Octopus.do
Visual sitemap builder that turns a URL, template, or AI prompt into a shareable site map in seconds.
Buy Octopus.do if your discovery phase ends in a sitemap nobody can open, or if you want agents to generate structure via MCP or the REST API. The no-sign-up viewer links, one-click crawl of an existing site, and per-page SEO analysis are the pieces agencies actually use, and the ChatGPT app and Claude connector (shipped November 2025) keep it relevant as AI-assisted planning spreads. It is planning software, not design software: keep Figma for pixels and a CMS for the live site. If you need high-fidelity prototypes or enterprise permissioning, look elsewhere — Slickplan and WriteMaps compete on planning alone, and neither matches Octopus on crawl-plus-share-без-account ease.
Verified 5d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/octopus-do
- UX/UI designers who need client-approved site architecture fast
- SEO consultants auditing and restructuring existing site navigation
- Agencies running discovery workshops with live sitemap editing
- Product owners and copywriters planning page content in one place
- Teams needing a CMS with hosting and dynamic content
- Anyone wanting high-fidelity interactive prototypes
- Enterprise buyers requiring SSO and granular permission controls
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Octopus.do if you need an actual CMS with hosting, dynamic content, and high-fidelity interactive prototypes — it plans structure and content, then hands off to Figma or your build stack.
The free entry point lets solo freelancers and first-time planners build, generate, and share sitemaps with no sign-up, and a per-professional tier adds content planning, SEO analysis, wireframes, exports, and Figma sync. The team tier is where real-time collaboration, shared workspaces, publishing, and estimating live. It undercuts heavier planning suites with seat-based equivalents, but you still need Figma or a CMS downstream — budget for both.
In short
Octopus.do — Visual sitemap builder that turns a URL, template, or AI prompt into a shareable site map in seconds. Best for UX/UI designers who need client-approved site architecture fast, SEO consultants auditing and restructuring existing site navigation, Agencies running discovery workshops with live sitemap editing. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo.
What's new in Octopus.do
Checked 5 days agoAcross the latest 2 updates: 1 feature update and 1 launch.
MCP Support and AI Integrations
Added MCP (Model Context Protocol) support plus a ChatGPT app and Claude connector, letting AI agents create and edit Octopus.do sitemaps programmatically.
Public REST API Launched
Introduced the public REST API so developers can embed Octopus.do sitemap creation and management in their own automated workflows.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Octopus.do? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- AI sitemap generation from a text prompt
- Website crawler import with page metadata
- Visual sitemap builder with drag-and-drop editing
- Content planning in a rich text editor
- AI assistant for generating page content
- Per-page SEO analysis
- Low-fidelity wireframing with shapes and annotations
- Publish a simple navigation-driven website from the sitemap
- Export to CSV, PDF, and Google Docs
- Figma sync for design handoff
- Design mockup upload and on-map annotation
- Template library (personal, landing, corporate, portfolio)
- Create project estimates for scoping
- Share sitemaps with viewers who do not sign up
- MCP server, ChatGPT app, Claude connector, and public REST API for AI-agent automation
About Octopus.do
Octopus.do is a browser-based visual sitemap builder for planning website architecture before design or development starts. Crawl an existing site to import its structure with page metadata, start from a template for a personal site, landing page, corporate site, or portfolio, or write a prompt and let the AI generator produce a full project. Web designers, SEO consultants, product owners, copywriters, and agencies use it to lock down structure early. The workflow goes past mapping: you refine the tree with drag-and-drop, plan page copy in a rich text editor with an AI assistant, run per-page SEO analysis, sketch low-fidelity wireframes with shapes and annotations, create project estimates, upload designs, and sync the structure to Figma. Client review is the part buyers notice most — you send a link and viewers open the sitemap without creating an account, and you can publish a simple navigation-driven website straight from the plan. Recent releases push Octopus into agent workflows: an MCP server, a ChatGPT app, a Claude connector, and a public REST API let AI agents create, edit, and manage sitemaps programmatically, as documented on the /docs page. It sits between Slickplan and WriteMaps on the planning side and Figma on the execution side, rather than replacing either.
