BrowserAct
No-code AI web scraping: describe the data you want and get a tested, self-healing Bot.
BrowserAct earns its keep if CAPTCHA solving, proxy rotation, and selector maintenance are eating your week. The prompt-to-Bot build and self-healing re-extraction are the actual product, and pay-as-you-go credits keep entry cost low: Basic starts at $16/mo billed yearly, or $20/mo month-to-month, with a 7-day trial. Budget carefully — BrowserAct's own pricing page puts a complex Bot-Agent build at 800–1,500 credits with 20–30 credits per run. For most small-to-mid jobs it beats assembling Playwright plus a proxy vendor, and it undercuts flat-rate actor platforms for intermittent work. Teams scraping millions of pages monthly should still price a dedicated self-hosted stack.
Verified 6d ago · liveness 55/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/browseract
- AI agent developers who need a browser layer driven via Local CLI or MCP
- No-code builders who want structured data without maintaining selectors
- E-commerce and product teams tracking prices, stock, and ratings
- Competitive and customer research teams collecting public posts and reviews
- Teams requiring on-premise or self-hosted deployment
- High-volume scraping programs where a flat-rate proxy plus self-hosted stack is cheaper per page
- Buyers who want a single flat fee — builds and runs both draw from one credit balance
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip BrowserAct if you need on-premise deployment or scrape at volumes where a flat-rate proxy and self-hosted scraper undercut a shared credit balance across builds and runs.
Builds and runs draw from the same credit pool, so a complicated target site can consume 800–1,500 credits before you have run it once.
BrowserAct fits solo builders and small data teams: Basic at $16/mo billed yearly ($20/mo month-to-month) includes 10,000 monthly credits, and Advanced at $96/mo billed yearly ($120/mo month-to-month) covers 100,000 credits with 40 simultaneous tasks. Compared with flat-rate scraping-actor platforms, per-run costs stay low for intermittent jobs, but heavy continuous scraping is cheaper on a self-hosted Playwright plus proxy stack. Custom plans exist for managed infrastructure and higher
In short
BrowserAct — No-code AI web scraping: describe the data you want and get a tested, self-healing Bot. Best for AI agent developers who need a browser layer driven via Local CLI or MCP, No-code builders who want structured data without maintaining selectors, E-commerce and product teams tracking prices, stock, and ratings. Free to start; paid plans from $16/mo.
What's new in BrowserAct
Checked 6 days agoAcross the latest 2 updates: 2 news mentions.
How to Find Social Media Accounts: 9 Methods & 5 Tools
A BrowserAct guide covering nine methods and five tools for locating social media accounts, framed around its own scraping workflows.
How to Bypass CAPTCHA in 2026: Complete Guide & Solutions
A guide collecting current CAPTCHA-bypass approaches and describing where BrowserAct fits among them.
What people actually say about BrowserAct — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
1 mentions across 1 source (Hacker News) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
Average across the 1 source that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +No-code skills simplify browser automation for non-developers.
- +Stealth fingerprints and TLS rotation claim to evade bot detection.
- +99%+ CAPTCHA solving success rate if claims hold true.
- +Reuses local Chrome sessions for logged-in scraping.
- +Unlimited concurrent browser sessions with zero interference.
- −No real user data or reviews to validate claims.
- −Pricing per credit is unclear; may become expensive at scale.
- −Cloud browser option still 'coming soon' — local-only for now.
- −Skills system could create vendor lock-in.
- −Anti-detection may not work against advanced fingerprinting like Cloudflare Turnstile.
- • Credit cost per task not transparent; may exceed budgets.
