Extruct AI
Extruct AI is a company research API that finds and enriches companies from a 10M index or the live web, with every answer cited.
If your workflow lives in an agent or a script, Extruct earns its place fast: cited results, an MCP server, and a free 25-credit tier to prove it out. The credit math is the real decision — Deep Search at 2 credits per match and phone lookups at 20 each get expensive at volume, so model your monthly usage before committing to Pro at $149/mo. For flat-rate, no-code enrichment, Apollo or ZoomInfo will feel simpler.
Verified 8d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/extruct-ai
- GTM and sales ops teams automating prospect research with AI and cited sources
- Market researchers building targeted company lists from natural-language prompts
- Investors running diligence on companies and teams that need verifiable reports
- Developers wiring company data into agents via the MCP server or REST API
- Teams that want flat-rate per-seat pricing rather than credit-metered usage
- Users needing real-time coverage of very small or private companies outside the 10M index
- Non-technical buyers who want no-code, all-in-one CRM enrichment
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Extruct AI if you want flat-rate per-seat enrichment with no code, or if your sourcing is mostly phone numbers at volume where 20 credits per lookup makes Pro uneconomic.
Credits do not roll over month to month, so unused monthly allowance is lost rather than banked.
Free at $0/mo with 25 credits is enough to test search and the API. Starter at $49/mo fits a single researcher or small team doing semantic and lookalike list-building with exports. Pro at $149/mo is the tier with Deep Search, AI tables, and contact lookups. Against flat-rate per-seat enrichment suites like Apollo or ZoomInfo, Extruct is cheaper to start but metered, so high-volume sourcing can cost more; teams needing only light list-building pay less.
In short
Extruct AI — Extruct AI is a company research API that finds and enriches companies from a 10M index or the live web, with every answer cited. Best for GTM and sales ops teams automating prospect research with AI and cited sources, Market researchers building targeted company lists from natural-language prompts, Investors running diligence on companies and teams that need verifiable reports. Free to start; paid plans from $49/mo.
What's new in Extruct AI
Checked 8 days agoAcross the latest 2 updates: 1 feature update and 1 launch.
Extruct search now returns up to 2,000 results on paid plans
Paid plans can now pull up to 2,000 results from a single search — 8x the previous cap — across Semantic Search and Lookalike Search.
Extruct ships MCP server and deeper enrichments in April–May update
April and May releases add an MCP server bringing Extruct into Claude and editors, plus faster and more complete enrichments.
What people actually say about Extruct AI — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
17 mentions across 2 sources (Product Hunt, Lemmy) · researched Jul 5, 2026.
Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +API-first design ideal for developers embedding research into tools.
- +Semantic search lets you describe needs in natural language.
- +Cited sources provide transparency for every answer returned.
- +Multiple search modes: semantic, lookalike, deep search.
- +Chrome extension and MCP server enable quick integration.
- −Free tier only 25 credits/month, very limited for testing.
- −No native CRM integrations yet, hurts GTM teams.
- −Accuracy for complex or global queries unproven.
- −Email and phone lookups are credit-expensive on Pro plan.
- −API-centric approach may intimidate non-technical users.
- • Email lookups cost 4 credits each on Pro plan
- • Phone lookups cost 20 credits each
- • Heavy usage may require upgrading tier sooner than expected
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Extruct AI? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Semantic search from plain-English prompts into company lists
- Lookalike search finds similar companies by domain or UUID
- Deep Search applies multiple criteria for fewer, higher-fit matches
- Every search and report returns cited sources
- Deep Research generates cited reports on companies, people, or teams
- AI research tables for repeatable enrichment and scoring
- Email lookups at 4 credits each (Pro plan)
- Phone lookups at 20 credits each (Pro plan)
- Up to 2,000 results per search on paid plans
- REST API access for embedding research in custom tools
- Remote MCP server for Claude, Codex, Cursor, and VS Code
- Chrome extension for lookalike search in the browser
- Shared credit pool across search, tables, and lookups
- Public Data Rooms for browsing indexed datasets
- Exports and sharing of tables and searches on Starter and above
About Extruct AI
Extruct AI is an API-first company research platform for AI agents, developers, and GTM teams that need to discover and enrich company data with a source attached to every result. It pairs a curated index of 10 million companies with live web search, so instead of filtering a static database you describe what you want in plain English and Extruct builds the list. Three search modes do the heavy lifting: Semantic Search turns a natural-language prompt into a company list, Lookalike Search returns companies similar to a target domain or UUID, and Deep Search runs multiple criteria at once and trades volume for fit. On top of search sit Deep Research for cited company or people reports and AI Tables for repeatable enrichment and scoring workflows. Paid plans now return up to 2,000 results per search, an 8x jump from the previous 250 cap. Where Extruct separates from Apollo or ZoomInfo is the agent-native angle: an MCP server puts it inside Claude, Codex, Cursor, and VS Code, and open-source Cowork skills cover post-meeting sales execution. It suits technical teams embedding verified research into their own tooling rather than teams shopping for an all-in-one CRM enrichment suite.
