Rectify
Rectify bundles uptime monitoring, AI session replay, support, roadmaps, and code scans into one workspace you drive by chatting with its Quanta agent.
Rectify's pitch holds up: one conversational surface for monitoring, replay, support, and roadmaps instead of four dashboards and four bills. The BYOK model is the sharpest part — you plug in your own Deepseek, Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, or OpenRouter keys at zero markup, which keeps a bootstrapped team's AI costs near raw API rates. Quanta's cross-platform linking (ticket to replay, code scan to roadmap card) is the feature you can't easily replicate by stapling Sentry to Zendesk. If you already run Sentry and Zendesk happily, you gain little. If you're drowning in tabs, the 14-day no-credit-card trial costs you nothing to test.
Verified 16h ago · liveness 71/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/rectify
- SaaS founders who want monitoring, replay, support, and roadmap in one chat-controlled workspace
- Small teams shipping with Cursor, Claude, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or v0
- Bootstrapped startups using BYOK to keep AI costs at raw API rates with zero markup
- Non-technical founders who prefer asking Quanta a question over configuring dashboards and filters
- Large enterprises needing on-prem deployment or SOC 2 compliance documents
- Teams requiring deep custom analytics, advanced filtering, or saved query views
- High-volume support orgs with advanced routing rules, SLAs, and multi-tier escalation
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Rectify if you already run Sentry and Zendesk in a settled workflow, need on-prem deployment or SOC 2 paperwork from day one, or require saved-query analytics and multi-tier support SLAs rather than natural-language agent control.
AI agent actions draw on one-time credits that don't refill — $5 on Build, $10 on Launch, $15 on Accelerate — so a chat-heavy month can exhaust them before the billing period ends.
Rectify's paid tiers — $29/mo Build, $59/mo Launch, $99/mo Accelerate — fit a bootstrapped SaaS of one to twenty-five people that would otherwise pay for Sentry, Zendesk, and Productboard separately. The $699 lifetime Believer plan buys Accelerate in perpetuity, which undercuts three years of Accelerate monthly. Larger teams needing more than 25 seats and monitors move to custom Enterprise pricing rather than a published tier.
In short
Rectify — Rectify bundles uptime monitoring, AI session replay, support, roadmaps, and code scans into one workspace you drive by chatting with its Quanta agent. Best for SaaS founders who want monitoring, replay, support, and roadmap in one chat-controlled workspace, Small teams shipping with Cursor, Claude, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or v0, Bootstrapped startups using BYOK to keep AI costs at raw API rates with zero markup. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.
What's new in Rectify
Checked todayAcross the latest 1 update: 1 feature update.
What people actually say about Rectify — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Rectify on Jul 6, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Rectify? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Uptime monitoring across HTTP/HTTPS, TCP, DNS, and ICMP protocols
- Instant alerts via Slack, Discord, email, or webhooks
- Branded status pages with automatic MTTR incident tracking
- SSL certificate monitoring to prevent expired-cert outages
- AI session replay via Quanta, queried in plain English instead of filters
- Automatic detection of rage clicks, errors, and drop-off patterns
- AI-first support inbox with drafted replies and escalating context, in three modes
- On-demand GitHub code scanning with A-E maintainability, reliability, and security ratings
- Bug reporting with annotated screenshots, Loom recordings, and console/network capture
- Before/after comparison to verify fixes on reported bugs
- Workflow automations across feedback, roadmap, code scans, monitoring, inbox, and changelog events
- Changelog generation from commits via Quanta prompts
- Roadmap with user voting and feature request collection
- PRD prompt generator that converts ideas to JSON for AI models
- MCP server with OAuth for Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible IDE
About Rectify
Rectify is a single workspace for the operational chores of a small software company: uptime monitoring across HTTP/HTTPS, TCP, DNS, and ICMP, AI session replay, a support inbox, on-demand GitHub code scanning, bug reporting, roadmaps, changelogs, and a PRD prompt generator. The connective tissue is Quanta, its AI operations agent. Instead of configuring filters or dashboards, you describe what you want in plain English and Quanta finds error sessions, rage clicks, and drop-offs in replay, drafts support replies with full conversation context, pulls code scan reports, checks uptime, generates changelogs, or moves roadmap cards. Support runs in three modes — AI-first, AI-only, or human-only. Cross-platform intelligence links a ticket to a session replay, or traces a bug from code scan to roadmap card, without tab-switching. A browser extension captures console logs, network requests, and runtime errors during debugging, and an MCP server connects Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible IDE; an April 2026 update added OAuth, so you can drive SaaS workflows straight from an AI conversation. A BYOK option lets you plug in your own Deepseek, Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, or OpenRouter keys at zero markup. Pricing runs a free Idea tier, Build at $29/mo, Launch at $59/mo, and Accelerate at $99/mo (monthly; yearly billing saves 20%), a $699 lifetime Believer plan, and custom Enterprise. Rectify positions itself as a bundled alternative to running Sentry, Zendesk, and Productboard side by side.
