Interfaze
A deterministic multimodal AI model for OCR, speech-to-text, and structured extraction with confidence scores and bounding boxes.
Interfaze picks a fight worth picking: extraction you can audit. Confidence scores and bounding boxes turn OCR from a hope into a review queue, and $1.50/$3.50 per MTok with caching and sandbox/browser infrastructure included is aggressive for this class of work. The 2026 additions make it a stronger buy than the seed copy suggests — logging and zero data retention controls shipped in August, so the 'coming soon' observability caveat no longer holds. It's a builder's tool. Punt if you want a chat product, or if your latency budget lives under a second, or if you need output beyond 32k tokens.
Verified 3d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/interfaze
- Developers building auditable OCR pipelines where every extracted field needs a confidence score
- Document-heavy operations extracting structured fields from IDs, invoices, and forms at volume
- Teams automating speech-to-text and audio understanding with multilingual coverage
- Data teams scraping and structuring web pages without maintaining their own headless browser
- Anyone wanting a general-purpose chat assistant or consumer app for everyday questions
- Long-form writing, creative generation, or tasks needing a large output budget — output caps at 32k tokens
- Production teams that need to exceed 50 requests per second without an enterprise agreement in place
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Interfaze if you need a conversational assistant or creative writing tool, if you require more than 50 requests per second on a self-serve plan, or if you need output beyond 32k tokens.
Input token counts often exceed the input you actually sent — the multipass preprocessing chain inflates input context, so your input spend runs above the published $1.50/MTok rate.
At $1.50/MTok input and $3.50/MTok output with no minimums and no seat fees, Interfaze sits in the mid-range of multimodal model pricing but delivers specialized extraction work at $0.002–$0.004 per OCR'd page and $0.016 per ID extraction — often well under dedicated document-AI vendors billing per page. Solo developers and small teams can start free with no credit card. Enterprise volume discounts, SLAs, and SOC2/HIPAA agreements are negotiated separately.
In short
Interfaze — A deterministic multimodal AI model for OCR, speech-to-text, and structured extraction with confidence scores and bounding boxes. Best for Developers building auditable OCR pipelines where every extracted field needs a confidence score, Document-heavy operations extracting structured fields from IDs, invoices, and forms at volume, Teams automating speech-to-text and audio understanding with multilingual coverage. Free to use.
What's new in Interfaze
Checked 3 days agoAcross the latest 5 updates: 3 feature updates and 2 launches.
Jev, now open source: Lev
Interfaze open-sourced Lev, the successor to its Jev diffusion-based audio ASR model, giving developers a view into the transcription stack.
Introducing DefaultModel
Interfaze launched DefaultModel, a new default model option selectable on the platform.
Introducing OpenWebSearch
OpenWebSearch shipped, adding a web search capability that can be folded into extraction pipelines.
Interfaze Updates: Native LangChain SDK, Chat local storage, Docx support
Native LangChain SDK, chat local storage, and Docx file support added; the company is also hiring AI researchers.
Logs now available with new Zero Data Retention (ZDR) controls
Logging went live alongside Zero Data Retention controls, letting teams choose whether prompts and outputs are retained at all.
What people actually say about Interfaze — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
70 mentions across 4 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Bluesky, Lemmy) · researched Jul 6, 2026.
Average across the 4 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +State-of-the-art OCR with confidence scores and bounding boxes (OCRBench V2 leader).
- +Hybrid architecture combines DNNs and transformers for specialized task accuracy.
- +Pay-as-you-go pricing at $1.50/MTok input is competitive for production workloads.
- +Supports structured extraction with Zod schema enforcement and function calling.
- +Multimodal input handles text, images, audio, files, and video via one API.
- −Limited community feedback; most buzz comes from founder posts and launch events.
- −Not suitable for general conversational AI or creative generation.
- −Self-hosting unclear and only available on request.
- −Benchmark claims lack independent verification from third parties.
- −Docs could be more thorough on advanced guardrail configuration.
- • No free tier mentioned; you pay from first token.
