Mireye vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-08-23
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionMireyeScreenplayIQ
PricingContact for pricing (paid)$19/mo (Pro), $49/mo (Studio), Free tier available
Best ForInsurance underwriters, lenders, AI agents, site selection analystsScreenwriters, producers, studio executives, script coverage analysts
Core FeaturesProvenance-tagged geospatial data, 207 fields, LLM-synthesized answers, MCP serverAI screenplay analysis, box office prediction, heatmaps, genre classification
IntegrationsClaude Desktop, CursorPitchTrailer
Geographic CoverageUS coordinates onlyFeature films (English, under 150 pages)
Target IndustryInsurance, real estate, energy, GISEntertainment (film & TV)

Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a film professional needing script marketability predictions and structural feedback. Choose Mireye if you require auditable geospatial data for US coordinates, particularly for insurance underwriting or site selection. They serve entirely different domains; no direct overlap.

Try MireyeTry ScreenplayIQ
Mireye
Mireye

Provenance-tagged US geospatial data API for AI agents and underwriters.

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis with box office prediction and tailored feedback.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
$0/mo
$19/mo
$99/mo
Custom
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$48 for TV / ~$78 for Feature
~$60 for TV / ~$98 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$24 for TV / ~$38 for Feature
~$118 for TV / ~$198 for Feature
Popularity
1 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
APIPlugin
WebAPI
Categories
🌐 Web Scraping & Search APIs🔌 MCP Servers & Agent Tooling
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Natural language /v1/ask endpoint returns synthesized answers with inline citations
Raw field /v1/fetch endpoint returns per-field values with provenance for batch jobs
Address geocoding /v1/geocode with match confidence and candidate handling
Canonical parcel lookup /v1/lookup for coordinates, addresses, and APNs with typed refusal
Drive-time distance & matrix via /v1/proximity covering US and Canada
MCP server for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and custom MCP agents
285 cited fields across 7 layers: terrain, land cover, built environment, utilities, parcels, climate, hazards
15 use-case presets: solar_siting, flood_risk, data_center_siting, wildfire_underwrite, and more
Field request system: describe missing data, queue a build, poll with request_id
Partial failure reporting with retryable flag for unavailable fields
Public field catalog at GET /v1/meta/fields
Multiple auth methods: bearer token, dashboard API token, device-flow login, or MCP OAuth
Data from 85 authoritative sources: USGS, FEMA, NOAA, USDA, EPA, EIA, FCC, Census, and more
Per-field citations with source, source_url, fetched_at, and confidence bucket
Batch processing: send hundreds of locations in one call, one bad address doesn't fail the rest
AI-powered structural analysis
Box office performance prediction
PitchTrailer integration for pitch decks
Beat sheet generation
Visual heatmap of dialogue and pacing
Genre classification
Character arc and emotional journey charts
Comparative market data
PDF report export
Collaborative workspace (up to 5 users)
Custom genre templates
API access
Advanced analytics dashboard
Priority support
Dedicated account manager
Integrations
Claude Desktop
Cursor
PitchTrailer

What real users say: Mireye vs ScreenplayIQ

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Mireye

0 mentions · 39% positive — critical

What users praise

  • • Provenance-tagged data with exact federal source citations.
  • • Dual API endpoints: LLM-synthesized answers and raw field values.
  • • MCP server integrates directly with Claude Desktop and Cursor.
  • • 207 fields across 7 layers covering terrain, land cover, climate, etc.

What frustrates them

  • • No community reviews or testimonials to verify claims.
  • • Pricing is opaque – no free tier or transparent cost breakdown.
  • • Documentation is sparse and lacks troubleshooting examples.
  • • Support channels are not publicly visible or easily accessible.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

ScreenplayIQ

7 mentions across 1 sources · 25% positive — critical

YouTube

What users praise

  • • Pay-per-analysis avoids subscription lock-in.
  • • Offers box office prediction, a unique feature.
  • • Tailored feedback based on script length and TV options.
  • • Includes character journey charts and beat sheets.

