Cloudflare vs Push Security
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Cloudflare | Push Security |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Edge CDN, serverless compute & Zero Trust platform | Browser-native phishing & shadow AI defense |
| Pricing type | Freemium (Free tier; $7/user Zero Trust tier) | $5/user/month (freemium entry) |
| Core attack coverage | DDoS (310B daily threats), WAF, bot management, Turnstile | AiTM, ClickFix, device-code, consent phishing, BitB, infostealers, session hijacking |
| SWEET SPOT DEPLOYMENT | Global anycast network across 335+ cities | Browser extension across Chrome/Edge/AI browsers |
| Identity / SSO angle | Zero Trust SASE (ZTNA, SWG, DEX) free for first 50 employees | Ghost login, MFA status monitoring, SSO-bypass detection |
| Adjacent free tier hook | 100k daily requests + 50 free Zero Trust seats | Not the focus — priced per seat from the start |
Cloudflare runs CDN, DDoS protection, Zero Trust access, and Workers edge compute on one network within 50ms of 95% of the world.
Visit Website
Push Security is browser security for the AI era — it stops AiTM phishing, ClickFix attacks, session hijacking and shadow AI inside the
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Cloudflare vs Push Security
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Cloudflare
113 mentions across 7 sources · 56% positive — mixed (weighted across 7 sources)
Reddit, Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Free tier includes unmetered DDoS, Universal SSL, and global CDN — unmatched value at $0
- • Workers bills on CPU time, so LLM wait and hibernating WebSockets don't burn budget
- • R2 object storage has no egress fees — a real line-item saver versus S3
- • Zero Trust is free for the first 50 employees, then only $7 per active user
What frustrates them
- • Support is widely described as slow or absent, especially below Enterprise
- • November 2025 global outage took many sites down, proving single-provider fragility
- • WARP and Zero Trust have reported DNS REFUSED and iOS reconnect-loop bugs on managed endpoints
- • Workers dev-to-prod gap causes unexplained 500s where local worked fine
Researched Oct 16, 2026
Push Security
30 mentions across 3 sources · 51% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy
What users praise
- • Browser-extension delivery means no endpoint agent and no forced enterprise-browser migration
- • Cross-browser coverage including Chromebooks and AI/enterprise browsers
- • Published $5/user/month Standard pricing with self-serve trial lowers evaluation friction
- • Detections target modern browser-layer threats: AiTM, ClickFix, BitB, device-code phishing
What frustrates them
- • Essentially no independent user reviews anywhere in the scraped community data
- • Extension-based security is itself a supply-chain risk that HN commenters flag
- • Clipboard, prompt and file-upload monitoring raises privacy and data-residency objections
- • Autonomous agent deployment of blocks may conflict with change-control processes
Researched Oct 14, 2026
Feature-by-feature
Push Security's entire feature set is browser-extension threat detection: behavioral phishing, AiTM reverse-proxy pages, cloned logins, BitB, ClickFix clipboard injection, device-code phishing, consent phishing, malicious OAuth apps, malicious extensions, infostealers, session hijacking, credential stuffing, ghost logins, and MFA guardrails. Its integrations are identity- and SIEM-centric (Okta, Google Workspace, M365, Sentinel, Splunk, Datadog, SentinelOne). The output is telemetry and real-time blocking inside the browser, plus shadow-AI inventory (prompts, clipboard, file uploads to LLMs).
Cloudflare's feature set is infrastructure: Workers serverless billed on CPU time (1ms granularity, no wall-clock charge), Workers AI inference at the edge including GLM-5.3 with a 1M-token context window and function calling, AI Gateway with real-time spend limits, AI Search with agentic search and GLM-5.3 Flash support, R2 with no egress, Durable Objects, Containers, Workers KV, and a Zero Trust SASE stack (ZTNA, SWG, DEX). Its security story is network-layer — DDoS, WAF, bot management, Turnstile — not identity-layer phishing forensics. The two overlap only conceptually: Push detects attacks at the last mile (the user's browser), Cloudflare blocks them at the first mile (the edge).
Pricing compared
Push Security is billed per user per month ($5/user/month for teams up to 500 employees), which means a 200-person company pays roughly $1,000/month for the whole browser defense layer. There's no meaningful infrastructure cost to model — the buyer is buying seats, not compute. Cloudflare is a consumption platform with a genuine free tier: 100,000 daily requests on Workers plus 50 free Zero Trust seats, and a $7/user tier for Zero Trust beyond that. Costs scale with traffic (R2 storage, Workers CPU time, Workers AI inference, AI Gateway spend), not with headcount alone. A startup can run entirely free for a while; a large site pays based on bandwidth and CPU. Neither product's pricing model maps to the other's: Push is a fixed per-seat security subscription, Cloudflare is a metered infrastructure bill with a generous free on-ramp. Comparing them financially is apples-to-oranges unless you're specifically asking whether to spend security budget on browser detection or on Zero Trust seats — and even then, Cloudflare's free 50 seats often makes that decision for small teams.