- • Self-hosting pricing is opaque and negotiated individually.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Interfaze? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- OCR for images and documents with per-field confidence scores and bounding boxes
- Speech-to-text for audio and video input
- Speaker diarization for multi-speaker audio
- Structured data extraction driven by Zod schemas via responseFormat
- Object detection with position output
- GUI detection for interface elements
- Time-series forecasting
- Multimodal input: text, images, audio, files, and video in a single model
- 100+ language support across every supported modality
- Sandboxed code execution environment
- Headless browser engine for web scraping
- OpenWebSearch web search capability
- run-task mode for predefined output structures that cuts intermediary token cost
- Configurable guardrails across S1–S14 text categories plus S12_IMAGE image checks
- Hybrid Mixture-of-Architecture (MoA) combining specialized DNNs/CNNs with a transformer layer
About Interfaze
Interfaze is a multimodal AI model built for production tasks where a wrong answer costs money: OCR, speech-to-text, speaker diarization, object detection, structured data extraction, classification, and web scraping. It's made by JigsawStack, Inc. in San Francisco and backed by Y Combinator, and it's aimed at developers and enterprise teams running document processing, audio transcription, and data extraction at volume — the crowd that can't ship pipelines on outputs they can't audit. The core difference is verifiability. Every extraction comes back with a confidence score and bounding boxes, so you can route low-confidence fields to human review and build rule-based systems on the rest. Behind that sits a hybrid Mixture-of-Architecture (MoA) design that pairs specialized DNNs/CNNs with a transformer layer — specialized components where precision matters, transformer flexibility where it doesn't. One model handles text, images, audio, files, and video, with 100+ languages across every supported modality, a 1M-token context window, and a 32k-token output cap. Built-in tools cover ground you'd otherwise maintain yourself: a sandboxed code execution environment, a headless browser engine, STT with diarization, time-series forecasting, GUI detection, an OpenWebSearch capability, and configurable guardrails across 14 text categories (S1–S14) plus a dedicated image category (S12_IMAGE). The `run task` feature activates only the part of the model a predefined task needs, cutting intermediary token count and cost significantly. Since July 2026 the platform has moved fast: logging went live alongside zero data retention controls on 2026-08-01, Interfaze reported up to 10x cost reduction through better token efficiency and caching on 2026-07-29, and the release cadence added native LangChain SDK, chat local storage, and Docx support (2026-08-12) plus a native MCP Server and n8n integration. Jev, the diffusion-based audio ASR model, was open-sourced under the name Lev on 2026-09-24. Pricing is token-based with no minimums and no seat fees: $1.50 per million input tokens and $3.50 per million output tokens, with caching and sandbox/browser infrastructure included and converted to tokens rather than billed separately. A full OCR document page runs roughly $0.002–$0.004 via the run-task path, an ID or invoice extraction about $0.016 per document, and audio transcription about $0.006 per minute. If your workload is deterministic extraction rather than open-ended chat, Interfaze is positioned against general-purpose multimodal models on cost and auditability, not on breadth.
Behind the Verdict
Interfaze's bet is that the interesting AI workloads in 2026 aren't conversations but deterministic pipelines — parse this invoice, transcribe this call, classify this ticket — and that those workloads need something a general-purpose chat model doesn't give you: a way to know when the model is wrong. That's the real product. Ask Interfaze to pull first_name, last_name, dob, and driver_licence_number off an ID and you don't just get strings back. You get a precontext payload where each field carries a confidence value (the docs example shows 0.99, 1.0, 0.98) and bounding boxes with top_left/bottom_right coordinates. You can auto-accept anything above 0.95, route the rest to a human, and keep a paper trail for the auditor. For teams in insurance, healthcare intake, legal discovery, or KYC, that's the difference between a demo and something you can put in production. The architecture is a hybrid Mixture-of-Architecture: specialized DNNs and CNNs handling the precision-sensitive parts, a transformer layer providing flexibility, and a chain of multipass preprocessing steps that expand input context in exchange for higher determinism and lower output token cost. That tradeoff is visible in the billing — Interfaze's own docs warn that your input token count can exceed the input you actually sent, because the preprocessing chain inflates it. The published rate is $1.50 per million input tokens and $3.50 per million output tokens, but your effective input spend can be higher than that number implies. The company reported up to 10x cost reduction on 2026-07-29 through token efficiency and caching work, and since cached tokens aren't counted toward usage, repeat workloads benefit more than one-shot ones. Cost by workload is published and unusually concrete: $0.002–$0.004 per OCR'd document page via run-task (roughly $2–$4 per 1,000 pages), $0.016 per extracted ID or invoice (~$16 per 1,000), $0.006 per minute of audio transcription, $0.03–$0.08 per scraped and structured web page, and about $0.006 per classified or moderated text snippet. If you've been pricing a Document AI or cloud OCR vendor per page, those numbers are worth comparing directly. The bundled infrastructure is the quiet value. A sandboxed code execution environment and a headless browser engine ship inside the same API as the model, with no separate infrastructure charge — infrastructure usage converts to tokens and lands in your input/output counts. So does STT, speaker diarization, time-series forecasting, GUI detection, OpenWebSearch, and object detection. Teams that would otherwise run Playwright on a separate box and ETL the results now make one call. Safety tooling is configurable rather than opinionated: you pass a guard array naming the categories you want (S1 violent crimes through S14 code interpreter abuse, plus S12_IMAGE for image content) and the model filters accordingly. That's a different posture from vendors who bake one moderation policy into the endpoint. Where it
Researching Interfaze? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Interfaze actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You receive scanned driver's licences through an upload form. You send each image to Interfaze with a Zod schema describing first_name, last_name, dob, and licence number, then read the precontext array for per-field confidence and bounding boxes before writing to your KYC database.
