Dev
Mission control Kanban for orchestrating multiple AI coding agents with isolated git worktrees.
dev-3.0 solves a real problem for solo devs running multiple AI agents—isolated worktrees, live previews, and column automation beat juggling terminal tabs. The alpha maturity means rough edges, but the core workflow is clever. If you're a terminal power user, try it; if you want a graphical chat-style agent, skip it. For a more polished, collaboration-oriented alternative, consider Linear or Jira for project tracking, but for agent orchestration there's no direct equivalent yet.
Verified 15d ago · liveness 63/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/dev
- Solo developers managing 3+ AI coding agents on different branches
- Indie founders acting as full-stack + product + QA, needing parallel agent workflows
- Developers running the same task with multiple agents/models to compare results
- Git-heavy workflows requiring strict branch isolation per task
- Teams larger than one person—no collaboration, sharing, or roles
- Users who prefer a graphical chat-style agent interface
- Developers wanting a full IDE with built-in debugger, language server, or code editing
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip dev-3.0 if you prefer a graphical chat-style agent interface, need team collaboration, or are not comfortable with terminal tools and git worktrees.
There are no hidden costs—the app is free and open source, but you must have the terminal-based agents (e.g., Claude Code) separately installed and configured, which may incur API costs from those providers.
dev-3.0 is free and open source, making it ideal for solo developers and indie founders who want to orchestrate multiple agents without spending on a subscription. Compared to project management tools like Linear (from $8/user/month) or Jira (from $7.75/user/month), dev-3.0 is $0, but you'll pay for the underlying agent APIs.
In short
Dev — Mission control Kanban for orchestrating multiple AI coding agents with isolated git worktrees. Best for Solo developers managing 3+ AI coding agents on different branches, Indie founders acting as full-stack + product + QA, needing parallel agent workflows, Developers running the same task with multiple agents/models to compare results. Free to use.
What people actually say about Dev — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Dev on Jul 3, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Dev? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: September 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Kanban board with drag-and-drop columns
- Per-task isolated git worktrees
- Live terminal preview on hover (updates every second)
- Built-in tmux terminal powered by Ghostty
- Split panes for multiple agents per task
- One task, many attempts with different agents/models
- Auto-allocated ports ($DEV3_PORT0, $DEV3_PORT1)
- Copy-on-write cloning for fast node_modules/.venv
- Column agents: auto-spawn agent when task enters column
- Automatic AI review of completed tasks
- Monorepo file filter with sparse-checkout
- Multi-monitor support (⌘⇧N to open new window)
- Labels (Bug, Feature, Refactor) and full-text search
- Create tasks from remote branches
- Terminal bell alerts
About Dev
dev-3.0 is a free, open-source desktop app that turns the chaos of running multiple AI coding agents into a structured, visual workflow. Built for solo developers and indie founders who juggle 5+ agents across different projects, it replaces dozens of terminal tabs with a Kanban board where each task is a fully isolated git worktree. You can launch any terminal-based agent—Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, opencode, or any CLI tool—directly into that worktree, split tmux panes to run several agents side by side, and hover over any card to see a live terminal preview. No more context-switching tax, no more merge conflicts between parallel agents. Every feature is engineered around one goal: keeping your focus while commanding a fleet of AI agents. Per-task git worktrees give you strict branch isolation, so multiple agents can work on the same codebase without stepping on each other. Copy-on-write cloning makes node_modules and .venv setup near-instant. Auto-allocated ports inject $DEV3_PORT0 and $DEV3_PORT1 into your scripts, preventing clashes between dev servers. Column agents auto-spawn when a task lands in a column, and completed tasks pass through a configurable AI reviewer before they reach you. The app is keyboard-first, with a single shortcut panel (⌘/) covering app navigation and the full tmux keymap. You can define custom workflow columns, create tasks from remote branches, and run one task many times with different agents or prompts, keeping the winner. It supports dark and light themes, multi-monitor windows, and monorepo sparse-checkout to speed up worktree creation. It's not an IDE—it deliberately stays out of code editing, handing you off to VS Code or Cursor when you need it, and it integrates with Linear and Jira via MCP. dev-3.0 is free and open source, distributed via GitHub, currently in alpha/pre-release. It targets the 'One Person Studio'—developers who are their own whole team and want a mission-control cockpit instead of terminal soup.
