Naïve

Naïve

Declarative agent infrastructure where autonomous agents spend money, hold identity, and run under policy committed to code.

75/100Safe BetFree · from $20/moFreemium

Naïve is the rare agent platform where governance is load-bearing rather than a dashboard afterthought — budgets and tool policy live in the same committed naive.config.ts as the agents, and the file is immutable to the agents it governs. The $20/mo Standard plan with $20 of included credit, no per-seat fee, and zero metering on MCP, SDK, and CLI is unusually honest for this category, and publishing per-second computer rates ($0.0666 per running hour at 1 vCPU / 1 GiB) plus a $0 paused rate means idle agents cost nothing. Pick it if your agents need to move money, hold KYC-backed identity, or run for hours unattended; skip it if your workload is a single chatbot with no budget to enforce.

Verified 4d ago · liveness 75/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/naive

Best for
  • Developers building autonomous agents that must spend money and hold real-world identity
  • Teams running multi-agent systems that need hard budget caps and approval gates on tool calls
  • Founders deploying a running company blueprint — clipping, SEO agency, recruiting — from a template
  • Engineering orgs replacing a DIY AWS + Stripe + payments stack with one declarative config
Not ideal for
  • Non-technical users who want a no-code agent builder — a committed config file and CLI are the entry fee
  • Enterprises requiring on-premise or private-cloud deployment out of the box
  • Simple single-purpose chatbots that never need identity, payments, or policy enforcement
Visit Website

AdvancedA developer who already knows the stack can create an agent, run a session, and read the meter in under five minutes per the docs quickstart. Deploying a company template from Studio is faster still since the blueprints ship with agent teams attached. Budget an afternoon for wiring real per-agent identity — KYC-backed phone, domain DNS, and third-party account connections depend on externalWeb · API · CLIAPI availableVerified 4d ago
Pricing
Free · from $20/mo
FreemiumFree tier3 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Advanced
A developer who already knows the stack can create an agent, run a session, and read the meter in under five minutes per the docs quickstart. Deploying a company template from Studio is faster still since the blueprints ship with agent teams attached. Budget an afternoon for wiring real per-agent identity — KYC-backed phone, domain DNS, and third-party account connections depend on external
Runs on
WebAPICLI
API available · 15 integrations
Who it's for
Solo developer shipping an autonomous content channelOps lead at a small agency running client workEngineer running long-horizon back-office jobs
Live sentiment
Is Naïve actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Naïve if you want a no-code agent builder or an instant-response chatbot — Naïve assumes you will commit a naive.config.ts and drive it from the CLI, Studio, or an agent runtime like Claude Code.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Every call past your included credit bills at published rates — web search $0.002158 and web fetch $0.001079 per call — so research-heavy agents burn credit faster than a chat workload would.

Price reality

Standard at $20/mo with $20 of credit included and Pro at $200/mo with $200 of credit are flat per-organization prices — no per-seat fee however many people use the organization — which undercuts per-seat agent platforms once a team passes a handful of users. Past the included credit both plans use identical published rates, so Pro is purely a larger credit bucket. Custom (Managed) adds committed-volume pricing, invoicing and PO terms, a monthly allowance, and a security review and DPA for

In short

Naïve — Declarative agent infrastructure where autonomous agents spend money, hold identity, and run under policy committed to code. Best for Developers building autonomous agents that must spend money and hold real-world identity, Teams running multi-agent systems that need hard budget caps and approval gates on tool calls, Founders deploying a running company blueprint — clipping, SEO agency, recruiting — from a template. Free to start; paid plans from $20/mo.

What's new in Naïve

Checked 4 days ago

Across the latest 3 updates: 1 feature update, 1 launch and 1 community discussion.

What people actually say about Naïve — is it worth it?

We scanned public community sources for Naïve on Jul 6, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.

Viability Score

75/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Naïve? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
50
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Declarative infrastructure as code via naive.config.ts with a strict defineProject entrypoint
  • Rejects undeclared config fields
  • Per-agent daily and per-task budgets declared in one committed file
  • Tool policy map with allow / ask / deny rules
  • Agents cannot edit the config file that binds them
  • Multi-agent orchestration: goals decomposed and delegated across agent teams
  • Per-agent registered AGT ID, verified email, verified phone, domain with DNS
  • Per-agent third-party account linking limited to the tools its role needs
  • US phone numbers with KYC and SMS OTP, including a sole-proprietor tier with no LLC or EIN
  • Vetta managed runtime with sessions, events, and long-horizon durable execution
  • Per-session isolated Linux micro-VM with shell, filesystem, and optional browser
  • Computers pause between turns and meter $0 while paused
  • Completion windows chosen per request: immediate, priority, or loose tariffs
  • Skills — persisted, versioned expertise loaded with progressive disclosure
  • Files — durable organization-scoped storage for session artifacts

