Mireye

Mireye

Mireye is a cited US geospatial API and MCP server that gives AI agents auditable facts about any place.

65/100MonitorFree · from $19/moFreemium

For US property diligence where you have to show your work, Mireye treats provenance as the headline feature rather than a footnote — source, source_url, fetched_at and confidence on every field. The credit model is honest money: Lookup costs 300 credits because county parcel records carry per-record licensing and is charged only on a successful match, and no plan bills past its allowance. Reach for it when an auditor might ask where a number came from — insurance underwriting, mortgage and title disclosure, data center siting against interconnection queue data. Look elsewhere if you need predictive risk scores, want a point-and-click UI, or need coverage outside the US.

Verified 11d ago · liveness 65/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/mireye

Best for
  • Insurance underwriters pulling flood zone, base flood elevation, design wind speed and distance to coast for US coastal
  • Mortgage and title teams assembling cited hazard disclosure facts for a property
  • Data center siting analysts screening slope, flood zone, nearest 345 kV line, substation voltage and interconnection
  • Developers and AI agent builders wiring cited geospatial facts into MCP-native Claude, Cursor or custom agent workflows
Not ideal for
  • Anyone needing geospatial coverage outside the United States — drive-time proximity is the only Canada-capable endpoint
  • Teams wanting predictive risk scores or modeled interpretations rather than cited raw facts they must interpret
  • Projects needing real-time streaming feeds, commercially licensed data or personal contact data — these return a typed
Visit Website

IntermediateA technical user following the Quickstart with curl and jq can get a first cited answer in about five minutes, with no SDK required. Wiring the MCP server into Claude Code or Cursor is described as one command. Going from a key to a production batch job — auth, retry on partial_failures, credit budgeting against the published per-endpoint table — realistically takes an afternoon to a couple ofAPI · PluginAPI availableVerified 11d ago
Pricing
Free · from $19/mo
FreemiumFree tier4 plans6 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
A technical user following the Quickstart with curl and jq can get a first cited answer in about five minutes, with no SDK required. Wiring the MCP server into Claude Code or Cursor is described as one command. Going from a key to a production batch job — auth, retry on partial_failures, credit budgeting against the published per-endpoint table — realistically takes an afternoon to a couple of
Runs on
APIPlugin
API available · 9 integrations
Who it's for
Insurance underwriter at a coastal-exposure carrierData center siting analystAI agent developer building an MCP-native workflow
Live sentiment
Is Mireye actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Mireye if you need predictive risk scores, non-US coverage for anything other than drive-time proximity, or a point-and-click UI — the product is an API and MCP server that returns cited raw facts you interpret yourself.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Lookup costs 300 credits per successful match because county parcel records are licensed per record, so a Free account's 5,000 monthly credits cover only about 16 parcel lookups.

Price reality

Free (5,000 credits/mo) suits a solo developer proving the API works; Build at $19/mo (25,000 credits) covers roughly the monthly screening of 500 parcels or 1,000 enriched addresses; Growth at $99/mo (120,000 credits, 300 req/min) fits a production desk running continuous portfolio work; Enterprise is quoted to volume with custom SLAs. Newer Geospatial API competitors usually sit under $19/mo but meter fewer cited fields, while incumbent property-data vendors bundle parcel records into much

In short

Mireye — Mireye is a cited US geospatial API and MCP server that gives AI agents auditable facts about any place. Best for Insurance underwriters pulling flood zone, base flood elevation, design wind speed and distance to coast for US coastal, Mortgage and title teams assembling cited hazard disclosure facts for a property, Data center siting analysts screening slope, flood zone, nearest 345 kV line, substation voltage and interconnection. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo.

What's new in Mireye

Checked yesterday

Across the latest 3 updates: 3 community discussions.

