Asteroid
Asteroid gives healthcare teams an API for EHRs and payer portals that will never ship one, using AI agents in browser and desktop
If you are replacing offshore data-entry throughput on payer and EHR portals, this is the strongest fit we have reviewed in the category — 100+ pre-automated portals is not something a generic browser agent replicates. The published throughput numbers are batched outputs, not marketing math. The credit model is the real risk: runtime, LLM usage, and proxies draw down the same balance, so a heavy multi-portal workflow can outrun the $300/mo Startup commit.
Verified 3d ago · liveness 70/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/asteroid
- Healthcare ops teams automating prior authorization, eligibility, and EHR extraction at volume
- Insurance and call-center teams keying enrollment applications across carrier portals
- Voice-AI healthcare companies that need post-call triage forms submitted into practice systems
- Clinic and referral networks clearing intake backlogs without adding headcount
- Simple single-page automations where a cheaper browser-agent script does the job
- Teams that want to write and maintain their own automation code rather than use a builder and catalog
- Non-regulated industries with low portal complexity where credit-based pricing does not pay off
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Asteroid if your automation targets are simple single-page flows a cheap browser-agent script can cover, or if you need Windows and Citrix environments but cannot commit to the $1,000/mo Scale tier.
Top-up credits convert dollar-for-dollar with no bonus, so usage beyond your monthly commit costs more per credit than the committed portion.
Asteroid is priced for teams replacing paid human throughput, not for hobbyists. Individual is credit-based with no monthly commit; Startup is $300/mo with $330 in credits, which fits a single-stream ops team; Scale is $1,000/mo with $1,150 in credits and is the entry point for Windows and Citrix environments. Against offshore data-entry seats or a per-check vendor charging roughly $12.95 a manual eligibility check, the $300/mo commit is cheap — but only if your credit burn stays inside it.
In short
Asteroid — Asteroid gives healthcare teams an API for EHRs and payer portals that will never ship one, using AI agents in browser and desktop. Best for Healthcare ops teams automating prior authorization, eligibility, and EHR extraction at volume, Insurance and call-center teams keying enrollment applications across carrier portals, Voice-AI healthcare companies that need post-call triage forms submitted into practice systems. Free to start; paid plans from $300/mo.
What people actually say about Asteroid — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Asteroid on Jul 3, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Asteroid? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Build AI agents from natural language, an uploaded SOP, or a visual graph editor
- Run agents in browser, Linux, Citrix, or Windows environments with concurrency control
- Live View: watch every run, intervene mid-session, and review the recording
- 100+ payer portals, EHRs, and registries pre-automated
- EHR extraction and write-back with scheduled unattended runs (7 workflows)
- Prior authorization submission, status tracking, and attachment upload (9 workflows)
- Eligibility and benefits checks with structured JSON written back to the EMR
- Credentialing checks: NPI, exclusions, licenses, DEA, state adverse actions (9 workflows)
- Provider enrollment via payer web forms, including multi-state and Medicaid MCO (7 workflows)
- Member and Medicare enrollment: ACA, ICHRA, MA, PDP, Medigap, SOA capture
- Claims and denials: status retrieval, denial detail, appeal submission
- Referral intake: referral pull, eligibility, patient record, booking (3 workflows)
- Connect to desktop apps, Citrix, VPNs, and vaults without an API
- Integrations called like an API: Slack, MCP, and webhooks
- Credits cover runtime, LLM usage, and proxies across every tier
About Asteroid
Asteroid is a healthcare portal integration platform for teams that need to move data through systems that will never expose an API. You deploy AI agents that log in the way your staff do — into payer portals, EHRs, registries, and desktop apps — pull or push data, and write structured results back into your own systems. The realistic buyer is a clinic automation vendor, health-insurance call center, voice-AI company, or provider ops team sitting on a manual backlog across dozens of portals. The platform ships 100+ pre-automated portals plus a catalog of ready-made workflows: EHR extraction and write-back (7), scheduling (4), referral intake (3), prior authorization (9), member enrollment (4), credentialing and verification (9), provider enrollment (7), eligibility and benefits (4), claims and denials, and Medicare enrollment. Astro, the agent builder, defines agents from natural language, an uploaded SOP, or a visual graph editor, and connects to desktop apps, Citrix, VPNs, and vaults. Published production numbers are specific rather than round: 77 seconds per EHR record against 12 minutes of staff time, 37,000 records a month across 11 EHRs, 16,000 triage forms a month at 99.6% completion across 80+ practices, and an insurance enrollment back office running unattended in 13–22 minutes where licensed-agent keying alone took 7–15. Live View lets clinicians and ops staff watch every run, intervene mid-session, and review the recording afterward. Compliance posture is documented: HIPAA compliant with a BAA from Startup upward, and SOC 2 Type II certified. Pricing is credit-based across four tiers, crediting runtime, LLM usage, and proxies at the same meter. The differentiator is not the agent loop — it is the portal coverage and the Integrate layer that wires up systems with no APIs, which generic browser agents and RPA suites do not ship.