Behind the Verdict
Extruct AI is best understood as infrastructure, not an app. The core is a search-and-enrichment API over a 10M-company index plus live web, and the distinguishing feature is that every search and every Deep Research report comes back with its source cited — which matters a lot if you are feeding results into an AI agent that has to justify what it says. The three discovery modes cover different jobs: Semantic Search for recall-first sourcing from a plain-English prompt, Lookalike Search when you already have one good company domain or UUID and want more like it, and Deep Search when fit matters more than volume. Deep Research generates cited reports on a company, person, or team, and AI Tables turn a list you already have into a repeatable enrichment and scoring workflow. The agent-native layer is where Extruct has pulled ahead of general-purpose enrichment tools: a remote MCP server puts Extruct search and tables inside Claude, Codex, Cursor, and VS Code, and the docs point you at an Extruct API Skill and third-party automation via CRM. The June 2026 change that lifted paid plans to 2,000 results per search removes the previous 250-result ceiling that constrained list-building. The tradeoffs are structural. Pricing is a single shared credit pool, so a Deep Search match costs 2 credits and an email lookup 4 while a phone number costs 20 — heavy phone sourcing will exhaust a Pro plan's 2,000 credits fast, and unused credits do not roll over month to month. Deep Search, AI research tables, and contact lookups sit behind the Pro tier, so Starter buyers get volume and exports but not the deeper workflows. It is not a CRM and does not do email sequencing or sales engagement, and the index skews to companies with a real web presence rather than long-tail private outfits. For a technical team wiring verified company research into its own tooling, that focus is the point; for a non-technical team that wants one login and a sequencer, it is friction.
Researching Extruct AI? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Extruct AI actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Connect the Extruct MCP server inside Cursor or Claude, then ask the agent in natural language for lookalike companies to a target domain and pull them into the CRM.
Outcome: An enriched, source-cited prospect list lands in Affinity without leaving the editor, with the Lookalike API doing the sourcing.
Run Deep Search with five criteria — size, region, certifications, recent project value, and hiring signals — then review the ranked shortlist.
Outcome: A few hundred high-fit matches out of thousands of candidates, each with its citation, ready to export or share on Starter or above.
Submit a Deep Research brief on a target company's leadership team and recent funding, requesting a cited report.
Outcome: A markdown or schema-structured report with sources attached, usable directly in an investment memo.
Use Cases
- Find HVAC contractors in Florida with specific certifications and project history for sales outreach.
- Enrich a list of prospect companies with email addresses and phone numbers for outbound campaigns.
- Build a lookalike list of similar startups to a target company for investment analysis.
- Generate a cited research report on a competitor's leadership team and recent funding.
- Automate CRM data enrichment by triggering Extruct AI Tables via API on new contacts.
- Search for companies using specific technology stacks and hiring patterns across multiple criteria.
- Use Claude Code with the Lookalike API to auto-build enriched prospect lists via natural language.
- Run post-meeting workflows with open-source Cowork skills (MEDDPICC, account plans, org charts).
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-29
Limitations
- Extruct AI is a credit-based company research API and platform.
- The Free plan provides 25 monthly credits with 25 results per search; Starter ($49/mo) provides 500 credits and Pro ($149/mo) provides 2,000 credits, both capped at up to 2,000 results per search on paid plans.
- Deep Search, AI research tables, and email/phone lookups are limited to the Pro plan, with credit costs ranging from 1 to 20 credits per action.
- Credits reset each month and do not roll over.
- Team & Enterprise pricing is custom and requires talking to the founders.
- Extruct is search and enrichment infrastructure rather than a CRM — it does not include email sequencing or sales engagement features.
as of 2026-10-02
Verification history
We have re-verified Extruct AI 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Extruct AI tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
A developer or researcher who wants to test semantic and lookalike search plus API access before spending anything.
What this tier adds
Starting tier at $0/mo: 25 monthly credits, 25 searches, 25 results per search, public Data Rooms, API access and Chrome extension — no exports or sharing.
