Cloudglue
Video context API that structures, searches, and reasons over video for AI agents.
Get Cloudglue if your team is building a chatbot, RAG layer or analytics pipeline over video and you want the indexing and multimodal understanding managed for you. The concrete differentiators are agent-native design (tool calling, playable citations), schema-based entity extraction that stays consistent across a library, and 4-credits-per-minute processing that the vendor quotes at 2 hours of video in ~3 minutes. The free tier is a sampler at 25 minutes indexed, so budget past Mini ($15/mo) or Starter ($45/mo) if you are indexing real libraries. If you need a no-code interface or on-prem processing, this is the wrong shape of product.
Verified 10d ago · liveness 69/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/cloudglue
- Developers building video-aware AI agents and chatbots
- Teams needing RAG over large video libraries (sales calls, training)
- Sales enablement platforms extracting insights from call recordings
- Enterprises analyzing surveillance or training footage at scale
- Teams wanting a no-code video analysis tool
- Users needing real-time or edge video processing
- Teams whose footage cannot be sent to a managed cloud service
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Cloudglue if you need a no-code tool, real-time or edge inference on live streams, local processing that never leaves your infrastructure, or you are indexing only a handful of short clips where the per-minute credit spend outweighs building retrieval yourself.
Credits are shared across ingestion and conversation: extraction and indexing cost 4 credits per minute of footage while chat completion and search cost 1 credit each, so an active chatbot drains the same balance as
The free and Mini/Starter tiers suit a solo developer or small team validating a video feature, while Builder at $350/mo (63 hours indexed, 22% off) and Scale at $600/mo (125 hours indexed, 33% off) are where production libraries land. Compared with assembling transcription, vision and vector search yourself, the packs are cheaper in engineering time but dearer in raw compute; compared with a general multimodal API you are paying a premium for the collection and agent layer.
In short
Cloudglue — Video context API that structures, searches, and reasons over video for AI agents. Best for Developers building video-aware AI agents and chatbots, Teams needing RAG over large video libraries (sales calls, training), Sales enablement platforms extracting insights from call recordings. Free to start; paid plans from $15/mo.
What's new in Cloudglue
Checked yesterdayAcross the latest 1 update: 1 news mention.
What people actually say about Cloudglue — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
19 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Product Hunt) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Fast indexing: 2 hours of video processed in 3 minutes.
- +Developer-first REST API with user-defined extraction schemas.
- +Native chat with playable citations across video libraries.
- +Designed for AI agents and RAG workflows out of the box.
- +Structured entity extraction reduces manual data prep.
- −Free tier too small for meaningful evaluation (25 minutes).
- −No self-hosted or offline processing available.
- −Usage-based credits can become expensive at scale.
- −Still in active development; some features are maturing.
- −Community feedback is almost entirely from launch day.
- • No flat-rate or enterprise tier announced; costs scale with usage and can spike.
- • Credit consumption per minute is fixed, but schema extraction and chat also consume credits.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Cloudglue? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Upload video and audio files for indexing
- Automatic transcription at 4 credits per minute of footage
- Scene segmentation and scene description
- Structured entity extraction against user-defined schemas
- Semantic search across video segments and collections
- Chat completion with playable timestamp citations
- RAG across entire video libraries
- Aggregate analysis and report generation across many videos
- Fast indexing: vendor states 2 hours of video in about 3 minutes
- Collection management and collection indexing
- REST API for video context extraction
- Credit-based usage with multiple credit packs
- Native AI agent support via tool calling
- Server-side processing with managed model upgrades
- Free playground for testing before you write code
About Cloudglue
Cloudglue is a video context engine that turns any video or audio into structured, LLM-ready data for developers. Through a REST API you upload footage, then extract transcripts, scene segmentations, entities and metadata, build collections, and query across them for RAG, chatbots and aggregate analytics. The pitch is speed and duration: the vendor states it processes 2 hours of video in about 3 minutes, and bills at 4 credits per minute of footage for extract/transcribe/describe work, with chat completion and indexing at 1 credit per request and search at 1 credit per search. It is built specifically for AI agents, with native tool calling and playable citations, so an assistant can answer a question about a video library and point back to the exact timestamp. Extractions run against user-defined schemas, which is what makes the output consistent across thousands of files rather than free-text summaries. Cloudglue is Y Combinator-backed and positions itself as production-ready for enterprise, with model upgrades and scaling handled server-side. Pricing runs from a free tier (200 credits, 25 minutes indexed) through Mini at $15, Starter at $45, Builder at $350 and Scale at $600 per month, with custom Enterprise plans. Best fit is a development team shipping a video-aware feature; there is no no-code layer and no offline option.