Behind the Verdict
Rectify's bet is that a small team would rather ask a question than configure a dashboard, and it builds the whole product around that bet. Quanta is not a chatbot bolted onto a monitoring tool — it's the interface for session replay ('find sessions where users hit errors, rage-clicked, or dropped off'), support drafting, code scan retrieval, uptime checks, changelog generation, and roadmap card moves. Three support modes (AI-first, AI-only, human-only) let you dial how much autonomy the agent gets, which matters if you don't yet trust it to answer customers unsupervised. The bundling is the real value. Uptime monitoring across HTTP/HTTPS, TCP, DNS, and ICMP with Slack/Discord/email/webhook alerts, SSL certificate monitoring, branded status pages with automatic MTTR tracking, on-demand GitHub code scanning with A-E ratings for maintainability, reliability, and security, a bug reporter that captures annotated screenshots, Loom recordings, console logs, network requests, and browser details in one click, a roadmap with user voting, and changelogs generated from commits — that's a stack most founders stitch together from four vendors. Rectify's cross-platform linking is what stapling those vendors together doesn't give you: link a support ticket to the session replay that provoked it, or trace a bug from a code scan finding to the roadmap card tracking its fix. The developer-facing side is the piece to watch. The MCP server connects Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-compatible IDE to Rectify with token-based auth, and the April 2026 update added OAuth so you can drive SaaS workflows from an AI conversation. Teams that already live in Cursor or Claude get code scan results, feedback insights, and project data inside that conversation instead of a second browser tab. Where Rectify is honest about its ceiling: the free Idea tier gives you 1 user, 1 project, 1 monitor, 10 session replays, 1 PRD, and $0 AI credits — enough to evaluate, not to run on. Paid tiers scale to 25 users and 25 monitors at Accelerate ($99/mo monthly, less if you pay yearly), and AI agent actions draw on one-time credits ($5 on Build, $10 on Launch, $15 on Accelerate), with BYOK as the escape hatch for teams that don't want credits at all. Code scanning is on-demand (10 to 100 scans by tier) and GitHub-only. If you need on-prem deployment, SOC 2 paperwork, deep saved-query analytics, or multi-tier support SLAs, this isn't the tool — that's enterprise territory Rectify explicitly routes to a custom plan. The sweet spot is a bootstrapped SaaS of one to twenty-five people shipping with Cursor, Claude, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or v0, where the founder is also the on-call engineer and the first-line support agent. For that team, paying $29-99/mo plus your own API keys to collapse four tabs into one conversation is a straightforward trade. For a funded team with an existing Sentry plus Zendesk workflow and a dedicated support org, migrating buys you less than the disruption costs.
Researching Rectify? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Rectify actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
A user reports a broken signup flow. You open Quanta, describe the error, and it surfaces the matching session replay showing where the user rage-clicked; the browser extension already captured the console logs and network requests from that session.
