mdhub
An AI-first clinic operating system for behavioral health, with AI workers for admissions, clinical notes, and billing.
For behavioral health clinics bleeding time on intake calls, charting, and denied claims, mdhub is one of the few platforms that actually wires those three together rather than selling a scribe and leaving the seams to you. The pricing math matters: Lite's 50 sessions per month at $42/mo billed annually (or $50/mo billed monthly) will not carry a full caseload, so Pro at $99/mo billed annually is the realistic entry point for most clinicians, and that is genuinely expensive next to a scribe-only tool like Freed or Heidi. The case for mdhub rests on replacing handoffs — if you only need notes, a focused scribe wins.
Verified 6d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/mdhub
- Psychiatrists and therapists who want notes, coding, and follow-ups handled without manual charting
- Group practices and CCBHCs that need admissions, clinical, and billing work under one roof
- Enterprise behavioral health organizations standardizing workflows across clinicians and locations
- Clinics losing revenue to insurance denials and missed intake calls
- General medical or primary care practices outside behavioral health
- Solo practitioners who only want a lightweight AI scribe and nothing else
- Very-low-volume clinicians who won't exceed Lite's 50 sessions per month
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip mdhub if you are a low-volume clinician who stays under 50 sessions a month and only wants notes — a scribe-only tool costs a fraction of Lite's $42/mo billed annually and you would be paying for admissions and billing you never use.
Lite's 50-session cap is per clinician per month, so a full caseload forces the jump to Pro at $99/mo billed annually (or $119/mo billed monthly) — a more than doubling of the seat price.
mdhub prices per clinician: Lite $42/mo billed annually ($50 monthly) with a 50-session cap, Pro $99/mo billed annually ($119 monthly) with unlimited sessions, Enterprise custom. That sits well above scribe-only tools such as Freed or Heidi, and roughly in line with or above behavioral health EHRs like TherapyNotes. The pricing fits established group practices and CCBHCs where intake and denial loss already cost more than the seats; it does not fit solo or very-low-volume clinicians.
In short
mdhub — An AI-first clinic operating system for behavioral health, with AI workers for admissions, clinical notes, and billing. Best for Psychiatrists and therapists who want notes, coding, and follow-ups handled without manual charting, Group practices and CCBHCs that need admissions, clinical, and billing work under one roof, Enterprise behavioral health organizations standardizing workflows across clinicians and locations. Plans from $42/mo.
What's new in mdhub
Checked 6 days agoAcross the latest 10 updates: 1 feature update, 1 launch and 8 news mentions.
Treatment Plan Template: Fields, Payer Rules and Examples
mdhub published a behavioral health treatment plan template covering required fields, Medicare and CCBHC criteria, measurable goal examples, and review rules.
90847 CPT Code: Family Therapy Billing Rules That Hold Up
Guide to the 90847 CPT code for family therapy with the patient present: time rule, differences from 90846 and 90837, telehealth status, and denial fixes.
Behavioral Health Billing Companies: How to Compare Them
Comparison framework for behavioral health billing companies on scope, pricing model, and exit terms, plus when keeping billing in house is the better call.
Superbill Template for Behavioral Health: Fields and Codes
Superbill template for behavioral health listing every required field, the CPT codes that belong on each line, and five checks that stop denials.
BIRP Notes Explained: Format, Examples, and the Time Cost
BIRP note formatting explained: what goes in each section, an annotated example, how BIRP compares with SOAP, DAP and GIRP, and the manual documentation time cost.
90833 CPT Code: Time Range, E/M Pairing, and Documentation
The 90833 add-on code covers 16 to 37 minutes of psychotherapy with an E/M service; guide covers the time range, single-billing restriction, and required documentation.
96127 CPT Code: Units, Documentation, and Denial Fixes
96127 covers brief behavioral screenings billed per instrument: what insurers check in the note, payer unit caps, and the top denial fixes.
DAP Notes: Behavioral Health Example, Format, and Audit Rules
DAP notes example for behavioral health, why the Data section loses clinical evidence, and what payers read in the Assessment and Plan sections.
Group therapy sessions documented once via Emma AI Clinical Assistant
Create a Group record and link participants; Emma writes one note attributing statements to the right participant, then sections are assigned and sent to each chart. Couple records work the same way.
mdhub Academy launched as public guide library
Public library of short step-by-step guides for running a clinic on mdhub, from first login through patients, scheduling and billing. Searchable, filterable by product, with new guides added as features ship.