Outcome: Fields scoring above 0.95 auto-approve; anything lower lands in an ops review queue with a highlighted bounding box, so reviewers see exactly which region of the document the model doubted instead of re-reading the whole card.
You need structured pricing tables from 500 competitor pages a week. Instead of running your own headless browser fleet, you call Interfaze's browser engine through the same API and get structured JSON back, or hand it off to a LangChain chain if you'd rather keep orchestration in your existing framework.
Outcome: One API key covers fetching and structuring, and cached tokens on repeat page structures aren't billed — so the marginal cost of a re-scrape drops sharply once caching warms up.
Recordings arrive as MP4 or MP3. You call Interfaze with the STT run-task, request speaker diarization for clinician-versus-patient separation, and request translation for non-English consultations — all through the same multimodal endpoint that handles your document intake.
Outcome: About $0.006 per minute of transcription with 100+ language coverage, and one vendor relationship instead of separate OCR, ASR, and translation contracts.
Use Cases
- Extract structured fields from identity documents with per-field confidence scores and bounding boxes you can route to human review.
- Transcribe and diarize audio for medical, legal, or call-center recordings across 100+ languages.
- Turn invoices, forms, and financial documents into validated JSON using Zod schemas.
- Scrape and structure web pages through the built-in headless browser engine without maintaining your own Playwright stack.
- Run classification or content moderation over text and image snippets with configurable guardrail categories.
- Detect and locate objects or GUI elements in screenshots for automation and testing pipelines.
- Execute generated code inside a sandbox instead of on your own infrastructure.
- Query the web through OpenWebSearch and fold results into an extraction pipeline.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-30
Limitations
- Output caps at 32k tokens, so long-form generation is out.
- The default rate limit is 50 requests per second, extendable only by contacting support — high-throughput batch work will need an enterprise conversation.
- Input token counts can exceed the input you actually sent: Interfaze runs a chain of multipass preprocessing steps that expand input context in exchange for higher determinism and lower output token cost, so your effective input spend runs above the headline $1.50/MTok.
- Infrastructure usage isn't billed separately; sandbox and browser consumption is converted to tokens and added to both input and output counts, which makes per-request cost estimation harder than a flat per-page rate.
- Media (images, PDFs, audio) is converted to binary and counted as input tokens, and the recommended way to size it is to run a test request.
- Reasoning is available but disabled by default.
- Self-hosted/VPC deployment is Enterprise-only.
as of 2026-10-05
Verification history
We have re-verified Interfaze 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Interfaze tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free / Pay-as-you-go
$0/mo + $1.50/MTok input, $3.50/MTok output
Ideal for
Solo developers and small teams prototyping an OCR, transcription, or extraction pipeline, or running low-to-moderate production volume without a procurement cycle.
What this tier adds
Starting tier: no credit card required, no minimums, no seat fees. $1.50/MTok input and $3.50/MTok output, with caching and sandbox/browser infrastructure included, at 50 requests per second.
Enterprise / Custom
Custom
Ideal for
Regulated or high-volume teams that need SOC2/HIPAA agreements, unlimited rate limiting, self-hosted or VPC deployment, or contractual SLAs.
