Adapt

Adapt

Build your company agent: one AI coworker that works inside Slack, GitHub, Linear, and more.

76/100Safe BetFree · from $50 to $5,000 / monthFreemium

Adapt is the right call for teams that want an AI agent that acts, not just answers. Its Slack-first, usage-based approach reduces friction and cost, and the new MCP server beta, desktop notifications, and per-member spending limits show a team iterating fast. But it's not for those needing offline deployment or granular per-tool permissions. For AI-native companies, it's a standout.

Verified 3d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/adapt

Best for
  • AI-native startups and scale-ups
  • Sales teams needing instant pipeline insights
  • Marketing ops wanting automated reporting
  • Engineering teams streamlining PR reviews
Not ideal for
  • Teams requiring fully offline or on-premises deployment
  • Organizations uncomfortable with AI agents acting on their data
  • Companies with extremely simple, low-data operations
Visit Website

Beginner-friendlySign up in minutes via Google OAuth, connect your tools, and ask your first question—most users see value in under 5 minutes. For automations and apps, expect a few hours to configure.Web · API · Plugin · DesktopAPI availableVerified 3d ago
Pricing
Free · from $50 to $5,000 / month
FreemiumFree tier3 plans4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Beginner-friendly
Sign up in minutes via Google OAuth, connect your tools, and ask your first question—most users see value in under 5 minutes. For automations and apps, expect a few hours to configure.
Runs on
WebAPIPluginDesktop
API available · 16 integrations
Who it's for
Sales Operations ManagerEngineering LeadMarketing Ops
Live sentiment
Is Adapt actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Adapt if you need fully offline or on-premises deployment, or if your organization is uncomfortable with AI agents taking autonomous actions on your data.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Usage-based pricing means your monthly bill can swing with consumption; even with a plan, heavy usage can push costs higher than expected.

Price reality

Usage-based pricing fits teams that value flexibility and pay for actual usage, not seats. For AI-native startups, the free Starter tier is a low-risk entry, while Pro scales with consumption—with the benefit of unlimited seats. Compared to per-seat competitors like Glean, Adapt can be cheaper for teams with many light users, but heavy automation may rack up credits. For predictable budgets, the annual commitment option offers discounts.

In short

Adapt — Build your company agent: one AI coworker that works inside Slack, GitHub, Linear, and more. Best for AI-native startups and scale-ups, Sales teams needing instant pipeline insights, Marketing ops wanting automated reporting. Free to start; paid plans from $505000/mo.

What's new in Adapt

Checked 3 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 5 feature updates.

What people actually say about Adapt — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

42 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Lemmy) · researched Jul 2, 2026.

0% positive100% critical
Recurring strengths
  • +No-code workflow automation across multiple business tools
  • +Slack-native integration for natural language queries
  • +Shared company brain for consistent knowledge and memory
  • +SOC 2 Type II certified security for enterprise trust
  • +Usage-based pricing with no per-seat fees
Recurring frustrations
  • No community reviews available to validate performance
  • Pricing structure could surprise heavy users
  • Limited information on model accuracy and reliability
  • No user feedback on support responsiveness
  • Dependency on Slack for full functionality
Patterns worth knowing
No relevant community discussion found; all scraped posts are off-topic.
Seen on Hacker News, Lemmy
Learning curve
beginnerProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • Usage can escalate fast if teams rely on expensive models like Claude Sonnet 5
  • No transparent pricing page with example costs

Viability Score

76/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Adapt? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
0
What the vendor publishes
60

Last calculated: September 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Tag @Adapt in Slack, GitHub, and Linear to get work done
  • Ask natural language questions across connected tools
  • Automate multi-step workflows via schedules or events
  • Build internal apps and dashboards without coding
  • Shared company brain with knowledge, skills, and memory
  • Adaptive intelligence: Fast vs Deep task routing
  • Sub-agents for parallel complex tasks
  • Automated PR reviews with confidence scores on GitHub
  • Gate pull requests on Adapt's review (GitHub status check)
  • Chrome extension for page summarization, drafting, and browser actions
  • Native tables in Slack replies for multi-record answers
  • Suggested trigger rules when Adapt joins a channel
  • Take browser actions from the Chrome extension (reread pages, fill fields, click controls)
  • App version history with one-click restore
  • Message Adapt via iMessage and RCS (mobile)

