Eko
Eko turns plain-English instructions into agentic workflows that drive browsers, desktop apps, and code for you.
Eko is the most interesting option in this review for anyone who wants agentic automation without learning a node-based builder. The distinct, named capabilities — Browser Use, Computer Use, Image Agent, Music Agent, Code Agent, Deep Search with visual reports — cover a real range of tasks, and scheduling is priced sanely ($19.0/mo for 3 scheduled tasks, $39.9/mo for 5). The catch is metering: Sparks burn at a rate the vendor itself calls variable, so budget by outcome, not by the "approximately 8 tasks" label. If your stack runs on a handful of connected SaaS apps with strict audit requirements, Zapier or n8n will serve you better. If you want an agent that opens a browser and does the
Verified 4h ago · liveness 67/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/eko
- Marketers automating competitive research and reporting
- Developers automating code generation and testing
- Data analysts wanting scheduled deep-search insights
- Solo operators and small teams without an automation engineer
- Teams that require self-hosted or on-premise deployment
- Enterprises needing a published SLA or compliance guarantees
- Buyers who want a large library of prebuilt SaaS connectors
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Eko if you need prebuilt connectors for specific SaaS apps, self-hosted or on-premise deployment, or a contractually guaranteed SLA — its strengths are natural-language browser and desktop automation, not deep app integration.
Sparks burn faster on complex workflows, so the advertised "approximately 8 tasks" on Plus can be far fewer in practice — the vendor itself says estimates are for reference only.
Eko prices for individuals and small teams: Free to trial, $19.0/mo Plus for light scheduled work, $39.9/mo Pro for a handful of recurring agents, and $199.9/mo Ultra when you need unlimited Sparks and scheduling (limited-time). There is no mid-market or enterprise contract tier, so larger organizations pay Ultra per seat rather than negotiating — and unlike Zapier or n8n, there is no cheap high-volume connector plan to fall back on.
In short
Eko — Eko turns plain-English instructions into agentic workflows that drive browsers, desktop apps, and code for you. Best for Marketers automating competitive research and reporting, Developers automating code generation and testing, Data analysts wanting scheduled deep-search insights. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo.
What people actually say about Eko — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
68 mentions across 5 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Aug 1, 2026.
Average across the 5 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Natural language workflow creation lowers barrier for non-coders.
- +Open-source core with active GitHub repo (4.9k stars) invites tinkering.
- +Supports browser, computer, code, image, and music agents in one tool.
- +Scheduling and concurrent tasks enable real multi-step automation.
- +Fellou chat interface makes defining workflows conversational and quick.
- −Workflow errors like 'undefined tools' break demos and frustrate users.
- −Documentation on generate/execute flows is unclear and incomplete.
- −Sparks credit system burns credits on failed runs, surprising users.
- −Browser agent gets stuck on cookie pop-ups and dynamic web elements.
- −Most community feedback is off-topic, making real reviews scarce.
- • Failed runs still consume Sparks, causing unexpected quota drain
- • API access is gated behind higher tiers (Plus and above)
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Eko? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: September 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Natural language workflow creation — describe a task and Eko plans the steps
- Browser Use (agentic web navigation) on every plan including Free
- Computer Use to automate desktop applications
- Image Agent for generating images inside a workflow
- Music Agent for generating music inside a workflow
- Code Agent for writing, refactoring, and testing code
- Deep Search with visual report generation
- Chat interface on all tiers
- Scheduled recurring tasks (2 on Free, 3 on Plus, 5 on Pro, unlimited on Ultra)
- Unlimited concurrent tasks (limited-time offer on all tiers)
- Sparks credit-based task metering
- Priority support on Plus, Pro, and Ultra
- Early access to new features on Plus and above
- Annual billing with 20% savings
- Public documentation, quickstart guide, and GitHub repo
About Eko
Eko (short for Eko Keeps Operating) is an agent framework from the team behind the Fellou agentic browser. Instead of wiring together nodes in n8n or configuring traditional RPA, you describe a task in natural language, and Eko plans the steps and runs them. It orchestrates several specialized agents: Browser Use for navigating websites, Computer Use for driving desktop applications, an Image Agent, a Music Agent, and a Code Agent, plus Deep Search with visual report output and a chat interface. You can schedule recurring tasks (2 on Free, 3 on Plus, 5 on Pro, unlimited on Ultra during the limited-time offer) and run tasks concurrently. Consumption is metered in Sparks: the Free plan starts with a 1,000-Spark new-user bonus (roughly four tasks), Plus is $19.0/mo for 2,000 Sparks a month (about 8 tasks), Pro is $39.9/mo for 5,000 Sparks (about 20 tasks), and Ultra is $199.9/mo with unlimited Sparks as a limited-time offer. Annual billing saves 20%. The vendor states plainly that real consumption varies significantly with workflow complexity, so those task estimates are reference points, not guarantees. It suits marketers, developers, and analysts who want multi-step automation without writing orchestration code, and there is an API plus documented quickstart for programmatic use. It is not a fit if you need self-hosting, an enterprise SLA, or a large library of prebuilt SaaS connectors — that is Zapier's territory, not Eko's.
