Video Assistant by muse.ai is live · free plan, paid from $8/mo billed annually · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability healthy

Video Assistant by muse.ai

Video Assistant by muse.ai

Skiv is AI video hosting with search inside your footage — find any spoken line, on-screen word, person, or object by describing it.

84/100Safe BetFree · from $8/mo billed annuallyFreemium

Buy Skiv when your problem is retrieving a moment, not storing a file. AI search across speech, screen text, people, and objects is the actual differentiator versus Vimeo and Wistia, and memberships mean you can resell access without a second platform. $8/mo billed yearly for 80 GB and one seat is a fair entry point; budget $50/mo if you need ad monetization and seats for a team.

Verdict generated

Verified 5d ago · liveness 84/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/video-assistant-by-muse-ai

Best for
  • Course creators building searchable lecture libraries with transcripts and chapters
  • Conference and event organizers archiving talks so attendees can find moments later
  • Sales and marketing teams hosting branded demos and walkthroughs without YouTube ads
  • Creators running a paid membership video site with tiers and managed billing
Not ideal for
  • Anyone needing live streaming or real-time broadcast
  • Teams wanting a full non-linear video editor rather than clipping and light assembly
  • Short-clip marketing catalogs where titles alone already make everything findable
Visit Website

IntermediateSolo creator: minutes to first value — sign up, drag a file onto the grid, and indexing, transcription, and chapters run automatically. Small team: about an hour to upload a starter library and style the player with your logo and colors. Course site or membership: half a day if you're embedding collections and configuring tiers and billing, plus time to update any legacy muse.ai embed or APIWeb · APIAPI availableVerified 5d ago
Pricing
Free · from $8/mo billed annually
FreemiumFree tier5 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Solo creator: minutes to first value — sign up, drag a file onto the grid, and indexing, transcription, and chapters run automatically. Small team: about an hour to upload a starter library and style the player with your logo and colors. Course site or membership: half a day if you're embedding collections and configuring tiers and billing, plus time to update any legacy muse.ai embed or API
Runs on
WebAPI
API available · 5 integrations
Who it's for
Course creator with an existing lecture archiveSales engineer producing product demosEvent organizer archiving conference talks
Live sentiment
Is Video Assistant by muse.ai actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Skiv if you need live streaming or a full non-linear editor rather than clipping and search — the platform is built around hosting, indexing, and monetizing recorded video.

Skip-it-if note generated
The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

The AI Assistant is billed as an add-on on every tier, including Pro, so chat-over-your-library costs more than the headline plan price.

Price reality

Skiv sits below Vimeo and Wistia at the entry point: Basic at $8/mo billed yearly for 80 GB and 1 seat is squarely solo-creator pricing, Plus at $20/mo billed yearly fits a small customer-facing video operation, and Pro at $50/mo billed yearly with 1 TB and 10 seats is competitive for a team that would otherwise pay per-seat on a generalist host. Enterprise is quote-only with tailored limits and a dedicated account manager.

Generated

In short

Video Assistant by muse.ai — Skiv is AI video hosting with search inside your footage — find any spoken line, on-screen word, person, or object by describing it. Best for Course creators building searchable lecture libraries with transcripts and chapters, Conference and event organizers archiving talks so attendees can find moments later, Sales and marketing teams hosting branded demos and walkthroughs without YouTube ads. Free to start; paid plans from $8/mo billed annually.

What is Video Assistant by muse.ai?

Video Assistant by muse.ai — Skiv is AI video hosting with search inside your footage — find any spoken line, on-screen word, person, or object by describing it. Best for Course creators building searchable lecture libraries with transcripts and chapters, Conference and event organizers archiving talks so attendees can find moments later, Sales and marketing teams hosting branded demos and walkthroughs without YouTube ads. Free to start; paid plans from $8/mo billed annually.

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · API

Skiv (the platform that rebranded from muse.ai in March 2026) hosts your videos and makes everything inside them findable. Upload footage and perceptual AI indexes it all: it transcribes speech, reads text on screen, and tags people, objects, and broader ideas. Then you search for a half-remembered phrase or visual detail and land on the exact timestamp instead of scrubbing. The audience is anyone sitting on a video library nobody can navigate. Course creators build searchable lecture archives; event organizers turn talk recordings into a queryable back catalog; sales and marketing teams host branded demos free of YouTube ads; and internal teams record updates, then search the archive rather than rewatching it. Key pieces: AI video search across speech, text, people, and objects; an AI chat assistant that answers questions about your library and returns answers with timestamps; auto-generated subtitles, transcripts, and chapters on every upload, with an interactive transcript viewers click to jump; and a customizable HTML5 player with 4K, DASH/HLS adaptive streaming, AirPlay, and Chromecast. Memberships let you sell subscription access with your own tiers and managed billing, and Pro unlocks VAST-compliant ad support and delegated uploads. An API handles upload, analysis, search, and library management. The split against Vimeo or Wistia is organizational. Those platforms sort your library around metadata you write; Skiv sorts it around what is actually in the footage. Keep in mind the rebrand: legacy muse.ai embed, script, API, and cookie references need updating to skiv.com, though accounts and content carried over intact.