Viability Score

65/100
Monitor

How well maintained and how widely used is Mireye? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
not measured
Site health
95
User sentiment
39
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • /v1/ask natural-language endpoint returning cited answers with a replayable execution plan
  • /v1/fetch cited typed fields at any US location, batched with partial-failure reporting
  • /v1/geocode address-to-coordinate resolution that refuses centroid-grade matches
  • /v1/lookup returns canonical parcel, parcel ID, boundary geometry, owner of record, county and census-tract codes
  • /v1/proximity drive-time distance and matrix, nearest-N, screening and labor-shed population for US and Canada
  • /v1/field-requests plain-language requests for missing data, matched against the catalog first
  • MCP server exposing geospatial tools to Claude, ChatGPT, Kimi, Gemini, Cursor, Grok, Copilot, DeepSeek and custom agents
  • 15 use-case presets including solar_siting, flood_risk, data_center_siting, grid_interconnect and wildfire_underwrite
  • 366 cited typed fields across 7 layers: terrain, land cover, built environment, utilities, parcels, climate, hazards
  • Per-field provenance: source name, source_url, fetched_at timestamp and confidence bucket
  • Public unauthenticated catalog endpoint at GET /v1/meta/fields
  • Batch processing: hundreds of locations per call, one bad address does not fail the rest
  • Typed refusals on low-confidence matches and typed no for data the index cannot serve
  • Absence as a structured answer: missing records return absent with a reason, source failures surface in partial_failures with a retryable flag
  • Multiple auth methods including bearer token, dashboard API token and device-flow login

About Mireye

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableAPI · Plugin

Mireye is a US geospatial data API plus MCP server that hands AI agents and regulated professionals cited, timestamped facts about physical locations instead of the guesses a general LLM produces. Ask about elevation at a Manhattan coordinate and you get 13.03 meters on the NAVD88 datum, the source (USGS_3DEP_COG), a fetch timestamp, and a confidence bucket. The catalog now holds 366 cited typed fields across seven layers — terrain, land cover, built environment, utilities, parcels, climate and hazards — drawn from USGS, FEMA, NOAA, USDA, EPA, EIA, FCC, Census, NREL, USFWS, USFS, FHWA, FAA, BTS, USACE, BLM, HUD, FHFA, BLS, NSIDC, Overture, JRC, Sentinel-2 and licensed county parcel records. Six endpoints cover the workflow: /v1/ask answers a natural-language question and returns the plan it ran so you can replay it; /v1/geocode resolves an address and states whether the point sits on the parcel or was interpolated along a centerline, refusing centroid-grade matches; /v1/lookup returns the whole place in one call — parcel ID, boundary geometry, owner of record, county, census tract, congressional district, metro, timezone, elevation, flood status; /v1/fetch pulls named fields or one of 15 presets at any location, batched so one bad address does not sink the rest; /v1/proximity runs four drive-time operations across the US and Canada; /v1/field-requests turns a genuine gap into a queued build that lands in the catalog for every caller after you. The MCP server exposes those endpoints as native tools to Claude, ChatGPT, Kimi, Gemini, Cursor, Grok, Copilot, DeepSeek and custom agents. Mireye launched on Hacker News as part of YC S26. Pricing is credit-based with 5,000 free credits a month and paid plans from $19/mo — no plan bills past its allowance.

Behind the Verdict

Mireye's pitch is narrow and defensible: an AI agent knows the internet but not the ground, so when a frontier model answers a question about a specific parcel it estimates. Mireye answers from the authoritative record. That distinction is the entire product, and it shows up in the API design. Strengths. Per-field provenance is structural, not decorative — the demo on the homepage returns elevation = 13.03 meters, source = USGS_3DEP_COG, fetched = 2026-07-28, confidence = medium, and /v1/fetch returns the same four attributes for any of 366 typed fields. Typed refusals are the second differentiator: /v1/geocode declines centroid-grade matches rather than guessing, and where a record genuinely does not exist you get absent with the reason plus partial_failures carrying a retryable flag, so a batch of hundreds of addresses survives one bad input. The catalog skews toward infrastructure rather than maps — the docs state the largest layer is utilities and grid (substations, transmission voltage class, interconnection context, water service areas, wastewater plant capacity, fiber), which is the layer that decides whether something can actually get built. Fifteen presets (data_center_siting, solar_siting, grid_interconnect, wildfire_underwrite, flood_risk and others) turn a screening question into a defined field set, and the field-request loop routes a real gap into a queued build that benefits every caller after you. The published credit table makes budgeting possible before you run: a full 135-field data center screen is 135 credits (about 14 cents), enriching 1,000 addresses with geocode plus 20 fields is 21,000 credits, and a month of screening 500 parcels is roughly 13,000 credits. Weaknesses. It is US-only for /v1/ask and /v1/fetch, with drive-time proximity the sole Canada-capable surface, so multi-country portfolios need a second vendor. There is no proprietary risk score and no modeled interpretation — deliberately, per the docs' "What we won't do" — which means the buyer supplies the actuarial or engineering judgment on top of raw cited facts. Access is programmatic: REST endpoints or the MCP server, no point-and-click app. Field requests are HTTP-only today, with an MCP tool planned. Credits reset on the 1st (UTC) and unused credits do not roll over, so spiky workloads park credits on the floor. Where it fits. Insurance underwriting against flood zone, base flood elevation, design wind speed and distance to coast; mortgage and title teams assembling hazard disclosure without an LLM estimate; data center siting analysts screening slope, FEMA flood zone, nearest 345 kV line, substation voltage and status and the county interconnection queue; commercial lenders assessing collateral with slope, flood zone, road access, utility territory and soil shrink-swell class. Mireye's own July 2026 research used it to screen every US meat plant for cold-chain fragility in an afternoon — a good illustration of a portfolio-scale question answered from

