Nabla

Nabla

Nabla delivers ambient AI clinical documentation, EHR dictation, and E/M coding for health systems.

74/100Safe BetFree · from $119/moFreemium

Put Nabla on the shortlist if you're a health system that wants ambient notes, EHR dictation, and coding suggestions under one contract and one security review. The breadth is the sell; the risk is breadth without depth in your specialty, so pilot it against your own templates and coding workflow. Solo and low-volume practices are shopping in the wrong aisle here.

Verified 15h ago · liveness 74/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/nabla

Best for
  • Health systems that want ambient notes, EHR dictation, and coding from a single vendor and contract
  • Organizations on Epic or athenahealth that need documentation inside the EHR workflow
  • IT, legal, and compliance leads who need HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR review to clear
  • Behavioral health and specialty groups needing per-clinician templates and pre-visit chart prep
Not ideal for
  • Organizations that need on-premise deployment or fully offline documentation
  • Buyers with strict local data residency rules outside the vendor's supported regions
  • Teams that only want a basic note generator and will never use dictation or coding
Visit Website

Beginner-friendlyFor a physician, first value comes within the first visit once Nabla is enabled in your EHR — the workflow is talk-then-review, not retraining. For a clinical informatics lead, expect a pilot scoped in weeks including security review, EHR integration, and clinician onboarding. For a product team embedding via Nabla Connect or API-first, the vendor describes embedding in weeks with hands-onWeb · Mobile · Plugin · APIAPI available5.1k viewsVerified 15h ago
Pricing
Free · from $119/mo
FreemiumFree tier3 plans
Learning curve
Beginner-friendly
For a physician, first value comes within the first visit once Nabla is enabled in your EHR — the workflow is talk-then-review, not retraining. For a clinical informatics lead, expect a pilot scoped in weeks including security review, EHR integration, and clinician onboarding. For a product team embedding via Nabla Connect or API-first, the vendor describes embedding in weeks with hands-on
Runs on
WebMobilePluginAPI
API available · 2 integrations
Who it's for
Primary care physician at a multi-site health systemClinical informatics lead evaluating vendorsProduct team at a health tech company
Live sentiment
Is Nabla actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Nabla if you need on-premise or fully offline clinical documentation, or if your sites sit outside the US with strict local data residency rules that configurable retention cannot satisfy.

The 30-second take
Price reality

Nabla's pricing fits teams whose volume aligns with the published tiers. Compare against the alternatives listed below for stage-specific value.

In short

Nabla — Nabla delivers ambient AI clinical documentation, EHR dictation, and E/M coding for health systems. Best for Health systems that want ambient notes, EHR dictation, and coding from a single vendor and contract, Organizations on Epic or athenahealth that need documentation inside the EHR workflow, IT, legal, and compliance leads who need HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR review to clear. Free to start; paid plans from $119/mo.

No head-to-head comparison for Nabla yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.

What's new in Nabla

Checked 8 days ago

Across the latest 6 updates: 6 news mentions.

What people actually say about Nabla — is it worth it?

We scanned public community sources for Nabla on Oct 10, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Only 4 of the posts we fetched could be positively tied to Nabla. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.

Viability Score

74/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Nabla? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
38
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Ambient AI captures patient-clinician conversations and generates structured clinical notes
  • Live transcript with speaker differentiation
  • Filters non-medical conversation out of the clinical note
  • Clinical-grade dictation built into Epic and major EHRs
  • E/M coding suggestions grounded in clinical documentation and AMA guidelines
  • ICD-10 coding suggestions with the final decision left to the clinician
  • Pre-visit chart preparation from the patient chart
  • Note templates customizable per specialty and per clinician
  • Nabla Connect for embedding clinical AI into existing systems in weeks
  • API-first deployment option for engineering teams
  • Web app, iOS app, Android app, and Chrome extension
  • Configurable data retention policies
  • HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliance
  • Agentic AI capabilities for clinical workflows

About Nabla

FreemiumBeginner-friendlyAPI availableWeb · Mobile · Plugin · API

Nabla is a clinical AI layer for health organizations: ambient documentation that captures the patient-clinician conversation and returns a structured note, clinical-grade dictation built into Epic and major EHRs, and E/M plus ICD-10 coding suggestions grounded in the documented encounter and AMA guidelines. Every final coding decision stays with the clinician. Note templates flex per specialty and per clinician, and chart prep pulls patient history before the visit starts. Deployment is where it diverges from a standalone scribe. Nabla Connect embeds the AI into an existing system in weeks, or an engineering team can go API-first and build on top of it. Apps cover web, iOS, Android, and a Chrome extension, so documentation happens in the exam room, not just at a desk. The vendor reports deployment across 130+ health organizations and use by 85,000+ clinicians, with 20M+ patient encounters a year. Governance is spelled out: HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, configurable retention policies, and a partnership with the Coalition for Health AI. Recent vendor writing has leaned into enterprise AI strategy and how buyers should vet vendors beyond the model card. Against lighter ambient scribes that sell a single note generator, Nabla pitches a wider documentation and coding layer aimed at IT, compliance, and clinical leadership rather than solo practices.

