Search Meta, Google & LinkedIn ad libraries directly from your AI assistant.
By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 03 Jul 2026
In short
Facebook Ads Library Mcp — Search Meta, Google & LinkedIn ad libraries directly from your AI assistant. Best for Paid social managers researching competitor ads across platforms, Product marketers analysing ad creative angles and hooks, Competitive intelligence analysts monitoring rival campaigns in real time. Free to use.
See what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.
3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report
Proxy eliminates the friction of hopping between ad libraries, integrating live competitor data directly into AI assistants. It's ideal for teams already using ChatGPT or Claude for research, but its beta status and reliance on official libraries limit historical depth. Best for fast, cross-platform competitive intelligence.
Compare with: Facebook Ads Library Mcp vs EverBee, Facebook Ads Library Mcp vs Mangools, Facebook Ads Library Mcp vs GeologicAI
Last verified: July 2026
Across the latest 1 update: 1 news mention.
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
21 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, App Store).
How likely is Facebook Ads Library Mcp to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.
Last calculated: July 2026
How we score →Proxy is a free MCP server that gives your AI assistant—ChatGPT, Claude, or Cursor—real-time access to competitor ads across Meta, Google, and LinkedIn. Instead of switching between separate dashboards, you ask your AI to pull live ad data and it returns results inside your chat. Proxy covers all three major ad libraries in one session, making it ideal for paid social teams, product marketers, and competitive intelligence researchers who want to stay in their AI workflow without losing context. Proxy works by installing the MCP server into your compatible client. Once connected, you type requests like “Show me what ads Notion is running on Google” and Proxy fetches the live data and returns it inside your chat. It also analyses video ads—transcribing them and extracting hooks, scripts, and creative angles. You can compare creatives across competitors, spot patterns, and discover unknown competitors by describing your market. What sets Proxy apart from standalone tools like AdSpy or BigSpy is its zero-context-switch design: it lives inside the AI tools you already use, covers three platforms instead of one, and is free during beta with no credit card required. It also requires no developer skills to set up—ChatGPT users find it in the GPT Store; Claude and Cursor users follow a guided install. While Proxy excels at fast, cross-platform competitor research, it relies on official ad library data and doesn't offer historical archives or campaign management features. For deep-dive analytics requiring historical data or granular filtering, dedicated tools like AdSpy may be more appropriate.
Proxy solves a real pain point: context-switching between ad libraries. If you're a paid social manager who lives in ChatGPT or Claude, installing Proxy means you can ask a question like 'What are the latest ads from Monday.com on LinkedIn?' and get an answer in seconds without opening a new tab. That speed is hard to beat. We'd reach for Proxy when we need a quick competitive pulse—checking what a rival is running across all three platforms, or brainstorming creative angles based on real ads. The video transcription feature is a hidden gem: it pulls hooks and scripts from video ads without you having to watch them. For a free tool, that's impressive. Where it bites: Proxy only shows currently active ads. If you need historical data—say, to track a competitor's campaign evolution over months—you're out of luck. It also can't run automated searches on a schedule or save searches for later. Paid tools like Foreplay or AdSpy offer those comforts, but they cost $50–$150+/mo. Compared to AdSpy, Proxy wins on simplicity and integration but loses on depth. AdSpy gives you years of archived creatives, advanced filters, and saved alerts—things Proxy doesn't attempt. If your workflow demands daily monitoring at scale, a dedicated platform is still the right call. A practical caveat: Proxy's performance depends on the official ad libraries. The Meta Ad Library has rate limits and occasional data gaps, and Google's Transparency Center doesn't show every ad. So while Proxy gives you a good snapshot, don't treat it as a complete census of competitor activity. In short, use Proxy to move fast and stay in your AI flow. Keep a paid tool for the heavy archival lifting.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Facebook Ads Library Mcp, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Used Facebook Ads Library Mcp? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.