About Adapt

FreemiumBeginner-friendlyAPI availableWeb · API · Plugin · Desktop

Adapt is an AI-native platform that operates as an integrated coworker, embedded directly in the tools your team already uses. Instead of toggling between dashboards or writing SQL, you tag @Adapt in Slack (or use the web app, GitHub, Linear, or even iMessage/RCS) to ask questions, automate multi-step workflows, or build internal apps and dashboards using natural language. It pulls live data from connected systems like CRMs, data warehouses, payment providers, help desks, and marketing tools, then delivers evidence-backed answers with cited sources—right where you work. Built for AI-native companies, Adapt combines a shared company brain (knowledge, skills, and memory) with adaptive intelligence that routes each task to the best model for quality, speed, and cost. It supports scheduled automations like daily briefings, pipeline reports, and system monitoring. Non-technical users can describe what they need, and Adapt builds internal tools, calculators, and dashboards instantly—shareable in a secure environment. Recent updates have made Adapt even more actionable: it can now take browser actions directly from the Chrome extension—rereading pages, filling fields, and clicking controls—and it formats multi-record answers in Slack as native tables for easier scanning. When Adapt joins a channel, it suggests one-tap trigger rules for proactive responses, and app version history lets you restore any earlier build. Adapt integrates with 20+ tools, including Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Stripe, Snowflake, BigQuery, PostgreSQL, GitHub, Linear, Notion, Zendesk, and more. Data stays private, never used to train models, and the platform is SOC 2 Type II certified. Positioned against enterprise search tools like Glean, Adapt doesn't just surface documents—it reasons over live context and takes action, making it a fit for teams that want an AI agent that does the work, not just answers questions.

Behind the Verdict

Adapt positions itself as an 'AI computer for business', and the description is apt: it's not a chatbot bolted onto your stack but an agent that lives inside the tools you already use. The Slack-first design means you can get answers without leaving your workflow, and the recent push into browser actions, mobile messaging, and MCP server beta shows a product that's expanding its reach. The core value is its 'full-stack' approach: a router that sends each request to the best model, microVM sandboxes with persistent filesystems, and a company brain that remembers your knowledge, skills, and memory. This is more than a thin wrapper—it's a platform with real engineering depth. The new 'Policies' feature lets you control which integrations the agent can access via natural-language access policies, addressing some governance concerns. However, there are constraints. Pricing is usage-based, which can be unpredictable for teams with variable workloads, though the recent per-member spend limits and transparent credit breakdown help. There's no offline mode, and granular per-tool permissions are still maturing despite the Groups and Policies feature. For teams needing on-premises or air-gapped deployment, Adapt won't fit. Where it shines: AI-native startups, sales and marketing ops teams that live in Slack, and engineering teams that want automated PR reviews with confidence scores. For companies that want an agent that not only answers but acts—posting to Slack, updating CRM, gating merges—Adapt is a strong choice. If your team just needs a simple Q&A bot, a lighter tool might be enough. The 2026 updates show a team that's iterating quickly: branded Slack apps, desktop notifications, and the ability to email or text results. These are practical improvements that reduce friction. The MCP server beta is a meaningful step for developers who want to connect their editor or terminal. Overall, if you're comfortable with cloud-based AI and want an agent that does work, Adapt is worth a serious look.

Researching Adapt? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Adapt actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Sales Operations Manager

You need to answer 'What's our pipeline this quarter?' after a major deal closes. You tag @Adapt in Slack.

Outcome: Adapt pulls data from HubSpot and Stripe, cites the sources, and posts a concise answer with a native table, saving you a trip to the dashboard.

Engineering Lead

A PR is ready for review and you want to ensure quality. Adapt automatically reviews the PR and provides confidence scores and inline comments.