Behind the Verdict
Octopus.do's value is narrowing the gap between a structure conversation and a shippable plan. Crawl an existing URL and you get its page tree with metadata; type a prompt and the AI generator builds a project; pick a template (personal, landing, corporate, portfolio) and start clean. From there the tree is fully editable by drag-and-drop, each page can hold copy written in a rich text editor with an AI assistant, and you get per-page SEO analysis, low-fidelity wireframes with shapes and annotations, project estimates, and design uploads — all in one place instead of four tabs. Sharing is the standout: viewers open a sitemap link with no account, which is exactly what client review needs. Exports cover CSV, PDF, and Google Docs, Figma sync handles design handoff, and you can publish a simple navigation-driven website straight from the tree. The 2025 additions — a public REST API in June, MCP support plus ChatGPT and Claude connectors in November — mean agents can create and edit sitemaps for you, which is a genuine workflow shift for teams already building with LLM tooling. Weaknesses are worth naming: this is browser-only planning software, not a CMS with hosting or dynamic content, and it will not replace Figma for high-fidelity prototypes. Enterprise buyers needing SSO and granular permissions are outside what the published tiers advertise. The AI features (prompt generation, content assistant) are real and useful, but Octopus does not disclose which underlying models power them, so you are buying the workflow, not a specific model. Where it fits: agencies running discovery workshops, SEO consultants auditing site structure, UX leads who need sign-off fast, and developers who want sitemap generation inside a script. Where it does not: teams that need a production site out of the plan, or anyone expecting offline work — it runs in the browser. Pricing spans a free entry, a per-professional tier, and a per-team tier, with education also offered, so the buy decision is about whether you need shared workspaces and publishing, not about whether the basic tool is usable.
Researching Octopus.do? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Octopus.do actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
A prospect sends their existing marketing site and asks for a restructure proposal by Friday. The designer crawls the URL in Octopus.do, drags pages into a new hierarchy, adds per-page notes, and sends a no-sign-up viewer link.
Outcome: The client opens the link without an account, comments on the new structure in the browser, and the designer exports the approved plan to Figma before starting wireframes.
An ecommerce client wants its category architecture audited. The consultant imports the site, runs per-page SEO analysis on each node, and marks which pages need consolidation or new content.
Outcome: The agency walks the client through the annotated tree in a workshop, publishes the plan for internal reference, and hands the restructure list to the dev team as a CSV export.
The team already runs an LLM workflow and wants sitemap scaffolding generated automatically. They connect Octopus through MCP or call the public REST API from their own script.
Outcome: New project sitemaps get created and edited programmatically inside the existing AI workflow, then opened in Octopus.do for human review before design handoff.
Use Cases
- Define website hierarchy and page relationships visually before development starts
- Generate a first-draft sitemap from a short prompt for a new project idea
- Crawl an existing site to audit and reorganize its page structure
- Share a sitemap link with a client who never has to create an account
- Export the plan to Figma so designers can pick up the structure
- Publish a simple navigation-driven site straight from the sitemap
- Plan page copy with an AI assistant and per-page SEO analysis
- Drive sitemap creation programmatically over the REST API, MCP, or an AI agent
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-24
Limitations
- Octopus.do runs entirely in the browser, so there is no offline mode.
- It is planning software, not a CMS: published sites are limited to simple navigation-driven pages, with no hosting stack or dynamic content behind them.
- Wireframes are deliberately low-fidelity, so it will not replace Figma for detailed or interactive design work.
- Enterprise controls such as SSO and granular permissions are not part of the published tiers.
- The AI generation and AI content assistant are real, but Octopus does not name the underlying models in its documentation, so if your procurement requires a specific model the vendor does not confirm one.
as of 2026-10-03
Verification history
We have re-verified Octopus.do 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Octopus.do tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo freelancers and first-time planners who want to test the visual builder, AI generation, and no-sign-up sharing before paying.