Key features

  • AI video search across speech, text, people, objects, and ideas
  • AI chat assistant answers questions about your library with timestamps
  • AI Assistant add-on generates descriptions, summaries, and chapters
  • Auto-generated subtitles, transcripts, and chapters on upload
  • Editable and downloadable transcripts
  • Interactive transcript with click-to-jump navigation
  • In-player video search without leaving the player
  • 4K playback with DASH/HLS adaptive streaming
  • AirPlay and Chromecast casting
  • Customizable HTML5 player with branded themes and CTA overlays
  • Embed single videos or searchable collections on any site
  • Memberships with subscription tiers and managed billing
  • VAST-compliant ad support on Pro and Enterprise
  • API for upload, analysis, search, and library management
  • Browser-based screen and camera recorder

Behind the verdict

Most video platforms ask you to do the librarianship yourself: title it, tag it, folder it, hope you remember. Skiv instead indexes what is in the footage and lets you retrieve it by description. In practice that distinction matters most once a library passes a few dozen videos, which is exactly when manual tagging stops scaling. Pick it if you host lectures, talk archives, product walkthroughs, or recorded internal updates and people keep asking where a specific explanation lives. The AI chat assistant is the sleeper feature: ask a question in plain language, get an answer grounded in your content with a timestamp pointing at the source, drawn from any video in the library. Pass on it if you need live streaming or real-time broadcast, or if you want a full non-linear editor rather than clipping and light assembly. Skiv gives you clip creation, not timeline editing, so teams producing heavily edited output will still live in a separate NLE. If your catalog is short marketing clips where titles alone make everything findable, the AI search earns you little. On monetization, the tiers are worth a look for anyone already selling course access. Memberships handle subscription tiers and billing, and geo-restricted playback, expiring links, and call-to-action overlays show up on Plus, so customer-facing video gets the controls you would otherwise bolt on with a third-party tool. Watch the rebrand paperwork. muse.ai became Skiv in March 2026 and accounts and content carried over, but legacy embed URLs, scripts, API calls, and cookie references need updating to skiv.com. Teams with embeds scattered across production sites should audit before the old references break.

Models under the hood

ChatGPT

as of 2026-10-25

Limitations

  • Skiv (formerly muse.ai) is a video hosting and AI-search product; legacy muse.ai embed, script, API, and cookie references should be updated to skiv.com.
  • The AI Assistant is described as an add-on based on ChatGPT, and subtitle translation is tied to the Plus plan, so some AI capabilities require specific tiers or enabling add-ons.
  • VAST ad support is limited to Pro and above, and Enterprise is quote-only.

as of 2026-10-08

Researching Video Assistant by muse.ai? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Is Video Assistant by muse.ai still active?

Video Assistant by muse.ai is live · free plan, paid from $8/mo billed annually · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability healthy.

Viability score

84/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Video Assistant by muse.ai? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
not measured
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
85
What the vendor publishes
60

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

What do users say about Video Assistant by muse.ai?

What people actually say about Video Assistant by muse.ai — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

Researched

Discussed by users across 1 source (Product Hunt) · researched Oct 23, 2026.

85% positive15% critical

Weighted by the 15 posts each of 1 source contributed.

Recurring strengths
  • +Search for a spoken phrase and land on the exact timestamp instead of scrubbing
  • +Auto-generated chapters, titles, and descriptions make archives more accessible and engaging
  • +Existing customer confirms solid hosting and content delivery for hundreds of hours of video
  • +4K streaming with DASH/HLS adaptive playback praised by launch commenters
  • +Interactive click-to-jump transcripts and in-player search keep viewers inside the video
Recurring frustrations
  • −Feedback comes almost entirely from one Product Hunt launch, not sustained real-world use
  • −Several commenters were confused about what 'talk to your videos' actually does
  • −AI descriptions, summaries, and chapters require a paid add-on, not the base plan
  • −No community discussion of pricing, uptime, or support quality at scale
  • −Collaborative team features appear limited or absent, which one commenter flagged
Patterns worth knowing
Finding a specific moment in long video saves real time versus scrubbing
Seen on Product Hunt
Auto-generated chapters, titles, and descriptions improve accessibility and engagement
Seen on Product Hunt
Launch reaction is enthusiastic but shallow, mostly one-line congratulations
Seen on Product Hunt
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • • AI descriptions, summaries, and chapters require a paid add-on beyond base plans
  • • Ad support and delegated uploads are gated to Pro and Enterprise tiers, not entry plans

How we verified this

Every listed fact about Video Assistant by muse.ai— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 25 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.

