Mediar
Mediar's AI agents learn your Windows desktop workflows by watching you record them once, then run them 24/7 in the cloud.
If your worst process runs inside SAP GUI, a green screen, or Epic through Citrix, Mediar targets the exact gap UiPath overcharges for and vision-based agents keep fumbling. The accessibility-API approach plus a stated one-week deployment is a genuinely different trade from a six-figure RPA program, and the $0 self-hosted engine at $0.75/min execution gives you a way to prove it on one workflow before committing to the $500/month Turnkey Service. Mediar's own comparison table puts legacy RPA at 6-18 months and 60-80% success versus its 99.9% deterministic claim. Skip it if your apps are cloud-native — you would be automating a problem you don't have.
Verified 5h ago · liveness 71/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/mediar
- Operations teams stuck automating Windows ERP, EHR or core banking software with no API
- RPA consultants replacing UiPath engagements with faster, cheaper deployments
- Finance teams processing invoices, reconciliations and bulk PDF data entry
- Healthcare administrators automating claims intake and patient registration
- Anyone needing macOS, Linux or mobile automation — this is a Windows desktop tool
- Teams whose entire stack is cloud-native and already has APIs
- Buyers who want a fully managed service without running the open-source engine themselves
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Mediar if your applications already expose real APIs or your workflows live in a browser — you'd be paying $0.75/min to automate a screen you could call directly.
The $0 tier is only the engine — every deployed workflow execution bills at $0.75/min, so a high-volume process carries real per-minute cost.
Mediar sits well under legacy RPA. UiPath and Power Automate implementations run $50K-500K+ in setup per Mediar's own comparison table, while the self-hosted engine starts at $0 with $0.75/min execution and the managed Turnkey Service is $500/month. Against per-task computer-use agents at $0.50-5.00 per action, per-minute execution is usually the cheaper shape at volume.
In short
Mediar — Mediar's AI agents learn your Windows desktop workflows by watching you record them once, then run them 24/7 in the cloud. Best for Operations teams stuck automating Windows ERP, EHR or core banking software with no API, RPA consultants replacing UiPath engagements with faster, cheaper deployments, Finance teams processing invoices, reconciliations and bulk PDF data entry. Free to start; paid plans from $500/mo.
What people actually say about Mediar — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Mediar on Jul 27, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Mediar? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Record-once workflow capture that learns from human demonstration
- Deterministic execution via OS-level accessibility APIs
- Self-healing workflows that survive UI changes
- Runs on any Windows desktop application with no API
- Cloud execution 24/7 with live run status
- Real-time dashboard for success rate, speed and cost savings
- SAP Business One A/P invoice and reconciliation automation
- SAP GUI and green-screen mainframe automation
- Epic Resolute automation through Citrix sessions
- Fiserv core automation across Premier, Signature and DNA
- Bulk PDF processing and complex compliance form filling
- Gmail to Google Sheets and invoices to Google Sheets transfers
- Insurance claims intake automation
- EMR documentation and patient registration automation
- 1-week deployment versus 6-18 months for legacy RPA
About Mediar
Mediar is an AI-native desktop automation platform for Windows applications that have no usable API. You record a workflow once inside SAP Business One, SAP GUI, a green-screen mainframe, Epic Resolute through Citrix, or a Fiserv core, and Mediar's agents watch the demonstration, build the workflow, and then run it on their own in the cloud around the clock. The published dashboard at app.mediar.ai shows live workflows, executions, average speed and success rates, including a healthcare claims workflow at 245 runs and 98% success and a one-minute batch of 11 invoices. Published use cases cover invoices and Gmail data into Google Sheets, bulk PDF processing, insurance claims intake, EMR documentation and patient registration, and complex compliance form filling. The technical distinction Mediar draws for itself is that it drives OS-level accessibility APIs rather than screenshot-and-guess vision, which is the basis for its self-healing claim and its quoted one-week deployment against the 6-18 months its own comparison table assigns to UiPath and Power Automate. Mediar separately calls out computer-use entrants like BrowserBase, BrowserUse and Cyberdesk, pegging pixel/vision agents below 50% success and noting per-action AI costs. Mediar raised a $2.8M seed round in July 2025. Pricing is published as two paths: a $0 self-hosted open-source engine with pay-as-you-go execution at $0.75/min after deployment, or a $500/month Turnkey Service where Mediar's team builds and manages the workflows. It is Windows-only desktop automation; if your stack is already cloud-native with real APIs, those APIs remain the cheaper answer.
