Phidata

Phidata

Open-source Python framework for building and running private, production-ready multi-agent systems.

87/100Safe BetFree · from $150/moFreemium

Agno is a strong pick for engineering teams that want to own their agent infrastructure without building it from scratch. The standout is AgentOS's production governance (RBAC, HITL, audit logs) and default private deployment—your data never leaves your cloud. If you're evaluating LangGraph or CrewAI, Agno offers better async support and a cleaner path to a managed runtime. The catch is the Pro tier at $150/mo, which may be steep for small teams; the free tier is limited to local development.

Verified 1d ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/phidata

Best for
  • Engineering teams wanting production multi-agent systems with governance and audit trails
  • Companies needing private-by-default agent infrastructure where data stays in their cloud
  • Developers who want an intuitive framework with minimal boilerplate and strong async support
  • Teams that need a fast path from prototype to scalable deployment on their own cloud
Not ideal for
  • Teams needing heavy custom graph-based workflows or complex state machines
  • Hobbyists wanting a fully free tier with production hosting
  • Projects already deeply invested in LangGraph's ecosystem (high switching cost)
Visit Website

IntermediateFor a developer familiar with Python: under 2 minutes to build a basic agent with the SDK (the homepage quotes 'literally 2 minutes'). For full production deployment on your cloud: a few hours to set up AgentOS with a coding agent prompt, plus time to configure RBAC and approval flows.Web · Desktop · API · CLIAPI available3.7k viewsVerified 1d ago
Pricing
Free · from $150/mo
FreemiumFree tier3 plans4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
For a developer familiar with Python: under 2 minutes to build a basic agent with the SDK (the homepage quotes 'literally 2 minutes'). For full production deployment on your cloud: a few hours to set up AgentOS with a coding agent prompt, plus time to configure RBAC and approval flows.
Runs on
WebDesktopAPICLI
API available · 18 integrations
Who it's for
Startup engineerML platform team leadAI consultant
Live sentiment
Is Phidata actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Agno if you need heavy custom graph-based workflows (LangGraph may be better), want a fully free production hosting, or are a small team that can't justify the $150/mo Pro tier.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Additional seats beyond the four included in Pro cost $30/mo per seat, so a growing team on Pro adds up quickly.

Price reality

Agno's pricing sits between fully free open-source frameworks (LangGraph, CrewAI) and hosted platforms like LangSmith or Relevance AI that charge per event/token. Pro at $150/mo is a fixed cost with no per-event fees, which suits teams running many agents; smaller teams might find LangGraph's free usage cheaper, while enterprises with compliance needs may justify the cost for private deployment.

In short

Phidata — Open-source Python framework for building and running private, production-ready multi-agent systems. Best for Engineering teams wanting production multi-agent systems with governance and audit trails, Companies needing private-by-default agent infrastructure where data stays in their cloud, Developers who want an intuitive framework with minimal boilerplate and strong async support. Free to start; paid plans from $150/mo.

What's new in Phidata

Checked 8 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 2 feature updates and 3 news mentions.

Viability Score

87/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Phidata? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
not measured
Site health
95
User sentiment
not measured
What the vendor publishes
80

Last calculated: August 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Open-source Python framework for multi-agent systems
  • AgentOS runtime: stateless, secure FastAPI backend
  • 50+ endpoints for runs, sessions, memory, knowledge, traces
  • Unified API across 30+ model providers (Chat, Responses, Interactions)
  • Run agents built with Agno, Claude Agent SDK, LangGraph, DSPy
  • Streaming, background execution, and resume
  • Unified sync/async API
  • JWT-based RBAC and per-session isolation
  • Human-in-the-loop approval flows and audit logs
  • Web console (Control Plane) for monitoring and management
  • Session and trace monitoring
  • Memory and knowledge management
  • System evaluations: accuracy, reliability, performance
  • Follow-up suggestions (v2.5.9)
  • Text-to-speech via Smallest AI tools (v2.8.6)

