Siteline is live · free plan, paid from $49/mo · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability healthy
Siteline
Siteline reads your server logs to show which AI agents use your site, where they get stuck, and what to fix.
Siteline answers a question Google Analytics can't: what are AI agents actually doing on your site, and is any of it turning into humans? Real log data, per-platform breakdowns (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Meta AI), page-level re-fetch rates, and concrete fix recommendations make it worth a trial for any team seeing agent traffic on docs or marketing pages. It is not a Semrush or Ahrefs replacement for traditional rank tracking — pair the two. If you can't grant server-side log access or your site sees almost no agent traffic, the data will be too thin to act on.
Verdict generatedVerified 5d ago · liveness 80/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/siteline
- Marketing and SEO teams tracking brand citations across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity
- Developer-focused teams verifying docs and install pages get fetched by coding agents
- Agencies managing AI visibility across multiple client sites
- Content teams converting agent traffic data into specific copy and comparison-page fixes
- Sites with minimal AI agent traffic — thin data means thin insights
- Teams needing traditional SEO rank tracking — Semrush or Ahrefs does that job
- Companies that cannot or will not grant server-side log access
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Siteline if you cannot grant server-side or log-level access to your site, or if your pages see almost no AI agent traffic — without logs there is no measurement, and without traffic there is nothing to measure.
Agent Analytics depends on log access; if your stack isn't one of the eight one-click integrations, plan for engineering time to wire up log ingestion before you see any data.
Siteline's ladder runs from a free tier to Starter, Scale, and Pro, with the insights agent and MCP routing reserved for the top tier. That is priced for a growth or dev-marketing team that already sees meaningful agent traffic; a solo site with negligible AI crawler hits will get more from the free tier, and teams wanting prompt-level rank tracking alone can pair a cheaper AEO tracker with their existing SEO suite.
In short
Siteline — Siteline reads your server logs to show which AI agents use your site, where they get stuck, and what to fix. Best for Marketing and SEO teams tracking brand citations across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, Developer-focused teams verifying docs and install pages get fetched by coding agents, Agencies managing AI visibility across multiple client sites. Free to start; paid plans from $49/mo.
No head-to-head comparison for Siteline yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.
What is Siteline?
Siteline — Siteline reads your server logs to show which AI agents use your site, where they get stuck, and what to fix. Best for Marketing and SEO teams tracking brand citations across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, Developer-focused teams verifying docs and install pages get fetched by coding agents, Agencies managing AI visibility across multiple client sites. Free to start; paid plans from $49/mo.
Siteline is an analytics layer for AI agent traffic. Instead of simulating prompts, it parses your server logs to show which AI agents, chatbots, and crawlers fetch your pages, which routes they revisit, and how much of that activity turns into human visits. The Agent Analytics dashboard breaks traffic down by platform — OpenAI, Anthropic/Claude, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, and Meta AI — with page-level fetch counts and per-session re-fetch rates, so a docs route that Claude Code hits 3.4 times per session stands out from one it ignores. Visibility Tracking and Citation Monitoring cover the brand side: which prompts matter in your category, where you rank across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, and Gemini, and which third-party pages (Reddit, G2, TechCrunch) get cited in your place. A built-in insights agent turns that data into ranked opportunities — for example, a missing comparison page for "vs Auth0" prompts where ChatGPT cited the competitor in 6 of 10 answers — with impact and effort ratings, and you can ask follow-ups in-product or route findings into other tools over MCP. Setup runs through one-click integrations for Vercel, Cloudflare, Netlify, Azure CDN, AWS CloudFront, Next.js, WordPress, and Fastly. Siteline launched in February 2026, open-sourced its AI agent traffic analyzer in April 2026, and says 1,000+ companies and agencies use it. The trade: everything depends on server-side log access, and sites without meaningful agent traffic will see thin data.