What people actually say about mdhub — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
8 mentions across 4 sources (YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Lemmy), 6 more we could not attribute · researched Sep 23, 2026.
Weighted by the 14 posts each of 4 sources contributed.
- +App Store reviewers consistently say it eliminates note backlog and saves hours weekly
- +Session summaries double as client handouts, a feature users call a great addition
- +Directly targets the three biggest behavioral health admin burdens: intake, notes, billing
- +Product Hunt community praises the mental health access mission and clinician focus
- +AI workers Sarah, Emma, and Eric cover the full patient journey in one connected system
- −No public answer on what happens when the AI misses critical clinical information
- −Integration with existing EMR systems remains an unanswered question from Product Hunt
- −Community footprint is tiny: no Reddit, HN, or Stack Overflow discussion to verify claims
- −Pricing tiers are hidden behind 'freemium' with no clear feature gates or usage limits
- −Positive reviews come only from solo users, with no enterprise or group practice validation
- • No public details on what triggers upgrade from free tier
- • Enterprise pricing requires sales contact, no self-serve transparency
- • Potential costs for additional AI worker usage or patient volume caps
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is mdhub? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- AI Admissions Coordinator (Sarah) answers and qualifies patient inquiries 24/7 via voice, text, and fax
- AI Clinical Assistant (Emma) generates structured clinical notes during and after sessions
- AI Billing Specialist (Eric) reviews and submits claims end to end
- Ambient medical scribe with mobile app recording
- Browser recorder for ambient scribing
- Pre-charting that fills charts with relevant history and open items before sessions
- Automatic CPT code assignment from clinical context
- Chart-aware, HIPAA-compliant AI assistant for questions and summaries
- Patient follow-up summaries and treatment planning support
- Insurance eligibility verification at intake
- Denial reduction and prior authorization management
- Group therapy documentation: one Emma note attributing statements to each participant, routed to each chart
- Couples chart documentation using the same linked-record approach
- Telehealth platform
- Practice management: scheduling, intake, and referral management
About mdhub
mdhub is an AI-first clinic operating system built only for behavioral health practices. Rather than bolting a scribe onto an existing EHR, it runs a team of named AI workers inside one connected system. Sarah handles admissions — answering inquiries 24/7 by voice, text, and fax, qualifying and matching patients to a clinician, and verifying insurance eligibility before the visit. Emma is the clinical assistant: she pre-charts sessions with relevant history, generates structured notes during and after the session, assigns CPT codes from clinical context, and powers a HIPAA-compliant, chart-aware assistant for summaries and follow-ups. Eric manages billing end to end — reviewing and submitting claims, catching issues before they become denials, and handling prior authorizations. The platform spans EHR, CRM, and RCM, plus telehealth, scheduling, intake, referral management, a mobile app, and a browser recorder for ambient scribing. Group therapy and couples sessions were added in August 2026: you create a Group or Couple record, Emma writes one note attributing statements to the right participant, and sections are routed to each chart. Enterprise adds custom templates, role-based access, advanced analytics, and a dedicated account manager. Pricing runs per clinician: Lite is $42/mo billed annually or $50/mo billed monthly, with 50 sessions per month; Pro is $99/mo billed annually or $119/mo billed monthly, with unlimited sessions, scales and questionnaires, chart-aware GPT, and telehealth; Enterprise is custom. If you need intake, documentation, and revenue cycle orchestrated in one place, that is the case for mdhub. If you only want a note-taker, you are paying for a platform you will not use.