About Phidata

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · Desktop · API · CLI

Agno (formerly Phidata) is an open-source Python framework and high-performance runtime for building, running, and managing multi-agent systems in production. It pairs a developer-friendly SDK for defining agents, teams, and workflows with AgentOS, a stateless, secure FastAPI runtime you deploy in your own cloud (AWS, GCP, Railway, or airgapped). AgentOS provides 50+ endpoints covering runs, sessions, memory, knowledge, and traces, plus built-in governance features like JWT-based RBAC, per-session isolation, human-in-the-loop approval flows, and audit logs. The web console (Control Plane) gives you visibility and control: chat with agents, monitor sessions and traces, manage memories and knowledge, and run system evaluations across accuracy, reliability, and performance. Agno is designed for engineering teams whose code, data, and logs live in different places and who need a unified view of their entire agent stack. It supports 30+ model providers through a single API, and you can run agents built with other frameworks—Claude Agent SDK, LangGraph, DSPy—alongside your Agno agents in the same runtime. The framework emphasizes async support with a unified sync/async API, streaming, background execution, and resume. A key differentiator is privacy: all usage, logs, metrics, traces, memory, knowledge, and user data stay in your environment, never leaking to a hosted vendor. Recent updates keep the platform current: v2.5.9 (August 2026) adds follow-up suggestions to agents; v2.8.6 (July 2026) adds text-to-speech via Smallest AI; v2.7.3 (July 2026) adds Valkey support and Redmine tools. The pricing is freemium: Free for building and local development, Pro at $150/mo for production with one live connection and four seats, and Enterprise for custom solutions.

Behind the Verdict

Agno (formerly Phidata) is one of the most complete open-source agent frameworks we've reviewed. It doesn't just give you a Python SDK—it gives you a production runtime (AgentOS) with governance features that most teams would otherwise have to build themselves: JWT-based RBAC, per-session isolation, human-in-the-loop approval flows, and audit logs. That combination is rare; most open-source agent frameworks stop at the SDK layer and leave you to figure out deployment, security, and observability. The private-by-default deployment model is a major plus. AgentOS runs in your own cloud—AWS, GCP, Railway, or airgapped—so your agents' conversations, memory, knowledge, and traces never leave your environment. That's a big deal for companies with strict data residency or compliance requirements. It also means no per-token or per-event fees; you pay for your own infrastructure, which can be more predictable at scale. The unified API across 30+ model providers is another strength. You can switch models without rewriting your agent logic, and it works with Chat, Responses, and Interactions APIs. The ability to run agents built with Claude Agent SDK, LangGraph, or DSPy in the same runtime is a practical migration path for teams already invested in other frameworks. We particularly like the async support. Agno gives you a single agent that works seamlessly in sync and async modes—no event-loop headaches. That's a common pain point in Python agent frameworks, and Agno handles it well. The free tier is genuinely useful for learning and local development—you can build agents and run them against a local AgentOS Control Plane, with session monitoring, memory and knowledge management, and system evaluations. But to go into production with a live connection, you need Pro at $150/mo, which includes one live connection and four total seats. Additional seats are $30/mo and extra live connections are $95/mo. That's not cheap for small teams or hobbyists, but it's reasonable for companies running real agent systems. One limitation is that you manage your own infrastructure—deploying AgentOS on your cloud is on you. The docs provide coding-agent prompts to help with deployment on Railway, Docker, AWS, Fly, GCP, Kubernetes, Azure, Render, and Modal, which lowers the barrier, but it's still more work than a fully hosted solution. We also note that recent updates (v2.5.9, v2.8.6, v2.7.3) show active development, adding features like follow-up suggestions, text-to-speech, Valkey support, and Redmine tools. The roadmap seems strong. Where Agno might not fit: if you need heavy custom graph-based workflows or complex state machines, LangGraph's explicit graph model might be a better match. And if you're looking for a completely free way to run agents in production, Agno's Free tier won't cut it—you'll need Pro. For teams that want a self-managed runtime without the AgentOS dependency, you can use the SDK alone but you'll lose the governance and control plane benefits.

Researching Phidata? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Phidata actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Startup engineer

You need to build a customer support copilot that can query internal docs and escalate to a human.

Outcome: Using Agno SDK, you define an agent with a knowledge base and a Slack tool, connect it to AgentOS on Railway, and get a live chat interface with governance within an afternoon.

ML platform team lead

Your team runs agents built on LangGraph and Claude SDK and wants to unify them under one runtime.

Outcome: You import those agents into AgentOS, add RBAC and audit logs, and monitor all traffic from the Control Plane—without rewriting your agent logic.

AI consultant

A client needs a private, airgapped agent system for processing sensitive HR documents.

Outcome: You deploy AgentOS on-prem, use the memory and knowledge managers to organize documents, and run evaluations to prove accuracy—all without data leaving the client's environment.