Behind the Verdict
Pick Asteroid when the bottleneck is portal coverage, not cleverness. Anyone can wire an agent loop; the hard part on a payer portal in month two is the MFA prompt, the session timeout, and the Citrix-only legacy app. That is what the 100+ pre-automated portals and the environment layer are actually buying.Start with a single high-volume workflow and measure. EHR extraction is the cleanest proof-of-concept: run it overnight, compare against your current 12-minute-per-record baseline, and see whether 77 seconds holds on your particular EHR mix. The referral intake workflow is the other easy entry, since clearing a 2,000-referral backlog in two weeks is a result staff can verify by walking in.Pass if your automation lives inside one web app behind one login. A cheaper browser-agent script handles that, and credit-based pricing will look ridiculous next to a flat seat fee. Teams who want to own their automation code should also look elsewhere — Astro is a builder and a catalog, not a library you maintain.Where it bites: credits are portable across runtime, LLM usage, and proxies, so a workflow with long browser sessions and heavy model calls burns faster than the workflow count suggests. Budget for variable spend or move to Scale, which also unlocks Citrix and Windows environments plus FDE onboarding. The catalog is deepest in payer-side work — prior authorization, credentialing, enrollment — so specialty clinical workflows may need building, not buying. Regulated buyers should plan the tier jump accordingly.Closest alternatives are generic computer-use agents and RPA suites. Those win on price and
Researching Asteroid? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Asteroid actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Deploy an Astro agent against a browser-based EHR to pull patient records on a nightly schedule and write structured data back, with a clinician watching the first runs in Live View.
Outcome: Records land in your own system at roughly 77 seconds each instead of 12 minutes of staff time, with no interface built against the EHR.
After the customer says yes, run the unattended back office: CRM reconcile, marketplace application, compliant plan pick, e-signature, and policy write-back across marketplace portals.
Outcome: The whole back office completes unattended in 13–22 minutes instead of 7–15 minutes of licensed-agent keying just for the application.
Have the voice agent answer a patient call, then trigger an Asteroid agent via webhook to submit the structured triage form into the practice's own system.
Outcome: Triage forms land with zero human touch at about 2 minutes per request, versus roughly 5 minutes of receptionist processing.
Use Cases
- Automate prior authorization submission, status tracking, and attachment uploads across payer portals
- Pull and write back patient records from API-less browser EHRs on a schedule
- Verify eligibility and benefits across primary, secondary, and state programs, and write JSON back to the EMR
- Run end-to-end member enrollment: CRM reconcile, marketplace application, plan pick, e-signature, policy write-back
- Submit structured triage forms into a practice's own system after a voice-AI call ends
- Run credentialing checks (NPI, exclusions, licenses, DEA, state adverse actions) that gate reimbursement
- Enroll providers through payer web forms including multi-state and Medicaid MCO enrollment
- Clear a referral intake backlog overnight — referral pull, eligibility, patient record, booking
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-15
Limitations
- Pricing is credit-based, with credits covering runtime, LLM usage, and proxies, and top-ups converting dollar-for-dollar with no bonus.
- Concurrency is tiered (5 concurrent environments on Individual, 25 on Startup, 100 on Scale).
- Windows and Citrix environments are limited to Scale and Enterprise; Individual and Startup get browser and Linux only.
- A BAA for HIPAA compliance is included from Startup upward.
- The 10% (Startup) and 15% (Scale) credit bonuses apply to the monthly commit only, not to top-ups.
as of 2026-10-09
Verification history
We have re-verified Asteroid 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Asteroid tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Individual
Pay as you go
Ideal for
Solo builder or pilot team testing a single portal workflow with no monthly commitment and variable credit spend.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: pay-as-you-go credits, 5 concurrent browser or Linux environments, unlimited agents and team members.