Outcome: You trace the bug to the exact step in under five minutes instead of asking the user to reproduce it, then push the fix and use the before/after comparison to confirm the reported bug is resolved.
Support is set to AI-first mode. Quanta drafts replies with the full conversation context, pulls relevant feedback from prior tickets, and escalates to you when the question isn't one it can answer; you approve the draft.
Outcome: First-response time drops without hiring, and every escalated ticket arrives with the context attached instead of a bare subject line.
You connect your own OpenAI or Claude API key so Quanta runs at raw API rates with zero markup, then connect the MCP server to Cursor so your editor can read code scan results and feedback insights inline while you debug.
Outcome: AI costs stay predictable on your own API bill, and code analysis happens inside the editor instead of a separate dashboard tab.
Use Cases
- Monitor your infrastructure across HTTP/HTTPS, TCP, DNS, and ICMP protocols, with alerts to Slack, Discord, email, or webhooks.
- Ask Quanta to find user sessions where errors, rage-clicks, or drop-offs occurred, in plain language instead of filters.
- Automate support replies with AI drafts that include full conversation context and escalate to a human when needed.
- Pull code scan reports and generate changelogs from commits through natural-language commands.
- Link a support ticket to a session replay, or trace a bug from a code scan finding to the roadmap card tracking it.
- Run your SaaS from an AI conversation via the MCP server, which added OAuth support in April 2026.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-24
Limitations
- The free Idea tier caps support responses at 10 and session replays at 10; the paid ceiling is 5,000 session replays and 25 monitors at Accelerate.
- AI agent actions draw on one-time credits per plan — $0 on Idea, $5 on Build, $10 on Launch, $15 on Accelerate — so heavy Quanta use either burns credits or requires bringing your own API keys via BYOK, which puts the API bill on you.
- Code scanning is on-demand, limited to GitHub, and capped at 10 scans on Build, 25 on Launch, and 100 on Accelerate.
- Larger teams needing more than 25 users or 25 monitors are routed to a custom Enterprise conversation rather than a published tier.
as of 2026-10-08
Verification history
We have re-verified Rectify 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Rectify tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Idea
$0/mo
Ideal for
A solo founder evaluating Rectify on a side project who wants one monitor, basic replay, and a roadmap without paying anything.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: 1 user, 1 project, 1 monitor, 10 session replays, 1 PRD, $0 AI credits.
Build
$29/mo
Ideal for
An individual or small team prototyping with Cursor or Bolt that needs code scans and a support inbox for the first time.
What this tier adds
Adds 3 users, 3 projects, 3 monitors with a status page, 100 replays, 10 PRDs, 10 code scans, 10 support responses, and $5 AI credits.
Launch
$59/mo
Ideal for
A team that has shipped and now needs headroom — 10 seats, 1,000 replays, and enough monitors to cover a real status page.
What this tier adds
Scales to 10 users, 10 projects, 10 monitors, 1,000 session replays, 25 PRDs, 25 code scans, and $10 AI credits.
Accelerate
$99/mo
Ideal for
A scaling business with a busier support load, 25 people, and enough traffic that 5,000 replay sessions and 100 code scans are realistic.
What this tier adds
Top published tier: 25 users, 25 projects, 25 monitors, 5,000 session replays, 100 PRDs, 100 code scans, and $15 AI credits.
Believer (Lifetime)
$699 one-time
Ideal for
A founder who has already decided Rectify is the long-term workspace and would rather pay once than keep a subscription line item.
What this tier adds
One-time $699 payment for lifetime access to the Accelerate plan, no recurring subscription.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Teams at scale that have outgrown 25 users and 25 monitors or need bespoke terms beyond the published tiers.