About Naïve

FreemiumAdvancedAPI availableWeb · API · CLI

Naïve (usenaive.ai) is agent infrastructure for teams whose autonomous agents need to actually run a business rather than just answer questions. Instead of wiring AWS, Stripe, and a payment processor together yourself, you write one naive.config.ts and the control plane enforces it: per-agent daily budgets, per-task caps, and tool policy such as "social.post": "ask" or "payments.send": "deny". Agents cannot edit the file that binds them. Identity is provisioned per agent, not per team — the vendor page shows each agent receiving a registered AGT ID (producer · AGT-7F3K), a verified email, a verified phone, a domain with DNS, and third-party accounts linked only for the role it performs. Multi-agent orchestration is a first-class concept: a goal is decomposed, delegated to named agents, and run in parallel until finished, as in the page example where a CEO agent splits work to a clipper and a producer that fans out to four subagents. Naïve's docs describe two names on one stack — Vetta is the managed agent runtime (agents, sessions, computers, skills, budget, real-USD billing), and Naïve is the blueprints, templates, and Studio on top of it. Prebuilt company templates carry much of the setup: Naive Clipping v1 (917,438 runs), Short Form v1 (483,271 runs), SEO / GEO Agency (178,326 runs), AI Automation Agency (152,904 runs), plus Long Form, Newsletter, and themed clip channels. You deploy from the browser in Studio or from a terminal, or paste a setup prompt into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Hermes, or OpenClaw. Pricing is one organization plan, not per seat: $20/mo Standard with $20 of credit included each month, or $200/mo Pro with $200 of credit, then metered per call at published rates. You need to be comfortable with a committed config file and a CLI.

Behind the Verdict

What separates Naïve from the crowded agent-framework field is that the governance layer is the product, not a feature bolted onto it. In naive.config.ts you declare agents, delegation, a perAgentDay and perTask budget, and a policy map where each tool is allow, ask, or deny — the page's own example sets "social.post": "ask" and "payments.send": "deny". The vendor states plainly that no agent can edit the file that binds it, which is what makes the budget a budget rather than a suggestion an agent can talk its way past. Identity is the second differentiator. Rather than one shared team credential, each agent is issued a registered AGT ID, a verified email, a verified phone, a domain with DNS, and a scoped set of linked third-party accounts — a producer gets video tooling, not the payments credential. The /phone primitive was updated in August 2026 to add a sole-proprietor tier: carrier-registered US numbers with KYC and SMS OTP without an LLC or EIN, which removes a real barrier for solo operators. On cost, the docs are unusually specific. A session's computer is 1 vCPU / 1 GiB, so a full running hour is $0.0504 + $0.0162 = $0.0666, and a computer paused costs $0 with no creation fee and the boot disk inside the allowance. Web search is $0.002158 per call and web fetch $0.001079 per call, booked from what the provider charged, and a fetch refused by domain policy is stopped before the request and costs nothing. Model inference is metered per token across five disjoint tiers (input, cached reads, cache writes, output, reasoning), and you choose a completion window per request — immediate, priority, or loose — with the vendor advising you pay the interactive tariff only when a person is waiting and run overnight work on loose for materially less. Vetta, launched 17 August 2026 as Naïve's managed agent for long-horizon work, is positioned on cost per finished task; the vendor claims 2.7x cheaper task completion than the next-best harness on the same model and tasks. Sessions get an isolated Linux micro-VM (8 August 2026 announcement) with shell, filesystem, and optional browser that pauses between turns. The docs list what is available now: agents, sessions, the durable runtime, completion windows, budgets, the computer, skills, files, cron, webhooks, real-USD billing, identity (personas, domains, email, SMS, connections, the vault), web search and fetch, image and video generation, a Messages-format model proxy, observability, structured outputs, audit logs, and teams with a version-pinned roster and shared board. Where it doesn't fit: the entry fee is a committed configuration file and CLI, so there is no no-code path. The vendor does not offer on-premise or private-cloud deployment out of the box. Long-horizon budgets assume you are willing to trade completion speed for lower inference cost — the loose completion window is cheaper precisely because it is slower. And because the config is authoritative, a mistyped policy that denies an action

Researching Naïve? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Naïve actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Solo developer shipping an autonomous content channel

Deploy Naive Clipping v1 from a template, set perAgentDay and perTask budgets in naive.config.ts, add "payments.send": "deny" and "social.post": "ask", then let the five-agent team cut and queue clips.

Outcome: A running clip channel governed by one committed file, with spend visible per call and no separate Stripe or AWS wiring.

Ops lead at a small agency running client work

Install the SEO / GEO Agency template, give each client a workspace, and scope each agent's linked accounts to the tools its role needs rather than sharing one credential.

Outcome: Client agents act under their own identity and budget caps, and the agency keeps one organization plan with no per-seat charge.

