Octopus.do vs Polycam
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Octopus.do | Polycam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free tier (1 project), Pro $0/mo (limited early adopter), regular pricing from $9/mo | Free tier (limited), Pro ~$79/mo or ~$360/yr, Pro+ $299/mo, Enterprise custom |
| Primary Use | Visual sitemap & website planning with AI generation | 3D scanning & photogrammetry for objects, interiors, floor plans |
| Platform | Web (browser-based) | iOS, Android, Web (desktop) |
| AI Features | AI sitemap generation from text prompt, AI content assistant | AI photogrammetry, AI 3D model generator (beta), AI texture generator (beta) |
| Export Formats | CSV, PDF, Google Docs, Figma (sync) | GLTF, OBJ, FBX, USDZ, PLY, LAS, STL, DAE, ESX, DXF |
| Best For | UX/UI designers, SEOs, product managers, web developers | Architects, engineers, product designers, forensic teams |
Polycam and Octopus.do serve completely different needs. If you need to capture real-world objects, interiors, or floor plans as 3D models or point clouds, Polycam is the clear choice with powerful LiDAR and photogrammetry. If you're planning a website's structure and content hierarchy visually, Octopus.do's AI sitemap generation and collaborative tools are purpose-built for that. There's no direct overlap, so pick based on your core task.
Lightning-fast visual sitemap builder for website planning, content, and AI generation.
Visit Website
AI-powered 3D scanning, floor plans, and reality capture for mobile, drones, and teams.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Octopus.do vs Polycam
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Octopus.do
0 mentions · 65% positive
What users praise
- • AI sitemap generation from a text prompt saves initial planning time.
- • Visual sitemap editing is intuitive and client-friendly.
- • No sign-up required for sharing sitemap views with clients.
- • Figma integration allows seamless export to design workflows.
What frustrates them
- • AI-generated content often needs heavy editing to be usable.
- • Free tier severely limits projects, forcing paid upgrade early.
- • Figma sync sometimes breaks, causing workflow interruptions.
- • No community forums or direct support channels available.
Researched Jul 3, 2026
Polycam
61 mentions across 4 sources · 55% positive — mixed
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store
What users praise
- • Fast, easy LiDAR scans with minimal learning curve.
- • Generates mesh, floor plan, and idealized model from one scan.
- • Cross-platform with iOS, Android, and web support.
- • Free tier includes valuable tools like AI generator and Gaussian splat.
What frustrates them
- • Scan reliability is spotty: failed uploads, lost tracking, backdrop capture.
- • Dimensions and full floor plans locked behind $400 paywall.
- • Curved walls and stairs render angular, forcing Matterport for pros.
- • Confusing free/paid feature split, feels like dark patterns.
Researched Aug 18, 2026
Who should pick which
- Architect capturing floor plansPick: Polycam
Polycam has automatic floor plan generation with measurements, LiDAR scanning, and exports to CAD-friendly formats like DXF.
- UX designer planning site architecturePick: Octopus.do
Octopus.do offers visual sitemaps, AI generation from prompts, and easy sharing with clients without sign-up.
- Product designer scanning prototypesPick: Polycam
Polycam's photogrammetry and LiDAR capture detailed 3D models for digital review, exportable to OBJ/FBX for CAD.
- SEO specialist restructuring a websitePick: Octopus.do
Octopus.do includes website crawling, SEO analysis per page, and export to CSV for reporting.
- Forensic team documenting a scenePick: Polycam
Polycam's fast, accurate 3D scanning with measurements and point cloud export (PLY, LAS) suits forensic documentation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Octopus.do vs Polycam: which should you choose?
Polycam and Octopus.do serve completely different needs. If you need to capture real-world objects, interiors, or floor plans as 3D models or point clouds, Polycam is the clear choice with powerful LiDAR and photogrammetry. If you're planning a website's structure and content hierarchy visually, Octopus.do's AI sitemap generation and collaborative tools are purpose-built for that. There's no direct overlap, so pick based on your core task.
Can Polycam generate floor plans from photos?
Yes, Polycam automatically generates floor plans with measurements from LiDAR scans or photos, and includes a floor plan editor to fix overlapping objects (added March 2026).
Does Octopus.do integrate with Figma?
Yes, Octopus.do has Figma synchronization, allowing you to bring sitemaps into Figma for further design.
Can I use Polycam without LiDAR?
Yes, Polycam works with photos and video from any device (including Android ARCore). LiDAR is not required but improves quality.
Is Octopus.do free?
Octopus.do has a free tier with one project. The Pro plan is currently $0/month as an early adopter offer, but regular pricing starts at $9/month.
What file formats does Polycam export?
Polycam exports to GLTF, OBJ, FBX, USDZ, PLY, LAS, STL, DAE, ESX, and DXF.
Can Octopus.do generate sitemaps from existing websites?
Yes, Octopus.do includes a website crawler that imports the existing site structure into a visual sitemap.
Does Polycam have a free tier?
Yes, but the free tier is limited in captures and exports. Full features require a Pro or Pro+ subscription.
Does Octopus.do support wireframing?
Yes, it offers basic shapes and annotations for wireframing, but not high-fidelity prototyping.
More Octopus.do or Polycam comparisons
Polycam and Airtable serve completely different needs: Polycam is a dedicated 3D scanning and reality capture tool for AEC and media professionals, while Airtable is a collaborative database platform
Polycam and Notion serve completely different purposes. Polycam is a specialized 3D scanning tool for professionals needing photogrammetry, floor plans, and drone mapping, while Notion is a general-pu
Polycam and Miro serve entirely different needs: Polycam is a specialized tool for capturing real-world 3D data (scanning, floor plans, drone mapping) while Miro is a broad collaboration platform for
Choosing between LM Studio and Polycam is straightforward: they solve completely different problems. LM Studio is ideal for developers who need private, offline LLM inference on their own hardware, wh
If you need reality capture and 3D scanning for architecture, construction, or forensics, Polycam is the clear choice. For product development teams seeking AI-native issue tracking, triage, and agent
Choose Polycam if you need reality capture—3D scanning objects, interiors, or floor plans for AEC, forensics, or game dev. Choose Sketch if you’re a macOS UI/UX designer who values native performance,
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: July 3, 2026