Startup
$300/mo
Ideal for
Teams putting automated workflows into a product, where a $300/mo commit fits one or two high-volume portal streams.
What this tier adds
Adds $330 in credits/month (10% bonus on the commit), 25 concurrent browser or Linux environments, a HIPAA BAA, and priority Slack support.
Scale
$1,000/mo
Ideal for
Ops teams running advanced multi-portal work at volume who need Windows access and Asteroid's help building workflows.
What this tier adds
Adds $1,150 in credits/month (15% bonus), 100 concurrent browser, Linux, or Citrix environments, Windows environment access, catalog workflows, and FDE onboarding.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Enterprises that want Asteroid to build and maintain the workflows rather than self-serve them, with tailored infrastructure and terms.
What this tier adds
Adds managed workflows built and maintained by Asteroid, a dedicated AI engineer, private networking, custom commit and concurrency limits, multiple teams, and SLAs.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Asteroid's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Asteroid is priced for teams replacing paid human throughput, not for hobbyists. Individual is credit-based with no monthly commit; Startup is $300/mo with $330 in credits, which fits a single-stream ops team; Scale is $1,000/mo with $1,150 in credits and is the entry point for Windows and Citrix environments. Against offshore data-entry seats or a per-check vendor charging roughly $12.95 a manual eligibility check, the $300/mo commit is cheap — but only if your credit burn stays inside it.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Asteroid — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Individual and Startup are self-serve: start free, build with Astro, and expect a first working agent against a pre-automated portal in hours rather than weeks. Scale adds catalog workflows plus FDE workflow onboarding, which is the faster path if your target portal is already covered. Enterprise is a scoping call, and Asteroid builds and maintains the workflows for you.
Switching to or from Asteroid
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From manual staff keying: stand up an Astro agent against the same portal your staff log into, watch it in Live View, then shift to scheduled unattended runs.
- →From offshore data-entry vendors: move the highest-volume portal first (eligibility checks or prior authorization) and compare credit burn against the seat cost you are replacing.
- →From RPA suites: reuse your existing SOPs as Astro inputs via SOP upload rather than rebuilding selectors per portal.
- →From generic browser-agent scripts: port the flow to Astro and gain the 100+ pre-automated portal catalog plus concurrency control.
- ↗To a generic browser-agent framework: re-implement each workflow against the portals your team actually uses, accepting you lose the pre-automated catalog and Live View.
- ↗To a traditional RPA suite: rebuild portal logins and selectors for each EHR and payer, and add your own LLM layer if you want the extraction step.
- ↗To in-house engineering: wrap computer-use models directly, and budget for the vault, proxy, and concurrency infrastructure Asteroid already runs.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Asteroid”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Asteroid” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Asteroid.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Asteroid
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Asteroid, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Glide
Glide turns spreadsheets, prompts, and files into internal business apps and AI agents for desktop and mobile.
Adept
Adept builds AI agents that take real actions across desktop and web apps using the Adept Workflow Language and its own multimodal models.
Skyvern
Open-source AI browser agent that logs into portals, solves CAPTCHAs, handles 2FA, and returns structured data.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Asteroid vs Locus Robotics
Choose Asteroid if you need to automate digital browser tasks like insurance quoting or EHR data entry—it replaces offshore data entry teams with AI agents you build in natural language. Choose Locus Robotics if you need to automate physical warehouse picking and putaway—it uses autonomous mobile robots to boost fulfillment productivity 2-3x. These tools serve entirely different domains; your decision depends on whether the bottleneck is in software portals or warehouse aisles.
Asteroid vs Truleo
If you run a law enforcement agency drowning in siloed data, Truleo is purpose-built for you—connecting RMS, jail calls, and BWC to generate leads in minutes. For operations teams automating repetitive browser tasks (like prior auth or data entry), Asteroid offers a flexible AI workforce with HIPAA compliance and a credit-based model. Choose Truleo for police intelligence; choose Asteroid for enterprise workflow automation.
Asteroid vs Presto Voice
These tools serve entirely different worlds. Choose Asteroid if you need to automate complex browser-based workflows in regulated industries (healthcare, insurance) with high reliability and compliance. Choose Presto Voice if you run a QSR chain and want to automate drive-thru ordering with proven upsell results. They are not competitors.
Alternatives to Asteroid
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Asteroid? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.