Who should pick which
- Security team seeing AiTM/ClickFix bypass their email gatewayPick: Push Security
Push's extension detects AiTM reverse-proxy pages, ClickFix clipboard injection, and device-code phishing that email and SWG tools miss — at a predictable $5/user/month for sub-500-seat orgs.
- Developer deploying an AI agent that waits on LLM latencyPick: Cloudflare
Workers bills on CPU time, not wall clock — a 2,500ms LLM call burning 0.5ms of CPU is charged as 0.5ms, and Workers AI gives you edge inference with GLM-5.3 and a 1M-token context window.
- Identity team hunting ghost logins and SSO bypass pathsPick: Push Security
Push specifically detects ghost logins, password fallback paths, and MFA status gaps via browser session markers — the exact SSO-bypass scenarios Okta and M365 logs often under-report.
- Startup that needs CDN, WAF, and Zero Trust on one free-ish billPick: Cloudflare
The free tier covers 100k daily requests and 50 Zero Trust seats, and upgrading to $7/user keeps DDoS, WAF, and SASE on a single platform — no separate security vendor to manage.
- Mid-market org wanting shadow-AI visibility without an endpoint agentPick: Push Security
Push inventories shadow AI apps and can control prompts, clipboard use, and file uploads to LLMs entirely through a browser extension — no enterprise browser migration and no endpoint deployment required.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I replace my email security gateway with Push Security?
No. Push is explicitly not a standalone email security gateway replacement — it covers the browser layer (phishing pages, ClickFix, consent phishing) rather than inbound mail filtering. It's designed to sit alongside email and SWG controls, not replace them.
Does Cloudflare include phishing protection like Push Security's?
Cloudflare's security stack is network-edge focused: DDoS, WAF, bot management, Turnstile, and Zero Trust SASE including SWG. Its public feature list does not describe browser-extension AiTM, ClickFix, or consent-phishing detection of the kind Push Security ships, so the two cover different layers rather than overlapping.
Which one should a 200-person company buy first?
If phishing is your active incident, Push Security at $5/user/month is the targeted fix with visible ROI in the browser. Cloudflare's free tier already covers a lot of infrastructure for small teams, so it's often already in place — the decision is whether the browser blind spot justifies a dedicated vendor.
Do the two products integrate with each other?
Neither vendor's stated integration list mentions the other. Push's connectors are identity and SIEM tools (Okta, M365, Splunk, SentinelOne); Cloudflare's are developer and support tools (GitHub Actions, VS Code, Slack, Zendesk). If you run both, they'd be managed as separate platforms.
Does Cloudflare's recent Python Workers GA change the comparison?
It strengthens Cloudflare's developer story — Python web frameworks and AI orchestration libraries now run on Workers without JavaScript glue — but it doesn't touch the phishing-detection capability Push sells, so the products remain in different categories.
Is Push Security viable if our endpoint policy blocks browser extensions?
No. Push is delivered as a browser extension, so environments where endpoint policy blocks extensions outright are explicitly listed as not a fit. That's a deployment blocker, not a feature gap you can configure around.
What does Cloudflare's free tier actually include for security?
Per the current data: 100k daily requests plus Zero Trust SASE (ZTNA, SWG, DEX) free for the first 50 employees, with a $7/user tier beyond that. DDoS mitigation, WAF, bot management, and Turnstile sit on the same platform, so a small team can get meaningful edge security without a custom contract.
Can Cloudflare's CASB or Client-Side Security substitute for Push's browser controls?
Those features address different problems: CASB automates remediation of risky SaaS shares via webhooks, and Client-Side Security flags malicious storefront scripts. Neither is described as detecting AiTM sessions, ClickFix clipboard injection, ghost logins, or malicious browser extensions — the specific gaps Push targets.
More Cloudflare or Push Security comparisons
You shouldn't be choosing between these. If your problem is getting live, rendered web pages into an agent or RAG pipeline — with proxies, CAPTCHA handling, and streaming crawls — Spider Cloud is purp
These are not competitors, and you should not shortlist them against each other. Push Security answers a security question — how do you stop browser-based phishing (AiTM, ClickFix, device code, consen
These two don't compete for the same budget, so there's no either/or decision here. Buy Push Security if you're a security or identity team watching AiTM phishing, ClickFix, device-code phishing, and
These two are not competitors and shouldn't be evaluated head-to-head — they solve different problems for different budget owners. If your problem is browser-borne attacks (AiTM reverse proxies, Click
These are not substitutes — they're different layers of a security/ops stack. Buy Datadog if your problem is observability, cloud posture, or AI-workload monitoring across multi-cloud infrastructure;
These are not competitors, so there is no 'either/or' decision here — shortlisting both in one evaluation would be a category mistake. If your problem is browser-delivered credential theft, AiTM rever
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: September 25, 2026