Verification history

We have re-verified Video Assistant by muse.ai 13 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — changed pricing page, limitations
  2. — changed pricing page, limitations, platforms, models
  3. — changed summary, our verdict, features, description, pricing tiers, who should skip it
  4. — changed limitations, pricing page
  5. — changed who should skip it, pricing tiers, description, summary, our verdict, limitations, setup time, features, switching out, hidden costs, switching in, pricing fit, integrations, who it suits, use cases
  6. — changed who it suits, pricing tiers, features, our verdict, summary, who should skip it, integrations, description

Showing the 6 most recent of 13 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

How much does Video Assistant by muse.ai cost in 2026?

Video Assistant by muse.ai: Free to start; paid plans from $8/mo billed annually. Pricing last verified 25 Oct 2026.

Plans compared

Every published Video Assistant by muse.ai tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.

Video Assistant by muse.ai pricing plans compared
PlanPriceBillingWho it's for
FreeFree—Anyone who wants to test AI video search, transcripts, and the player before paying — no credit card needed to start.Adds: Starting tier: a 14-day trial of paid features with cancel-anytime terms, used to evaluate indexing quality on your own footage.
Basic$8/mo billed annuallyVendor: “$8/mo billed yearly”monthly, billed annuallySolo creator or single operator with a modest library — a course author, podcaster, or one-person marketing channel.Adds: Entry paid tier at $8/mo billed yearly: 80 GB storage, 1 seat, AI video search, AI metadata, API access, unlimited embeds, 4K playback, memberships, and email support.
Plus$20/mo billed annuallyVendor: “$20/mo billed yearly”monthly, billed annuallySmall team or creator whose videos are seen by customers and need branding plus access control rather than raw capacity.Adds: Adds 200 GB and 3 seats over Basic, plus geo-restricted playback, expiring links, call-to-action overlays, original file storage, custom player styling, and privacy and security controls.
Pro$50/mo billed annuallyVendor: “$50/mo billed yearly”monthly, billed annuallyTeams that run on video — a sales or enablement group with a large library and several uploaders.Adds: Adds 1 TB and 10 seats over Plus, plus VAST ad support, delegated uploads, priority support, custom extensions, and custom integrations.
EnterpriseCustomquoteOrganizations with unusual storage, seat, or compliance needs and a dedicated contact requirement.Adds: Quote-only tier with tailored storage and seat limits, a dedicated account manager, and custom builds.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • The AI Assistant is billed as an add-on on every tier, including Pro, so chat-over-your-library costs more than the headline plan price.
  • VAST-compliant ad monetization is locked to Pro at $50/mo billed yearly and Enterprise — you can't run your own ad provider on Basic or Plus.
  • Storage is the real ceiling: Basic caps at 80 GB and 1 seat, so a growing lecture archive hits the Plus upgrade at $20/mo billed yearly sooner than the seat count suggests.
  • Plus adds geo-restricted playback, expiring links, and original file storage that Basic doesn't include, so privacy-sensitive workflows pay the mid-tier premium.
  • Pro's 10 seats are shared with your upload limits — adding a teammate without adding storage means more people competing for the same 1 TB.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Video Assistant by muse.ai's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Skiv sits below Vimeo and Wistia at the entry point: Basic at $8/mo billed yearly for 80 GB and 1 seat is squarely solo-creator pricing, Plus at $20/mo billed yearly fits a small customer-facing video operation, and Pro at $50/mo billed yearly with 1 TB and 10 seats is competitive for a team that would otherwise pay per-seat on a generalist host. Enterprise is quote-only with tailored limits and a dedicated account manager.

Hidden-cost and price-fit notes generated

Has Video Assistant by muse.ai's pricing changed?

No plan price for Video Assistant by muse.ai has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.

Who should pick Video Assistant by muse.ai?

Pick Video Assistant by muse.ai if you are Course creators building searchable lecture libraries with transcripts and chapters, Conference and event organizers archiving talks so attendees can find moments later, Sales and marketing teams hosting branded demos and walkthroughs without YouTube ads, Creators running a paid membership video site with tiers and managed billing.