What this tier adds
Starting tier: build, generate, crawl, and share sitemaps without signing up, with no content planning, SEO analysis, or Figma sync.
Pro
$19/mo
Ideal for
Individual designers, copywriters, and SEO consultants who need content planning, per-page SEO checks, wireframes, and design handoff on their own projects.
What this tier adds
Adds content planning in the rich text editor, the AI content assistant, per-page SEO analysis, low-fidelity wireframing, CSV/PDF/Google Docs export, and Figma sync.
Team
$49/mo
Ideal for
Agencies and in-house teams that plan sites together and need a shared workspace, live collaboration, publishing, and scoping.
What this tier adds
Adds real-time collaboration, a shared project workspace, publishing of simple navigation-driven sites, and project estimate creation on top of Pro.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Octopus.do's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
The free entry point lets solo freelancers and first-time planners build, generate, and share sitemaps with no sign-up, and a per-professional tier adds content planning, SEO analysis, wireframes, exports, and Figma sync. The team tier is where real-time collaboration, shared workspaces, publishing, and estimating live. It undercuts heavier planning suites with seat-based equivalents, but you still need Figma or a CMS downstream — budget for both.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Octopus.do — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
You can start without an account: pick a template or write a prompt and Octopus.do generates a project to edit. For a first real sitemap, expect a few minutes to crawl a URL or generate from a prompt and refine the tree, and a short session to connect Figma or wire up the REST API or MCP if you are automating. Agencies running a live client workshop typically have a shareable link in under an
Switching to or from Octopus.do
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Slickplan: crawl or manually rebuild the page tree in Octopus.do, then use the no-sign-up share link for client review and Figma sync for handoff.
- →From WriteMaps: import or re-create the structure, move page copy into the rich text editor, and keep exports in CSV, PDF, or Google Docs.
- →From a spreadsheet or outline: use the AI generator or templates to bootstrap the tree, then paste copy into per-page editors and run SEO analysis.
- ↗To Figma: sync the sitemap structure into Figma and continue with high-fidelity design there.
- ↗To a CMS or website builder: export the plan to CSV, PDF, or Google Docs and hand the approved structure to your build team.
- ↗To an AI workflow: pull sitemap data through the public REST API or MCP rather than re-entering structure elsewhere.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Octopus.do
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Octopus.do, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
CanvasGPT
A visual AI workspace that turns an infinite canvas into mind maps, research, media, and shareable web tools.
Framer
Framer is a website builder with canvas-native AI design agents that generate and refine your real site in place.
Uizard
Uizard turns text prompts, screenshots, and hand-drawn wireframes into editable multi-screen mockups and clickable prototypes.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Octopus Do vs Gem
Gem and Octopus.do are completely different tools serving distinct needs. Gem is a powerful AI recruiting platform ideal for talent teams, while Octopus.do is a lightweight sitemap builder for web planning. Choose Gem if you need to automate recruiting workflows; choose Octopus.do if you need to visualize website structure.
Octopus Do vs Polycam
Polycam and Octopus.do serve completely different needs. If you need to capture real-world objects, interiors, or floor plans as 3D models or point clouds, Polycam is the clear choice with powerful LiDAR and photogrammetry. If you're planning a website's structure and content hierarchy visually, Octopus.do's AI sitemap generation and collaborative tools are purpose-built for that. There's no direct overlap, so pick based on your core task.
Octopus Do vs Poke Interaction Co
Octopus.do and Poke solve entirely different problems: one is a visual sitemap and website planner for design teams, the other is an AI assistant living in your messaging apps to automate tasks. Choose Octopus.do if you need to map out site architecture with AI-generated sitemaps and Figma sync. Choose Poke if you want a proactive AI that manages email, calendar, and No­tion from WhatsApp or iMessage. They are complementary, not competitors.
Alternatives to Octopus.do
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Octopus.do? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.