- • No clear upgrade path or enterprise pricing details.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is BrowserAct? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Build reusable Bots from a plain-English prompt with no code
- Self-healing extraction finds data again after a site layout change
- Bot-Agent mode for adaptive tasks and Bot Workflow mode at 3 credits per step
- Browser stealth with 30+ fingerprint attributes kept consistent per session
- Automatic CAPTCHA handling for reCAPTCHA, Turnstile, and DataDome at 99%+ success
- Human-in-the-loop handoff for 2FA and complex verification
- Global residential proxies with country-level targeting and 99.9% success rate
- Rotating or persistent IPs plus signed-in browser session modes
- Cloud Browser Runtime: 24/7 scheduled and concurrent runs with no local setup
- Local CLI to give your own AI agent a browser, free by default with $0 runtime fee
- Local fingerprint browsers at 100 credits per browser, as low as $0.064 per browser
- Dynamic proxy at 5,000 credits per GB, as low as $3.2/GB
- Multimodal inputs and outputs: images, text, files in; CSV, JSON, images, video, files out
- Skill Hub with pre-built scrapers across Amazon, Reddit, Google Maps, YouTube, LinkedIn
- Free GEO Report showing how AI assistants discover and recommend your brand
About BrowserAct
BrowserAct is a no-code AI web scraping platform that turns a plain-English request into a tested, reusable Bot. You describe the data — for example, the names, prices, and stock status of headphones on a store page — and the AI agent explores the site, chooses an extraction approach, identifies the fields, and returns a Bot you can run on demand. On BrowserAct's own homepage example, building that Bot costs 320 credits and each repeat run costs 20 credits, roughly 6% of the build, delivered as a spreadsheet you can add columns to by asking for them in plain language. The platform is aimed at AI agent developers, no-code builders, product and pricing researchers, and data teams who need public web data without maintaining CSS selectors. It manages the parts that usually break scrapers: browser stealth that keeps 30+ fingerprint attributes consistent within a Chromium session, global residential proxies with country-level targeting and rotating or persistent IPs, automatic handling of reCAPTCHA, Turnstile, and DataDome, and a human-in-the-loop handoff when a site's verification needs a person. When a site changes its layout, self-healing locates the data again rather than requiring a rebuild. There are two paths. Bots run in BrowserAct Cloud on a 24/7 schedule with concurrent tasks and no local setup, or you use the Local CLI to hand your own agent a browser, which is free by default with credits charged only for optional browser and proxy services. Results export as CSV, JSON, images, video, or files, and route onward through API, webhook, Make, n8n, Zapier, Google Sheets, Airtable, and MCP. Bot-Agent mode handles adaptive tasks while Bot Workflow mode runs step-based processes at 3 credits per executed step. Recent additions include a free GEO Report showing how AI assistants discover and recommend a brand, five documented Reddit scraping methods, and Agent Skills installable inside OpenClaw. Paid plans run from Basic at $16/mo billed yearly ($20/mo month-to-month, 10,000 monthly credits) to Advanced at $96/mo billed yearly ($120/mo month-to-month, 100,000 monthly credits).
Behind the Verdict
The clearest thing BrowserAct does is collapse the fragile part of scraping. Instead of writing selectors and re-writing them after a redesign, you describe the fields you want, the agent explores the site and returns a Bot, and when the layout changes the self-healing step finds the data again. On BrowserAct's homepage example, the build consumed 320 credits and the run consumed 20 — about 6% of the build cost — and you can add a field like customer ratings by asking for it in the same spreadsheet. Two modes cover different jobs. Bot-Agent mode builds adaptively with AI: BrowserAct's pricing page estimates 300–500 credits to build a simple task and 10–20 credits per run, or 800–1,500 to build a complex one at 20–30 credits per run. Bot Workflow mode executes predefined browser steps at 3 credits per step, which suits predictable, repeatable processes where you want the cost to be knowable in advance. Infrastructure is bundled rather than assembled. Browser stealth holds 30+ fingerprint attributes consistent per Chromium session, residential proxies cover country-level targeting with rotating or persistent IPs, CAPTCHA handling covers reCAPTCHA, Turnstile, and DataDome at a stated 99%+ success rate, and human-in-the-loop handles 2FA and the verification cases automation cannot finish. The Cloud Runtime runs Bots 24/7 with concurrent tasks and no local setup; the Local CLI is free by default, so runtime on your own machine costs nothing unless you add optional fingerprint browsers at 100 credits per browser or dynamic proxy at 5,000 credits per GB. Multimodal inputs and outputs mean images, text, and files in, and CSV, JSON, images, video, or files out. Where it fits: AI agent developers who want a browser they can drive via CLI or MCP, no-code operators building competitor price and stock monitors, and researchers collecting public posts, reviews, and listings. Skill Hub ships pre-built scrapers across Amazon, Reddit, Google Maps, YouTube, and LinkedIn, and the blog has grown into practical walkthroughs — five Reddit scraping methods, building a competitor tracking pipeline in n8n, and installing BrowserAct agent skills in OpenClaw. Where it doesn't: the cost model is consumption-based, so both builds and runs draw from the same credit balance and a broad or messy target site can burn credits quickly. Free and paid tiers cap simultaneous tasks (2 on Free up to 40 on Advanced) and static proxies are tier-limited. Teams that need on-premise deployment, or that scrape at volumes where a flat-rate proxy plus a self-hosted stack is cheaper, should look elsewhere. And any shop that measures value purely in raw pages per dollar will find the build step, not the run, is where their budget goes.