What this tier adds
Custom pricing and solutions negotiated with sales; no published feature list.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Rectify's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Rectify's paid tiers — $29/mo Build, $59/mo Launch, $99/mo Accelerate — fit a bootstrapped SaaS of one to twenty-five people that would otherwise pay for Sentry, Zendesk, and Productboard separately. The $699 lifetime Believer plan buys Accelerate in perpetuity, which undercuts three years of Accelerate monthly. Larger teams needing more than 25 seats and monitors move to custom Enterprise pricing rather than a published tier.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Rectify — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Solo founder tracking one product: the Chrome extension plus a single monitor gets you feedback capture and uptime alerts in under an hour, with Quanta usable immediately. Two-to-ten-person teams: expect a day or two to wire Slack or Discord alerts, connect GitHub for code scanning, and set the support inbox mode (AI-first, AI-only, or human-only). Teams adding the MCP server: one line of config
Switching to or from Rectify
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Sentry: reconnect your error monitoring by pointing Rectify's session replay and Quanta error queries at the same app, and keep Sentry running until you've verified the new replay coverage.
- →From Zendesk: export your ticket history, set the support inbox to AI-first mode, and let Quanta draft with full conversation context while you review before anything sends.
- →From Productboard: rebuild your roadmap in Rectify's voting-based roadmap, then use the changelog generator to carry commit history over from your existing release notes.
- →From a status page tool: recreate your branded status page in Rectify and let automatic MTTR tracking replace your manual incident log.
- →From manual debugging: install the Chrome extension so console logs, network requests, and runtime errors are captured automatically instead of pasted into tickets.
- ↗To Sentry: export replay and error session data, then re-point your SDK at Sentry's error tracking; you'll lose Quanta's plain-English session queries.
- ↗To Zendesk or Intercom: export ticket history and rebuild routing rules, accepting that AI-drafted replies with cross-tool context aren't part of those platforms' inbox by default.
- ↗To Productboard or Linear: export roadmap cards and votes, then reconfigure changelog publishing wherever you land, since commit-to-changelog generation is Rectify-specific.
- ↗To a standalone status page or UptimeRobot: replicate monitors and incident history manually, because uptime and replay share the same workspace in Rectify.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Rectify”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Rectify” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Rectify.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Rectify
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Rectify, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Amplitude
Amplitude combines product analytics, session replay, experimentation, and an MCP server so AI agents can query your product data where you already work.
Pylon AI
Agentic B2B support platform that unifies Slack, Teams, email, chat, SMS, WhatsApp and phone into one inbox.
Hotjar
Hotjar is now Contentsquare — free behavior analytics with heatmaps, session replay, surveys, and AI insights for 200k sessions a month.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Rectify vs Spider Cloud
Choose Rectify if you're a SaaS founder or small team wanting an AI-powered ops hub that combines monitoring, support, and feedback in one conversational interface. Choose Spider Cloud if you're building AI agents or RAG pipelines that need fast, cheap, and reliable web data extraction. Rectify is a broader platform; Spider Cloud is a specialized data pipeline tool.
Rectify vs Presto Voice
For QSR chains automating drive-thru ordering with proven revenue uplift, Presto Voice is the clear choice. For SaaS teams needing a unified, AI-first ops platform covering monitoring, support, and debugging, Rectify offers unique conversational control at a freemium entry point. They are not direct competitors: Presto dominates physical restaurant voice AI, while Rectify streamlines digital product operations.
Rectify vs Temporal Ai
For teams building mission-critical AI agents or multi-step workflows that require durability and crash recovery, Temporal AI is the clear choice. For SaaS founders and small teams who need an all-in-one platform for monitoring, support, and debugging with a conversational AI interface, Rectify wins. They solve different problems—choose based on your primary need: orchestration vs. observability/support.
Alternatives to Rectify
View all
Amplitude
Amplitude combines product analytics, session replay, experimentation, and an MCP server so AI agents can query your product data where you already work.
Frequently Asked Questions
Used Rectify? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.