Use Cases

  • Build in-product AI copilots and chat interfaces on your own infrastructure.
  • Label text, image, audio, and video data using multi-modal agents.
  • Generate synthetic data and preference pairs for training and evaluations.
  • Automate document processing, knowledge organization, and weekly reports.
  • Create Slack-native agents that handle workspace tasks with human oversight.
  • Deploy multi-agent investment teams for financial analysis and portfolio management.

Models Under the Hood

gpt-5.4-miniGPT-4o mini

as of 2026-08-15

Limitations

  • The Free plan supports building agent systems and running them using the AgentOS Control Plane for local development.
  • The Pro plan ($150/mo) includes one live connection and four total seats, with additional seats at $30/mo and additional live connections at $95/mo.
  • Enterprise plans require contacting sales for custom solutions.
  • The platform is designed to run in your own system, so you manage the underlying infrastructure and associated costs.

as of 2026-08-14

Verification history

We have re-verified Phidata 14 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 14 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Phidata tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

Solo developers and small teams prototyping multi-agent systems locally, exploring the SDK and AgentOS features without production needs.

What this tier adds

Starting tier with local Control Plane for development, includes session monitoring, knowledge management, and system evaluations but no live production connections.

Pro

$150/mo

Ideal for

Engineering teams running production multi-agent systems on their own cloud who need live connections, unlimited usage, and governance features at a predictable monthly cost.

What this tier adds

Adds one live AgentOS connection and four seats, plus unlimited usage, monitoring, retention, knowledge, memories, and chats; extras cost extra.

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Enterprises with mission-critical agent systems that require custom SSO/RBAC, dedicated support, self-hosted Control Plane, and custom agent solutions.

What this tier adds

Adds dedicated Slack channel, technical lead, SLA, custom SSO/RBAC, self-hosted Control Plane, and custom agent solutions over Pro.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Additional seats beyond the four included in Pro cost $30/mo per seat, so a growing team on Pro adds up quickly.
  • Each additional live connection beyond the one included in Pro costs $95/mo, so running multiple production environments gets expensive.
  • You are responsible for your own cloud infrastructure costs (compute, storage, network) when running AgentOS, which can be significant at scale.
  • Enterprise features like custom SSO and self-hosted Control Plane are only available on the custom-priced Enterprise plan, requiring a sales conversation.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Phidata's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Agno's pricing sits between fully free open-source frameworks (LangGraph, CrewAI) and hosted platforms like LangSmith or Relevance AI that charge per event/token. Pro at $150/mo is a fixed cost with no per-event fees, which suits teams running many agents; smaller teams might find LangGraph's free usage cheaper, while enterprises with compliance needs may justify the cost for private deployment.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Phidata — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For a developer familiar with Python: under 2 minutes to build a basic agent with the SDK (the homepage quotes 'literally 2 minutes'). For full production deployment on your cloud: a few hours to set up AgentOS with a coding agent prompt, plus time to configure RBAC and approval flows.

Switching to or from Phidata

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From LangGraph: Run your existing LangGraph agents inside AgentOS without rewriting; use the same runtime for governance and monitoring.
  • From Claude Agent SDK: Import your Claude agents directly; they run alongside Agno agents in the same AgentOS runtime.
  • From DSPy: Bring your DSPy programs into AgentOS to gain observability and control plane features.
Migrating out
  • To LangGraph: If you need more explicit graph control, you can migrate your agent logic, but you'll lose AgentOS's built-in governance and runtime features.
  • To a fully self-hosted stack: If you want zero dependency on Agno, you can use the SDK standalone and build your own serving layer, but you'll need to recreate RBAC, memory, and observability.

Integrations

AWSGCPRailwaySlackDiscordOpenAIAnthropicGoogle GeminiMistralGroqTogether AIAWS BedrockAzure AICloudflare AI GatewayInception LabsTokenLabRedmineValkey

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Tools that pair well with Phidata

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Phidata, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Alternatives to Phidata

View all
OpenAI Agents SDK

OpenAI Agents SDK

Open-source Python framework for building multi-agent workflows with handoffs, guardrails, and voice.

FreeTry
AutoGen Studio

AutoGen Studio

Open-source, low-code GUI for prototyping multi-agent AI systems, built on Microsoft's AutoGen AgentChat framework.

FreeTry
INK Editor

INK Editor

Open-source agent OS for building, securing, and scaling production AI agents.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Phidata? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.