Octopus.do
Lightning-fast visual sitemap builder for website planning, content, and AI generation.
Octopus.do is a fast, forgiving sitemap builder that's ideal for agencies and freelancers who need a client-facing map fast. The AI generator and no-sign-up trial remove startup friction, but it falls short for high-fidelity prototyping or heavy CMS needs. Pick it for structure; keep Figma for the fine detail.
Verified 6d ago · liveness 53/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/octopus-do
- UX/UI designers mapping site architecture for client approval
- SEO professionals analyzing and improving site structure
- Product managers planning website content with teams
- Web developers prototyping navigation before build
- Teams needing a full-CMS with hosting and dynamic content
- High-fidelity prototyping or advanced interactive wireframes
- Enterprise buyers requiring SSO, advanced permissions, or dedicated support
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Octopus.do if you need a full CMS, high-fidelity prototyping, or enterprise-grade security—it's built for quick sitemap planning, not production builds.
The free plan lets you work on only one active project at a time, so you'll need to upgrade to Pro ($19/mo) if you juggle multiple clients.
Octopus.do's freemium model is ideal for freelancers and small agencies—the free tier covers one project, and Pro at $19/mo is cheaper than Slickplan's $19/mo entry. Team at $49/mo is reasonable for small teams, but enterprise buyers will find it lacks SSO and advanced roles that competitors offer.
In short
Octopus.do — Lightning-fast visual sitemap builder for website planning, content, and AI generation. Best for UX/UI designers mapping site architecture for client approval, SEO professionals analyzing and improving site structure, Product managers planning website content with teams. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo.
What people actually say about Octopus.do — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
- +AI sitemap generation from a text prompt saves initial planning time.
- +Visual sitemap editing is intuitive and client-friendly.
- +No sign-up required for sharing sitemap views with clients.
- +Figma integration allows seamless export to design workflows.
- +Website crawler imports existing site structures accurately.
- −AI-generated content often needs heavy editing to be usable.
- −Free tier severely limits projects, forcing paid upgrade early.
- −Figma sync sometimes breaks, causing workflow interruptions.
- −No community forums or direct support channels available.
- −Published websites have limited customization options.
- • No hidden costs reported; Pro tier is fixed price.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Octopus.do? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: August 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Visual sitemap builder
- AI sitemap generation from prompt
- Website crawler import
- Content planning with rich text editor
- AI assistant for content generation
- SEO analysis per page
- Wireframing with basic shapes and annotations
- Publish simple navigation-driven websites
- Export to CSV, PDF, and Google Docs
- Figma sync
- Template library (personal, landing, corporate, portfolio)
- Collaborative sharing without sign-up for viewers
- Upload design mockups for annotation
- Create estimates for project scoping
- Public REST API
About Octopus.do
Octopus.do is a visual sitemap builder and website planning tool that turns site structure into an interactive, shareable diagram. It targets web designers, developers, SEOs, product managers, and content teams—anyone who needs to map a website's architecture before a single line of code is written. The core workflow is simple: crawl an existing site, pick a template, or type a prompt for AI to generate the sitemap. From there, you refine the structure, add content, and collaborate without forcing viewers to create accounts. What sets Octopus.do apart is its emphasis on speed. The interface is built for zero entry friction—there's no sign-up required to start a trial, and the AI generator can produce a full sitemap in seconds. Beyond mapping, you can plan content page-by-page using a rich text editor, create low-fidelity wireframes with basic shapes and annotations, and even publish a simple navigation-driven website directly from the tool. SEO analysis on each page helps you catch structural gaps, while exports to CSV, PDF, and Google Docs make it easy to drop the plan into client deliverables. For teams, Octopus.do offers real-time collaboration. Share a sitemap link with stakeholders who don't have accounts, sync the structure to Figma, or upload design mockups to annotate right on top. Agency users say it's become the backbone of their discovery phase, and the template library covers personal sites, landing pages, corporate sites, and portfolios to jumpstart any project. Octopus.do competes with tools like Slickplan and WriteMaps, but it leans harder on AI generation and a freemium model that lets you test the full flow before paying. While it won't replace a full CMS or high-fidelity prototyping tool, for pure sitemap planning and content architecture, it's a fast, client-friendly option that gets everyone on the same page early.
Behind the Verdict
Octopus.do excels at one thing: turning a scattered website idea into a clear, shareable sitemap in minutes. The AI generation is the star—type a prompt like 'corporate website for a law firm' and you get a full sitemap with pages and content suggestions instantly. That's a killer feature for discovery-phase work. Strengths: The no-sign-up trial is genuinely frictionless—you can be inside a project in seconds. Sharing is painless: stakeholders can view and comment without accounts. The crawler is handy for auditing existing sites, and the template library covers common use cases. The price is right for freelancers: free for one project, then $19/mo Pro unlocks AI, SEO analysis, and exports. Weaknesses: It's not a full CMS. The publishing feature is limited to simple navigation-driven websites—fine for a quick mockup, but not for production. Wireframing is basic: only shapes and annotations, so don't expect high-fidelity prototyping. Integration options are thin—just Figma and Google Docs natively, though the API and MCP could bridge gaps. There's no SSO or advanced roles below Enterprise, which could be a blocker for bigger orgs. Where it fits: Agencies running discovery phases, freelancers mapping client projects, SEOs auditing site structure, product managers aligning stakeholders on IA. Where it doesn't: teams needing a real CMS, high-fidelity prototypes, or enterprise-grade security controls.