Key features
- Agent Analytics on real server-log data, not simulated prompts
- Platform breakdown across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Meta AI
- Page-level data on which routes AI agents fetch and where they stall
- Per-session re-fetch rate analysis for docs and API routes
- Human referral tracking tied back to specific AI agent sessions
- Visibility Tracking across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini
- Citation Monitoring showing which platforms and third-party pages cite you
- Insights agent producing opportunities with impact and effort ratings
- In-product follow-up queries on any insight
- MCP integration to route findings into external tools
- Mentions Building for competitive visibility (Spring 2026 release)
- Teams & Roles for multi-user access (Spring 2026 release)
- Log Explorer for deep session-level analysis
- Open-source AI agent traffic analyzer for self-hosted log parsing (April 2026)
- Agent Readiness Check and AI Agent Directory of bots and crawlers
Behind the verdict
Siteline's bet is that the interesting question about AI traffic is not "how do I rank in ChatGPT" but "what is ChatGPT's crawler actually fetching from my server, and what happens after." That is a real gap. Standard web analytics undercount bot traffic by design, and prompt-simulation AEO tools infer behavior rather than observe it. Siteline observes it: the Agent Analytics dashboard lists each platform, its agent and page counts, raw agent visits, and human referrals tied back to those sessions — the scrape shows OpenAI at 30,774 agent visits against 2,847 human referrals, and Perplexity at 4,035 against 892, for example. Page-level data goes further, with per-session re-fetch rates; the product's own sample insight flags a /docs/api-keys route jumped from 412 to 1,361 visits with 3.4 hits per session, and recommends adding copy-pasteable curl, Node, and Python examples near the top. That is a specific, actionable finding you would not get from a rank tracker. Visibility Tracking and Citation Monitoring round out the brand side — which prompts matter in your category, your ranking and positioning against competitors across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, and Gemini, and which third-party domains (reddit.com, g2.com, techcrunch.com) get cited when someone asks about you. The insights agent then combines both data sets and produces ranked opportunities with impact and effort ratings, and MCP lets you push findings into external tools. The Spring 2026 release added Mentions Building for competitive visibility and Teams & Roles for multi-user access; the April 2026 open-sourcing of the traffic analyzer means teams can parse agent logs themselves if they'd rather not run the hosted product. Where it doesn't fit: everything hinges on log access. One-click setup covers Vercel, Cloudflare, Netlify, Azure CDN, AWS CloudFront, Next.js, WordPress, and Fastly; anything else takes manual work. Visibility tracking covers ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, and Gemini, not every AI surface. And a site with negligible agent traffic will produce negligible signal — this is a tool for teams whose docs, API references, or comparison pages already show up in agent logs. It also isn't a human-traffic analytics replacement or an SEO rank tracker; treat it as a third lens alongside GA and Semrush/Ahrefs.
Models under the hood
as of 2026-10-23
Limitations
- Siteline requires connecting server or log data; without that access you get none of the core measurement.
- One-click setup covers Vercel, Cloudflare, Netlify, Azure CDN, AWS CloudFront, Next.js, WordPress, and Fastly — stacks outside that list need manual work.
- Visibility tracking covers ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, and Gemini.
- Sites with little agent traffic produce little signal.
- The site's own framing positions it as complementing rather than replacing traditional analytics and SEO rank tools.
as of 2026-10-20
Researching Siteline? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Siteline still active?
Siteline is live · free plan, paid from $49/mo · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Siteline? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about Siteline?
What people actually say about Siteline — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
ResearchedDiscussed by users across 3 sources (YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store) · researched Oct 11, 2026.
Weighted by the 22 posts each of 3 sources contributed.
- +Parses real server logs instead of simulating prompts — a genuinely different measurement approach
- +Private-beta users publicly confirm it delivered actionable AI SEO visibility improvements
- +One-click integrations with Vercel, Cloudflare, Netlify, CloudFront, WordPress, and Fastly
- +Founding team praised repeatedly as responsive, helpful, and technically knowledgeable
- +Open-sourced agent traffic analyzer in April 2026 adds transparency and self-hosting option
- −No public answer on whether it detects agents that spoof user agents or rotate IPs
- −Unclear how it separates OpenAI's crawler from genuine ChatGPT browsing sessions
- −Only months of public operation — long-term accuracy and uptime at scale are unproven
- −No independent Reddit, HN, or Stack Overflow discussion to corroborate vendor claims
- −Citation Monitoring exists, but Mentions Building and Teams & Roles won't ship until Spring 2026
- • Paid tier pricing is not publicly detailed — buyers should request a quote before committing
- • Potential compute or storage cost if self-hosting the open-source analyzer
- • No published info on overage charges for high-log-volume sites
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Siteline— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 25 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Siteline 24 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed switching in, who it suits, pricing tiers, limitations, who should skip it, hidden costs, summary, setup time, our verdict, use cases, description, pricing fit, switching out, features
- — changed description, summary, our verdict, pricing tiers, features, who should skip it
- — changed models
- — changed features, description, our verdict, hidden costs, limitations, switching in, switching out, who should skip it, pricing tiers, pricing fit, setup time, use cases
- — changed limitations, pricing page, SSL certificate
- — changed description, summary, pricing tiers, our verdict, who should skip it, features, who it suits
Showing the 6 most recent of 24 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Siteline cost in 2026?