Behind the Verdict
Mediar's whole argument rests on one engineering decision: it drives the operating system's accessibility tree instead of taking screenshots and asking a vision model where to click. That matters because it changes what breaks. A pixel agent re-derives every target on every run, so a moved button is a failed run and a re-prompt; an accessibility layer reads the control itself, which is why Mediar can quote 99.9% deterministic reliability and claim self-healing when a UI shifts. Mediar's own comparison table prices the alternatives out loud: legacy RPA at $50K-500K+ setup and 6-18 months to production with a full dev team on maintenance, computer-use startups at $0.50-5.00 per task with sub-50% success and prompt-engineering overhead, and Mediar at a one-week deployment with per-minute execution cost. The second thing Mediar gets right is the buying motion. The $0 tier is the real open-source engine, self-hosted, with unlimited Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Code usage — you only pay $0.75/min when a deployed workflow actually executes. That is a genuine try-before-you-buy path for a category where buyers are used to five-figure quotes before anything runs in production. The $500/month Turnkey Service is the other half: Mediar's team develops the custom workflow, manages deployment, handles priority bug fixes on a monthly cadence, and gives you dedicated support. For an operations or finance team with no automation engineers, that is the difference between a tool and an outcome. Where this fits: SAP Business One A/P invoice and reconciliation work, SAP GUI and green-screen mainframe data entry, Epic Resolute through Citrix, Fiserv Premier/Signature/DNA core processes, insurance claims intake, EMR documentation and patient registration, bulk PDF extraction into Google Sheets, and complex compliance forms on Windows apps that will never get an API. Public case studies cited on the site include a restaurant-chain CFO describing a move from UiPath with 70% cost savings, an RPA consultant reporting $80k/year saved, and an IT manager at Imperial Treasure saying Mediar fixed things other RPAs couldn't. Where it doesn't: Mediar is Windows-only. It has no macOS, Linux or mobile story, and it automates desktop surfaces plus what's reachable through Windows — web-only and mobile-first tasks belong to a browser agent. Organizations that want a deep library of prebuilt SaaS connectors, rather than UI-driven automation against a screen, are shopping for a different product class. And teams already running cloud-native applications with real APIs should not buy a screen-scraping layer to talk to a system that will gladly accept a webhook. The honest caveat is that Mediar is early. A $2.8M seed round in July 2025 and a product surface that is still largely desktop-driven means you are buying into a young company, and the self-hosted path puts operational responsibility on you — you run the engine, you own the uptime, and you pay per minute of execution.
Researching Mediar? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Mediar actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Record the A/P invoice reconciliation once in SAP B1, including the vendor code, posting date and invoice-line entry, then let Mediar's agent run the nightly batch in the cloud.
Outcome: The published dashboard shows SAP Invoice Sync running at 99% success and 2.1s average across 312 runs, replacing hours of manual keying.
Rebuild the client's Windows-only processes as Mediar recordings during a one-week deployment instead of a 6-18 month implementation, and run them self-hosted.
Outcome: Mediar's published case study cites an RPA consultant saving $80k a year after finding Mediar was the tool that could automate Windows applications when n8n could not.
Record one claims intake workflow through a Citrix-hosted Epic Resolute session, then run thousands of claim variations against it.
Outcome: The sample run history on app.mediar.ai shows a healthcare claims workflow at 98% success across 245 runs, with 12 claims processed in 3.2s.
Use Cases
- Automate SAP Business One invoice reconciliation with 99.9% reliability.
- Record insurance claims intake once and run thousands of variations.
- Extract data from PDF invoices and populate Google Sheets without coding.
- Fill complex compliance forms on legacy Windows apps automatically.
- Copy patient data between EMR screens and billing systems.
- Migrate from UiPath or Power Automate to a self-healing AI agent.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-15
Limitations
- Mediar is Windows-only desktop automation, deployed by recording a workflow once and then running it in Mediar's cloud; macOS, Linux and mobile workflows are out of scope.