Behind the Verdict
If you're a solo developer running more than a couple of AI coding agents across different branches, dev-3.0 is worth a serious look. The terminal-tab chaos is real, and this tool's per-task git worktrees are a clean fix. The live hover preview is a standout—it lets you check on agents without switching views, which cuts a lot of context-switching overhead. But this isn't for everyone. It's alpha software, so expect rough edges and occasional instability. And if you prefer a graphical chat-style interface with a pretty agent panel, dev-3.0's terminal-first approach will feel like a step backwards. It's built for keyboard-triggered, tmux-literate developers who aren't afraid of a CLI. Compared to DeepSeek's recently announced Harness (also in the orchestration space, but in developer preview), dev-3.0's edge is its open-source nature and the depth of its git integration. Harness might be worth watching, but dev-3.0 is available now and free—no waitlist. For teams, dev-3.0 is a hard pass. There are no collaboration features, no shared boards, no roles. It's designed for the 'One Person Studio'—if you need to manage other people, stick with Linear or Jira. In practice, the column agents and AI reviewer are the features that save real time, but they require configuration. You'll need to invest some effort upfront to set up your workflow. The payoff is a board that runs itself. Watch out for the learning curve. tmux keybindings and git worktrees are second nature to some, but if you're new to either, you'll spend your first few sessions just getting comfortable. Once over that hump, the speed gains are substantial.
Researching Dev? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Dev actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Managing multiple features across a single repo
Outcome: Create a task for each feature, each in its own worktree. Launch Claude Code for one, Gemini CLI for another, and monitor both via hover previews. Merge the winners to your main branch.
Testing a refactor with multiple agents
Outcome: Create one task, run 5 attempts with different agents and prompts. Each attempt gets its own worktree. Compare outputs side-by-side and keep only the best one.
Monitoring a fleet of agents across projects
Outcome: Organize projects into Spaces (Client work, Products). Use terminal bell alerts to know when an agent needs attention, and check hover previews to see progress without switching contexts.
Use Cases
- Run Claude Code on one branch while Gemini CLI refactors another, all from a single board.
- Compare outputs of 5 different agents on the same prompt by creating multiple attempts per task.
- Keep a Kanban board of bug fixes, each with its own worktree, and hop between terminals via hover preview.
- Launch Codex CLI in a worktree for documentation, then Codex CLI in another for test generation – without branch conflicts.
- Use terminal bell alerts to get notified when an agent requests approval, minimizing idle time.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-09
Limitations
- Agent integration relies on external terminal-based CLI tools such as Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, and opencode.
- Each task on the board requires an isolated git worktree, and the built-in terminal is powered by Ghostty with tmux preconfigured.
- The product is noted as being for a One Person Studio, and it is available for download with GitHub links.
as of 2026-08-25
Verification history
We have re-verified Dev 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Dev tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Early Access
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo developers and indie founders who want to try a free, open-source mission control for their AI coding agents without any upfront cost.
What this tier adds
This is the free entry point: the entire app is available at no cost, with alpha/pre-release access via GitHub.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Dev's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
dev-3.0 is free and open source, making it ideal for solo developers and indie founders who want to orchestrate multiple agents without spending on a subscription. Compared to project management tools like Linear (from $8/user/month) or Jira (from $7.75/user/month), dev-3.0 is $0, but you'll pay for the underlying agent APIs.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Dev — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
If you're familiar with terminal agents and git, you can be productive within the first hour. Creating a project and your first task takes minutes. Installing the app on macOS is straightforward via GitHub releases. Windows support is not mentioned, so expect macOS-only for now.
Switching to or from Dev
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- ↗To Linear or Jira: Export your task list as CSV and import, but you'll lose the worktree integration.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Dev”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Dev” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Dev.
Official links
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Dev vs Locus Robotics
These tools serve entirely different domains: Dev is for solo developers managing multiple AI coding agents via a Kanban/terminal interface (free, alpha), while Locus Robotics is for warehouses with high-volume order fulfillment using autonomous mobile robots (paid RaaS). Choose Dev if you need structure for parallel AI coding tasks as an individual; choose Locus Robotics if you run a warehouse needing 2-3x productivity gains.
Dev vs Presto Voice
Dev and Presto Voice serve completely different markets and purposes. Dev is a free, alpha-stage desktop tool for solo developers orchestrating multiple AI coding agents via a Kanban/terminal interface. Presto Voice is a mature, enterprise voice AI platform for QSR drive-thrus, focusing on order accuracy and upselling. Your choice depends entirely on whether you need to manage coding agents (choose Dev) or automate fast-food ordering (choose Presto Voice). There is no overlap.
Dev vs Truleo
Dev is a free, alpha-stage tool for solo developers juggling multiple AI coding agents—ideal for parallel prompt experiments and git isolation. Truleo is a paid, mature intelligence platform for law enforcement, automating lead generation from RMS, CAD, and jail calls. Your choice depends entirely on whether you are a solo dev or a police agency.
Popular in Autonomous Coding Agents
Cognition AI
Autonomous software engineer that plans, writes, tests, and ships production code inside your existing codebase.
Poolside AI
Open-weight agentic coding models — Laguna XS 2.1 and Laguna S 2.1 — built for secure on-prem and air-gapped enterprise AI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Dev? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.