK let you deploy serverless AI agents at the edge with free tier and 1ms CPU billing.

  • Enterprise adopting Zero Trust
    Pick: Cloudflare

    Zero Trust SASE for first 50 employees free, plus WAF, DDoS, and DMARC Management — all in one platform.

  • Org needing AI usage policy enforcement
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time AI tool visibility, usage policies, and DLP for clipboard/file uploads directly in the browser.

  • Developer needing CDN + serverless + security
    Pick: Cloudflare

    Single platform for Workers, KV, Durable Objects, R2, CDN, WAF, and SSL — plus free DMARC and Turnstile.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cloudflare vs Push Security: which should you choose?

Push Security and Cloudflare serve different primary needs. Push is laser-focused on browser-based threats (AiTM, ClickFix, AI DLP) and identity hardening, ideal for security teams that need visibility into user browsing and AI tool usage without switching browsers. Cloudflare is a broader platform for developers and security teams needing CDN, serverless compute, Zero Trust networking, and edge AI — but lacks deep browser threat detection. Choose Push if browser security is your priority; choose Cloudflare if you need a unified edge platform with some security overlays.

Can Push Security replace Cloudflare's Zero Trust?

No. Push focuses on browser-internal threats (AiTM, session hijacking) and identity hardening, while Cloudflare Zero Trust includes full SASE (ZTNA, SWG, DEX) for network access control. They complement each other.

Does Cloudflare offer browser-level phishing detection like Push?

Not specifically. Cloudflare's WAF and DNS filtering can block known phishing domains, but it doesn't detect AiTM or ClickFix attacks inside the browser session. Push specializes in that.

Which is better for securing employee use of ChatGPT?

Push. It provides visibility into AI tool usage, real-time policy enforcement, and DLP for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads) directly in the browser. Cloudflare's AI Gateway controls API spend but not user-side browser activity.

Can I use Push Security without installing a browser extension?

No. Push requires a browser extension across all major browsers. If your policy blocks extensions, Push is not suitable. Cloudflare requires no client-side software for most features (Zero Trust uses a client or DNS filter).

Does Cloudflare have a free tier for browser security?

Cloudflare offers free DDoS protection, WAF, and DMARC Management, but not browser-specific security like AiTM or session hijacking detection. Push's free tier may include basic detection, but paid is needed for full features.

Which one integrates with Okta and Slack?

Both. Push integrates with Okta and Slack for identity and alerting. Cloudflare also integrates with Slack and supports Okta as an IdP for Zero Trust.

Can I use Cloudflare Workers for threat hunting like Push's autonomous agents?

Not directly. Cloudflare Workers can process telemetry, but Push's autonomous agents are purpose-built for browser threat hunting and detection rule generation. Cloudflare's Agents SDK is for AI agents, not security hunting.

Which tool is better for a small business with minimal browser threats?

Cloudflare. Its free tier offers valuable CDN, security, and DDoS protection. Push's browser security is overkill if there's no AiTM or AI usage risk.

More Cloudflare or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

If your priority is securing browser-based attacks and shadow AI usage, choose Push Security — it directly addresses AiTM phishing, AI tool data leakage, and ghost logins across all browsers. If you n

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Explore each tool further

Cloudflare
View Cloudflare reviewCloudflare alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Developer Infrastructure toolsBest AI Threat Detection & SOC toolsBest AI Application & Code Security toolsBest AI Security & Privacy tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: June 1, 2026