Token Monitor vs ScreenplayIQ

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionToken MonitorScreenplayIQ
Primary UseReal-time token/cost tracking for AI coding assistantsAI screenplay analysis with box office prediction
PlatformLocal-first desktop widget (macOS/Windows)Web-based, collaborative workspace
IntegrationsClaude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, etc.PitchTrailer
Best ForDevelopers using multiple AI coding assistantsScreenwriters, producers, studio execs
Key LimitationNo cloud-managed or enterprise-grade solution out of boxFeature films only, ≤150 pages, English

If you're a screenwriter or producer seeking data-driven script feedback and box office forecasts, ScreenplayIQ is your tool. If you're a developer juggling multiple AI coding assistants and need to track token usage, costs, and limits in real time, Token Monitor is a free must-have. Choose based on your domain—they serve completely different needs.

Token Monitor
Token Monitor

Token Monitor is a free desktop widget that tracks AI coding token usage, cost, and quota limits across 44+ tools and providers.

Visit Website
ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ

AI screenplay analysis that returns a logline, comps, character arcs, and proofed fixes on your draft

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Paid
Plans
$0
~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature
~$48 TV / ~$78 Feature
~$60 TV / ~$98 Feature
~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature
Custom
Popularity
26 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
Desktop
WebAPI
Categories
📡 LLM Observability & Evals
📖 Fiction & Screenwriting
Features
Token, cost, and quota tracking across 44+ AI coding tools and providers
Per-tool and per-model usage breakdown with cache-hit versus cache-miss input splits
Session, weekly, billing, credit, and balance quota windows with estimated reset times
Multi-account provider handling — two Codex or Claude logins shown side by side
Per-session drill-down with each prompt and reply, input/output/cache counts, and per-reply cost
Provider status view showing active incidents for Claude, OpenAI, Cursor, and others
Drag-to-arrange menu bar and system tray built from icons, quota bars, reset times, cost, tokens, and live tok/s
Opt-in Edge Dock rail with auto-hide or always-visible modes
Floating bubble mode — draggable mini-window with click or hover preview
Opt-in history dashboard with GitHub-style activity heatmap and streaks
Stacked per-tool and per-model bar charts plus K-line time series across 7 days to all-time
Native macOS 14+ widgets: Summary, Activity, Breakdown, Quota, and Dashboard
Subscription tracking comparing what you pay against monthly usage value
Predicted Codex reset forecasts (regular versus banked) and credit-backed balance display
Self-hosted cross-device rollup via in-widget hub, Node CLI hub, or Cloudflare Worker
Generate a logline from a full screenplay draft
Surface comparable films and TV shows for market framing
Break a script into structured story points
Produce a full synopsis without reading the whole draft
Write character synopses for the full cast
Create visual representations of characters
Chart each character's emotional journey across the script
Deliver a full assessment analysis of the draft
Break down the story's themes
Proofread report with inline highlights on every issue
Recommend a fix for each flagged issue
Build a custom analysis package outside the presets
Price analysis by page length, quoted separately for TV and features
Store uploaded scripts in encrypted, siloed storage
WGA-compliant handling of submitted scripts
Integrations
Cloudflare Workers
Discord
Widgy
Scriptable
OpenRouter
Ollama
LM Studio

What real users say: Token Monitor vs ScreenplayIQ

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Token Monitor

60 mentions across 6 sources · 45% positive — mixed (averaged across 6 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Free and open-source with no account or cloud required.
  • • Local-first design ensures privacy; data never leaves your machine.
  • • Supports many AI tools: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes, Cursor, and more.
  • • Real-time token and cost tracking in a compact desktop widget.

What frustrates them

  • • macOS performance issues: high CPU and syspolicyd crashes from concurrent scanning.
  • • Hermes Agent integration broken on Windows with WSL.
  • • Cursor and Codex limit displays not working for some users.
  • • Setup requires manual configuration and knowledge of local file paths.

Researched Jul 6, 2026

ScreenplayIQ

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Oct 14, 2026 and found posts matching the name “ScreenplayIQ”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Who should pick which

  • Screenwriter seeking marketability feedback
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    ScreenplayIQ provides data-driven structural analysis and box office prediction, helping writers fine-tune scripts for commercial success.

  • Producer evaluating script ROI
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    Its market trend comparison and financial forecasting aid in slate decisions and pitch deck creation via PitchTrailer integration.

  • Developer using multiple AI coding assistants
    Pick: Token Monitor

    Token Monitor tracks real-time token usage, costs, and limits across tools like Cursor and Claude Code, preventing surprise bills and rate limit hits.

  • Team needing centralized usage telemetry
    Pick: Token Monitor

    With multi-device sync via self-hosted backend and per-user breakdowns, teams can monitor collective AI tool spending.

  • Studio executive making greenlight decisions
    Pick: ScreenplayIQ

    The Studio tier offers collaborative workspace and API access to evaluate multiple scripts with quantitative metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

Token Monitor vs ScreenplayIQ: which should you choose?

If you're a screenwriter or producer seeking data-driven script feedback and box office forecasts, ScreenplayIQ is your tool. If you're a developer juggling multiple AI coding assistants and need to track token usage, costs, and limits in real time, Token Monitor is a free must-have. Choose based on your domain—they serve completely different needs.

Are ScreenplayIQ and Token Monitor direct competitors?

No. ScreenplayIQ targets screenwriting and film industry professionals; Token Monitor targets developers using AI coding assistants. They serve completely different domains.

Can I try ScreenplayIQ for free?

Yes, the Free tier includes 1 analysis per month. Pro ($19/mo) and Studio ($49/mo) are paid.

Is Token Monitor really free?

Yes, Token Monitor is free to use with no paid tiers. It's a local-first desktop widget.

Does ScreenplayIQ support TV scripts or short films?

No. According to its 'not_for' list, it only supports feature films (over 150 pages? actually ≤150 pages). TV and short films are not supported.

What AI coding tools does Token Monitor integrate with?

It supports Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes, OpenClaw, Cursor, Antigravity, Cline, Kimi, Qwen, Grok, and Copilot.

Does Token Monitor require internet?

It runs locally; opt-in history dashboard can sync via self-hosted backend but doesn't require cloud.

Can I collaborate with others on ScreenplayIQ?

Yes, the Studio tier ($49/mo) supports collaborative workspace for up to 5 users.

Which tool is better for a solo developer?

Token Monitor is ideal for solo developers tracking AI coding costs. ScreenplayIQ is better for screenwriters, not developers.

More Token Monitor or ScreenplayIQ comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026