Smithery

Smithery

Connect AI agents to 700+ MCP servers with managed auth and sessions.

74/100Safe BetFree planFreemium

Smithery is the fastest way to wire real-world tools into MCP-based agents, with a marketplace already past 715 servers and auth handled for you. The free tier is generous, but opaque paid pricing and MCP-only scope will push some teams elsewhere. If you're building on MCP, start here—just know the paid cost before you commit.

Verified 3d ago · liveness 74/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/smithery

Best for
  • Developers building AI agents needing quick web search, finance, and API tools
  • Solo founders prototyping with minimal integration work
  • AI-native teams using OrgX for task delegation and cross-session memory
  • Developers who want to publish and share MCP servers
Not ideal for
  • Teams needing transparent paid pricing without sign-up
  • Enterprises with strict data locality or on-prem requirements
  • Non-developers unfamiliar with MCP protocol
Visit Website

IntermediateFor adding a popular server like Exa Search: under 10 minutes with the CLI. For setting up OrgX coordination: 30-60 minutes. Publishing a custom server: 1-2 hours including configuration.Web · CLI · APIAPI available7.0k viewsVerified 3d ago
Pricing
Free plan
FreemiumFree tier6 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
For adding a popular server like Exa Search: under 10 minutes with the CLI. For setting up OrgX coordination: 30-60 minutes. Publishing a custom server: 1-2 hours including configuration.
Runs on
WebCLIAPI
API available · 11 integrations
Who it's for
Solo developer building an MCP-based agentAI-native team coordinating multiple agentsDeveloper wanting to distribute a custom MCP server
Live sentiment
Is Smithery actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Smithery if you're not using MCP, need strict on-prem data control, or require transparent paid pricing before sign-up.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Paid tiers are not listed upfront; you must sign up to see pricing, making it hard to budget before committing.

Price reality

Smithery's free tier is generous for solo devs exploring MCP, but paid plans are opaque. Compared to alternatives like Sourcegraph Cody (which offers transparent per-user pricing) or building your own integration stack (free but time-consuming), Smithery's value depends on your time-to-market. If you need predictable costs, consider alternatives with published pricing.

In short

Smithery — Connect AI agents to 700+ MCP servers with managed auth and sessions. Best for Developers building AI agents needing quick web search, finance, and API tools, Solo founders prototyping with minimal integration work, AI-native teams using OrgX for task delegation and cross-session memory. Free to use.

What people actually say about Smithery — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

34 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, Product Hunt, Lemmy) · researched Aug 18, 2026.

58% positive42% critical
Recurring strengths
  • +One-click connection to 715+ (now 2,000+) MCP servers
  • +Managed OAuth with auto token refresh saves hours
  • +Encrypted credential storage simplifies security handling
  • +CLI and REST API enable programmatic control
  • +Centralized session management across agents
Recurring frustrations
  • Path traversal vulnerability exposed 3k servers (Oct 2025)
  • 22% of servers flagged vulnerable in community scan
  • Paid tiers hidden behind signup — no upfront pricing
  • Acquisition by Arcade.dev raises long-term uncertainty
  • Server quality varies; ranking doesn't guarantee security
Patterns worth knowing
Security and trust are the biggest recurring concern — from the path traversal incident to the 22% vulnerability scan.
Seen on Hacker News, Lemmy
Ease of use and speed to market are the strongest praised aspects — one-click setup and managed auth are huge time-savers.
Seen on Product Hunt, Hacker News
Marketplace breadth and community-driven growth are repeatedly acknowledged — the server count doubled to 2,000+.
Seen on Product Hunt, Hacker News
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~5 minutes
Hidden costs people mention
  • No transparent pricing means you must sign up to see costs.
  • Potential extra charges for high-volume usage or multi-agent coordination (speculation).

Viability Score

74/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Smithery? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
not measured
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
58
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: September 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • One-click connection to 715+ MCP servers
  • Built-in OAuth authentication with auto token refresh
  • Encrypted credential storage
  • Session management (stateless for users)
  • OrgX coordination: task delegation, decision workflows, cross-session memory
  • Flame persistent assistant for Telegram and Slack
  • CLI for programmatic access
  • REST API for programmatic access
  • Publish custom MCP servers to the marketplace
  • Usage statistics and server popularity metrics
  • Agent News with citations and Ethics Engine ratings
  • OneSignal push notification, email, and SMS management
  • Exa Search web search with fresh results
  • Context7 version-specific documentation fetching
  • DC Hub: real-time data center infrastructure intelligence