Researching Mireye? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Mireye actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Insurance underwriter at a coastal-exposure carrier

Screen a Galveston, TX address at 29.2899, -94.7875 with the flood_risk preset and pull flood zone, base flood elevation, design wind speed, distance to coast and wetland intersect for the file.

Outcome: Each figure arrives with its FEMA or NOAA source, a fetched_at timestamp and a confidence bucket, so the underwriting file shows where every number came from instead of an unsourced estimate.

Data center siting analyst

Run the data_center_siting preset (135 fields) and grid_interconnect (36 fields) at 39.0438, -77.4874 to pull slope, FEMA flood zone, nearest 345 kV line, substation voltage and status, and the county interconnection queue.

Outcome: The screen costs roughly 135 credits — about 14 cents — and one bad address among a batch of candidate sites reports as a partial_failure rather than killing the run.

AI agent developer building an MCP-native workflow

Install the MCP server so Claude Code or Cursor can call mireye_geocode, mireye_lookup and mireye_fetch directly, then ask a plain-language question through /v1/ask about a specific parcel.

Outcome: The agent returns a cited answer with the plan it ran, so you can replay the exact field selection and fetch path instead of trusting an unverifiable model recollection.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

gpt-5claude-opus

as of 2026-10-08

Limitations

  • Coverage is cited US geospatial data (USGS, FEMA, NOAA, EPA, EIA and similar federal sources), with only the drive-time proximity tools also reaching Canada per the existing profile.
  • Access is programmatic — REST endpoints (/v1/ask, /v1/geocode, /v1/lookup, /v1/fetch, /v1/proximity, /v1/field-requests) or the MCP server — so integration work is required; there is no standalone web or mobile app offered on the site.
  • Credits are consumed at fixed published rates (Geocode 1 credit, Fields 1 credit per field per location, Ask 10 credits, Lookup 300 credits, Proximity 12 credits per driving calculation) and usage stops at the plan allowance with no overage billing, so the monthly plan price is the maximum cost.
  • Lookup is charged only on a successful match, and the catalog is not fixed — missing fields can be requested and genuine gaps become queued builds for all callers.

as of 2026-09-27

Verification history

We have re-verified Mireye 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Mireye tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

A solo developer or analyst proving out the API against a handful of US locations before committing budget

What this tier adds

Starting tier — 5,000 credits a month, 20 req/min, one field request at signup, and roughly 16 parcel lookups since Lookup costs 300 credits

Build

$19/mo

Ideal for

A small team or single production desk running recurring screens, such as 500 parcels a month or 1,000 enriched addresses

What this tier adds

Raises the monthly allowance to 25,000 credits, the rate limit to 60 req/min, and adds one field request per month plus email support over Free

Growth

$99/mo

Ideal for

A production underwriting or siting desk running continuous portfolio work against the API

What this tier adds

Adds 120,000 monthly credits and lifts the rate limit to 300 req/min, with three field requests a month and a shared Slack channel

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

A carrier, lender or siting team with sustained volume or dedicated market coverage needs and a procurement process