Outcome: You can gate merges on Adapt's review (a required GitHub status check), reducing manual review load and catching issues early.

Marketing Ops

You want a weekly report on signups and spend. You set up an automation in chat.

Outcome: Adapt schedules the report, pulls data from HubSpot and Slack, and posts it to your channel every Monday, with credit usage visible per run.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

gpt-5.6-luna-lowgemini-3.7-flashkimi-k3haiku-4.5-nonegpt-5.6-sol-mediumkimi-k3-highsonnet-5-lowfable-5-xhighopus-5-highgpt-5.6-sol-xhigh

as of 2026-08-28

Limitations

  • Adapt's usage-based pricing can lead to variable costs depending on consumption.
  • The platform primarily operates through Slack and a web app, with additional browser actions available via a Chrome extension.
  • Autonomous actions require careful policy configuration to avoid unintended operations.
  • The platform requires cloud connectivity; there is no offline mode.
  • Granular per-tool permissions are still maturing despite the new Groups and Policies feature.

as of 2026-08-31

Verification history

We have re-verified Adapt 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Adapt tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Starter

$0/month

Ideal for

Small teams or individual users exploring AI-powered data access and automation with no upfront cost, needing unlimited seats for basic queries.

What this tier adds

Free entry point with unlimited seats, usage metered by task, and connections to Slack and core tools.

Pro

$50 to $5,000 / month

Ideal for

Growing companies with moderate usage that want flexibility and credit-based pricing, including premium research integrations and automatic recharge to avoid interruptions.

What this tier adds

Adds up to 10% bonus credits, recharge options, and premium research integrations, priced from $50 to $5,000/month.

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Large organizations needing dedicated support, custom contracts, and committed usage discounts for predictable costs and advanced governance.

What this tier adds

Includes a dedicated AI engineer, discounts for committed usage, invoicing, and premium research integrations.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Usage-based pricing means your monthly bill can swing with consumption; even with a plan, heavy usage can push costs higher than expected.
  • Going beyond your plan's included usage may trigger automatic recharge (at $0.01 per credit), which can surprise you if you forget to set a limit.
  • Premium research integrations are gated behind Pro and Enterprise tiers, so if you need deep company/market research, the free Starter tier won't cover it.
  • Per-member spend limits and detailed credit breakdowns are only available on subscription plans, so free-tier users have less visibility and control over costs.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Adapt's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Usage-based pricing fits teams that value flexibility and pay for actual usage, not seats. For AI-native startups, the free Starter tier is a low-risk entry, while Pro scales with consumption—with the benefit of unlimited seats. Compared to per-seat competitors like Glean, Adapt can be cheaper for teams with many light users, but heavy automation may rack up credits. For predictable budgets, the annual commitment option offers discounts.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Adapt — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Sign up in minutes via Google OAuth, connect your tools, and ask your first question—most users see value in under 5 minutes. For automations and apps, expect a few hours to configure.

Switching to or from Adapt

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From internal dashboards: Connect your data sources and ask natural-language questions to replace manual SQL.
  • From email-based reporting: Set up automations in chat to deliver results to Slack or email.
Migrating out
  • To a simpler Q&A bot: Export your knowledge base and recreate basic workflows in a lighter tool.
  • To an on-premises solution: Since Adapt is cloud-only, you'll need to rebuild integrations and automations in a self-hosted platform.

Integrations

SlackGitHubLinearNotionPostgresStripeGmailSentryHubSpotSalesforceSnowflakeBigQueryZendeskBambooHRGoogle AnalyticsDoppler

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Tools that pair well with Adapt

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Adapt, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Adapt

View all
C3 AI

C3 AI

Enterprise AI platform for building, deploying, and governing agentic applications at scale.

Contact SalesTry
Cargo

Cargo

Code-first GTM infrastructure for AI agents, with versioned primitives and a runtime.

FreemiumTry
Instabase

Instabase

Enterprise agentic automation platform turning complex documents into verifiable intelligence.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Adapt? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.