Behind the Verdict
mdhub's argument is structural rather than feature-level. Most behavioral health software is an EHR with AI features stapled on; mdhub inverted it, shipping three named AI workers — Sarah (admissions), Emma (clinical documentation), Eric (billing) — that operate inside one system spanning EHR, CRM, and RCM. The value shows up in the handoffs that disappear. Sarah answers by voice, text, or fax, qualifies and matches the patient, and verifies eligibility upfront, so your front desk stops being the bottleneck between an inquiry and a scheduled visit. Emma pre-charts, generates the note during the session, and assigns CPT codes from clinical context so coding does not become a separate downstream task. Eric reviews and submits claims and manages prior authorizations. The vendor reports 30% more patients scheduled, a 55% reduction in insurance denials, and up to 2 hours saved per clinician per day. Customer quotes on the site are more specific and worth reading: Jenna Harper at University Health Kansas City cites 6 to 20 minutes saved per note with minimal editing, and Candice Leimkuhler at Family Care Center says therapists there complete 7,000 sessions daily on the platform. Those are the numbers to test in a trial. Strengths: it is behavioral-health-specific, so documentation templates, CPT logic, and intake flows are built for psychiatry and therapy rather than adapted from general medicine. The system is genuinely one place — scheduling, chart, coding, claims. Group therapy and couples documentation shipped in August 2026, with Emma writing a single note that attributes statements to the right participant before sections route to each chart; that is a real gap in most scribe tools. A public mdhub Academy guide library launched the same month. Weaknesses: Lite's 50 sessions per month is a hard ceiling at $42/mo billed annually (or $50/mo billed monthly), which pushes any full caseload to Pro at $99/mo billed annually (or $119/mo billed monthly) per clinician — for a five-clinician group that is a meaningful line item, and per-clinician pricing scales linearly with headcount. Custom templates and role-based access sit behind Enterprise, so mid-size practices can hit a paywall on capabilities that feel operational rather than exotic. The platform is purpose-built for behavioral health; general medical and primary care practices should look elsewhere. And this is an operating system, not a tool — adopting it means configuring templates and workflows, which is real implementation time. Where it fits: group practices and CCBHCs where intake volume, documentation load, and denial rates all hurt at once and someone owns operations. Where it does not: the solo clinician who wants a recorder button and nothing else, or a practice deeply committed to an EHR it already likes.
Researching mdhub? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas mdhub actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You record sessions through the mobile app or browser recorder; Emma generates the structured note and assigns CPT codes from the clinical context, and you review rather than write. Before each session, the chart is already pre-filled with history and open items.
Outcome: Notes stop accumulating after hours, coding is done in the same pass as documentation, and you start each session already oriented to the patient.
Sarah answers every new inquiry by voice, text, or fax around the clock, qualifies the patient, matches them to the right clinician, and verifies insurance eligibility before the appointment lands on the schedule.
Outcome: Fewer missed inquiries and fewer unqualified or uninsured patients consuming clinician slots, with front desk staff handling exceptions instead of every call.
Eric reviews and submits claims, flags issues before they become denials, and manages prior authorizations without manual follow-up, pulling from the same chart Emma documents into.
Outcome: Coding errors get caught at the source instead of in the denial queue, and prior auth work stops being a spreadsheet chase.
Use Cases
- Automate patient intake and scheduling with 24/7 AI response via voice, text, or fax
- Generate clinical notes automatically during therapy sessions with ambient recording
- Reduce insurance denials by submitting clean claims and managing prior authorizations
- Use chart-aware AI to pre-chart sessions and draft follow-up summaries
- Manage billing end to end, from eligibility verification to claim submission
- Document group therapy and couples sessions in one note routed to each participant's chart
- Monitor clinic performance with advanced analytics and dashboards (Enterprise)
- Standardize workflows across multiple clinicians and locations
Limitations
- The Lite plan caps sessions at 50 per month per clinician at $42/mo billed annually (or $50/mo billed monthly), which will not carry a full caseload.
- Pro removes the cap but runs $99/mo billed annually or $119/mo billed monthly per clinician, and per-clinician pricing scales linearly — a five-clinician group pays five times.
- Custom templates and role-based access management are gated to Enterprise, so mid-size practices can hit a paywall on capabilities that feel operational rather than advanced.
- The platform is purpose-built for behavioral health, so general medical practices won't find it suitable.
- Adoption also means configuration: documentation templates and workflows need to be set up before the platform matches how your clinic actually works.
as of 2026-10-03
Verification history
We have re-verified mdhub 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published mdhub tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Lite (annual)
$42/mo per clinician billed annually
Ideal for
Low-volume clinician under 50 sessions a month who wants automatic notes, pre-charting, and follow-up summaries without paying for a full caseload tier.
What this tier adds
Starting tier: $42/mo per clinician billed annually, capped at 50 sessions per month, with standard support and community access.