Researching BrowserAct? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas BrowserAct actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Describe the fields they want on a competitor's headphone category page, let the AI agent build a price-and-stock Bot for about 320 credits on the homepage example, then schedule it in BrowserAct Cloud to run daily at 20 credits per run.
Outcome: A CSV of competitor prices, ratings, and stock lands on schedule, and when the competitor redesigns the page, self-healing re-finds the fields without a rebuild.
Use the free Local CLI to give their own agent a browser, then hand it tasks via MCP and pull in a dynamic residential proxy only for sites that block the local IP.
Outcome: The agent browses and extracts on their own machine at $0 runtime fee, paying credits only for the optional proxy GBs they actually consume.
Install BrowserAct Agent Skills inside OpenClaw and run the documented Reddit scraping workflow to collect threads, then push results into an n8n pipeline for reporting.
Outcome: Public posts and reviews flow into the team's existing n8n reporting without a single selector being written or maintained.
Use Cases
- Scrape Amazon bestsellers with price, rating, and stock, then export CSV
- Monitor competitor prices across multiple ecommerce sites on a 24/7 schedule
- Extract LinkedIn profile or comment data without writing code
- Build a competitor tracking pipeline in n8n with BrowserAct handling collection
- Turn a website into an API your AI agent can query for fresh structured data
- Collect Reddit threads for sentiment and topic research using documented methods
- Gather product, supplier, and lead generation data for market research
- Track social accounts and follower changes to spot emerging trends
Limitations
- BrowserAct runs on credits: 200 free credits and 2 free Agent builds on the Free plan, then paid tiers from Basic at $16/mo billed yearly ($20/mo month-to-month, 10,000 monthly credits) to Advanced at $96/mo billed yearly ($120/mo month-to-month, 100,000 monthly credits).
- Builds and runs share that balance, so cost scales with both.
- BrowserAct's own pricing page estimates 300–500 credits to build a simple Bot-Agent and 10–20 credits per run, versus 800–1,500 to build a complex one at 20–30 credits per run; Bot Workflow tasks bill at 3 credits per executed step.
- Simultaneous tasks are capped by tier (2 on Free, 10 on Basic, 20 on Essential, 40 on Advanced), and static proxies (5/25/50) and free local browsers (5/10/50/100) are tier-limited.
- Optional Local CLI add-ons cost credits too: 100 credits per fingerprint browser and 5,000 credits per GB of dynamic proxy.
as of 2026-10-02
Verification history
We have re-verified BrowserAct 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published BrowserAct tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Someone evaluating scraping automation before spending anything — testing one Bot build and a handful of local browser runs.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: 200 signup credits, 2 free Agent builds, 2 simultaneous tasks, 5 free local browsers.
Basic
$16/mo billed yearly · $20/mo month-to-month
Ideal for
A solo operator or two-person team running a handful of scheduled Bots, like a weekly competitor price pull.
What this tier adds
Adds 10,000 monthly credits, 10 simultaneous tasks, unlimited MCP servers, and up to 5 static proxies; 7-day trial with 1,000 free credits.
Essential
$56/mo billed yearly · $70/mo month-to-month
Ideal for
A small data team running concurrent monitors across several sites and regions who need more proxy identities.
What this tier adds
Raises the allowance to 50,000 monthly credits, 20 simultaneous tasks, up to 25 static proxies, and 50 free local browsers.
Advanced
$96/mo billed yearly · $120/mo month-to-month
Ideal for
A dedicated research or growth function scraping at volume with many parallel jobs and the widest proxy footprint.