Behind the Verdict
Eko's core promise is that orchestration should be a sentence, not a canvas. Where n8n makes you drag nodes and Zapier makes you pick from a connector list, Eko takes a natural-language brief, plans the steps, and executes across browser, desktop, and code. That breadth is the product's real differentiator: the same tool can deep-search competitors and render a visual report, generate a batch of campaign images and music, and schedule a weekly code agent to refactor and test a repository. Strengths start with scope. Browser Use and Computer Use together mean Eko is not confined to web APIs — it can operate the desktop apps and web UIs that never shipped an integration. Deep Search produces a visual report rather than a wall of chat text, which matters for the competitive-research and analyst use cases this tool is clearly built around. Scheduling and concurrent execution are available on every tier (unlimited concurrent tasks are a limited-time offer), so you are not forced onto the top plan just to run two things at once. Plus and above add priority support and early access to new features. The framework also has documentation, a quickstart guide, and a public GitHub repo, which is more than most agent startups offer. Weaknesses are equally clear. The integrations list is thin — there are no documented prebuilt connectors to Slack, Notion, Salesforce, or the rest of the SaaS long tail, so work that would be a one-click Zap becomes a browser-automation task for Eko. Metering is the second issue: Sparks scale with workflow complexity, and because the vendor's own page warns that estimates are "for reference only," the effective cost per finished task is hard to predict in advance. Third, there is no self-hosted or on-premise option, and no published SLA or enterprise tier, which rules Eko out for regulated or large-enterprise deployments. Fourth, all the unlimited allowances — Sparks on Ultra, scheduled tasks on Ultra, concurrent tasks on every tier — are explicitly marked limited-time offers, so long-term planning around them carries risk. Where it fits: small teams and solo operators who want an agent to do multi-step web and desktop work on a schedule, and who value speed-to-automation over connector depth. Where it doesn't: enterprises needing on-prem deployment, procurement-friendly SLAs, or a mature library of prebuilt SaaS integrations. Start on the Free plan, run a couple of your real workflows, and measure Sparks burn before committing to Plus or Pro.
Researching Eko? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Eko actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Every Monday, a scheduled Eko task deep-searches three competitors, pulls pricing and messaging changes, and renders a visual report into the team channel.
Outcome: A competitor briefing lands without anyone opening a browser; roughly 150-200 Sparks per run on Plus keeps monthly burn inside the 2,000-Spark allowance for weekly runs.
A weekly scheduled Code Agent task checks the repository, refactors flagged files, and runs the test suite, with results reviewed in the chat interface.
Outcome: Routine maintenance happens on a schedule without CI wiring, and the 1,000-Spark Free bonus is enough to validate whether the agent's output is trustworthy.
Eko uses Browser Use to log into several web portals, extract figures, and assemble a visual report, with concurrent tasks running each portal in parallel.
Outcome: Hours of copy-paste extraction collapse into one scheduled run; because Sparks scale with steps, the analyst tracks consumption per report before scaling to Pro.
Use Cases
- Automate competitive analysis by having Eko deep-search rivals and compile a visual report on a weekly schedule.
- Generate a batch of campaign images and music from a single natural-language brief for social media.
- Schedule a weekly Code Agent task to refactor and test a repository.
- Use Browser Use to fill forms and pull data from multiple sites concurrently.
- Build a research assistant that searches the web, summarizes articles, and drafts replies.
Limitations
- Sparks consumption varies significantly with workflow complexity, and the vendor states the published task estimates are for reference only — your real task count can be well below the "approximately 8 tasks" figure on Plus.
- There are no documented prebuilt integrations with common SaaS tools, so connecting to a specific app usually means Browser Use or Computer Use instead of a native connector.
- Unlimited Sparks on Ultra, unlimited scheduled tasks on Ultra, and unlimited concurrent tasks on all tiers are all marked limited-time offers, so those allowances could change.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premise option and no enterprise tier with an SLA.
as of 2026-09-15
Verification history
We have re-verified Eko 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Eko tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo tinkerers and first-time agent users who want to test whether Eko can handle their task before paying anything.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: 1,000 Sparks as a new-user bonus (roughly 4 tasks), 2 scheduled tasks, unlimited concurrent tasks as a limited-time offer, plus Chat, Deep Search, Browser Use, Computer Use, and the Image, Music, and Code agents.
