Lido
Lido extracts data from PDFs, invoices, and scans into Excel or CSV with zero templates and no training.
The second half of the pipeline is what earns Lido its keep: validating extracted values against your ERP and then filing, renaming, or form-filling automatically is where the hours actually come back. The free 50 pages never expire and need no credit card, so test it on your worst handwritten BOL before anything else. Just know the jump from $29/mo to the annual Scale plan is steep if your volume is modest.
Verified 6h ago · liveness 79/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/lido
- Finance and AP teams automating invoice and purchase order entry into Excel or an ERP
- Logistics teams extracting air waybills, sea waybills, and handwritten BOLs into a TMS
- Accounting and CPA firms needing template-free extraction across many client vendors
- Manufacturing and shared services groups reconciling high volumes of POs and statements
- Teams that need mobile capture today — Lido states it does not work on mobile and is desktop-only
- Organizations requiring on-premise deployment for data residency or air-gapped processing
- Developers who only need raw OCR on simple, single-layout PDFs and can wire up a cheaper per-page API
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Lido if you need to capture documents from a phone, require on-premise deployment, or only want raw OCR on simple files that you'll wire into a per-page API yourself.
Page credits are pooled across your whole workspace, so one heavy uploader can burn through the team's monthly allowance before anyone else gets a document through.
Lido fits teams with steady, meaningful extraction volume: Standard at $29/mo for 100 pages/mo is a single-seat trial tier, while Scale at $7,000/yr for 42,000 pages (about $0.17/page) is where a real AP or logistics operation lands. Compare that against per-page OCR APIs, which the pricing page puts at roughly $0.01–$0.05/page before you pay anyone to build the integration, and against ABBYY FlexiCapture or Tungsten Capture, which typically carry larger implementation commitments. Enterprise
In short
Lido — Lido extracts data from PDFs, invoices, and scans into Excel or CSV with zero templates and no training. Best for Finance and AP teams automating invoice and purchase order entry into Excel or an ERP, Logistics teams extracting air waybills, sea waybills, and handwritten BOLs into a TMS, Accounting and CPA firms needing template-free extraction across many client vendors. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.
No head-to-head comparison for Lido yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.
What's new in Lido
Checked 2 days agoAcross the latest 5 updates: 2 feature updates and 3 news mentions.
Lido publishes Tungsten Capture alternatives guide
Lido's blog lists alternatives to Tungsten Capture, formerly Kofax Capture, for document processing in 2026 — vendor-authored comparison content.
Lido posts Best Tesseract Alternatives in 2026
Lido compares Tesseract alternatives for 2026 as part of a 22-tool head-to-head comparison library on its blog.
Lido publishes ABBYY FlexiCapture alternative guide
Lido names itself the best ABBYY FlexiCapture alternative in 2026 for template-free document extraction.
Lido details air waybill and sea waybill OCR
Lido explains extracting AWB, MAWB, HAWB, container, cargo, and customs fields from shipping documents into a TMS.
Lido covers handwritten BOL and POD extraction into TMS
Lido describes extracting handwritten BOLs, PODs, and driver tickets and pushing the data to a TMS via CSV or API.