Lite (monthly)
$50/mo per clinician billed monthly
Ideal for
Same low-volume clinician who wants to try the platform without committing to an annual term, at a higher per-month cost.
What this tier adds
$50/mo per clinician billed monthly — the same 50-session Lite feature set as the annual plan, without the annual discount.
Pro (annual)
$99/mo per clinician billed annually
Ideal for
Full-caseload psychiatrist or therapist who exceeds 50 sessions a month and needs coding, telehealth, and the chart-aware assistant in one seat.
What this tier adds
Removes the session cap and adds scales and questionnaires, chart-aware GPT, telehealth, and priority support for $99/mo per clinician billed annually.
Pro (monthly)
$119/mo per clinician billed monthly
Ideal for
Full-caseload clinician who wants unlimited sessions and telehealth without an annual commitment.
What this tier adds
$119/mo per clinician billed monthly — identical Pro capabilities to the annual plan at a $20/mo higher rate.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Group practices, CCBHCs, and multi-location organizations that need custom templates, role-based access, and analytics across clinicians.
What this tier adds
Adds a dedicated account manager, custom templates and workflows, advanced analytics and reporting, and role-based access management on top of everything in Pro, at custom pricing.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where mdhub's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
mdhub prices per clinician: Lite $42/mo billed annually ($50 monthly) with a 50-session cap, Pro $99/mo billed annually ($119 monthly) with unlimited sessions, Enterprise custom. That sits well above scribe-only tools such as Freed or Heidi, and roughly in line with or above behavioral health EHRs like TherapyNotes. The pricing fits established group practices and CCBHCs where intake and denial loss already cost more than the seats; it does not fit solo or very-low-volume clinicians.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of mdhub — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
The pricing page advertises '1 Minute to get started' and a free trial, which reflects the scribe path — install the app, hit record, and Emma produces a note. Expect the real clinic-level setup to take longer: Sarah's intake scripts and routing rules, Emma's documentation templates, and Eric's billing workflows all need configuring against how your practice actually runs before the platform
Switching to or from mdhub
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From TherapyNotes or Kareo: run mdhub alongside your existing EHR during a trial period, starting with Emma's documentation for a small clinician group before moving billing and intake across.
- ↗To a scribe-only tool: keep mdhub's exported notes and coding as your documentation baseline, but expect to rebuild intake and billing workflows separately since a scribe covers neither.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “mdhub”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “mdhub” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about mdhub.
Official links
Tools that pair well with mdhub
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside mdhub, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
NectarVet
NectarVet is a cloud veterinary practice management platform whose AI turns dictated exams into SOAP notes and auto-generates invoices and client reminders.
Knowtex
Ambient clinical AI that turns the patient visit into notes, ICD-10/E&M codes, and staged orders for health systems.
Tortus
Tortus is ambient voice AI for NHS clinical documentation, capturing consultations and drafting clinician-approved notes, letters and referrals.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Mdhub vs Isomorphic Labs
These tools serve entirely different markets: mdhub is an AI-native EHR for behavioral health clinics, while Isomorphic Labs is a drug discovery AI research partner for pharma giants. Your choice depends on whether you run a therapy practice (mdhub) or are a big pharma company seeking to accelerate lead optimization (Isomorphic Labs). There is no overlap in functionality or pricing.
Mdhub vs Codametrix
Choose mdhub if you run a behavioral health clinic and need an end-to-end AI-native EHR to automate admissions, notes, and billing at a predictable per-clinician price. Choose CodaMetrix if you are a large health system aiming to slash coding costs and denials with enterprise-grade automation integrated into Epic or Cerner. These tools serve completely different markets—pick based on your organization type and core need.
Mdhub vs Rapidsos
Choose mdhub if you run a behavioral health clinic and want AI to handle documentation, billing, and admissions; pricing is transparent per clinician. Choose RapidSOS if you're a public safety agency or enterprise needing real-time emergency data integration and AI dispatch support; pricing is enterprise contact-based. These tools solve completely different problems, so your decision hinges on whether you're managing patient care or emergency response.
Alternatives to mdhub
View all
NectarVet
NectarVet is a cloud veterinary practice management platform whose AI turns dictated exams into SOAP notes and auto-generates invoices and client reminders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Used mdhub? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.