Researching Octopus.do? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Octopus.do actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You land a client who needs a new corporate website. You type a prompt into Octopus.do, get a sitemap in seconds, refine it, then share the link with the client for feedback—no account needed.
Outcome: Client approval in days, not weeks; you move to Figma for the next step, using the sitemap as a guide.
A client wants to reorganize their site. You crawl their existing site with Octopus.do, see the structure, and spot missing pages.
Outcome: You present a visual sitemap with SEO notes to the client, leading to a clear plan for improvement.
You're leading a website revamp with a distributed team. You set up a sitemap in Octopus.do, upload design mockups, and share the link with stakeholders.
Outcome: Everyone comments in one place, and you export the final structure to Google Docs for the developers.
Use Cases
- Define website hierarchy and page relationships visually before development.
- Generate a sitemap from a simple prompt for a new project idea.
- Crawl an existing site to audit and reorganize its page structure.
- Collaborate with clients by sharing a shareable visual sitemap that requires no account.
- Export site plans to Figma for further design work.
- Publish a simple navigation-based website directly from the sitemap.
- Plan content with AI suggestions and SEO analysis per page.
- Drive projects programmatically via the public REST API or MCP integration.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-08-19
Limitations
- The tool is a visual sitemap builder that uses AI for content and sitemap generation, but specific AI model names are not disclosed.
- It offers various export and integration options including Figma sync and export to CSV, PDF, and Google Docs.
- While it provides a public REST API, details on its capabilities and limitations are not documented.
- The free plan may have limitations, but specifics are not provided in the evidence.
as of 2026-08-18
Verification history
We have re-verified Octopus.do 5 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Octopus.do tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo creator or freelancer exploring the tool with a single project, wanting to test the flow without committing.
What this tier adds
Starting tier includes visual sitemap builder, AI generation, crawler import, and basic content planning, but limited to 1 active project.
Pro
$19/mo
Ideal for
Freelancers and small agencies who need lightning-fast AI, SEO analysis, exports, and design sync for client work.
What this tier adds
Adds advanced content editor, SEO analysis per page, wireframing, exports to CSV/PDF/Google Docs, and Figma sync to the Free tier.
Team
$49/mo
Ideal for
Small teams of 3-5 who need collaboration, design mockup uploads, and project scoping estimates.
What this tier adds
Builds on Pro with team collaboration features, estimate creation, design mockup uploads, and advanced sharing options.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Octopus.do's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Octopus.do's freemium model is ideal for freelancers and small agencies—the free tier covers one project, and Pro at $19/mo is cheaper than Slickplan's $19/mo entry. Team at $49/mo is reasonable for small teams, but enterprise buyers will find it lacks SSO and advanced roles that competitors offer.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Octopus.do — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For a freelancer, you can be inside a project with a generated sitemap within 2 minutes of landing on the site—no sign-up required. An SEO consultant might take 5–10 minutes to crawl an existing site and review the results. A product manager setting up team collaboration might need 15–20 minutes to upload mockups and share with stakeholders.
Switching to or from Octopus.do
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Slickplan: Export your sitemap as an XML or CSV file from Slickplan, then import it into Octopus.do by re-creating the structure manually or using the crawler to pull in a similar site.
- ↗To Figma: Use the built-in Figma sync to push your sitemap structure directly into a Figma project for design work.
- ↗To Google Docs: Export your sitemap and content as a Google Doc to hand off to writers or developers.
- ↗To a CMS: Export your sitemap as CSV or PDF and use it as a guide when building in WordPress, Webflow, or a custom CMS.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Octopus.do
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Octopus.do, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Octopus Do vs Gem
Gem and Octopus.do are completely different tools serving distinct needs. Gem is a powerful AI recruiting platform ideal for talent teams, while Octopus.do is a lightweight sitemap builder for web planning. Choose Gem if you need to automate recruiting workflows; choose Octopus.do if you need to visualize website structure.
Octopus Do vs Polycam
Polycam and Octopus.do serve completely different needs. If you need to capture real-world objects, interiors, or floor plans as 3D models or point clouds, Polycam is the clear choice with powerful LiDAR and photogrammetry. If you're planning a website's structure and content hierarchy visually, Octopus.do's AI sitemap generation and collaborative tools are purpose-built for that. There's no direct overlap, so pick based on your core task.
Octopus Do vs Poke Interaction Co
Octopus.do and Poke solve entirely different problems: one is a visual sitemap and website planner for design teams, the other is an AI assistant living in your messaging apps to automate tasks. Choose Octopus.do if you need to map out site architecture with AI-generated sitemaps and Figma sync. Choose Poke if you want a proactive AI that manages email, calendar, and No­tion from WhatsApp or iMessage. They are complementary, not competitors.
Alternatives to Octopus.do
View allFrequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Octopus.do? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.