What this tier adds
Adds volume discounts on tokens, unlimited rate limiting, SLAs, self-hosted/VPC deployment, SOC2 and HIPAA compliance agreements, priority 24x7x365 support with a private channel, and custom development.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Interfaze's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
At $1.50/MTok input and $3.50/MTok output with no minimums and no seat fees, Interfaze sits in the mid-range of multimodal model pricing but delivers specialized extraction work at $0.002–$0.004 per OCR'd page and $0.016 per ID extraction — often well under dedicated document-AI vendors billing per page. Solo developers and small teams can start free with no credit card. Enterprise volume discounts, SLAs, and SOC2/HIPAA agreements are negotiated separately.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Interfaze — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Solo developer: 10–20 minutes — npm install interfaze or pip install interfaze, pull an API key from the dashboard, and make a first OCR call following the docs example. Teams using an existing AI SDK: 5 minutes, since the Chat Completion API accepts a base URL swap to https://api.interfaze.ai/v1. LangChain and Vercel AI SDK users can install the native providers. Production rollout with
Switching to or from Interfaze
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a general-purpose multimodal LLM (GPT-style chat API): swap the base URL to https://api.interfaze.ai/v1 and keep your existing Chat Completion request shape — no rewrite needed to start, then add Zod schemas to get
- →From a per-page OCR or Document AI vendor: move document pages to the OCR run-task path, which prices at roughly $0.002–$0.004 per page, and adopt precontext confidence scores in place of the vendor's accuracy
- →From a separate ASR service: consolidate transcription into the same multimodal endpoint using the STT run-task, and add speaker diarization without a second vendor contract.
- →From a self-managed Playwright or Puppeteer scraping stack: replace your browser fleet with the built-in headless browser engine — no separate infrastructure charge beyond token conversion.
- →From LangChain with a custom model provider: install @interfaze-ai/langchain (or pip install interfaze-langchain) and use the native integration instead of a generic wrapper.
- ↗To a general-purpose multimodal LLM: because Interfaze speaks the Chat Completion API standard, you can point your client at another provider's base URL; you'll lose precontext bounding boxes and confidence scores
- ↗To a dedicated per-page OCR vendor: if your workload is high-volume, single-modality document scanning and you don't need per-field confidence routing, a per-page OCR contract may be simpler to forecast.
- ↗To a self-hosted open model: if data residency forbids any third-party inference and the Enterprise VPC arrangement isn't workable, plan a migration to an open-weight vision model you operate yourself.
- ↗To a separate best-of-breed ASR service: if you need model-level control over transcription quality or on-device inference that the bundled STT doesn't provide.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
- Documentationinterfaze.ai
Docs · Interfaze
Full product docs from interfaze.ai
- Documentationinterfaze.ai
Ocr · Interfaze
Full product docs from interfaze.ai
- Documentationinterfaze.ai
Speech To Text · Interfaze
Full product docs from interfaze.ai
- Documentationinterfaze.ai
Guardrails · Interfaze
Full product docs from interfaze.ai
- Resourceinterfaze.ai
Help · Interfaze
Helpful link from interfaze.ai
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Interfaze”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Interfaze” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Interfaze.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Interfaze
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Interfaze, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
RapidSOS
RapidSOS pipes AI-assisted emergency intelligence and pre-call device data straight into 911 dispatch.
Soniox
Soniox speech AI API: real-time speech-to-text, TTS, and translation in 60+ languages.
Deepgram
Deepgram gives you speech-to-text, text-to-speech and a Voice Agent API from one vendor, priced per minute.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Interfaze vs Geologicai
These tools serve entirely different domains. GeologicAI is purpose-built for mining companies needing automated, multi-sensor core analysis with sub-48-hour turnaround, while Interfaze targets developers requiring high-accuracy deterministic AI (OCR, STT, structured extraction). Choose GeologicAI for end-to-end mineral exploration workflows; choose Interfaze for building precise, auditable AI pipelines in software.
Interfaze vs Versatile
If you're a steel erector or GC tracking crane picks and delays without workflow changes, Versatile is your only purpose-built option. But if you need high-accuracy OCR, speech-to-text, or structured data extraction from a multimodal model, Interfaze delivers deterministic outputs with confidence scores at a competitive token price. Choose based on domain: construction site vs. developer toolkit.
Interfaze vs Screenplayiq
Interfaze is the better choice if you need high-accuracy deterministic AI for OCR, speech, or data extraction, backed by recent innovations like diffusion ASR and Postgres LLM. ScreenplayIQ is a niche tool for screenwriters and producers needing market-driven script analysis, but its lack of updates and limited scope make it less versatile. Developers and enterprises should pick Interfaze; film industry professionals may still benefit from ScreenplayIQ's free tier.
Alternatives to Interfaze
View allFrequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Interfaze? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.