Engineer running long-horizon back-office jobs

Create a Vetta agent with a budget cap and max task cost, run it as a session with an isolated micro-VM and a cron trigger, and set overnight work to the loose completion window.

Outcome: Hours-long jobs finish without a person in the loop, the computer meters nothing between turns, and the per-task cap holds the worst case.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

claude-opus-5opus-5zai-org/GLM-5.2-FP8

as of 2026-09-28

Limitations

  • Pricing is metered per unit of consumption: model inference per token across five disjoint tiers (input, cached reads, cache writes, output, reasoning) at the tariff for the completion window requested; computers per second while running, with a 1 vCPU / 1 GiB session costing $0.0504 + $0.0162 = $0.0666 per running hour; web tools per call (web_search $0.002158, web_fetch $0.001079); and media generation billed once per finished job at real cost, admitted against the headroom under the agent's per-task cap because a render cannot be quoted before it runs.
  • Standard is $20/mo including $20 of credit and Pro is $200/mo including $200 of credit, with everything past the included credit billed pay-as-you-go against a prepaid balance, so heavy multi-agent workloads scale in real dollars.
  • The runtime is built for long-horizon work and per-task budget caps rather than instant responses.
  • KYC-backed identity issuance and third-party account linking depend on external providers for verification and connection.
  • Because agents are bound by a committed config they cannot edit, any action declared ask or deny is blocked — a policy misconfiguration can stop intended actions.

as of 2026-10-04

Verification history

We have re-verified Naïve 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
$240
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
$20
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Every call past your included credit bills at published rates — web search $0.002158 and web fetch $0.001079 per call — so research-heavy agents burn credit faster than a chat workload would.
  • Media generation is billed once per finished job at real cost and cannot be quoted before it runs, so a big video batch lands as a lump of spend admitted against each agent's per-task cap.
  • Model inference is metered as five disjoint token tiers, including cached reads and cache writes, so caching-heavy agents pay on tiers a flat per-token estimate would miss.
  • A long-running computer meters $0.0504/vCPU-hr plus $0.0162/GiB-hr while it runs; it is free only while paused, so agents that keep a machine awake around the clock accrue steadily.
  • Choosing the immediate completion window pays the highest tariff — the same model at the loose window costs materially less, and that difference is a decision you make per request.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Naïve's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Standard at $20/mo with $20 of credit included and Pro at $200/mo with $200 of credit are flat per-organization prices — no per-seat fee however many people use the organization — which undercuts per-seat agent platforms once a team passes a handful of users. Past the included credit both plans use identical published rates, so Pro is purely a larger credit bucket. Custom (Managed) adds committed-volume pricing, invoicing and PO terms, a monthly allowance, and a security review and DPA for

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Naïve — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

A developer who already knows the stack can create an agent, run a session, and read the meter in under five minutes per the docs quickstart. Deploying a company template from Studio is faster still since the blueprints ship with agent teams attached. Budget an afternoon for wiring real per-agent identity — KYC-backed phone, domain DNS, and third-party account connections depend on external

Switching to or from Naïve

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From a DIY AWS + Stripe + payment-processor stack: replace the wiring with one naive.config.ts that declares agents, budgets, and tool policy.
  • →From a general agent framework: move the agent definition into the Agent primitive (model, prompt, tools, skills, budget) and let the runtime handle sessions and durability.
  • →From a chat-only LLM API: add a budget cap and a policy map so tool calls are allow / ask / deny rather than unconstrained.
  • →From a per-seat automation platform: consolidate onto one organization plan, since Naïve charges no per-seat fee.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a general-purpose cloud: rebuild the identity, payments, and policy layer yourself on top of the provider's primitives.
  • ↗To a standalone agent framework: keep the agent logic but re-implement budget enforcement and approval gates outside a committed config.
  • ↗To a no-code agent builder: accept less explicit governance in exchange for not maintaining a config file.
  • ↗To a per-seat SaaS automation tool: trade per-agent budgets and real-world identity for a fixed monthly seat price.

Integrations

StripeSupabaseVercelGitHubNotionSlackShopifyHubSpotGmailTikTokYouTubeInstagramMeta AdsElevenLabsKling

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Naïve”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Naïve” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Naïve.

Tools that pair well with Naïve

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Naïve, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Naïve

View all
Fimo

Fimo

An autonomous website platform that runs on your own Git repo, with scheduled AI agents that keep improving the site after launch.

FreemiumTry
E2B

E2B

E2B runs secure Linux sandboxes so AI agents can execute code, process data, and use tools safely

FreemiumTry
Poolside AI

Poolside AI

Open-weight agentic coding models — Laguna XS 2.1 (33B) and Laguna S 2.1 (118B) — built for code that cannot leave your security boundary.

Contact SalesTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Naïve? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.