Behind the Verdict

The decision with ambient clinical AI usually comes down to scope. Buy a note generator and you still need dictation and a coding story. Nabla's pitch is that all three come from one vendor, with the same governance paperwork behind them. We'd reach for it when the buyer is an organization, not a clinician. If your EHR is Epic or athenahealth, your compliance team needs SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 on file before anything touches PHI, and you want per-clinician templates instead of one fixed note format, Nabla's checklist is largely pre-filled. Where it bites: breadth is not the same as best-in-class at every step. Your specialty's note conventions and your coding team's tolerance for suggested codes need to survive a real pilot. Run a few weeks against live encounters inside your EHR, then compare the note quality and the coding acceptance rate to a dedicated scribe. On cost, Nabla sits in the enterprise tier of this market. Practices that document a handful of visits a day and don't bill complex E/M codes won't earn back the seat. Teams wanting a simple note-taker with no coding or dictation ambitions should pass and look at lighter tools. One caveat worth naming: much of the recent vendor output is thought leadership on enterprise AI strategy and vendor vetting. Useful reading, but evaluate the product on your own transcript accuracy and workflow data, not on the blog.

Researching Nabla? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Nabla actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Primary care physician at a multi-site health system

You start the visit with Nabla listening in the exam room, talk to the patient normally, then review the structured note and E/M suggestion Nabla generated before signing.

Outcome: Documentation happens during the encounter instead of after hours, and the note lands in Epic without you typing it.

Clinical informatics lead evaluating vendors

You run Nabla through your security and compliance review using its HIPAA, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR posture plus configurable data retention, then pilot with a cohort of physicians.

Outcome: You get a defensible vendor decision backed by the NEJM AI randomized trial results rather than a demo impression.

Product team at a health tech company

You embed Nabla through Nabla Connect, or go API-first, so documentation and coding sit inside your own application instead of a separate clinician-facing tool.

Outcome: Clinical AI ships inside your product in weeks, with compliance and specialty depth handled by the vendor.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

GPT-5.5

as of 2026-10-16

Limitations

  • Nabla is designed specifically for clinical settings and is not intended for non-medical uses.
  • Ambient capture depends on a reasonably quiet environment and clear speech, so shared or noisy spaces can degrade results.
  • The vendor documents EHR integration centered on Epic and athenahealth, so confirm support for other EHRs directly before planning a rollout.
  • Nabla Connect embedding and API-first deployment are enterprise motions that involve vendor implementation involvement rather than pure self-serve setup.
  • The company named Brian Manning CEO in July 2026, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to raise during a multi-year procurement.

as of 2026-09-30

Verification history

We have re-verified Nabla 24 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 24 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Nabla tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

A clinician or small team who wants to try ambient documentation and structured note generation before evaluating a paid deployment.

What this tier adds

Free entry point — trial access to ambient documentation and conversation capture with structured note generation, no paid commitment.

Pro

$119/mo

Ideal for

An individual clinician or specialty practice that needs ambient notes, dictation inside Epic or athenahealth, and coding suggestions in daily practice.

What this tier adds

Adds clinical-grade dictation in Epic and major EHRs, E/M and ICD-10 coding suggestions, customizable note templates by specialty, and pre-visit chart preparation over the free tier.

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Health systems and health tech companies embedding clinical AI across many sites, with governance, retention, and integration requirements to satisfy.

What this tier adds

Adds Nabla Connect API and API-first deployment, hands-on implementation and adoption support, configurable data retention, HIPAA/SOC 2 Type 2/ISO 27001/GDPR compliance, and dedicated white glove support.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Nabla's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Nabla's pricing fits teams whose volume aligns with the published tiers. Compare against the alternatives listed below for stage-specific value.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Nabla — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For a physician, first value comes within the first visit once Nabla is enabled in your EHR — the workflow is talk-then-review, not retraining. For a clinical informatics lead, expect a pilot scoped in weeks including security review, EHR integration, and clinician onboarding. For a product team embedding via Nabla Connect or API-first, the vendor describes embedding in weeks with hands-on

Switching to or from Nabla

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From manual EHR documentation: enable Nabla in Epic or athenahealth and have clinicians review ambient-generated notes against their existing templates.
  • →From a general-purpose dictation tool: switch to Nabla's clinical-grade speech recognition inside Epic and major EHRs, keeping the same documentation workflow.
  • →From a separate coding tool: consolidate E/M and ICD-10 suggestions into Nabla, which grounds them in the clinical documentation and AMA guidelines.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a standalone ambient scribe: export your configured note templates and confirm the successor supports your specialty structure before switching.
  • ↗To an in-house or on-premise documentation stack: plan for rebuilding the ambient capture, dictation, and coding pipeline that Nabla provides in one contract.
  • ↗To your own application built on a foundation model: you lose Nabla's compliance posture, specialty template library, and the NEJM AI-tested efficiency results.

Integrations

Epicathenahealth

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Nabla”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Nabla” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Nabla.

Official links

Tools that pair well with Nabla

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Nabla, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Alternatives to Nabla

View all
Abridge

Abridge

Abridge turns clinical conversations into documentation, coding, and care actions for enterprise health systems

Contact SalesTry
Knowtex

Knowtex

Ambient clinical AI that turns patient visits into notes, ICD-10/E&M codes, and staged orders for health systems.

Contact SalesTry
Tortus

Tortus

Ambient voice AI for NHS clinical documentation — captures consultations, drafts clinician-approved notes, letters and referrals.

Contact SalesTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Nabla? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.