Behind the Verdict
Cloudglue sits in a narrow but real gap: generic multimodal APIs will describe a single video well, but they do not give you a library you can query, a schema you can extract against repeatedly, or citations your agent can play back. That combination is the product. The workflow is: upload footage, pay 4 credits per minute for transcribe/describe and extract, segment scenes, define entity schemas, index collections, then chat and search at 1 credit per request or search. The credit ledger is the part to study before you commit — the same currency pays for ingestion, indexing, chat and search, so a chatty end-user surface can burn budget in ways a one-off extraction job will not. Strengths. Speed and duration at scale are the headline claim and they are specific: 2 hours of video in about 3 minutes, with chat and search working across hundreds of videos. The agent-native framing is not decoration — tool calling and playable citations are exactly what you need if the consumer of this data is an LLM rather than a human analyst. Schema-driven extraction is the sleeper feature: it is the difference between a demo and a pipeline that produces the same fields for video 1 and video 10,000. Server-side model management means you are not the one migrating when the multimodal stack shifts, which matters more than any single model choice. And the vendor's research work on sales transcripts was accepted to a KDD workshop, which is a reasonable signal that the video-to-structured-data problem is being worked on seriously rather than wrapped. Weaknesses and honest boundaries. There is no no-code route here — this is an API for people who write code, and the value only appears once you have built the retrieval and UI around it. Real-time and edge processing are out of scope; this is a batch indexing pipeline. Offline or local processing is not offered, so if your footage cannot leave your environment, stop here. Cost scales with minutes, and the jump from Mini ($15/mo, 2 hours indexed) to Starter ($45/mo, 6 hours indexed) to Builder ($350/mo, 63 hours indexed) means any serious library pushes you up fast; the volume tiers carry 22% and 33% discounts, which tells you the per-hour economics improve a lot at scale but only if you commit to the pack. Where it fits. A startup building a support or sales assistant over recorded calls, an edtech team making lecture archives searchable with timestamp links, a security or ops team generating structured reports from footage against a fixed schema. Where it does not: agencies that want to click through a UI, teams needing frame-level real-time inference, or anyone whose video cannot be sent to a managed service. Compared with wiring up a general vision model yourself, you are paying for the collection layer, the schema consistency and the agent plumbing — which is usually the part that takes the longest to build and the part nobody wants to maintain.
Researching Cloudglue? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Cloudglue actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Index a backlog of recorded sales calls, define a schema for objections and competitor mentions, then expose a chat endpoint that answers rep questions with playable citations back to the exact moment.
Outcome: A working assistant over the call library in days rather than weeks, with every answer traceable to a timestamp the rep can play.
Upload lecture recordings, let Cloudglue transcribe and segment scenes at 4 credits per minute, build a collection, and run search plus chat so students jump to the relevant topic and slide.
Outcome: Students find the right five minutes of a 90-minute lecture instead of scrubbing, and the team pays per minute indexed rather than per seat.
Define an entity schema for events of interest, run extraction across a footage set, and have an AI agent aggregate the results into a report instead of reviewing hours by hand.
Outcome: Consistent structured event reports across many recordings, with the same fields extracted from every file.
Use Cases
- Build a chatbot that answers questions about your video library with specific timestamps and quotes.
- Analyze thousands of sales call recordings to extract common objections, product mentions and sentiment.
- Create a searchable archive of lecture videos where students find specific topics and slides.
- Automatically generate structured reports from security footage, flagging relevant events.
- Give an AI agent a collection of screen recordings to reason over and turn into step-by-step guides.
- Extract consistent entities such as license plates or brand logos across a large video dataset.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-14
Limitations
- Credits are spent per successful API request and the rate varies by endpoint: extract, transcribe/describe and indexing run at 4 credits per minute of footage, while chat completion, file upload and search run at 1 credit per request or search.
- That means ingestion and conversation draw on the same balance.
- The free tier covers 200 credits, 25 minutes indexed and 200 chat completion requests — enough to evaluate, not enough to run a library.
- Paid packs start at Mini ($15/mo, 2 hours indexed) and reach Scale ($600/mo, 125 hours indexed).
- This is an API-first product with no no-code interface, and there is no offline or local processing option.
as of 2026-09-27
Verification history
We have re-verified Cloudglue 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Cloudglue tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
A developer evaluating the API on a handful of short clips before committing budget.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: 200 credits, 200 chat completion requests and 25 minutes indexed, with no credit card required.