- The live evidence does not name any underlying AI model powering the agents.
- Pricing is not published on the site — the pricing page shows only blog/guides links — so buyers must schedule a call for commercial terms.
as of 2026-09-27
Verification history
We have re-verified Mediar 10 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 10 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Mediar tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0
Ideal for
Technical teams or RPA consultants who can self-host the engine and want to prove one Windows workflow in production before committing to a managed plan.
What this tier adds
Starting tier — the open-source engine at $0 with unlimited Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Code usage, billed only at $0.75/min when a deployed workflow executes.
Turnkey Service
$500/month
Ideal for
Operations, finance or healthcare teams with no automation engineers who need Mediar's team to build, deploy and maintain the workflows for them.
What this tier adds
Adds custom workflow development, managed deployment, dedicated support and priority bug fixes on a monthly cadence for $500/month.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Mediar's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Mediar sits well under legacy RPA. UiPath and Power Automate implementations run $50K-500K+ in setup per Mediar's own comparison table, while the self-hosted engine starts at $0 with $0.75/min execution and the managed Turnkey Service is $500/month. Against per-task computer-use agents at $0.50-5.00 per action, per-minute execution is usually the cheaper shape at volume.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Mediar — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Self-hosted: you install and configure the open-source engine yourself, then record your first workflow — the on-site demo shows a workflow built in about 30 seconds. Turnkey Service: Mediar quotes a one-week deployment to first production automation, against the 6-18 months its comparison table assigns to UiPath and Power Automate.
Switching to or from Mediar
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From UiPath: rebuild the Windows-only processes as Mediar recordings rather than selector-based flows, cutting the implementation from months to about a week.
- →From Power Automate Desktop: replace selector maintenance with accessibility-API execution that survives UI changes.
- →From a vision-based computer-use agent: swap pixel-guessing for OS-level accessibility targets to lift success rates above the sub-50% pixel agents deliver.
- ↗To native APIs: if the application you automate ships a real API, moving to direct integration removes per-minute execution cost entirely.
- ↗To a browser automation agent: for web-only tasks, a browser-first tool is a better fit than driving the Windows desktop.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Mediar”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Mediar” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Mediar.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Mediar
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Mediar, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Domo
Domo prepares governed data for AI agents, then layers BI dashboards, workflows, and embedded analytics on top of it.
Cryptohopper
Cryptohopper runs an automated crypto trading bot in the cloud, with Copy Bot mirroring and an MCP server for AI trading agents.
Glide
Glide turns spreadsheets, prompts, and files into internal business apps and AI agents for desktop and mobile.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Mediar vs Locus Robotics
Pick Locus Robotics if you need physical AMRs to boost warehouse productivity by 2-3x in high-volume eCommerce or 3PL operations. Pick Mediar if you need to automate legacy Windows desktop workflows (ERP, EHR) without coding, with rapid 1-week deployment and 99.9% reliability. They solve fundamentally different problems, so your choice hinges on whether your bottleneck is physical movement or screen-based data entry.
Mediar vs Truleo
Choose Truleo if you are a law enforcement agency needing to connect siloed data (RMS, jail calls, BWC) into actionable intelligence and automated report writing. Choose Mediar if you need to automate any Windows desktop workflow (SAP, forms, PDFs) without coding, replacing traditional RPA tools like UiPath. They serve entirely different domains — pick based on your organization type and workflow automation need.
Mediar vs Presto Voice
Presto Voice is the clear winner for QSR chains needing to boost drive-thru revenue and efficiency with proven voice AI, while Mediar is ideal for enterprises stuck on legacy Windows desktop workflows. If you run a multi-location QSR, choose Presto Voice; if you automate SAP data entry or insurance claims, choose Mediar. Both are strong in their niches.
Alternatives to Mediar
View allDomo
Domo prepares governed data for AI agents, then layers BI dashboards, workflows, and embedded analytics on top of it.
Cryptohopper
Cryptohopper runs an automated crypto trading bot in the cloud, with Copy Bot mirroring and an MCP server for AI trading agents.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Mediar? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.