BettaFish vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-24
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionBettaFishScreenplayIQ
PricingFree (open source, self-hosted, API costs extra)Free tier (1 analysis/month), Pro $19/mo, Studio $49/mo
Primary UseMulti-agent public opinion analysisScreenplay analysis & box office prediction
Key FeatureForumEngine debate mechanism with 3 agentsBeat sheet, heatmap, market data comparison
Target UsersOpinion analysts, social researchers, marketing teamsScreenwriters, producers, studio executives
DeploymentSelf-hosted (Docker, Python, requires technical setup)Cloud SaaS (workspace up to 5 users)
Language Support22 languages (sentiment analysis)English only (feature films ≤150 pages)

ScreenplayIQ is best for film professionals wanting data-driven script marketability forecasts with ready-to-use SaaS. BettaFish suits technical teams needing customizable, multi-source public opinion analysis with agent debate capabilities. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you need immediate screenplay insights; choose BettaFish if you can self-host and require deep social media monitoring.

BettaFish
BettaFish

Open-source multi-agent public opinion analysis with debate coordination to break information cocoons.

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Paid
Plans
$0/mo
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
5 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
WebCLI
WebAPI
Categories
🔭 Market & Competitive Intelligence📊 Data & Analytics🕸️ Agent Frameworks & Orchestration
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Multi-source data collection from 30+ platforms via MindSpider crawler
Parallel agent execution with QueryEngine, MediaEngine, InsightEngine
ForumEngine debate moderator coordination via chain-of-thought collision
Multimodal analysis of videos, images, and structured data cards
Five-level sentiment analysis in 22 languages using fine-tuned BERT/GPT2/Qwen models
Multi-format report generation (HTML, PDF, Markdown) with template-driven pipeline
Private-public data fusion (PostgreSQL/MySQL database connectors)
Docker containerized deployment for easy setup
Flask web application and Streamlit interface for real-time monitoring
Real-time communication via WebSocket and SSE
Robust JSON parser for structured agent output
Qwen-based keyword optimizer for SQL query expansion
Template selection and layout with validation and repair
Integration with DeepSeek Chat, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Kimi K2, and Qwen Plus LLM backends
DeepWiki documentation for architecture and setup
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration for pitch decks
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
PostgreSQL
MySQL
Flask
Streamlit
Docker
Playwright
Tavily
Bocha
Anspire
Gemini
DeepSeek
Kimi
Qwen
PitchTrailer

What real users say: BettaFish vs ScreenplayIQ

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

BettaFish

1 mentions across 1 sources · 50% positive — mixed

Hacker News

What users praise

  • Innovative ForumEngine uses debate to reduce echo chamber effects.
  • Covers 30+ Chinese and global social media platforms.
  • Multi-agent architecture allows parallel analysis with different LLMs.
  • Generates reports in HTML, PDF, and Markdown automatically.

What frustrates them

  • Extremely difficult to set up without deep technical skills.
  • Very little community feedback or support available.
  • No pre-built hosted version forces users to self-deploy.
  • Documentation may be sparse for non-native Chinese speakers.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

ScreenplayIQ

7 mentions across 1 sources · 25% positive — critical

YouTube

What users praise

  • Pay-per-analysis avoids subscription lock-in.
  • Offers box office prediction, a unique feature.
  • Tailored feedback based on script length and TV options.
  • Includes character journey charts and beat sheets.

What frustrates them

  • Reported to nearly ruin a user's script feedback.
  • Expensive per analysis, up to $198.
  • No line-by-line editing, despite expectations.
  • Limited to English scripts only.

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Film producer evaluating a script's box office potential
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ provides direct box office prediction, comparative market data, and structural feedback tailored for feature films.

  • Social media analyst monitoring brand sentiment across platforms
    Pick: BettaFish

    BettaFish's multi-source scraping, multi-agent analysis, and sentiment analysis in 22 languages fit this need perfectly.

  • Solo screenwriter seeking free script feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ's free tier offers one analysis per month, no technical setup needed, and includes beat sheet and pacing analysis.

  • Academic researcher studying online public opinion dynamics
    Pick: BettaFish

    BettaFish's debate mechanism, customizable agents, and in-depth cross-platform analysis support rigorous research.

  • TV writer or short filmmaker
    Pick: BettaFish

    ScreenplayIQ is limited to feature films ≤150 pages. BettaFish does not analyze scripts but can be used for other text analysis if needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

BettaFish vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

ScreenplayIQ is best for film professionals wanting data-driven script marketability forecasts with ready-to-use SaaS. BettaFish suits technical teams needing customizable, multi-source public opinion analysis with agent debate capabilities. Choose ScreenplayIQ if you need immediate screenplay insights; choose BettaFish if you can self-host and require deep social media monitoring.

Does ScreenplayIQ support TV scripts or short films?

No, it only supports English feature films; scripts over 150 pages may fail, and TV/short formats are not supported.

Can BettaFish analyze scripts?

No, BettaFish is designed for public opinion analysis from social media and news, not for screenplay analysis.

Is BettaFish free to use?

Yes, it's open-source and free, but you must pay for your own LLM API keys and server hosting (e.g., cloud VPS).

What languages does BettaFish support?

It supports 22 languages for sentiment analysis via fine-tuned BERT/GPT2/Qwen models.

Does ScreenplayIQ offer API access?

Yes, on the Studio tier ($49/mo) it includes API access and a collaborative workspace for up to 5 users.

Which tool is easier for non-technical users?

ScreenplayIQ is a SaaS with a web interface, no setup required. BettaFish requires Docker, Python, and API configuration, suitable for developers.

Can I use BettaFish for real-time monitoring?

BettaFish is designed for deep analysis, not real-time streaming. For high-frequency monitoring, consider other tools.

Does ScreenplayIQ integrate with other tools?

It integrates with PitchTrailer for pitch deck generation; no other integrations are mentioned.

More BettaFish or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026