Mini
$15/mo
Ideal for
A solo developer or small project indexing two hours of footage per month.
What this tier adds
Adds indexing volume over Free: 1,000 credits, 1,000 chat completion requests and 2 hours indexed for $15/mo.
Starter
$45/mo
Ideal for
A small team running a pilot chatbot or search feature over a modest video library.
What this tier adds
Triples the Mini pack: 3,000 credits, 3,000 chat completion requests and 6 hours indexed for $45/mo.
Builder
$350/mo
Ideal for
A production team indexing dozens of hours of calls, lectures or recordings monthly.
What this tier adds
Jumps to 30,000 credits, 30,000 chat completion requests and 63 hours indexed, carrying a 22% volume discount.
Scale
$600/mo
Ideal for
An organisation running large libraries or high-volume agent chat across footage.
What this tier adds
Doubles Builder at 60,000 credits, 60,000 chat completion requests and 125 hours indexed, with a 33% volume discount.
Enterprise
Contact Us
Ideal for
Larger teams that need custom volume, discounts or terms beyond the published packs.
What this tier adds
Custom plans and discounts negotiated directly with Cloudglue rather than fixed credit packs.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Cloudglue's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
The free and Mini/Starter tiers suit a solo developer or small team validating a video feature, while Builder at $350/mo (63 hours indexed, 22% off) and Scale at $600/mo (125 hours indexed, 33% off) are where production libraries land. Compared with assembling transcription, vision and vector search yourself, the packs are cheaper in engineering time but dearer in raw compute; compared with a general multimodal API you are paying a premium for the collection and agent layer.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Cloudglue — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
A developer can call the API within an hour, but plan on half a day for a first end-to-end pipeline: sign up, run a few files through the free playground, then wire upload, transcription, schema definition and collection indexing before chat and search work over a real library. Teams without an existing retrieval layer should budget several days to a week for a production-quality integration.
Switching to or from Cloudglue
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From building on a raw multimodal/vision API: keep your prompt and schema logic, move transcription, scene segmentation and entity extraction behind the Cloudglue upload and extract endpoints, then replace your own
- →From a self-hosted transcription plus embedding pipeline: stop maintaining the transcode and embedding workers, upload footage directly and let collection indexing produce the searchable segments.
- →From a batch script over recordings: convert the script into API calls, define extraction schemas for the fields you currently parse by hand, and switch ad-hoc queries to chat completion with citations.
- ↗To a self-managed multimodal stack: export your transcripts and extracted entities, re-embed the segments into your own vector store, and reimplement chat and citation generation against your chosen model.
- ↗To a no-code video analysis tool: export structured extraction output as the record of your analysis, then re-upload source footage into the no-code tool for ongoing review.
- ↗To a provider with local or on-prem processing: export transcripts, entities and collection metadata, then reprocess the original footage inside your own environment.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Cloudglue”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Cloudglue” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Cloudglue.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Cloudglue
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Cloudglue, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Reduct.video
Text-based video editor: search, clip, redact, and share spoken-word footage by selecting words in the transcript.
Descript
Descript is a text-based AI video and audio editor — cut footage by editing the transcript, then let Underlord finish the job.
Podcastle
Async (formerly Podcastle) is a chat-based AI video editor that cuts, dubs, and generates video from plain-language prompts
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Cloudglue vs Spider Cloud
Choose Spider Cloud if your AI agent needs real-time web data for RAG or scraping — it's vastly cheaper and more feature-rich for text-based extraction. Pick Cloudglue only if your core use case is querying video libraries, as it's purpose-built for that but has a narrower scope and higher per-minute cost.
Cloudglue vs Voyage Ai
Choose Voyage AI if your priority is high-accuracy text retrieval on domain-specific documents (finance, legal) with long-context needs, and you have enterprise budget. Choose Cloudglue if you need to turn video/audio into searchable data for AI agents, want a freemium pricing to start, and value fast indexing over deep text embedding features.
Cloudglue vs Temporal Ai
If you need to orchestrate reliable, crash-resistant AI agents or long-running workflows, Temporal AI is the proven choice—trusted by OpenAI and Replit. If your primary need is turning video/audio into structured, queryable data for AI agents (e.g., sales call analysis), Cloudglue offers a fast, purpose-built video context engine. They solve different problems; choose based on your core use case.
Alternatives to Cloudglue
View allReduct.video
Text-based video editor: search, clip, redact, and share spoken-word footage by selecting words in the transcript.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Cloudglue? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.