Look elsewhere if you are Anyone needing live streaming or real-time broadcast, Teams wanting a full non-linear video editor rather than clipping and light assembly, Short-clip marketing catalogs where titles alone already make everything findable, Existing muse.ai users unwilling to update legacy embed, script, API, and cookie references to skiv.com.

Skip it if Skip Skiv if you need live streaming or a full non-linear editor rather than clipping and search — the platform is built around hosting, indexing, and monetizing recorded video.

Generated

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Video Assistant by muse.ai actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Course creator with an existing lecture archive

You upload a semester of recorded lectures, let Skiv transcribe and chapter them on upload, then embed the searchable collection on your course site so students can search inside the videos for a topic rather than scrubbing.

Outcome: Students land on the exact timestamp for the concept they're stuck on, and you stop answering 'which lecture covers this' emails.

Sales engineer producing product demos

You record a walkthrough with the browser screen recorder, clip the strongest two minutes, and share the clip as a link — or embed the full demo on your site with the ad-free branded player instead of hosting on YouTube.

Outcome: Prospects watch a branded demo without pre-roll ads, and your team can search the recording for the exact moment a feature was shown.

Event organizer archiving conference talks

Every session goes into a collection with auto-generated transcripts and chapters; after the event you publish the searchable archive so attendees and non-attendees can find a talk by what was said, not by the speaker's filename.

Outcome: The talk archive becomes a searchable reference instead of a list of videos nobody opens twice.

Workflow scenarios generated

Use cases

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Video Assistant by muse.ai — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Solo creator: minutes to first value — sign up, drag a file onto the grid, and indexing, transcription, and chapters run automatically. Small team: about an hour to upload a starter library and style the player with your logo and colors. Course site or membership: half a day if you're embedding collections and configuring tiers and billing, plus time to update any legacy muse.ai embed or API

Switching to or from Video Assistant by muse.ai

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From YouTube: upload your source files directly (Skiv stores and transcodes originals on Plus and above) and embed the ad-free player instead of the YouTube iframe.
  • →From Vimeo: export or re-upload your masters, then rebuild the metadata as AI labels and tags rather than hand-written descriptions.
  • →From Wistia: re-upload master files, replace the embed with Skiv's player or searchable collection embed, and keep password and domain restrictions on Plus and above.
  • →From muse.ai: accounts and content carry over — you mainly need to update legacy embed code, script tags, API calls, and cookie references to skiv.com.
  • →From a Zoom-heavy workflow: connect the Zoom integration so recordings import automatically instead of being downloaded and re-uploaded by hand.
Migrating out
  • ↗To YouTube or Vimeo: download your videos from the library, and note that AI-generated transcripts, labels, and chapters won't carry across as structured data.
  • ↗To a self-hosted setup: pull originals via the download option (original file storage is available on Plus and above) and re-implement search yourself.
  • ↗To a full video editor: use Skiv for hosting and search, but expect to export clips out for anything beyond trimming a start and end point.
  • ↗To an LMS-native video tool: re-upload masters, since Skiv's searchable collection embeds won't translate into an LMS's own player.

Integrations

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Video Assistant by muse.ai”, and we withheld 6: 6 did not mention Video Assistant by muse.ai. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Video Assistant by muse.ai.

What are the best Video Assistant by muse.ai alternatives?

The closest alternatives to Video Assistant by muse.ai we list are Vimeo AI, Reduct.video and Wistia. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.

Closest alternatives to Video Assistant by muse.ai
AlternativePricingStarts atLast verified
Vimeo AIFreemiumPricing not published—
Reduct.videoPaidPricing not published—
WistiaFreemiumPricing not published—

Alternatives to Video Assistant by muse.ai

View all
Vimeo AI

Vimeo AI

Vimeo AI turns a talking-head recording into a finished video with an AI script generator, teleprompter, and text-based editing.

FreemiumTry
Reduct.video

Reduct.video

Text-based video editor: search, clip, redact, and share spoken-word footage by selecting words in the transcript.

PaidTry
Wistia

Wistia

Wistia is a video hosting and webinar platform that puts watch data on CRM contact records.

FreemiumTry

Tools that pair well with Video Assistant by muse.ai

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Video Assistant by muse.ai, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Video Assistant by muse.ai vs its closest rival

Video Assistant by muse.ai's closest head-to-head is with Splice — If you're a music producer needing millions of royalty-free samples and rent-to-own plugins like Serum 2, Splice is the clear choice. For educators or content creators who need AI-powered video search, automatic transcripts, and an embeddable player, Video Assistant (now Skiv) is superior. They serve entirely different needs—pick based on whether you create audio or video content. Verdict generated

Head-to-head comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Used Video Assistant by muse.ai? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.