What this tier adds

Replaces fixed credits with volume-based quoting and adds custom SLAs and SLOs, dedicated market coverage, priority support and per-account Lookup pricing

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Lookup costs 300 credits per successful match because county parcel records are licensed per record, so a Free account's 5,000 monthly credits cover only about 16 parcel lookups.
  • Credits reset on the 1st (UTC) and unused credits do not roll over, so a workload that spikes mid-month and goes quiet after leaves paid credits stranded.
  • Proximity is billed at 12 credits per driving calculation plus per-call floors (distance 2, nearest 2, screen 5, labor_shed 25), and each address you send instead of a coordinate adds 1 credit up to 25 per request.
  • Batch requests count as one API call against your rate limit but bill per location, so a 1,000-address enrichment job costs 21,000 credits — the whole Build plan — even though it is a single call.
  • Going past your plan allowance does not bill overage; calls are refused until the next reset, so production traffic simply stops unless you upgrade mid-month.
  • If you set your own spend limit in the dashboard, upgrading the plan does not lift it — you have to raise that limit separately.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Mireye's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Free (5,000 credits/mo) suits a solo developer proving the API works; Build at $19/mo (25,000 credits) covers roughly the monthly screening of 500 parcels or 1,000 enriched addresses; Growth at $99/mo (120,000 credits, 300 req/min) fits a production desk running continuous portfolio work; Enterprise is quoted to volume with custom SLAs. Newer Geospatial API competitors usually sit under $19/mo but meter fewer cited fields, while incumbent property-data vendors bundle parcel records into much

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Mireye — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

A technical user following the Quickstart with curl and jq can get a first cited answer in about five minutes, with no SDK required. Wiring the MCP server into Claude Code or Cursor is described as one command. Going from a key to a production batch job — auth, retry on partial_failures, credit budgeting against the published per-endpoint table — realistically takes an afternoon to a couple of

Switching to or from Mireye

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From a general web-search agent or raw LLM prompting: swap the prompt for /v1/fetch or /v1/ask so each value returns source, source_url, fetched_at and confidence instead of an estimated range.
  • →From a mapping or geocoding SDK: route address resolution through /v1/geocode, which states whether the point sits on the parcel or was interpolated along a centerline and refuses centroid-grade matches.
  • →From manual county recorder and FEMA flood-map lookups: replace the lookup with /v1/lookup at 300 credits, which returns parcel ID, boundary geometry, owner of record, county, tract, congressional district, metro,
  • →From an unnormalized collection of agency downloads: point batch enrichment at /v1/fetch, which normalizes 366 fields to one schema and reports partial_failures with a retryable flag instead of failing the batch.
  • →From CSV-based drive-time scripts: move to /v1/proximity for drive-time distance, matrix, nearest-N over infrastructure sets and labor-shed population across the US and Canada.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a predictive risk-scoring vendor: when you need modeled output rather than cited raw facts, Mireye returns no proprietary score and you must interpret the fields yourself.
  • ↗To a GIS or mapping platform: if the deliverable is a visual map product rather than programmatic facts, Mireye is API-only with no point-and-click interface.
  • ↗To a multi-country property data vendor: when coverage must extend beyond the United States, only /v1/proximity reaches Canada and everything else is US-bounded.
  • ↗To a real-time streaming data feed: Mireye answers on request and returns a typed no for streaming, so time-series feeds need a different provider.
  • ↗To a commercially licensed data reseller: Mireye's catalog is public-agency, open and explicitly named licensed sources, and requests outside that return a typed refusal.

Integrations

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Mireye”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Mireye” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Mireye.

Tools that pair well with Mireye

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Mireye, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Mireye

View all
Chrome DevTools MCP

Chrome DevTools MCP

Open-source MCP server that gives coding agents live Chrome DevTools access for debugging, automation, and performance traces.

FreeTry
Dbhub

Dbhub

Minimal database MCP server that gives MCP clients one gateway to PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, MariaDB, Oracle, and SQLite

FreeTry
Spider Cloud

Spider Cloud

Spider Cloud is a web scraping and crawling API that turns live pages into markdown or JSON for agents and RAG pipelines.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Mireye? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.