What people actually say about Lido — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Lido on Aug 24, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Lido? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Zero-template AI extraction from PDFs, scans, photos, Word files, and email attachments
- Invoices, purchase orders, bank statements, and bills of lading into structured tables
- Air waybill and sea waybill OCR for AWB, MAWB, HAWB, container, cargo, and customs fields
- Handwritten document extraction including BOLs, PODs, and driver tickets
- Export extracted data to Excel, Google Sheets, and CSV
- AI email parser auto-ingests documents from connected inboxes
- Automated validation and reconciliation of extracted data against internal systems
- Financial statement analyzer for accounting and CPA workflows
- AI form filling generates downstream documents from extracted data
- Workflow automation: split or rename files and send outputs on a schedule
- Batch upload plus shared folder connectors for Google Drive and OneDrive
- API and MCP server for custom integrations and TMS/ERP push
- Multi-language and multi-currency document processing
- Reset and reprocess any file within 24 hours at no extra page cost
- SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliant; documents auto-deleted after 23 hours
About Lido
Lido is an AI document extraction platform that reads PDFs, scans, photos, Word files, and email attachments and returns structured spreadsheet rows, with no templates to build and no model training. Upload a batch, connect a shared folder or inbox, tell Lido which fields you want, and it produces clean tables you can export to Excel or CSV in seconds. It targets finance and AP teams, accounting and CPA firms, logistics and supply chain operations, manufacturers, and healthcare organizations buried in invoices, purchase orders, bank statements, bills of lading, medical claims, and handwritten forms. Extraction is only the front half. Lido then validates pulled values against your internal systems to match the correct records, and can automate the follow-through: push data to an ERP, generate downstream documents with AI form filling, split or rename files, or send outputs on a schedule. An AI email parser ingests documents straight from a connected inbox. Logistics teams get documented air waybill and sea waybill OCR covering AWB, MAWB, HAWB, container, cargo, and customs fields, plus handwritten BOL, POD, and driver ticket extraction into a TMS. On security, Lido holds SOC 2 Type II and states HIPAA compliance, encrypts data in transit and at rest, deletes documents after 23 hours, and says it never trains on customer data. Custom BAAs are available on Enterprise. Page credits live in one shared pool per workspace, and Lido does not bill per page, so spend is predictable. The vendor states plainly that it does not work on mobile yet; the product is desktop-only for now. Against per-page OCR APIs and legacy capture suites, the pitch is time to value rather than raw parsing: no templates, no per-page metering, and a workflow layer on top. It is more product than a developer wiring Textract or Document AI into a script, and less useful than those tools if you need on-premise deployment.
Behind the Verdict
Most teams shopping for document extraction have already been burned by an OCR tool that needed a template per vendor. Lido's answer is to skip templates entirely and let the model read layout the way a person does, then keep working when a vendor changes its invoice format. That last part matters more than the accuracy headline, because layout churn is what quietly kills these projects. Where Lido earns its place is the back end of the process. Pulling fields is table stakes. Matching them to the right PO or vendor record, then renaming files, generating a downstream document, or pushing the row into your ERP is where AP teams actually reclaim headcount. If your workflow stops at "give me a CSV," you are paying for capability you will not use. Pick Lido when you have recurring, varied documents and at least one downstream destination: an accounting or CPA firm juggling hundreds of client vendors, a logistics team processing air waybills, sea waybills, and handwritten BOLs into a TMS, or an AP group that wants PO matching without building it. Healthcare shops get HIPAA-oriented handling with a BAA available at Enterprise. Pass when you need mobile capture today, since Lido states it does not work on mobile. Pass if your data cannot leave your infrastructure: there is no on-premise option documented. And pass if you only need raw text off clean, single-layout PDFs, because a metered OCR API will cost less and you will not pay for a UI you never open. Pricing is the real decision gate. Standard at $29/mo covers 100 pages and one seat, which is fine for testing but not for a working AP queue. The annual Scale plan bundles 42,000 pages across up to 10 seats with API and workflow access, so credits land upfront, which suits teams sitting on a backlog that later tapers.
Researching Lido? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Lido actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Forward the AP inbox to Lido's AI email parser, upload a batch of vendor invoices from Google Drive, map the fields you need — vendor, invoice number, date, amount, due date, PO number — then export a clean sheet to Excel and validate amounts against the PO system.
Outcome: Invoices that took a bookkeeper a few minutes each come out as reconciled rows, and the weekly AP batch stops eating a full day. Reprocess anything misread within 24 hours at no extra page cost.
Batch-upload air waybills, sea waybills, and photographed handwritten BOLs, extract container, routing, and customs fields, then push the output as CSV or via API into the TMS.
Outcome: Shipment data lands in the TMS without a keying step, including the handwritten driver tickets and PODs that template-based OCR tends to drop.
Run client bank statements and receipts through Lido's financial statement analyzer alongside the standard extractor, and export each client's data to Excel for reconciliation.
Outcome: Template-free extraction means one workflow covers many different client vendors and statement layouts instead of a template per bank.
Use Cases
- Convert incoming invoices into Excel for AP processing
- Extract data from bank statements and receipts for reconciliation
- Automate purchase order data entry from PDFs
- Handle healthcare claims processing with HIPAA compliance
- Extract handwritten BOLs, PODs, and driver tickets into a TMS
- Process utility bills for property management and ESG reporting
- Automate contract data extraction for legal and procurement teams
- Extract air waybill and sea waybill data for logistics
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-16
Limitations
- Lido does not work on mobile yet; the site states login details will be emailed for use back at a desktop.