Plus
$19.0/mo
Ideal for
Individual marketers or analysts running a light weekly automation, such as one recurring research report.
What this tier adds
Adds 2,000 Sparks a month (about 8 tasks) versus the one-off Free bonus, a third scheduled task, priority support, and early access to new features.
Pro
$39.9/mo
Ideal for
Power users juggling several recurring agents, for example research plus code maintenance plus report generation.
What this tier adds
Raises the monthly allowance to 5,000 Sparks (about 20 tasks) and allows 5 scheduled tasks, roughly doubling Plus capacity for twice the price.
Ultra
$199.9/mo
Ideal for
Solo operators or small teams running many scheduled agents daily who would otherwise blow through Spark allowances.
What this tier adds
Moves to unlimited Sparks and unlimited scheduled tasks — both marked limited-time offers — plus exclusive priority support, at $199.9/mo.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Eko's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Eko prices for individuals and small teams: Free to trial, $19.0/mo Plus for light scheduled work, $39.9/mo Pro for a handful of recurring agents, and $199.9/mo Ultra when you need unlimited Sparks and scheduling (limited-time). There is no mid-market or enterprise contract tier, so larger organizations pay Ultra per seat rather than negotiating — and unlike Zapier or n8n, there is no cheap high-volume connector plan to fall back on.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Eko — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Free is the fastest path to first value: sign up, claim the 1,000-Spark bonus, and run a first natural-language workflow in the chat interface within minutes — no node graph to learn. Expect 30-60 minutes to get a reliable scheduled task running, since you will iterate on the prompt as you observe how many Sparks each attempt consumes. Teams adding the API should budget about half a day against
Switching to or from Eko
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Zapier: re-describe each Zap as a natural-language Eko workflow, accepting that app-to-app steps become Browser Use automation rather than native triggers.
- →From n8n: port the logic of a workflow as a prompt plus agent selection, and move scheduled nodes onto Eko's scheduled tasks (3 on Plus, 5 on Pro).
- →From manual browser work: write down the click-by-click routine you follow today and hand it to Eko as a Browser Use task.
- →From a general-purpose chatbot: move recurring prompts into scheduled Eko tasks so they run without you pasting them each time.
- ↗To Zapier: rebuild Eko workflows as Zaps where native connectors exist, accepting far less natural-language flexibility in exchange for predictable per-task pricing.
- ↗To n8n: reimplement orchestration as a node graph, which buys self-hosting and connector depth but requires you to code the logic Eko inferred.
- ↗To Make: translate scheduled Eko tasks into scenarios where your automations are mostly app-to-app rather than browser-driven.
- ↗To a custom script: use the Eko API and quickstart guide to export the logic, then reimplement agents on your own infrastructure if you need self-hosting.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Eko”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Eko” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Eko.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Eko
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Eko, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
MarsX
Open-source dev platform uniting AI, NoCode, Code, and reusable MicroApps.
AppSheet
Google's no-code app builder that turns your spreadsheets and databases into custom mobile and desktop business apps.
AppGyver
SAP's unified low-code and pro-code platform with Joule AI for enterprise app development
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Eko vs Locus Robotics
Locus Robotics and Eko serve fundamentally different domains—physical warehouse automation vs. digital workflow automation. If you're a 3PL or eCommerce fulfillment center needing to boost picking productivity by 2-3x, Locus Robotics is the clear choice with its AMR fleet and LocusONE orchestration. If you're an individual or team looking to automate browser-based research, code generation, or desktop tasks without coding, Eko's natural language agentic workflows are ideal. Choose based on whether your automation need is physical or digital.
Eko vs Truleo
These tools serve completely different markets. Truleo is a specialized intelligence platform for law enforcement, integrating with RMS, CAD, and jail call systems. Eko is a general-purpose workflow automation tool for anyone needing browser/computer agents. If you're a police agency, Truleo is the only fit; for business automation, Eko wins.
Eko vs Presto Voice
Presto Voice and Eko serve entirely different domains — physical drive-thru operations vs. digital task automation. If you run a QSR chain with drive-thru, Presto Voice’s proven upselling and multi-model voice AI (now with Dairy Queen as a customer) is a no-brainer. For automating research, coding, or media generation with natural language, Eko’s freemium model and scheduled workflows offer a flexible, code-free alternative. Choose based on your restaurant or office need — not a direct competitor matchup.
Alternatives to Eko
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Used Eko? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.