Siteline: Free to start; paid plans from $49/mo. Pricing last verified 25 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Siteline tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Solo operators and small sites that want to confirm whether AI agents hit their pages at all before paying.Adds: Free entry point with no credit card required, covering Agent Analytics on real server-log data and platform breakdown. |
| Starter | $49/mo | monthly | Dev-marketing teams whose docs or API pages already see crawler traffic and need page-level detail plus human referral attribution.Adds: Adds page-level fetch data and human referral tracking tied to agent visits on top of the free agent-visibility baseline. |
| Scale | $99/mo | monthly | Content and SEO teams that also need to track brand visibility and citations across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, and Gemini.Adds: Adds Visibility Tracking and Citation Monitoring — the brand side — to Starter's agent-traffic analytics. |
| Pro | $299/mo | monthly | Growth teams that want the data turned into a prioritised action list and routed into their existing tooling.Adds: Adds the insights agent, in-product follow-ups, MCP routing, and impact/effort-rated recommendations. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Siteline's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Siteline's ladder runs from a free tier to Starter, Scale, and Pro, with the insights agent and MCP routing reserved for the top tier. That is priced for a growth or dev-marketing team that already sees meaningful agent traffic; a solo site with negligible AI crawler hits will get more from the free tier, and teams wanting prompt-level rank tracking alone can pair a cheaper AEO tracker with their existing SEO suite.
Has Siteline's pricing changed?
No plan price for Siteline has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Siteline?
Pick Siteline if you are Marketing and SEO teams tracking brand citations across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, Developer-focused teams verifying docs and install pages get fetched by coding agents, Agencies managing AI visibility across multiple client sites, Content teams converting agent traffic data into specific copy and comparison-page fixes.
Look elsewhere if you are Sites with minimal AI agent traffic — thin data means thin insights, Teams needing traditional SEO rank tracking — Semrush or Ahrefs does that job, Companies that cannot or will not grant server-side log access, Buyers expecting a full Google Analytics replacement for human traffic.
Skip it if Skip Siteline if you cannot grant server-side or log-level access to your site, or if your pages see almost no AI agent traffic — without logs there is no measurement, and without traffic there is nothing to measure.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Siteline actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Connect Vercel logs on day one, then open Agent Analytics and sort docs routes by per-session re-fetch rate to find the API page Claude keeps hitting.
Outcome: A ranked list of routes agents revisit most, plus a recommendation to add copy-pasteable curl, Node, and Python examples where they're missing.
Use Visibility Tracking to identify the competitor-comparison prompts your category actually asks, then run Citation Monitoring to see which third-party pages get cited in answers about your brand.
Outcome: A short list of content gaps — for example, no page for "vs Auth0" prompts despite 480 ChatGPT-User searches — with impact and effort ratings to prioritise the writing.
Set up Teams & Roles for the account team, connect each client's CDN or host, and route findings via MCP into the agency's reporting stack.
Outcome: Per-client AI visibility and agent-traffic dashboards that feed existing reports without manual export.
Use cases
- See which pages OpenAI's crawler fetches on your product docs and where sessions stall
- Track how often Claude Code re-fetches a specific API reference route and fix the bottleneck
- Find out which third-party domains get cited instead of you for brand prompts
- Compare your AI visibility against competitors across ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini
- Turn agent-traffic findings into a ranked content backlog with impact and effort ratings
- Check whether your site is discoverable by newer web agents such as Claude Code
- Push AI visibility findings into other tools over MCP
- Audit crawler access issues, such as CDN or Cloudflare configs blocking agents
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Siteline — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
If you're on Vercel, Cloudflare, Netlify, Azure CDN, AWS CloudFront, Next.js, WordPress, or Fastly, the integration is one click and data starts flowing as soon as logs accumulate — expect same-day access to raw agent visits. Deeper value (re-fetch patterns, citation trends, insights) needs weeks of history. Custom log pipelines take engineering time before the first chart appears.
Switching to or from Siteline
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From prompt-simulation AEO trackers: keep them for prompt coverage and add Siteline for measured agent-traffic data, since the two read different evidence.
- →From Google Analytics: leave GA in place for human traffic and add Siteline alongside it; GA doesn't surface agent-level fetch data.
- →From Semrush or Ahrefs: don't replace them — Siteline doesn't do traditional rank tracking, so run both and use Siteline for AI-surface visibility.
- ↗To a prompt-tracking AEO tool: if all you need is rank positions across AI chatbots, a simulation-based tracker is cheaper and doesn't require log access.
- ↗To self-hosted parsing: use Siteline's open-source AI agent traffic analyzer (April 2026) to parse logs yourself if you only need the raw agent-traffic cut.
Integrations
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Siteline”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Siteline” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Siteline.
Official links
What are the best Siteline alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Siteline we list are Ahrefs, Gauge Sentiment and Loamly. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Gauge Sentiment | Paid | Pricing not published | — |
| Loamly | Paid | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Siteline
View all
Ahrefs
Ahrefs tracks Google rankings and AI-search citations from its own crawl, with a 41.9B-keyword index and 400M monthly AI prompts.
Gauge Sentiment
AI sentiment analysis that shows how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude describe your brand every day.
Tools that pair well with Siteline
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Siteline, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Ahrefs
Ahrefs tracks Google rankings and AI-search citations from its own crawl, with a 41.9B-keyword index and 400M monthly AI prompts.
Gauge Sentiment
AI sentiment analysis that shows how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude describe your brand every day.
Loamly
AI recommendation intelligence that explains why ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend a competitor — and which citations to fix
Frequently asked questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Siteline? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.