- Pricing is page-limited: Standard is $29/mo for 100 pages and 1 user, Scale is $7,000/yr for 42,000 pages with up to 10 users, and Enterprise starts at $35,000/yr per the pricing card (the FAQ text says $30,000/yr on one line — confirm which applies to you).
- API access is listed on the Scale plan and above, not on Standard.
as of 2026-10-01
Verification history
We have re-verified Lido 21 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 21 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Lido tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0
Ideal for
Anyone evaluating document extraction on their own PDFs before committing — no credit card, and the 50 pages do not expire.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: 50 page conversions with all extraction features and Excel/CSV export, no card required.
Standard
$29/mo
Ideal for
A single AP or bookkeeping user with light recurring volume — a few dozen invoices or statements a month.
What this tier adds
Adds 100 pages per month and a full user seat on top of the free tier, plus email auto-forwarding for inbox ingestion.
Scale
$7,000/yr
Ideal for
A finance, shared-services, or logistics team running ongoing document volume that needs automation around extraction.
What this tier adds
Jumps to 42,000 pages per year available upfront, up to 10 users sharing one credit pool, plus API and workflow access and automated validation against internal systems.
Enterprise
From $35,000/yr
Ideal for
High-volume or regulated operations needing custom integrations, custom page limits, and a signed BAA for HIPAA workloads.
What this tier adds
Adds custom page limits, custom ERP integrations, custom validation logic, a dedicated US-based account manager, and live US-based onboarding.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Lido's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Lido fits teams with steady, meaningful extraction volume: Standard at $29/mo for 100 pages/mo is a single-seat trial tier, while Scale at $7,000/yr for 42,000 pages (about $0.17/page) is where a real AP or logistics operation lands. Compare that against per-page OCR APIs, which the pricing page puts at roughly $0.01–$0.05/page before you pay anyone to build the integration, and against ABBYY FlexiCapture or Tungsten Capture, which typically carry larger implementation commitments. Enterprise
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Lido — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Most buyers report first value in minutes, not weeks: Lido's homepage claims roughly one hour of implementation versus 4–8 weeks for legacy OCR, and the pricing FAQ says you can process your first document in under five minutes with no setup or training. The free 50 pages need no credit card, so you can evaluate on your own invoices before any procurement conversation. Bringing Scale or
Switching to or from Lido
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From ABBYY FlexiCapture: rebuild your document types as field instructions instead of templates, since Lido extracts without per-layout setup.
- →From Docparser: drop the parsing rules and templates; upload the same documents and describe the fields you want instead.
- →From Tesseract or a raw OCR pipeline: replace the OCR-plus-parsing code with Lido's extract-and-validate workflow, keeping CSV or API output as your handoff.
- →From Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture): move batch capture jobs to Lido's shared-folder or inbox ingestion and run the free 50 pages on your real documents first.
- →From manual AP data entry: forward the AP inbox to Lido's email parser, export to Excel or your ERP, and reprocess anything misread free within 24 hours.
- ↗To AWS Textract: rebuild field extraction as per-page API calls if you no longer want a managed interface and have engineering capacity.
- ↗To Google Document AI: same trade — you gain raw API flexibility and lose the email ingestion, validation, and workflow automation layers.
- ↗To ABBYY FlexiCapture: if you need template-controlled extraction tuned per document type, you'll rebuild layout-specific processing there.
- ↗To a mobile-capture-first tool: Lido is desktop-only, so field teams photographing receipts on phones need a different product entirely.
- ↗To on-premise OCR: if data residency rules forbid cloud processing, export your extracted CSV history and move the pipeline in-house.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Lido”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Lido” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Lido.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Lido
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Lido, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Molku
Molku extracts data from PDFs, images, and handwritten documents, then auto-fills your PDF or Google Sheets templates.
DocLine.ai
DocLine.ai extracts data from invoices, receipts, contracts, and forms using pre-trained document AI models and no-code custom field
Unstructured.io
Unstructured turns messy PDFs, scans, and forms into structured, AI-ready data for RAG pipelines and agents.
Alternatives to Lido
View all
Molku
Molku extracts data from PDFs, images, and handwritten documents, then auto-fills your PDF or Google Sheets templates.
DocLine.ai
DocLine.ai extracts data from invoices, receipts, contracts, and forms using pre-trained document AI models and no-code custom field
Unstructured.io
Unstructured turns messy PDFs, scans, and forms into structured, AI-ready data for RAG pipelines and agents.
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Lido? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.