Rankability

The question Rankability answers is not "what position do we rank at" but "where does our client get named when a buyer asks an AI assistant." That is a different data problem, and Rankability treats it that way. Tracking covers 11 named platforms — ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Microsoft Copilot, Brave AI, DeepSeek, and Meta AI — with daily monitoring counted against a shared active-query allowance. Every paid tier gets the same 11 platforms, so you are never paying more for wider coverage, only for more volume. The genuinely unusual part is that tracking and execution sit in one cockpit. A technical audit surfaces crawl and indexing barriers; a page-level content audit produces a prioritized fix list for writers; publishing goes out to WordPress, Webflow, or GitHub as a pull request so a human approves before anything goes live. That approval gate matters more than it sounds — it is the difference between an AI content tool your clients will tolerate and one that quietly publishes the wrong thing under their name. The Search Performance Index is the piece your account managers will actually use in a review call: it folds Google rankings, local Pack visibility, AI visibility, and video visibility into a single number that moves over time. Local Pack geo-grid scans cover multi-location clients, and weekly Google tracking goes to the top 30 results, so the traditional reporting is not an afterthought. Serena, the in-product assistant, turns connected client evidence into AI SEO priorities, and the hosted MCP server plus Agent API let you drive Rankability from Claude, Codex, or your own reporting stack. For a technical agency that already scripts its reporting, that is the difference between a dashboard you log into and a data source you build on. Where it gets tight is capacity accounting. Content projects, tracked AI queries, and Google keyword slots are shared allowances, not per-client meters — one heavy client can eat a third of a Starter plan's 20 projects. The jump from Starter to Agency is a 3x project increase for roughly 3x the price, so it is a straight volume ladder rather than a feature unlock, and most agencies will find themselves on Agency sooner than they expect. Note also that the $97, $297, and $497 figures are the month-to-month rates; the site advertises an annual option that saves two months, so the effective monthly cost is lower if you commit for a year, but the number you budget monthly is the one quoted. Against Surfer SEO, the distinction is workflow scope rather than content scoring alone — Rankability's October 2026 benchmark of 15 content optimization tools explicitly included Surfer, Yoast, and Rank Math and measured them against Google rankings and AI Overview citations, so the team clearly knows what it is competing with. Against Semrush or a standalone rank tracker, the distinction is that AI answer monitoring, content production, approvals, and branded