DeepAgents

DeepAgents

Open-source agent harness with sub-agents, filesystem, and human-in-the-loop

87/100Safe BetFreeFree

The most complete open-source agent harness for long-horizon tasks, with built-in sub-agents and filesystem access. Ideal if you want a Claude Code-like experience with any LLM, but its opinionated defaults can be overkill for simple loops.

Verified 17d ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/deepagents

Best for
  • Developers needing a full-featured agent harness for complex, multi-step tasks out of the box
  • Teams building production agents with sub-delegation, filesystem access, and human oversight
  • Those wanting a model-agnostic alternative to Claude Code or Cursor for coding agents
  • Rapid prototyping of agentic workflows with built-in context management and persistence
Not ideal for
  • Users who only need a simple agent loop without filesystem, sub-agents, or middleware
  • Scenarios requiring a minimal dependency footprint or no LangGraph stack
  • Projects where the 'trust the LLM' security model is unacceptable and custom sandboxing is not feasible
Visit Website

AdvancedPython developers: pip install deepagents and a basic agent is running in 5 minutes. Full setup with sub-agents, filesystem, and human-in-the-loop takes ~30 minutes of config. For Deep Agents Code CLI, the one-liner curl install takes 2 minutes, then you can start coding immediately.API · CLIAPI available6.0k viewsVerified 17d ago
Pricing
Free
FreeFree tier4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Advanced
Python developers: pip install deepagents and a basic agent is running in 5 minutes. Full setup with sub-agents, filesystem, and human-in-the-loop takes ~30 minutes of config. For Deep Agents Code CLI, the one-liner curl install takes 2 minutes, then you can start coding immediately.
Runs on
APICLI
API available · 11 integrations
Who it's for
Developer building a research agentTeam wanting a coding assistant with any LLMSaaS builder adding deep research features
Live sentiment
Is DeepAgents actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Deep Agents if you only need a simple single-step agent loop without filesystem access, sub-agents, or human-in-the-loop — LangGraph's create_agent is lighter for that.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Running frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7) on multi-step plans can cost $0.50–$2 per run; there's no built-in cost cap.

Price reality

Deep Agents is free and open-source (MIT license). You only pay for LLM API usage and optional LangSmith monitoring. This is dramatically cheaper than managed services like Claude Code ($20/mo) or Cursor ($20/mo Pro) — but you self-host and manage infrastructure. Best for development teams who can justify the ops overhead to avoid per-seat fees.

In short

DeepAgents — Open-source agent harness with sub-agents, filesystem, and human-in-the-loop. Best for Developers needing a full-featured agent harness for complex, multi-step tasks out of the box, Teams building production agents with sub-delegation, filesystem access, and human oversight, Those wanting a model-agnostic alternative to Claude Code or Cursor for coding agents. Free to use.

Viability Score

87/100
Safe Bet

How likely is DeepAgents to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.

momentum
100
funding runway
40
website health
90
wrapper dependency
100

Last calculated: July 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Sub-agents with isolated context windows
  • Pluggable filesystem backends (local, sandboxed, remote)
  • Automatic context summarization and output offloading
  • Sandboxed shell command execution
  • Persistent memory for cross-session recall
  • Human-in-the-loop approve, edit, reject tool calls
  • Reusable skills loaded on demand
  • Custom tools and MCP server integration
  • Model-agnostic: any LLM with tool calling
  • Built on LangGraph for streaming, persistence, checkpointing
  • First-class tracing, evaluation, deployment via LangSmith
  • Deep Agents Code: pre-built CLI coding agent
  • Available as Python library (pip install deepagents)
  • JavaScript/TypeScript library (deepagents.js)
  • Production-ready with LangGraph's deployment features

About DeepAgents

FreeAdvancedAPI availableAPI · CLI

Deep Agents is an opinionated, production-ready agent harness built on LangGraph by LangChain. It provides an out-of-the-box agent with sub-agents, filesystem access, context management, shell access, human-in-the-loop approval, and reusable skills. Designed for developers who need a full-featured agent for complex, multi-step workflows without wiring everything from scratch. It is model-agnostic, supporting any LLM with tool calling (frontier, open-weight, or local). Features include delegated sub-agents with isolated contexts, pluggable filesystem backends (local, sandboxed, remote), context summarization and output offloading, sandboxed command execution, persistent cross-session memory, human-in-the-loop tool call review, and a skills system. It also supports custom tools and any MCP server. First-class tracing, evaluation, and monitoring via LangSmith. Deep Agents is available as a Python library (`pip install deepagents`), a JavaScript/TypeScript library (`deepagents.js`), and a pre-built CLI coding agent (Deep Agents Code, installable via `curl -LsSf https://langch.in/dcode`). It contrasts with lighter harnesses like LangChain's `create_agent` (when you want the full bundle) and custom graphs in LangGraph (when the agent loop shape needs changing).

