Cloudflare vs Push Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Live tool data as of 2026-07-17
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionCloudflarePush Security
Pricingfreemium · from Free $0/mofreemium · from Standard $5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Best forStartups building web apps and APIs wanting a single platform for CDN, security, and serverless, Developers deploying AI agents who need edge inference and spend governanceSecurity teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing), Identity teams hardening unmanaged identities and enforcing MFA/SSO adoption
Standout featuresWorkers serverless with 1ms CPU billing (no wall-time cost) · AI Gateway with real-time spend limits across providers · DDoS mitigation blocking 234B daily threatsAdversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block · ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block · Session hijacking detection and block
Viability score95/10095/100
APINoYes

Cloudflare is the stronger pick for startups building web apps and apis wanting a single platform for cdn, security, and serverless; Push Security fits better for security teams needing visibility into browser-based attacks (aitm, clickfix, oauth phishing).

Built from live tool data, last verified 2026-07-17.

Cloudflare
Cloudflare

Unified edge platform for apps, agents, and workforce — build and scale without servers.

Visit Website
Push Security
Push Security

Browser security platform that stops AI-powered attacks and controls AI tool usage.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$20/mo (billed annually) or $25/mo (billed monthly)
$200/mo (billed annually) or $250/mo (billed monthly)
Custom (billed annually)
$0 forever (first 50 users)
$7/user/month
Custom annual price per user
$5/user/month (annual) or $6/user/month (monthly)
Custom
Popularity
6 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Beginner-friendly
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
WebPlugin
Categories
🔒 Security & Privacy⚙️ Developer Infrastructure
🔒 Security & Privacy
Features
Workers serverless with 1ms CPU billing (no wall-time cost)
AI Gateway with real-time spend limits across providers
DDoS mitigation blocking 234B daily threats
Zero Trust SASE (ZTNA, SWG, DEX) first 50 employees free
Workers AI inference at edge (25 daily requests free)
R2 object storage with no egress fees (10GB free)
CDN with universal SSL across 335+ edge locations
WAF with threat intel for real-time rules
DMARC Management GA — free for all customers
Durable Objects stateful serverless (1GB stored data free)
Workers KV global key-value store (1M daily reads free)
Turnstile bot detection with WebGL fingerprinting
Temporary accounts for AI agents (deploy Workers via wrangler --temporary)
Self-Managed OAuth for all developers
Agents SDK with durable background sub-agents and unified turn entry point
Adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing detection and block
ClickFix and ConsentFix attack detection and block
Session hijacking detection and block
Malicious OAuth integration detection and block
Ghost login and shadow SaaS discovery
Credential theft and compromised token detection
Agentic threat hunting using browser telemetry
Real-time AI tool visibility and usage control
In-browser data loss prevention for AI tools (clipboard, file uploads)
In-browser MFA registration and password change guardrails
Malicious browser extension detection and block
Mobile phishing detection via SMS/QR codes
Browser-based incident investigation with session replay
Supports Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Brave, and other Chromium browsers
Browser & Identity Attacks Matrix (51 techniques)
Integrations
OpenAI
Anthropic
GitHub Actions
VS Code
Slack
Shopify
Discord
Intercom
DoorDash
Zendesk
npm
Leagued
Liveblocks
SiteGPT
Character.AI
Okta
Azure AD
Google Workspace
Splunk
Snowflake

Who should pick which

  • Security team combating AiTM phishing
    Pick: Push Security

    Push directly detects and blocks AiTM attacks, session hijacking, and malicious OAuth integrations — the exact threats hitting browsers today.

  • Startup building an AI agent
    Pick: Cloudflare

    Cloudflare Workers + AI inference + Agents SDK let you deploy serverless AI agents at the edge with free tier and 1ms CPU billing.

  • Enterprise adopting Zero Trust
    Pick: Cloudflare

    Zero Trust SASE for first 50 employees free, plus WAF, DDoS, and DMARC Management — all in one platform.

  • Org needing AI usage policy enforcement
    Pick: Push Security

    Push provides real-time AI tool visibility, usage policies, and DLP for clipboard/file uploads directly in the browser.

  • Developer needing CDN + serverless + security
    Pick: Cloudflare

    Single platform for Workers, KV, Durable Objects, R2, CDN, WAF, and SSL — plus free DMARC and Turnstile.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Cloudflare or Push Security?

The best choice between Cloudflare and Push Security depends on your specific use case — we compare them independently on features, current pricing, integrations, and real-world signals (with an on-demand sentiment scan available for each). See the side-by-side breakdown above to match them to your needs.

What are the main differences between Cloudflare and Push Security?

The key differences include pricing model, feature set, platform support, and skill level requirements. Review the full comparison on RightAIChoice for a detailed breakdown.

Is there a free version of Cloudflare or Push Security?

Check the pricing section in the comparison for the latest pricing details on both tools, including free tiers, trial options, and paid plans.

More Cloudflare or Push Security comparisons

Looker vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Looker address entirely different domains — browser security vs. business intelligence — so the choice depends on your primary need. If your priority is stopping browser-based attack

Amplitude vs Push Security comparison

Buyers should not choose between Push Security and Amplitude — they serve entirely different needs. Push Security is for security teams defending against browser-based attacks and securing AI usage. A

Tableau vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Tableau serve fundamentally different purposes, so the choice depends entirely on your need: browser security and AI governance (Push Security) vs. data visualization and analytics (

Datadog vs Push Security comparison

Choose Datadog if you need deep, unified observability across infrastructure, apps, and security for DevOps/SRE teams. Choose Push Security if your priority is stopping browser-based attacks (AiTM phi

Power BI vs Push Security comparison

Push Security and Power BI serve fundamentally different needs: Push Security is a browser security platform for stopping AI-powered attacks and controlling AI tool usage, while Power BI is a business

Sentry vs Push Security comparison

Choose Push Security if your primary concern is browser-based attacks (AiTM phishing, OAuth abuse) and securing AI tool usage; it's purpose-built for security and identity teams. Choose Sentry if you'

Explore each tool further

Cloudflare
View Cloudflare reviewCloudflare alternatives
Push Security
View Push Security reviewPush Security alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Security & Privacy toolsBest AI Developer Infrastructure tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.