What this tier adds
Top self-serve tier: 100,000 monthly credits, 40 simultaneous tasks, up to 50 static proxies, and 100 free local browsers.
Custom
Custom
Ideal for
Companies whose credit use, concurrency, or compliance needs exceed the self-serve tiers and who want managed browser infrastructure.
What this tier adds
Custom credit packages, scalable usage and concurrency, and managed browser infrastructure with API, MCP, and workflow integrations.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where BrowserAct's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
BrowserAct fits solo builders and small data teams: Basic at $16/mo billed yearly ($20/mo month-to-month) includes 10,000 monthly credits, and Advanced at $96/mo billed yearly ($120/mo month-to-month) covers 100,000 credits with 40 simultaneous tasks. Compared with flat-rate scraping-actor platforms, per-run costs stay low for intermittent jobs, but heavy continuous scraping is cheaper on a self-hosted Playwright plus proxy stack. Custom plans exist for managed infrastructure and higher
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of BrowserAct — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Cloud path: sign up, describe your target and fields, and let the agent build — BrowserAct's homepage example shows a tested Bot returned in one build pass. Budget roughly 300–500 credits for a simple target and 800–1,500 for a complex one. Local CLI path: install and connect your own agent in a single sitting; runtime is $0 and you add fingerprint browsers or dynamic proxy only if a site demands
Switching to or from BrowserAct
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Playwright or Puppeteer scripts: point the AI agent at the same target URL and describe the fields instead of porting selectors, then move scheduled runs to BrowserAct Cloud.
- →From Apify actors: rebuild the equivalent task with a prompt-driven Bot, then replace the run trigger with the n8n, Make, Zapier, or webhook integration.
- →From in-house Selenium plus proxy vendor: drop the browser-management layer and let BrowserAct handle stealth, CAPTCHA, proxies, and scheduling.
- →From manual copy-paste research: describe the fields once, add columns by asking, and let the Bot deliver CSV or JSON on a schedule.
- ↗To a self-hosted Playwright plus proxy stack: export extracted fields and reimplement extraction for the highest-volume targets where per-page cost matters.
- ↗To a flat-rate scraping API: keep BrowserAct for exploratory and login-heavy targets while routing predictable high-volume endpoints elsewhere.
- ↗To a full data platform: export CSV or JSON and hand control of transforms and warehousing to a dedicated pipeline tool.
- ↗To BrowserAct Custom: for very large workloads, move from self-serve tiers to a custom credit package with managed infrastructure.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “BrowserAct”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “BrowserAct” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about BrowserAct.
Official links
Tools that pair well with BrowserAct
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside BrowserAct, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Maxun
Open-source no-code web scraping platform that turns any website into a structured API and LLM-ready data
Axiom
Browser automation and web scraping you can build no-code, in your own code, or by describing it to Claude.
Reworkd
Discontinued: Reworkd sunset its AI web-scraping product on February 6, 2025.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Browseract vs Spider Cloud
Choose BrowserAct if you need robust stealth browsing with CAPTCHA solving for small-to-medium scale agent tasks, especially when you want no-code reusable Skills. Choose Spider Cloud if you need fast, cost-effective scraping at high volumes for RAG/LLM pipelines, with structured output and AI-powered extraction. BrowserAct excels in anti-detection; Spider Cloud wins on scale, format variety, and AI tooling.
Browseract vs Temporal Ai
For AI agent developers who need reliable web interaction with built-in anti-bot evasion, BrowserAct is the clear pick. For teams building fault-tolerant, long-running workflows that survive crashes and require automatic retries, Temporal AI is essential. They solve different problems—browser automation vs. durable orchestration—so the right choice depends on your bottleneck: getting past CAPTCHAs or ensuring workflow resilience.
Browseract vs Presto Voice
BrowserAct and Presto Voice serve completely different domains. Choose BrowserAct if you need a stealth browser toolkit for AI agents to scrape or automate websites with CAPTCHA bypass. Choose Presto Voice if you operate a QSR chain looking to automate drive-thru ordering with voice AI. They are not direct competitors.
Alternatives to BrowserAct
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Topics
Used BrowserAct? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.