Starter
$49/mo
Ideal for
A single researcher or small team building company lists at volume who needs to export and share the results.
What this tier adds
Adds 500 monthly credits ($49/mo), lifts results to 2,000 per search, and unlocks exports plus table and search sharing.
Pro
$149/mo
Ideal for
A technical GTM or research team that needs Deep Search, AI tables, and contact lookups alongside search volume.
What this tier adds
Adds 2,000 monthly credits ($149/mo), Deep Search (1,000 matches), AI research tables (2,000 cells), email lookups (500) and phone lookups (100).
Team & Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Multi-seat teams that need shared billing, shared workspace, onboarding, and CRM integration guidance.
What this tier adds
Custom pricing adds shared workspace setup, per-seat pricing, workflow onboarding, CRM integration guidance, and dedicated Slack and email support.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Extruct AI's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Free at $0/mo with 25 credits is enough to test search and the API. Starter at $49/mo fits a single researcher or small team doing semantic and lookalike list-building with exports. Pro at $149/mo is the tier with Deep Search, AI tables, and contact lookups. Against flat-rate per-seat enrichment suites like Apollo or ZoomInfo, Extruct is cheaper to start but metered, so high-volume sourcing can cost more; teams needing only light list-building pay less.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Extruct AI — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Free-plan developer: an API token from the Dashboard takes minutes, and the docs' Authentication page gets a first curl call running the same session. Agent user: connecting the remote MCP server inside Claude, Codex, Cursor, or VS Code is a short configuration step. Non-technical researcher: semantic search from a plain-English prompt produces a first list immediately, but repeatable AI Table
Switching to or from Extruct AI
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Apollo or ZoomInfo: use Semantic or Lookalike Search to rebuild saved lists, keeping Extruct for cited research alongside your existing enrichment contract.
- →From manual spreadsheet sourcing: start with a plain-English Semantic Search prompt over the 10M index rather than building filters by hand.
- →From a hand-rolled scraping script: replace it with the REST API or MCP server so results arrive with sources attached.
- →From a general-purpose research assistant: move recurring company lookups into AI Tables so the workflow is repeatable rather than one-off.
- ↗To Apollo or ZoomInfo: export your Data Rooms and AI Table outputs, then reload them into a flat-rate per-seat enrichment suite if you need sequencing in the same tool.
- ↗To a CRM's native enrichment: pull Extruct table results into the CRM's own fields if you no longer want a separate credit-metered lookup step.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Extruct AI”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Extruct AI” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Extruct AI.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Extruct AI
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Extruct AI, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Marvin User Research
Marvin is an AI-native customer insights platform that runs AI-moderated interviews and delivers cited answers from your research repository.
Persana AI
Persana AI runs AI sales prospecting agents over 100+ data sources and 75+ live intent signals, with enrichment and outreach in one subscription.
Klue
Klue runs competitive intelligence and win-loss research together on one AI platform for B2B revenue teams.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Extruct Ai vs Nectar Energy
Extruct AI and Nectar Energy serve entirely different domains — Extruct is a company research API for sales and investment workflows, while Nectar optimizes building energy use. Choose Extruct if you need to find and enrich company data programmatically; choose Nectar if you manage commercial building operations and want automated HVAC/lighting control. Neither is a substitute for the other.
Extruct Ai vs Screenplayiq
These tools serve completely different audiences. If you're in sales or market research needing to discover and enrich company data with cited sources, Extruct AI is a powerful API-first choice that now returns up to 2,000 results and has become free to start. If you're a screenwriter or producer looking for data-driven script marketability analysis and box office predictions, ScreenplayIQ offers affordable tiers with structural feedback and comparative market data. Choose based on your domain — there's no overlap.
Extruct Ai vs Geologicai
Extruct AI and GeologicAI serve completely different domains — one is a company research API for sales and AI workflows, the other is a mining core scanning platform. Choose Extruct if you need to automate prospect research or enrich CRM data with cited sources. Choose GeologicAI if you're in critical minerals mining and need rapid, AI-driven core analysis to accelerate projects. They are not direct competitors.
Alternatives to Extruct AI
View allMarvin User Research
Marvin is an AI-native customer insights platform that runs AI-moderated interviews and delivers cited answers from your research repository.
Persana AI
Persana AI runs AI sales prospecting agents over 100+ data sources and 75+ live intent signals, with enrichment and outreach in one subscription.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Extruct AI? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.