Behind the Verdict

Deep Agents fills the gap between minimal agent wrappers and bespoke orchestration. Its standout strength is the bundling of sub-agents, filesystem access, context management, and human-in-the-loop right out of the box. For teams already on LangChain, it's a natural extension. Security-wise, it explicitly follows a 'trust the LLM' model — you must enforce boundaries at the tool/sandbox level. That's fine for sandboxed or trusted environments but a non-starter for tightly controlled production. The closest alternative is building custom agents directly in LangGraph, which gives you flexibility but trades Deep Agents' prebuilt capabilities. For most practical coding-agent use cases, Deep Agents is a faster start than Cursor or Claude Code when you want to bring your own model. We'd reach for it when we need a full-featured agent quickly and don't mind the LangGraph dependency. Pass if you need a minimal footprint or a fully managed SaaS.

Researching DeepAgents? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas DeepAgents actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Developer building a research agent

You need to automate competitive analysis by spawning sub-agents to research each competitor, summarize findings, and write a report with citations.

Outcome: Deep Agents handles sub-agent delegation with isolated contexts, context summarization, and filesystem writes — you get a structured report without manual orchestration.

Team wanting a coding assistant with any LLM

Your team uses Ollama for local models and wants a terminal-based coding agent like Claude Code but with full control over the model.

Outcome: Install Deep Agents Code CLI, configure Ollama as the backend, and get a coding assistant with sandboxed shell execution and file editing — no vendor lock-in.

SaaS builder adding deep research features

You want to let users ask complex questions and get multi-step research results with citations, all within your product.

Outcome: Integrate Deep Agents via its Python/JS library, provide your own search tools, and offer a research feature with sub-agents and human-in-the-loop review calls.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

GPT-5.5Claude Opus 4.7Gemini 2.5 ProLlama 3.3 70BOllama modelsvLLM modelsllama.cpp models

as of 2026-07-06

Limitations

  • Sandboxed shell execution is available but limited; sub-agents have isolated contexts that may increase token usage.
  • Quality depends on the underlying LLM's tool-calling ability.
  • As an open-source library, production support is community-driven.

as of 2026-07-01

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published DeepAgents tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Open Source

$0/mo

Ideal for

Developers and teams who want full control, self-hosting, and no per-seat fees. Best for prototyping, production use with dedicated infrastructure, and customization.

What this tier adds

Free and open-source (MIT license) — you get the full source code, all features, and can modify anything. No paid tiers; you only pay for LLM API costs.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Running frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7) on multi-step plans can cost $0.50–$2 per run; there's no built-in cost cap.
  • You pay for LLM API costs separately — Deep Agents itself is free, but the model provider bills per token.
  • Self-hosting requires infrastructure for LangSmith tracing if you want observability; LangSmith has usage-based pricing beyond free tier.
  • Pre-built CLI tool (Deep Agents Code) requires curl installation and may need Python/Node runtime setup on your system.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where DeepAgents's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Deep Agents is free and open-source (MIT license). You only pay for LLM API usage and optional LangSmith monitoring. This is dramatically cheaper than managed services like Claude Code ($20/mo) or Cursor ($20/mo Pro) — but you self-host and manage infrastructure. Best for development teams who can justify the ops overhead to avoid per-seat fees.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of DeepAgents — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Python developers: pip install deepagents and a basic agent is running in 5 minutes. Full setup with sub-agents, filesystem, and human-in-the-loop takes ~30 minutes of config. For Deep Agents Code CLI, the one-liner curl install takes 2 minutes, then you can start coding immediately.

Switching to or from DeepAgents

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From LangGraph create_agent: Replace create_agent with create_deep_agent and add filesystem, sub-agents, and skills config in the same codebase.
  • From custom LangGraph graph: Refactor your agent loop to use Deep Agents' opinionated graph — you lose custom topology but gain built-in features.
Migrating out
  • To LangGraph custom graph: You can extract the LangGraph graph from Deep Agents and customize it — the library is built on LangGraph so migration is incremental.
  • To Claude Code or Cursor: Deep Agents Code output can be ported to these proprietary tools if you need their tighter IDE integration.

Integrations

OpenAIAnthropicGoogleOllamavLLMllama.cppBasetenFireworksLangGraphLangSmithMCP servers

Resources & Guides

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Popular in Automation & Agents

Presto Voice

Presto Voice

Drive-thru voice AI automation for QSR chains to boost revenue and efficiency.

Contact SalesTry
Truleo

Truleo

AI intelligence agents that surface case leads from siloed law enforcement data.

PaidTry
Locus Robotics

Locus Robotics

Flexible AMR warehouse automation with Physical AI for autonomous fulfillment.

Contact SalesTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used DeepAgents? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.