About Smithery

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · CLI · API

Smithery is a platform that connects AI agents to real-world tools and services through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Instead of managing OAuth flows, credential storage, and session lifecycles yourself, Smithery handles that plumbing so you can wire an agent to services like OneSignal, Exa Search, and Context7 in minutes. The marketplace ranks every server by real usage, showing which tools are battle-tested before you add them to your agent. Auth is handled end-to-end: built-in OAuth, automatic token refresh, and encrypted credential storage. Session management and per-server usage statistics come included, plus a CLI and REST API for programmatic access. You can also publish your own MCP servers to the marketplace, turning it into a two-way street for tool distribution. For multi-agent setups, Smithery offers OrgX coordination infrastructure for task delegation, decision workflows, and cross-session memory, and Flame extends this into a persistent assistant available on Telegram and Slack. The free tier gives you access to the full marketplace, including popular servers like OneSignal, Agent News, Exa Search, and Context7. Paid tiers aren't listed upfront—you have to sign up to see them. If you're not using MCP or need strict on-prem data control, this isn't the fit. But for solo devs and AI-native teams committed to MCP, Smithery is the shortest path from zero to a tool-connected agent.

Behind the Verdict

Smithery shines when you're building agents that need to touch external services—search, notifications, docs, browsers—without drowning in integration boilerplate. The managed OAuth and credential storage are genuinely useful: you skip the redirect URIs, client secrets, and token refreshes that usually eat days. The marketplace's usage rankings help you pick proven servers, and publishing your own server for distribution is a nice two-way street. The free tier is generous, covering the full server catalog. But there are real caveats. Pricing is opaque—you must sign up to see paid tiers, which complicates budgeting. The platform is MCP-only, so if you're not using MCP, it's irrelevant. And the recent acquisition by Arcade.dev adds uncertainty about long-term direction. For solo devs and AI-native teams already committed to MCP, it's a strong boost. But if you need on-prem control or transparent pricing, look elsewhere.

Researching Smithery? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Smithery actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Solo developer building an MCP-based agent

Need to add web search and push notifications to an agent quickly.

Outcome: Connect Exa Search and OneSignal in minutes with managed OAuth, and start seeing usage stats immediately.

AI-native team coordinating multiple agents

Need task delegation and shared memory across agents.

Outcome: Use OrgX to set up decision workflows and cross-session memory, reducing coordination overhead.

Developer wanting to distribute a custom MCP server

Built a niche MCP server and want it discoverable.

Outcome: Publish it to the marketplace and gain visibility with usage rankings and observability.

Use Cases

Limitations

  • Smithery connects AI agents to external services via MCP servers.
  • It handles OAuth, credentials, and session management automatically.
  • The platform is now part of Arcade.dev, and the pricing page does not disclose specific pricing details.

as of 2026-08-30

Verification history

We have re-verified Smithery 17 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 17 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Smithery tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

Solo developers and hobbyists exploring MCP, wanting to connect popular servers and test the platform without cost.

What this tier adds

Entry tier with full marketplace access, managed auth, and session management at no charge.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Paid tiers are not listed upfront; you must sign up to see pricing, making it hard to budget before committing.
  • While the free tier covers the full marketplace, advanced coordination features like OrgX may require a paid plan.
  • If you exceed free-tier usage limits (e.g., number of sessions or API calls), you may incur overage charges not disclosed publicly.
  • Enterprise features like SSO or audit logs might be gated behind a custom Enterprise plan, with pricing only available on request.
  • Publishing your own MCP servers may have limits on the number of private servers or require a paid plan for full observability.
  • The recent acquisition by Arcade.dev could introduce pricing changes or migration requirements.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Smithery's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Smithery's free tier is generous for solo devs exploring MCP, but paid plans are opaque. Compared to alternatives like Sourcegraph Cody (which offers transparent per-user pricing) or building your own integration stack (free but time-consuming), Smithery's value depends on your time-to-market. If you need predictable costs, consider alternatives with published pricing.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Smithery — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For adding a popular server like Exa Search: under 10 minutes with the CLI. For setting up OrgX coordination: 30-60 minutes. Publishing a custom server: 1-2 hours including configuration.

Switching to or from Smithery

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From custom-built integrations: Replace your OAuth and credential management code with Smithery's managed auth and connect servers via CLI or REST API.
Migrating out
  • To self-hosted MCP servers: Export your server configurations and set up your own OAuth/credential storage—more work but full control.
  • To Arcade.dev: As Smithery is now part of Arcade.dev, you may migrate to Arcade's platform for continued support and features.

Integrations

OneSignalAgent NewsExa SearchContext7DC HubKeenable Web SearchURL Safety Validator MCPTelegramSlackBrowserbaseVercel AI SDK

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Official links

Tools that pair well with Smithery

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Smithery, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Smithery

View all
RoboWork

RoboWork

Unified multi-model AI workspace with custom agents, MCP servers, and visual workflows.

FreemiumTry
Albato

Albato

White-label AI agents and 1,000+ integrations embedded in your SaaS, via iFrame, API, or MCP.

FreemiumTry
Nubase

Nubase

Open-source self-hosted backend for AI coding agents to ship full-stack apps from chat

FreeTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Smithery? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.