What frustrates them

  • • Reported to nearly ruin a user's script feedback.
  • • Expensive per analysis, up to $198.
  • • No line-by-line editing, despite expectations.
  • • Limited to English scripts only.

Researched Aug 18, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Film producer evaluating script commercial viability
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ provides box office predictions, comparative market data, and structural feedback, directly helping producers decide which scripts to fund.

  • Insurance underwriter assessing property risk
    Pick: Mireye

    Mireye delivers provenance-tagged geospatial data (flood risk, wildfire hazard) with citations, essential for auditable underwriting decisions.

  • AI agent developer needing US geospatial context
    Pick: Mireye

    Mireye's MCP server and REST endpoints allow seamless integration with AI agents, providing cited field data for any coordinate.

  • Screenwriter seeking data-driven script improvement
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ's beat sheet generation, pacing heatmap, and character arc analysis give actionable feedback for revising a feature film script.

  • Site selection analyst for solar farm
    Pick: Mireye

    Mireye includes presets for solar_siting, terrain, and climate data, helping analysts screen locations with federally sourced information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Mireye vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a film professional needing script marketability predictions and structural feedback. Choose Mireye if you require auditable geospatial data for US coordinates, particularly for insurance underwriting or site selection. They serve entirely different domains; no direct overlap.

Can ScreenplayIQ analyze TV scripts or short films?

No, ScreenplayIQ is designed for feature films only (under 150 pages) and supports English scripts.

Does Mireye cover global coordinates?

No, Mireye only supports US coordinates (including territories). Not suitable for international sites.

Is there a free tier for ScreenplayIQ?

Yes, Free tier includes 1 analysis per month with limited features. Pro and Studio plans unlock unlimited analyses and collaborative features.

Does Mireye provide proprietary risk scores?

No, Mireye returns raw field values with provenance. It does not compute proprietary risk scores; data is sourced from federal sources.

Can I export ScreenplayIQ reports?

Yes, reports can be exported as PDF. The tool also integrates with PitchTrailer for pitch deck generation.

How does Mireye authenticate users?

Authentication via bearer token, dashboard API token, device-flow login, or MCP OAuth.

Which integrations does ScreenplayIQ support?

Currently only PitchTrailer. No direct integration with screenwriting software like Final Draft (though you can upload script files).

What is Mireye's model for partial failures?

Mireye reports partial failures with a retryable flag for fields that are unavailable, allowing developers to handle gracefully.

More Mireye or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Tableau vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

ScreenplayIQ and Tableau serve entirely different domains: one is a niche AI tool for screenplay analysis with box office prediction, while the other is a general-purpose data visualization platform.

Amplitude vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

ScreenplayIQ and Amplitude serve entirely different domains. If you need data-driven feedback on a screenplay's commercial potential, ScreenplayIQ's AI analysis and box office predictions are uniquely

Power BI vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

If you're a business analyst or enterprise user in a Microsoft shop, Power BI's freemium desktop plus affordable Pro licensing is a no-brainer for interactive dashboards. For screenwriters and produce

Looker vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a film industry professional needing predictive financial analytics on scripts. Choose Looker if you're an enterprise on Google Cloud requiring a governed, AI-driven BI p

Datadog vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

Datadog and ScreenplayIQ serve entirely different markets. Datadog is a comprehensive observability platform for tech teams managing complex cloud infrastructures, while ScreenplayIQ is a niche AI too

Neon vs ScreenplayIQ comparison

Neon and ScreenplayIQ serve entirely different markets. Neon is a serverless database platform for developers building scalable apps, while ScreenplayIQ is a niche AI tool for film industry profession

Explore each tool further

Mireye
View Mireye reviewMireye alternatives
ScreenplayIQ
View ScreenplayIQ reviewScreenplayIQ alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Web Scraping & Search APIs toolsBest AI Fiction & Screenwriting toolsBest AI MCP Servers & Agent Tooling tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026